[Bug fortran/60500] [5/6/7 Regression] Spurious warning on derived type initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60500 --- Comment #13 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Well, the change introduced by r241885 is quite complicated. > It may cause major regressions. I don't recommend backporting it. Agreed.

[Bug fortran/60777] [F03] RECURSIVE function rejected in specification expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60777 --- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: janus Date: Wed Nov 9 17:22:02 2016 New Revision: 242009 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242009=gcc=rev Log: 2016-11-09 Steve Kargl Janus Weil

[Bug sanitizer/78267] [7 Regression] libsanitizer breaks bootstrap on x86_64-apple-darwin16 at r241977

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78267 --- Comment #4 from Maxim Ostapenko --- (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #3) > (In reply to Maxim Ostapenko from comment #1) > > Eh, mine. > > > > typedef void (^os_trace_payload_t)(xpc_object_t xdict) looks very strange, > > it seems that

[Bug sanitizer/78267] [7 Regression] libsanitizer breaks bootstrap on x86_64-apple-darwin16 at r241977

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78267 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- extern char **environ; #endif -#if defined(__has_include) && __has_include() +#if defined(__has_include) && __has_include() && defined(__clang__) #define SANITIZER_OS_TRACE 1 #include #else is

[Bug c++/78274] Rejected specialization in different namespace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78274 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/78278] ICE in gfc_wide_memset, at fortran/scanner.c:153

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78278 --- Comment #1 from Gerhard Steinmetz --- Whereas, for example with "real" : $ cat z2.f90 program p real, pointer :: x => null() data x /null()/ print *, associated(x) end $ gfortran-7-20161106

[Bug c++/78280] New: GCC incorrectly accepts assignment in bitfield width

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78280 Bug ID: 78280 Summary: GCC incorrectly accepts assignment in bitfield width Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug sanitizer/78267] [7 Regression] libsanitizer breaks bootstrap on x86_64-apple-darwin16 at r241977

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78267 --- Comment #6 from Maxim Ostapenko --- Created attachment 40007 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40007=edit Untested fix. Attaching untested fix. Dominique, could you try it?

[Bug sanitizer/78267] [7 Regression] libsanitizer breaks bootstrap on x86_64-apple-darwin16 at r241977

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78267 --- Comment #8 from Maxim Ostapenko --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #7) > > Attaching untested fix. > > Dominique, could you try it? > > Allow for ~2 hours. Or better Jakub's fix, it looks cleaner.

[Bug sanitizer/78267] [7 Regression] libsanitizer breaks bootstrap on x86_64-apple-darwin16 at r241977

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78267 --- Comment #9 from Jack Howarth --- (In reply to Maxim Ostapenko from comment #6) > Created attachment 40007 [details] > Untested fix. > > Attaching untested fix. > Dominique, could you try it? The change fixes the bootstrap of current gcc

[Bug target/78255] [5/6/7 regression] Indirect sibling call causing wrong code generation for ARM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78255 --- Comment #1 from avieira at gcc dot gnu.org --- OK I think I assigned the blame to the wrong function, I think it is the responsibility of 'is_indirect_tailcall_p' to catch this. Though I believe the last time it is called during the

[Bug fortran/78279] New: ICE in identical_array_ref, at fortran/dependency.c:104

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78279 Bug ID: 78279 Summary: ICE in identical_array_ref, at fortran/dependency.c:104 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/65173] ICE while compiling wrong code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65173 --- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Compiling the test in comment 0 with and instrumented gfortran I get pr65173.f90:7:45: real*8, dimension(256), allocatable :: x 1 Error:

[Bug fortran/78259] [7 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_subcomponent_assign, at fortran/trans-expr.c:7330

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78259 --- Comment #3 from foreese at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: foreese Date: Wed Nov 9 17:31:27 2016 New Revision: 242010 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242010=gcc=rev Log: Fix ICE in gfc_trans_subcomponent_assign due to NULL components.

[Bug fortran/78259] [7 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_subcomponent_assign, at fortran/trans-expr.c:7330

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78259 foreese at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug sanitizer/78267] [7 Regression] libsanitizer breaks bootstrap on x86_64-apple-darwin16 at r241977

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78267 --- Comment #12 from Rainer Orth --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #10) > > Attaching untested fix. > > Dominique, could you try it? > > Now breaks with [...] > In file included from /usr/include/Availability.h:180:0, >

[Bug c/78284] warn on malloc with very large arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78284 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Severity|normal

[Bug fortran/61450] ICE in gfc_global_used()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61450 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > If it helps, I can take care of the packaging. PING!

[Bug libstdc++/78236] regex_iterator constructor is incomplete and creates uninitialized values that may be used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78236 Tim Shen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/78284] New: warn on malloc with very large arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78284 Bug ID: 78284 Summary: warn on malloc with very large arguments Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug fortran/44348] ICE in build_function_decl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44348 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug sanitizer/78267] [7 Regression] libsanitizer breaks bootstrap on x86_64-apple-darwin16 at r241977

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78267 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #11

[Bug c/77531] __attribute__((alloc_size(1,2))) could also warn on multiplication overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77531 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/78283] -Wc++1z-compat warning is sticky

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78283 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1) > Created attachment 40011 [details] > gcc7-pr78283.patch > > Untested fix. OK.

[Bug fortran/77414] ICE in create_function_arglist, at fortran/trans-decl.c:2410

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77414 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/78283] -Wc++1z-compat warning is sticky

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78283 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Nov 9 22:56:35 2016 New Revision: 242026 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242026=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/78283 * mangle.c (start_mangling): Reset

[Bug c/78285] New: error on duplicate switch label where a note should be

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78285 Bug ID: 78285 Summary: error on duplicate switch label where a note should be Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P3

[Bug target/78243] incorrect byte offset in vextractuh with -mcpu=power9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78243 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug sanitizer/78270] [7 Regression] ICE in gimplify_switch_expr, at gimplify.c:2272

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78270 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code

[Bug sanitizer/78270] [7 Regression] ICE in gimplify_switch_expr, at gimplify.c:2272

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78270 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/78269] FAIL: FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1z/noexcept-type11.C and FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1z/noexcept-type9.C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78269 Thomas Preud'homme changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug c++/78269] FAIL: FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1z/noexcept-type11.C and FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1z/noexcept-type9.C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78269 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Preud'homme --- Author: thopre01 Date: Wed Nov 9 10:50:21 2016 New Revision: 241997 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241997=gcc=rev Log: 2016-11-09 Thomas Preud'homme

[Bug c++/78269] FAIL: FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1z/noexcept-type11.C and FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1z/noexcept-type9.C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78269 Thomas Preud'homme changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|thopre01 at

[Bug c++/78269] FAIL: FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1z/noexcept-type11.C and FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1z/noexcept-type9.C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78269 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Preud'homme --- Marking the bug as NEW again because g++.dg/cpp1z/noexcept-type11.C still needs fixing

[Bug fortran/46459] ICE (segfault): Invalid read in compare_actual_formal [error recovery]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46459 --- Comment #9 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to janus from comment #8) > As mentioned by Harald, the patch in comment 1 works well and is close to > obvious. I verified that it regtests cleanly. Adapted to current trunk it looks

[Bug fortran/60777] [F03] RECURSIVE function rejected in specification expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60777 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/78272] New: [7 Regression] ICE in unshare_expr_without_location while building 471.omnetpp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78272 Bug ID: 78272 Summary: [7 Regression] ICE in unshare_expr_without_location while building 471.omnetpp Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug tree-optimization/78272] [7 Regression] ICE in unshare_expr_without_location while building 471.omnetpp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78272 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||6.2.1 Target

[Bug libstdc++/78273] New: The transparent version of {map,set}::count should call _M_count_tr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78273 Bug ID: 78273 Summary: The transparent version of {map,set}::count should call _M_count_tr Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/78272] [7 Regression] ICE in unshare_expr_without_location while building 471.omnetpp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78272 --- Comment #1 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Started with r241990

[Bug target/77308] surprisingly large stack usage for sha512 on arm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77308 --- Comment #62 from Bernd Edlinger --- Both parts of the patch are now posted for review: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-11/msg00523.html https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-11/msg00830.html

[Bug ipa/78268] [7 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78268 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/78268] [7 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78268 --- Comment #1 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #0) > Either r241990 or r241989 causes a new ICE during Firefox build: > > /home/trippels/gecko-dev/rdf/base/rdfutil.cpp:111:1: internal compiler >

[Bug target/78254] FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr77822.C -O3 -g (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78254 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- The question is whether this is invalid RTL, in which case we should guard against this in the RTL verifier (if we had one). Maybe the pattern should constrain the operand properly?

[Bug tree-optimization/78257] missing memcmp optimization with constant arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78257 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization

[Bug target/78262] [7 Regression] wrong code with -fschedule-insns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78262 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ipa/78268] [7 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78268 --- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- This happens on ppc64le. Doesn't seem to reproduce on X86.

[Bug debug/78265] Excess emission of debug info for ODR used global variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78265 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/78007] Important loop from 482.sphinx3 is not vectorized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78007 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/78269] New: FAIL: FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1z/noexcept-type11.C and FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1z/noexcept-type9.C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78269 Bug ID: 78269 Summary: FAIL: FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1z/noexcept-type11.C and FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1z/noexcept-type9.C Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ipa/78268] New: [7 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78268 Bug ID: 78268 Summary: [7 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/78255] [5/6/7 regression] Indirect sibling call causing wrong code generation for ARM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78255 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Target Milestone|---

[Bug testsuite/78256] [7 Regression] test case gcc.dg/pr35691-1.c fails starting with its introduction in r241915

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78256 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Component|middle-end |testsuite Target Milestone|---

[Bug ipa/78268] [7 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78268 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ipa/78258] [7 Regression] ICE in compare_values_warnv, at tree-vrp.c:1218

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78258 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid CC|

[Bug fortran/78259] [7 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_subcomponent_assign, at fortran/trans-expr.c:7330

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78259 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0

[Bug c++/78193] [7 regression] g++.dg/concepts/inherit-ctor3.C etc. FAIL at r241765

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78193 --- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou --- > This looks related to the ABI and was introduced by: > > r241765 | jason | 2016-11-02 02:50:29 +0100 (Wed, 02 Nov 2016) | 53 lines > > Implement P0136R1, Rewording inheriting constructors. The

[Bug ipa/78268] [7 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78268 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0

[Bug c++/78269] FAIL: FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1z/noexcept-type11.C and FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1z/noexcept-type9.C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78269 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target|arm, aarch64|arm, aarch64, x86_64-*-*

<    1   2