[Bug fortran/78505] [F08] Coarray source allocation not synchronizing on oversubscribed cores

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78505 vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/78646] incorrect result type for pointer addition in slsr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78646 --- Comment #2 from Stefan M Freudenberger --- It's not an ICE on x86, but the dump shows the incorrect pointer type. Can I assert that the cand_type is a pointer and not a reference?

[Bug rtl-optimization/78652] LRA generates wrong code by inheriting changed register

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78652 --- Comment #1 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- GCC is configured as below: --target=arm-none-eabi --prefix=... --with-gmp=... --with-mpfr=... --with-mpc=... --with-isl=... --disable-shared --disable-nls --disable-threads --disable-tls

[Bug rtl-optimization/78652] New: LRA generates wrong code by inheriting changed register

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78652 Bug ID: 78652 Summary: LRA generates wrong code by inheriting changed register Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/78649] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE on invalid C++ code on x86_64-linux-gnu (internal compiler error: tree check: expected class ‘type’, have ‘exceptional’ (error_mark) in build_value_init_noctor,

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78649 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||error-recovery, |

[Bug c++/78649] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE on invalid C++ code on x86_64-linux-gnu (internal compiler error: tree check: expected class ‘type’, have ‘exceptional’ (error_mark) in build_value_init_noctor,

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78649 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.5

[Bug c++/78651] Incorrect exception handling when catch clause uses local class and PIC and sanitizer are active

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78651 --- Comment #1 from dyp-cpp at gmx dot net --- Same issue if the LocalException is a non-local class with internal linkage.

[Bug target/78650] ira-costs.c:1716:53: runtime error: member access within null pointer of type 'struct cost_classes'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78650 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/78651] New: Incorrect exception handling when catch clause uses local class and PIC and sanitizer are active

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78651 Bug ID: 78651 Summary: Incorrect exception handling when catch clause uses local class and PIC and sanitizer are active Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/78650] New: ira-costs.c:1716:53: runtime error: member access within null pointer of type 'struct cost_classes'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78650 Bug ID: 78650 Summary: ira-costs.c:1716:53: runtime error: member access within null pointer of type 'struct cost_classes' Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/78649] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE on invalid C++ code on x86_64-linux-gnu (internal compiler error: tree check: expected class ‘type’, have ‘exceptional’ (error_mark) in build_value_init_noctor,

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78649 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/78642] [7 regression] ICE: invalid rtl sharing found in the insn on sparc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78642 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Can't reproduce in a cross-compiler, I also see (clobber (reg/i:SI 8 %o0 [24])) just once in the IL. That said, rtl sharing verification has been mistakenly not performed even with --enable-checking=rtl

[Bug c++/78649] New: ICE on invalid C++ code on x86_64-linux-gnu (internal compiler error: tree check: expected class ‘type’, have ‘exceptional’ (error_mark) in build_value_init_noctor, at cp/init.c:3

-trunk --disable-bootstrap Thread model: posix gcc version 7.0.0 20161202 (experimental) [trunk revision 243153] (GCC) $ $ gcc-trunk small.C small.C: In instantiation of ‘void test() [with T = void; Args = {}]’: small.C:4:24: required from here small.C:2:51: error: variable or field ‘t’ declared

[Bug target/78631] [Intel MPX] libmpxwrappers shared library leads to a non-bounds-preserving memcpy()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78631 --- Comment #2 from Dmitrii Kuvaiskii --- (In reply to Ilya Enkovich from comment #1) > PLT section is generated by linker. To have MPX friendly PLT you have to > have MPX enabled linker supporting '-z bndplt'

[Bug rtl-optimization/78038] [5 Regression] internal compiler error: in get_sub_rtx, at ree.c:655

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78038 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/78648] New: ICE on invalid C++ code on x86_64-linux-gnu (Segmentation fault, contains_struct_check)

/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/7.0.0/lto-wrapper Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Configured with: ../gcc-source-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap Thread model: posix gcc version 7.0.0 20161202 (experimental) [trunk revision 243153] (GCC) $ $ gcc-trunk

[Bug rtl-optimization/78038] [5 Regression] internal compiler error: in get_sub_rtx, at ree.c:655

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78038 --- Comment #12 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Fri Dec 2 12:22:54 2016 New Revision: 243175 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243175=gcc=rev Log: [ree] PR rtl-optimization/78038: Handle global register dataflow

[Bug target/78642] [7 regression] ICE: invalid rtl sharing found in the insn on sparc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78642 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/78328] wrong wording for unbounded alloc case in -Walloca-larger-than note

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78328 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/78328] wrong wording for unbounded alloc case in -Walloca-larger-than note

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78328 --- Comment #2 from Aldy Hernandez --- Author: aldyh Date: Fri Dec 2 12:20:42 2016 New Revision: 243174 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243174=gcc=rev Log: PR middle-end/78328 * gimple-ssa-warn-alloca.c (alloca_call_type):

[Bug ipa/78644] [7 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in is_gimple_reg_type with -Og -fipa-cp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78644 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/78645] [6/7 Regression] ICE on invalid C++ code on x86_64-linux-gnu (Segmentation fault, cxx_eval_call_expression)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78645 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Target Milestone|---

[Bug tree-optimization/78646] incorrect result type for pointer addition in slsr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78646 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wschmidt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com

[Bug c++/78645] ICE on invalid C++ code on x86_64-linux-gnu (Segmentation fault, cxx_eval_call_expression)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78645 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/78647] New: ICE on invalid C++ code on x86_64-linux-gnu (internal compiler error: tree check: expected tree_list, have error_mark in get_attribute_name, at attribs.c:664)

: posix gcc version 7.0.0 20161202 (experimental) [trunk revision 243153] (GCC) $ $ gcc-trunk small.C small.C: In function ‘void f()’: small.C:3:35: error: expected primary-expression before ‘)’ token void f() { alignas(do_not_remove(A)); } ^ small.C:3:37: internal

[Bug tree-optimization/78646] New: incorrect result type for pointer addition in slsr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78646 Bug ID: 78646 Summary: incorrect result type for pointer addition in slsr Product: gcc Version: 5.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/78645] New: ICE on invalid C++ code on x86_64-linux-gnu (Segmentation fault, cxx_eval_call_expression)

/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/7.0.0/lto-wrapper Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Configured with: ../gcc-source-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap Thread model: posix gcc version 7.0.0 20161202 (experimental) [trunk revision 243153] (GCC) $ $ gcc

[Bug ipa/78644] New: [7 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in is_gimple_reg_type with -Og -fipa-cp

ion 7.0.0 20161202 (experimental) (GCC) Some checking is probably needed in order to have verify_gimple_in_cfg() called.

[Bug c++/78637] [7 Regression] ICE on invalid C++ code on x86_64-linux-gnu (internal compiler error: in pop_namespace, at cp/name-lookup.c:3826)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78637 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug target/78643] New: ICE in convert_move, at expr.c:230

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78643 Bug ID: 78643 Summary: ICE in convert_move, at expr.c:230 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug fortran/78641] [5/6/7 Regression] [OOP] ICE on polymorphic allocatable function in array constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78641 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/78641] [5/6/7 Regression] [OOP] ICE on polymorphic allocatable function in array constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78641 --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres --- The ICE appeared between revisions r216305 (2014-10-16, compiles) and r216470 (2014-10-20, ICE), likely r216427 (pr63553).

[Bug fortran/78640] [F2015] gfortran accepts invalid allocatable polymorphic result in pure function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78640 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/78642] [7 regression] ICE: invalid rtl sharing found in the insn on sparc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78642 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0

[Bug target/78642] New: [7 regression] ICE: invalid rtl sharing found in the insn on sparc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78642 Bug ID: 78642 Summary: [7 regression] ICE: invalid rtl sharing found in the insn on sparc Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug other/67373] Can't compile gcc snapshot for avr target with mingw

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67373 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/78641] [5/6/7 Regression] [OOP] ICE on polymorphic allocatable function in array constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78641 --- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- This patch seems to fix comment 3: Index: gcc/fortran/class.c === --- gcc/fortran/class.c (revision 243035) +++ gcc/fortran/class.c

[Bug target/67839] Bit addressable instructions generated for invalid memory address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67839 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/67839] Bit addressable instructions generated for invalid memory address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67839 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0 --- Comment #6 from Georg-Johann

[Bug rtl-optimization/78547] [7 Regression] ICE: in loc_cmp, at var-tracking.c:3417 with -Os -g -mstringop-strategy=libcall -freorder-blocks-algorithm=simple

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78547 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/78575] [7 Regression] ICE: in trunc_int_for_mode, at explow.c:55 with -O2 -g

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78575 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/78641] [5/6/7 Regression] [OOP] ICE on polymorphic allocatable function in array constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78641 --- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Here is a slightly simpler version, replacing the function call with a variable reference, which fails with the same ICE with version 5, 6 and trunk: implicit none type foo end type

[Bug fortran/78641] [5/6/7 Regression] [OOP] ICE on polymorphic allocatable function in array constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78641 --- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Possibly related to PR 58557.

[Bug rtl-optimization/78547] [7 Regression] ICE: in loc_cmp, at var-tracking.c:3417 with -Os -g -mstringop-strategy=libcall -freorder-blocks-algorithm=simple

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78547 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Dec 2 08:44:42 2016 New Revision: 243165 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243165=gcc=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/78547 * emit-rtl.c (unshare_all_rtl): Make sure

[Bug fortran/78641] [5/6/7 Regression] [OOP] ICE on polymorphic allocatable function in array constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78641 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Known to work|

[Bug rtl-optimization/78575] [7 Regression] ICE: in trunc_int_for_mode, at explow.c:55 with -O2 -g

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78575 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Dec 2 08:42:12 2016 New Revision: 243164 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243164=gcc=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/78575 * config/i386/i386.c

[Bug target/78633] [7 Regression] [SH] libgcc/fp-bit.c:944:1: error: invalid rtl sharing found in the insn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78633 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Target Milestone|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/78634] [7 Regression] 30% performance drop after r242832.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78634 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization

[Bug ipa/78555] gcc/sreal.c:232:20: runtime error: left shift of negative value -2018967552

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78555 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/78635] [6/7 Regression] internal compiler error: in output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.c:4989

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78635 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/78637] [7 Regression] ICE on invalid C++ code on x86_64-linux-gnu (internal compiler error: in pop_namespace, at cp/name-lookup.c:3826)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78637 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||error-recovery Priority|P3

[Bug rtl-optimization/78638] [7 regression] test cases gcc.target/powerpc/rlwimi-0.c and rlwimi-2.c fail starting with r243000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78638 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0

[Bug target/78639] [7 Regression] Power9 bad code generation for cactusADM benchmark

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78639 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||powerpc64le-*-* Target Milestone|---

[Bug ipa/78555] gcc/sreal.c:232:20: runtime error: left shift of negative value -2018967552

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78555 --- Comment #8 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Fri Dec 2 08:36:01 2016 New Revision: 243163 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243163=gcc=rev Log: Fix runtime error: left shift of negative value (PR PR ipa/78555 *

[Bug target/77822] [6 Regression] arm64 Error: immediate value out of range 0 to 63 at operand 3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77822 Andreas Krebbel changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED --- Comment #35 from Andreas

[Bug target/77822] [6 Regression] arm64 Error: immediate value out of range 0 to 63 at operand 3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77822 Andreas Krebbel changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/78629] vec.h: null pointer passed as argument 1, which is declared to never be null

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78629 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/77822] [6 Regression] arm64 Error: immediate value out of range 0 to 63 at operand 3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77822 --- Comment #33 from Andreas Krebbel --- Author: krebbel Date: Fri Dec 2 08:30:16 2016 New Revision: 243160 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243160=gcc=rev Log: PR target/77822: S390: Validate argument range of {zero,sign}_extract. With

[Bug target/77822] [6 Regression] arm64 Error: immediate value out of range 0 to 63 at operand 3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77822 --- Comment #32 from Andreas Krebbel --- Author: krebbel Date: Fri Dec 2 08:26:19 2016 New Revision: 243159 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243159=gcc=rev Log: PR target/77822: Add helper macro EXTRACT_ARGS_IN_RANGE to system.h. The

[Bug tree-optimization/78608] gimple-ssa-sprintf.c:570:17: runtime error: negation of -9223372036854775808 cannot be represented in type 'long int'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78608 --- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- The patch fixes all issue that I came across. Please apply your patch. Thanks.

<    1   2