https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78691
--- Comment #6 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: amker
Date: Wed Dec 7 10:14:58 2016
New Revision: 243335
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243335=gcc=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/78691
* match.pd ((convert1 (minmax
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71691
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78468
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|libgomp |middle-end
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71691
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #16 from Aldy
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71537
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 71537, which changed state.
Bug 71537 Summary: GCC rejects consetxpr boolean conversions and comparisons on
the result of pointer arithmetic.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71537
What
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78589
--- Comment #7 from Martin Jambor ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Wed Dec 7 13:09:07 2016
New Revision: 243344
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243344=gcc=rev
Log:
Use dump_function_name rather than emit
2016-12-07 Martin Jambor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78709
Bug ID: 78709
Summary: Code size is bigger at -Os than at -O3
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78710
--- Comment #1 from Nicolai Josuttis ---
applies to any version AFAIK
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78713
Bug ID: 78713
Summary: [missed optimization] gcc doesn't use clobbers to
optimize constructors
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78561
--- Comment #18 from James Greenhalgh ---
Author: jgreenhalgh
Date: Wed Dec 7 14:01:59 2016
New Revision: 243345
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243345=gcc=rev
Log:
[Patch PR78561 PowerPC] Revert to old behaviour for counting constant
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72775
--- Comment #11 from Marek Polacek ---
This patch seems to disable initialization of a flexible array member in a
constructor, and, curiously, doesn't regress anything in C++ dg.exp.
--- a/gcc/cp/init.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/init.c
@@ -800,6 +800,11 @@
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72775
--- Comment #12 from Marek Polacek ---
(In reply to Matteo Bertello from comment #10)
> Just had the same internal compiler error on a different piece of code,
> using GCC 6.1.1 on Fedora 24.
> Might be useful to investigate the cause.
This
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21481
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|nathan at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78697
--- Comment #1 from Matthias Klose ---
well, it does make sense when the header files differ, however that is not the
case for the gc header files afaics. Is this what you are looking for? The
fallback directory should not override the values
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78709
--- Comment #1 from ErikaMolnar ---
The code size is smaller because of -ftree-loop-distribute-patterns, this
options has no effect on –Os.
Could you make this optimization to work on –Os also? as it is quite useful.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78698
--- Comment #1 from Matthias Klose ---
didn't check a configuration with --disable-shared :-/ What about checking for
a $bdw_lib_dir/libgc.la and in that case setting BDW_GC_LIBS to
$bdw_lib_dir/libgc.la and skipping the compile and link tests?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78626
--- Comment #9 from Bernd Schmidt ---
I can't read that assembly language, but I'll take your word for it. I'm
testing the patch on x86.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78633
--- Comment #14 from Kazumoto Kojima ---
No problem. I can continue nightly build with a minimal change
diff --git a/gcc/config/sh/sh.md b/gcc/config/sh/sh.md
index c6956a0..edadba7 100644
--- a/gcc/config/sh/sh.md
+++ b/gcc/config/sh/sh.md
@@
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71959
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nathan at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78710
Bug ID: 78710
Summary: suggest better exception text for stoi, stol, ...
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78711
Bug ID: 78711
Summary: gcc-6.2.0:: libjavamath.so inconsistent gmp link
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78712
Bug ID: 78712
Summary: gcc-4.9.4:: libjavamath.so inconsistent gmp link
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
cal/gnu/install/gcc-6 --disable-nls --disable-shared --with-dwarf2
--with-gnu-ld --with-gnu-as target_alias=avr --enable-languages=c,c++,lto
--enable-checking=release
Thread model: single
gcc version 6.2.1 20161207 (GCC)
$ svn info
Path: .
Working Copy Root Path: /srv/local/gnu/gcc.gnu.org/gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78708
Bug ID: 78708
Summary: [ASAN][LTO] ICE in expand_ASAN_MARK, at
internal-fn.c:380 - when compiling but not linking
with ASAN
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78691
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78153
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78626
--- Comment #7 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(In reply to Bernd Schmidt from comment #4)
> Created attachment 40269 [details]
> Candidate patch
That looks great :-)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77414
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> > The tests z7.f90, z8.f90, and z9.f90 compiles without error
> > at revision r242002 although I think they are invalid.
> > They give an ICE with r241962.
>
> This is due to r241972 (pr77596).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78655
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Of course I wonder why the check is here in the first place... Is placement
> new valid for nullptr?
It used to be, but is now UB, since
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78707
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code, ra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72717
--- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool ---
That works I guess... Please test on BE and 32-bit as well. Oh, and
no parens in a = (b) ? c : d; (for simple b at least).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78626
--- Comment #8 from Segher Boessenkool ---
... and works fine, too!
ms:
stwu 1,-32(1)
lis 9,qs@ha
lwz 9,qs@l(9)
twnei 9,0
.L6:
b .L6
Nice :-)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78633
--- Comment #13 from Oleg Endo ---
(In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #12)
> Perhaps the splitter in problem
> might have to take care of subreg case even when referencing
> a reg rtx in the input operands.
So it looks like a new rtx
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78711
--- Comment #3 from Eric ---
(In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #1)
> The included gmp is host-only, only for use with the compiler, not the
> target libraries.
sorry if I don't understand correctly.
what do you mean by "only for use
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78711
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab ---
The target libraries must always be built against the libraries of the target
system. You have to populate the sysroot accordingly.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78711
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78712
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78711
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab ---
*** Bug 78712 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78138
--- Comment #1 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Thu Dec 8 00:01:33 2016
New Revision: 243419
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243419=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c/53562 - Add -Werror= support for -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE /
__builtin___memcpy_chk
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53562
--- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Thu Dec 8 00:01:33 2016
New Revision: 243419
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243419=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c/53562 - Add -Werror= support for -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE /
__builtin___memcpy_chk
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77784
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Thu Dec 8 00:01:33 2016
New Revision: 243419
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243419=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c/53562 - Add -Werror= support for -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE /
__builtin___memcpy_chk
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78149
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Thu Dec 8 00:01:33 2016
New Revision: 243419
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243419=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c/53562 - Add -Werror= support for -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE /
__builtin___memcpy_chk
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78692
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Dec 7 19:10:50 2016
New Revision: 243377
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243377=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/78692
* cgraph.c
st.cpp illegal_inst_const.cpp
> ./opt
Illegal instruction
This is regression, which was introduced in trunk couple days ago.
> gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 7.0.0 20161207 (experimental)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78666
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
Attribute format suffers from a similar problem.
(I'm not looking for ways to break things, btw., but rather trying to come up
with a test to exercise my patch for bug 78673 in whose review Jeff pointed out
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19481
--- Comment #7 from Alan Modra ---
Author: amodra
Date: Wed Dec 7 23:16:03 2016
New Revision: 243417
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243417=gcc=rev
Log:
sync config/* from binutils
* elf.m4: Revert 2016-06-21 change.
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78138
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor ---
Implemented in 7.0 via r243419.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78723
Tim Shen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |timshen at gcc dot
gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72717
--- Comment #5 from Michael Meissner ---
Author: meissner
Date: Wed Dec 7 23:52:05 2016
New Revision: 243418
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243418=gcc=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2016-12-07 Michael Meissner
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78149
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53562
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78638
--- Comment #6 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Thu Dec 8 00:09:01 2016
New Revision: 243420
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243420=gcc=rev
Log:
simplify-rtx: Fix the last fix (PR78638)
I managed to get the last obvious
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78638
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77784
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78711
--- Comment #5 from Eric ---
(In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #4)
> The target libraries must always be built against the libraries of the
> target system. You have to populate the sysroot accordingly.
as during gcc build gmp is built
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51960
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed Dec 7 15:55:39 2016
New Revision: 243358
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243358=gcc=rev
Log:
libstdc++/51960 move-construction for raw_storage_iterator
Backport from mainline
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55727
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64767
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78708
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Works? You mean it doesn't ICE? As soon as there are any libasan routine
calls, it can't really link properly, at least not unless you g++ test.o -lasan
Anyway, this is related to PR69254, probably when
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65254
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78565
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77761
--- Comment #3 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Tue Dec 6 20:02:03 2016
New Revision: 243316
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243316=gcc=rev
Log:
2016-12-06 Vladimir Makarov
target/77761
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77761
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78698
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78326
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51960
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|7.0 |6.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78326
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed Dec 7 16:05:49 2016
New Revision: 243369
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243369=gcc=rev
Log:
PR78326 fix incorrect access of data member in base class
Backport from mainline
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78153
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78726
Bug ID: 78726
Summary: [5/6/7 Regression] Incorrect unsigned arithmetic
optimization
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69860
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71112
hs.naveen2u at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hs.naveen2u at gmail dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78728
Bug ID: 78728
Summary: [7 Regression] ICE in rtl_verify_bb_insns, at
cfgrtl.c:2656 (error: flow control insn inside a basic
block)
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78727
Bug ID: 78727
Summary: [7 Regression] ICE in rtl_verify_bb_insns, at
cfgrtl.c:2656 (error: flow control insn inside a basic
block)
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78729
Bug ID: 78729
Summary: [7 Regression] ICE in rtl_verify_bb_insns, at
cfgrtl.c:2656 (error: flow control insn inside a basic
block)
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78730
Bug ID: 78730
Summary: [7 Regression] ICE in rtl_verify_bb_insns, at
cfgrtl.c:2656 (error: flow control insn inside a basic
block)
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68439
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78703
--- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor ---
I agree. It's hard to strike a balance between false positives and false
negatives.
FYI: The pass tracks three byte counters for every sprintf call: exact (for
values we know are exact), minimum
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78382
--- Comment #2 from hs.naveen2u at gmail dot com ---
Fixed and Committed as:-
https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revision=243428
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78708
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
Summary|[ASAN][LTO] ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78714
Bug ID: 78714
Summary: std::get_time does not accept full month name in %b
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78695
--- Comment #7 from Matthias Klose ---
gcc configured with
--enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --prefix=/usr
--program-suffix=-7 --program-prefix=powerpc64le-linux-gnu- --enable-shared
--enable-linker-build-id
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78694
--- Comment #8 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
No, sorry.
It doesn't ICE for me.
Given that the ICE is an RTL sharing ICE, I believe it should only appear when
RTL checking is enabled through --enable-checking=rtl but I don't see that in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78551
--- Comment #11 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Created attachment 40276
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40276=edit
non-union crash
Union is not necessary to trigger the ICE. All we need is to initialize a char
array with a string
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78694
--- Comment #7 from Sebastian Huber ---
Are you able to reproduce the problem with this information? You need the
attached test case. The arm-eabi GCC build itself works.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71691
--- Comment #17 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
It's just latent. We still need to fix it appropriately.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78698
--- Comment #3 from Matthias Klose ---
On 07.12.2016 17:06, egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu wrote:
> Note that some package managers automatically delete .la files as part of the
> installation process. I suppose it'd just fall through to the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62182
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65173
--- Comment #12 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Patch posted to fort...@gcc.gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78731
Bug ID: 78731
Summary: Possible bug with switch when optimization is turned
on.
Product: gcc
Version: 5.4.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59997
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78731
Jim Wilson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
101 - 192 of 192 matches
Mail list logo