[Bug c++/79308] ICE on specialization of nested template classes (in finish_member_declaration, at cp/semantics.c:2963)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79308 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code |ice-on-valid-code --- Comment #4 from

[Bug fortran/79312] Empty array in assignment not correctly type-checked

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79312 --- Comment #2 from harper at msor dot vuw.ac.nz --- Another manifestation of this bug: program emptyarray6 implicit none logical,allocatable:: OK(:) OK = [logical::]==[real::] print *,OK end program emptyarray6

[Bug c++/79331] ICE on valid C++14 code (with initialized lambda capture) on x86_64-linux-gnu: in canonicalize_component_ref, at gimplify.c:2451

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79331 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code

[Bug tree-optimization/79327] [7 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -fprintf-return-value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79327 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor

[Bug c++/79325] ICE on valid GNU C++ code (typeof) on x86_64-linux-gnu: in arg_assoc_type, at cp/name-lookup.c:5823

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79325 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code

[Bug translation/79332] New: Several bugs related to translation in gcc 7.1-b20170101

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79332 Bug ID: 79332 Summary: Several bugs related to translation in gcc 7.1-b20170101 Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/79197] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE in extract_insn in gcc/recog.c:2311

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79197 --- Comment #10 from Orion Poplawski --- With gcc-7.0.1-0.4.fc26, we no longer get ICEs, but hdf5, openblas fail their tests on ppc64le, and python2/numpy appears to segfault in tests. So something does not appear to be right.

[Bug go/79281] gccgo: Binaries using goroutines crash on m68k

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79281 --- Comment #11 from Ian Lance Taylor --- Thanks. I committed the patch to the GCC 6 branch. GCC 7 will require a different fix, as the code has moved from C to Go. I'm not sure what the best approach is.

[Bug rtl-optimization/79286] [7 Regression] ira and lra wrong code at -O2 and -Os on i686-linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79286 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amodra at gmail dot com

[Bug c++/79331] New: ICE on valid C++14 code (with initialized lambda capture) on x86_64-linux-gnu: in canonicalize_component_ref, at gimplify.c:2451

,c++,lto --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap Thread model: posix gcc version 7.0.1 20170201 (experimental) [trunk revision 245083] (GCC) $ $ icc -c -std=c++14 small.cpp $ clang++ -c -std=c++14 small.cpp $ $ g++-trunk -c -std=c++14 small.cpp small.cpp: In lambda function: small.cpp:9

[Bug c++/79294] [7 Regression] ICE in convert_nontype_argument, at cp/pt.c:6812

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79294 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug go/79281] gccgo: Binaries using goroutines crash on m68k

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79281 --- Comment #14 from Ian Lance Taylor --- > Could you maybe also backport the fix for PR/79037? [1] Done. > Btw, even with the fixes from this PR/79281 and PR/79037, the "go" command is > still crashing on m68k with gcc-6. It might be

[Bug go/79037] gccgo: Binaries crash with parforsetup: pos is not aligned on m68k

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79037 --- Comment #14 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ian Date: Wed Feb 1 23:35:59 2017 New Revision: 245110 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245110=gcc=rev Log: PR go/79037 Backport from mainline: compiler, runtime:

[Bug target/70012] test case gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-vect-33.c fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70012 --- Comment #7 from Bill Schmidt --- Author: wschmidt Date: Wed Feb 1 22:11:57 2017 New Revision: 245108 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245108=gcc=rev Log: 2017-02-01 Bill Schmidt PR target/70012

[Bug target/79158] gcc.target/powerpc/pr70669.c fails on powerpc BE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79158 --- Comment #2 from Michael Meissner --- On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 09:17:26PM +, pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > Mike, Does this reasoning sound correct to you? If so I'll submit a patch. That looks fine. Thanks.

[Bug target/78604] [7 regression] test case gcc.target/powerpc/p8vector-vectorize-1.c fails starting with r242750

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78604 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|pthaugen

[Bug libstdc++/79193] libstdc++ configure incorrectly decides linking works for cross-compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79193 --- Comment #3 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 40649 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40649=edit patch to use "hello, world" to test linking The attached patch is sufficient to cause a link failure in

[Bug target/70012] test case gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-vect-33.c fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70012 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug go/79281] gccgo: Binaries using goroutines crash on m68k

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79281 --- Comment #13 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz --- (In reply to Ian Lance Taylor from comment #11) > GCC 7 will require a different fix, as the code has moved from C to Go. I'm > not sure what the best approach is. Btw, even with the fixes

[Bug ada/79309] incorrectly bounded calls to strncat in adaint.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79309 --- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Wed Feb 1 21:36:09 2017 New Revision: 245107 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245107=gcc=rev Log: PR ada/79309 * adaint.c (__gnat_killprocesstree): Use strlen

[Bug target/66144] vector element operator produces very bad code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66144 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug go/79281] gccgo: Binaries using goroutines crash on m68k

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79281 --- Comment #10 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ian Date: Wed Feb 1 22:58:43 2017 New Revision: 245109 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245109=gcc=rev Log: PR go/79281 Force Lock and Note to be aligned to a 4 byte

[Bug go/79281] gccgo: Binaries using goroutines crash on m68k

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79281 --- Comment #12 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz --- (In reply to Ian Lance Taylor from comment #11) > Thanks. I committed the patch to the GCC 6 branch. > > GCC 7 will require a different fix, as the code has moved from C to Go. I'm > not sure

[Bug c++/79326] mistakenly rejects valid GNU C++ (typeof) code on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79326 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|mistakenly rejects valid|mistakenly rejects valid

[Bug tree-optimization/79291] r244897 introduces IV related performance issues for daxpy on MIPS by enabling peeling for alignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79291 --- Comment #5 from Doug Gilmore --- > Bin: I suspect this is also now broken on ARM, can > you check? Oops, sorry I forgot that this problem is not exposed on the original ARM/Neon for DP. Sorry for the noise.

[Bug c++/79329] bogus operator delete access check during instantiation of new-expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79329 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid

[Bug middle-end/32003] Undocumented -fdump-tree options

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32003 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/79312] Empty array in assignment not correctly type-checked

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79312 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/78176] [MIPS] miscompiles ldxc1 with large pointers on 32-bits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78176 --- Comment #20 from Doug Gilmore --- I'll collect more tracing data on the costing problem. Hopefully I post an update in the next few days.

[Bug tree-optimization/79291] r244897 introduces IV related performance issues for daxpy on MIPS by enabling peeling for alignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79291 --- Comment #4 from Doug Gilmore --- > It also looks like mips lacks implementation of any of the > vectorizer cost hooks and thus defaults to > default_builtin_vectorization_cost which means that unaligned > loads/stores have double cost. I

[Bug debug/70578] internal compiler error: in output_index_string, at dwarf2out.c with -gsplit-dwarf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70578 --- Comment #5 from ishikawa,chiaki --- I have found that g++-5 can compile this without ICE. So this is a regression in gcc-6. The version that worked is: g++-5 -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=g++-5

[Bug c/79319] sizeof returns the wrong size of a union containing aligned members

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79319 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/79319] sizeof returns the wrong size of a union containing aligned members

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79319 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug fortran/79311] ICE in generate_finalization_wrapper, at fortran/class.c:1992

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79311 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/79319] sizeof returns the wrong size of a union containing aligned members

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79319 --- Comment #6 from Erik Hofman --- Thanks for the suggestion but after thinking it through some more I came to the conclusion I made a mistake. 32-byte alignment is only required for AVX when using 8-float (or 4-double) vectors. Otherwise the

[Bug ada/79309] incorrectly bounded calls to strncat in adaint.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79309 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug middle-end/79310] -Wnonnull false positive on strlen after strstr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79310 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/79319] New: sizeof returns the wrong size of a union containing aligned members

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79319 Bug ID: 79319 Summary: sizeof returns the wrong size of a union containing aligned members Product: gcc Version: 6.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/79319] sizeof returns the wrong size of a union containing aligned members

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79319 --- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse --- It is a bit confusing indeed that vec4_t has sizeof: 16 and _Alignof: 32, one might expect an invariant that sizeof >= _Alignof... But just a typedef doesn't increase the size, while stuffing it in a

[Bug tree-optimization/71824] [6 Regression] ICE when compiling libiberty with Graphite loop optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71824 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||7.0.1 Summary|[6/7

[Bug tree-optimization/79315] ICE while building SPEC CPU 2006 FP with -Ofast -ftree-parallelize-loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79315 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Probably a "regression" since we do this verification. I'll try to reproduce on x86_64.

[Bug tree-optimization/79315] [7 Regression] ICE while building SPEC CPU 2006 FP with -Ofast -ftree-parallelize-loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79315 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target|aarch64-linux-gnu |aarch64-linux-gnu, |

[Bug tree-optimization/79315] [7 Regression] ICE while building SPEC CPU 2006 FP with -Ofast -ftree-parallelize-loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79315 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- The bogus location is on &__builtin_powf in _224 = __builtin_powf (_38, 1.80942779541015625e+0); in wsm32d. It gets the location via #1 0x00ff33a5 in move_stmt_op (tp=0x766b3a90,

[Bug c++/69637] ICE on an invalid bit-field with template name for width

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69637 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/79308] ICE on specialization of nested template classes (in finish_member_declaration, at cp/semantics.c:2963)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79308 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code

[Bug c/79320] sqrt of negative number do not return NaN with i686-w64-mingw32-gcc on pentiumI7/Windows10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79320 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||i686-w64-mingw32 --- Comment #1 from

[Bug tree-optimization/70137] internal compiler error: in add_phi_arg_for_new_expr, at graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.c:2331

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70137 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/79318] conversion member function preceded with & is not marked as error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79318 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Smaller testcase: struct A { int a; A () : a(0) {}; int () { return a; }; }; int bar () { A a; return a; } clang++ indeed reports: pr79318.C:5:3: error: cannot specify any part of a return type

[Bug tree-optimization/79315] [7 Regression] ICE while building SPEC CPU 2006 FP with -Ofast -ftree-parallelize-loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79315 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Will test Index: gcc/tree-cfg.c === --- gcc/tree-cfg.c (revision 245064) +++ gcc/tree-cfg.c (working copy) @@ -6636,11 +6636,12 @@

[Bug fortran/79313] associate statement inside openmp loop breaks OMP intrinisics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79313 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Version|unknown

[Bug debug/70578] internal compiler error: in output_index_string, at dwarf2out.c with -gsplit-dwarf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70578 --- Comment #4 from ishikawa,chiaki --- I found that the following simplified command line causes ICE while the next command line where I have removed "-fno-exception" does not cause ICE even though I still keep -gdwarf-output. Hope this may

[Bug ada/79309] incorrectly bounded calls to strncat in adaint.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79309 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug go/79281] gccgo: Binaries using goroutines crash on m68k

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79281 --- Comment #6 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz --- On gcc-7, we actually can't build when enabling the Go frontend: libtool: compile: /<>/build/./gcc/xgcc -B/<>/build/./gcc/ -B/usr/m68k-linux-gnu/bin/ -B/usr/m68k-linux-gnu/lib/ -isystem

[Bug rtl-optimization/79279] combine/simplify_set: wrong call to REG_CANNOT_CHANGE_MODE_P

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79279 Aurelien Buhrig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/79319] sizeof returns the wrong size of a union containing aligned members

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79319 Erik Hofman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED --- Comment #2 from Erik Hofman

[Bug debug/70578] internal compiler error: in output_index_string, at dwarf2out.c with -gsplit-dwarf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70578 --- Comment #7 from ishikawa,chiaki --- Created attachment 40643 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40643=edit preprocessed file that caused gcc-5 to experience the similar ICE. The uploaded file was created by passing

[Bug other/79250] brig/brigfrontend/brig-to-generic.cc: two small problems

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79250 --- Comment #2 from Pekka Jääskeläinen --- Committed in r245084.

[Bug c/79320] New: sqrt of negative number do not return NaN with i686-w64-mingw32-gcc on pentiumI7/Windows10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79320 Bug ID: 79320 Summary: sqrt of negative number do not return NaN with i686-w64-mingw32-gcc on pentiumI7/Windows10 Product: gcc Version: 5.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/71824] [6/7 Regression] ICE when compiling libiberty with Graphite loop optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71824 --- Comment #11 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Feb 1 08:02:50 2017 New Revision: 245081 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245081=gcc=rev Log: 2017-02-01 Richard Biener PR

[Bug ada/79309] incorrectly bounded calls to strncat in adaint.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79309 --- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou --- > I think it would be better to do: Yes, this works for me.

[Bug target/79197] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE in extract_insn in gcc/recog.c:2311

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79197 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Michael Meissner from comment #8) > I agree the expander should call gpc_reg_operand and not reg_operand. This > is due to the fact that on PowerPCs with separate floating point registers, >

[Bug target/79197] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE in extract_insn in gcc/recog.c:2311

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79197 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c/79319] sizeof returns the wrong size of a union containing aligned members

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79319 --- Comment #4 from Erik Hofman --- This was just the shortest snippet of code that showed the situation. The reason for 32-byte alignment is that I use it with AVX code and wanted the fastest possible assignment from a float vector.

[Bug tree-optimization/67326] [5/6 Regression] -ftree-loop-if-convert-stores does not vectorize conditional assignment (anymore)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67326 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug pch/79306] ICE on valid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79306 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/79310] -Wnonnull false positive on strlen after strstr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79310 --- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse --- We already have infer_nonnull_range_by_attribute ("Return true if OP can be inferred to be a non-NULL after STMT executes by using attributes") and I assume that strstr has the nonnull attribute in this

[Bug tree-optimization/79315] [7 Regression] ICE while building SPEC CPU 2006 FP with -Ofast -ftree-parallelize-loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79315 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug debug/70578] internal compiler error: in output_index_string, at dwarf2out.c with -gsplit-dwarf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70578 --- Comment #6 from ishikawa,chiaki --- (In reply to ishikawa,chiaki from comment #5) > I have found that g++-5 can compile this without ICE. > So this is a regression in gcc-6. > > The version that worked is: > > g++-5 -v > Using built-in

[Bug tree-optimization/79315] [7 Regression] ICE while building SPEC CPU 2006 FP with -Ofast -ftree-parallelize-loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79315 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- On x86_64 I see a similar ICE when building 416.gamess

[Bug tree-optimization/79321] New: -ftree-parallelize-loops miscompiles 400.perlbench

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79321 Bug ID: 79321 Summary: -ftree-parallelize-loops miscompiles 400.perlbench Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code Severity: normal

[Bug debug/70578] internal compiler error: in output_index_string, at dwarf2out.c with -gsplit-dwarf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70578 --- Comment #8 from ishikawa,chiaki --- As for gcc-5 ICE, I observe an important thing after a little experimentation. This is a shortened command line that causes the ICE. /usr/bin/gcc-5 -std=gnu99 -o vp9_dsubexp.o -c -DNDEBUG=1 -DTRIMMED=1

[Bug other/79322] New: gcc-6.3.0 inconsistent libstdc++ and libgcc_s link for libcc1 and libgcj

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79322 Bug ID: 79322 Summary: gcc-6.3.0 inconsistent libstdc++ and libgcc_s link for libcc1 and libgcj Product: gcc Version: 6.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug tree-optimization/72712] [7 Regression] Tenfold compile time regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72712 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/68664] [6/7 Regression] Speculative sqrt in c-ray main loop causes large slow down

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68664 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug libstdc++/79323] New: FAIL: 20_util/duration/literals/range.cc (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79323 Bug ID: 79323 Summary: FAIL: 20_util/duration/literals/range.cc (test for excess errors) Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/71142] [6/7 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault in ssa_default_def (graphite)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71142 --- Comment #10 from Martin Liška --- Can't reproduce any of both tests on both x86_64-linux-gnu and aarach64. Is it still valid?

[Bug libstdc++/79254] [5/6/7 Regression] basic_string::operator= isn't exception safe

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79254 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug go/79281] gccgo: Binaries using goroutines crash on m68k

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79281 --- Comment #7 from Ian Lance Taylor --- It sounds like you have a patch for GCC 6. If you send it in I can apply it. The error you show must be from `make -j`, as compiling a file in libgfortran would not invoke go1. What is the actual

[Bug c/79320] sqrt of negative number do not return NaN with i686-w64-mingw32-gcc on pentiumI7/Windows10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79320 --- Comment #2 from Daniel WEIL --- OK. I log the issue on mingw bugs : https://sourceforge.net/p/mingw/bugs/2337/

[Bug target/78604] [7 regression] test case gcc.target/powerpc/p8vector-vectorize-1.c fails starting with r242750

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78604 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libquadmath/79317] logq is returning double precision results

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79317 --- Comment #1 from ggoeckel at presby dot edu --- My error. Sorry. Double precision entered with this assignment. lntwo=6.9314718055994530941723212145817446e-01

[Bug c++/79113] [7 Regression] ICE inheriting a default constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79113 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/79077] [7 regression][new inheriting ctors] bad code for inherited ctor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79077 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Priority|P3

[Bug libstdc++/79323] FAIL: 20_util/duration/literals/range.cc (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79323 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug other/79322] gcc-6.3.0 inconsistent libstdc++ and libgcc_s link for libcc1 and libgcj

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79322 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/12245] [5/6/7 regression] Uses lots of memory when compiling large initialized arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12245 --- Comment #63 from Richard Biener --- Sth that could pay off with other testcases (nested CONSTRUCTORs) is to truncate the size of the CONSTRUCTOR_ELTS vec<> to the exact final size after parsing it as it will never grow again and we

[Bug tree-optimization/67326] [5/6 Regression] -ftree-loop-if-convert-stores does not vectorize conditional assignment (anymore)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67326 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||5.1.0, 7.0 Target Milestone|7.0

[Bug tree-optimization/70137] internal compiler error: in add_phi_arg_for_new_expr, at graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.c:2331

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70137 --- Comment #3 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- I can't reproduce it anymore either. I guess it can be closed then

[Bug middle-end/19721] [meta-bug] optimizations that CSE still catches

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19721 Bug 19721 depends on bug 72712, which changed state. Bug 72712 Summary: [7 Regression] Tenfold compile time regression https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72712 What|Removed |Added

[Bug lto/78140] [7 Regression] libxul -flto uses 1GB more memory than gcc-6

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78140 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug libstdc++/79141] [6/7 Regression] std::pair<int,int> p = {}; fails to compile due to ambiguous overload

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79141 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/71351] [7 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (graphite)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71351 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- Just our of curiosity, why graphite does a transformation as original and AST are same: [scheduler] original ast: { for (int c0 = 0; c0 < P_19; c0 += 1) { S_4(c0); for (int c1 = 0; c1 <= 2; c1 +=

[Bug libstdc++/78975] uniform_real_distribution should not check RealType with is_floating_point

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78975 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan

[Bug libstdc++/56862] std::complex constructor ambiguous overload

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56862 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/79315] [7 Regression] ICE while building SPEC CPU 2006 FP with -Ofast -ftree-parallelize-loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79315 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Feb 1 12:47:25 2017 New Revision: 245089 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245089=gcc=rev Log: 2017-02-01 Richard Biener PR middle-end/79315

[Bug middle-end/78468] [7 regression] libgomp.c/reduction-10.c and many more FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78468 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug c++/79104] [7 Regression] ambiguity calling std::begin on a local constexpr array of structs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79104 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/79254] [5/6/7 Regression] basic_string::operator= isn't exception safe

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79254 --- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Wed Feb 1 11:41:48 2017 New Revision: 245085 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245085=gcc=rev Log: PR libstdc++/79254 simplify exception-safety in copy assignment PR

[Bug libstdc++/79195] make_array should not ask for common_type when the type is explicitly specified

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79195 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Wed Feb 1 12:12:34 2017 New Revision: 245087 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245087=gcc=rev Log: PR libstdc++/79195 fix make_array type deduction PR libstdc++/79195

[Bug libstdc++/79254] [5/6/7 Regression] basic_string::operator= isn't exception safe

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79254 --- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Wed Feb 1 12:12:28 2017 New Revision: 245086 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245086=gcc=rev Log: PR libstdc++/79254 fix exception-safety of std::string copy assignment

  1   2   >