[Bug c++/60068] missing diagnostic on array with negative bounds in template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60068 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid

[Bug c++/60063] [5/6/7 Regression] -Wunused-local-typedefs warning despite attribute used in a template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60063 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libfortran/79540] [7 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/fmt_fw_d.f90 -O0 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79540 --- Comment #4 from Jerry DeLisle --- Possibly due to r240018 which is fix for pr77393.

[Bug c++/79550] New: ICE in tsubst, at cp/pt.c:13474 with partial specialization of auto... template parameter pack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79550 Bug ID: 79550 Summary: ICE in tsubst, at cp/pt.c:13474 with partial specialization of auto... template parameter pack Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/60488] missing uninitialized warning (address taken, VOP)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60488 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Known to fail|

[Bug libstdc++/58909] C++11's condition variables fail with static linking

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58909 joel at clambassador dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/79549] New: ICE in tsubst, at cp/pt.c:13474 with partial specialization of auto... template parameter pack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79549 Bug ID: 79549 Summary: ICE in tsubst, at cp/pt.c:13474 with partial specialization of auto... template parameter pack Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/79521] [7 Regression] Bootstrap failure on i686-linux starting with r245436

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79521 --- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Thu Feb 16 06:35:29 2017 New Revision: 245500 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245500=gcc=rev Log: PR middle-end/79521 * ira-costs.c (scan_one_insn): Check

[Bug middle-end/79521] [7 Regression] Bootstrap failure on i686-linux starting with r245436

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79521 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/68971] -Woverflow false alarm in code unreachable after __builtin_mul_overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68971 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/79524] [5/6/7 Regression] valgrind error for gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/fimplicit_none_2.f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79524 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c++/79512] [6/7 Regression] ICE: Segfault in gimple_build_call_1, at gimple.c:218

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79512 --- Comment #2 from Tom de Vries --- Created attachment 40743 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40743=edit Demonstrator patch. Uses flag_openmp_simd in DEF_GOMP_BUILTIN This patch roughly restores the situation from before

[Bug c++/79525] [c++1y] ICE with auto as function parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79525 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ada/79421] gnat.dg/trampoline3.adb fails on s390x

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79421 Dominik Vogt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/79526] New: loop-9.c fails on s390 + s390x

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79526 Bug ID: 79526 Summary: loop-9.c fails on s390 + s390x Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug tree-optimization/79527] New: non-call-exceptions optimize attribute not propagated during inlining

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79527 Bug ID: 79527 Summary: non-call-exceptions optimize attribute not propagated during inlining Product: gcc Version: 5.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug sanitizer/79341] Many Asan tests fail on s390

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79341 --- Comment #55 from Dominik Vogt --- (In reply to Dominik Vogt from comment #53) > no fails with -m31; with -m64 null-deref-1.c fails with c and > c++, and memcmp-1.c with c++ only. memcmp-1.c is not reproducible.

[Bug tree-optimization/79527] non-call-exceptions optimize attribute not propagated during inlining

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79527 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/77468] [7 Regression] C-ray regression on Aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77468 --- Comment #26 from PeteVine --- OK, maybe this SoC is kinky, I give up: http://openbenchmarking.org/result/1702154-RI-CRAYFAST326

[Bug rtl-optimization/68749] FAIL: gcc.dg/ifcvt-4.c scan-rtl-dump ce1 "2 true changes made"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68749 Dominik Vogt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vogt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com ---

[Bug tree-optimization/79527] non-call-exceptions optimize attribute not propagated during inlining

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79527 --- Comment #1 from Stefan M Freudenberger --- Created attachment 40745 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40745=edit Output of -fdump-tree-einline-eh with -fnon-call-exceptions command line flag

[Bug c/79478] possible gimple error with gcc.dg/gimplefe-16.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79478 prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/68749] FAIL: gcc.dg/ifcvt-4.c scan-rtl-dump ce1 "2 true changes made"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68749 --- Comment #13 from James Greenhalgh --- (In reply to Dominik Vogt from comment #12) > This also fails on s390x with -m31 and s390. I'd just add those targets to the dg-skip-if if they don't have support for conditional select instructions. I

[Bug rtl-optimization/68749] FAIL: gcc.dg/ifcvt-4.c scan-rtl-dump ce1 "2 true changes made"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68749 --- Comment #14 from Dominik Vogt --- Thanks. Patch is here: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-02/msg00975.html With that, the test is fine on s390 and s390x.

[Bug c/79518] __builtin_assume_aligned should mark argument as aligned

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79518 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug sanitizer/79341] Many Asan tests fail on s390

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79341 --- Comment #56 from Dominik Vogt --- null-deref-1.c fails because the test expects this message in source line 10 but gets it for line 11: #0 0x1000853 in NullDeref .../c-c++-common/asan/null-deref-1.c:11

[Bug c/79528] New: DFP double rounding bug

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79528 Bug ID: 79528 Summary: DFP double rounding bug Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee:

[Bug testsuite/79273] FAIL: c-c++-common/Wduplicated-branches-13.c -std=gnu++98 (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79273 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Preud'homme --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #2) > I can't reproduce these failures with an hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 > cross-compiler and I don't see them in the most recent test results for the > target

[Bug tree-optimization/79529] New: [7 Regression] ICE in is_maybe_undefined (tree-ssa-loop-unswitch.c:162)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79529 Bug ID: 79529 Summary: [7 Regression] ICE in is_maybe_undefined (tree-ssa-loop-unswitch.c:162) Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug target/77468] [7 Regression] C-ray regression on Aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77468 --- Comment #27 from James Greenhalgh --- (In reply to PeteVine from comment #25) > The original issue never mentioned -Ofast or -ffast-math and I see no > difference at -Ofast, indeed: > >

[Bug target/79514] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.c:3773

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79514 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/77468] [7 Regression] C-ray regression on Aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77468 --- Comment #28 from PeteVine --- Lesson learnt, thanks! If you look at the last -Ofast result (or 1702153-RI-CRAYFAST467), the suspect difference is there (the compiler had been rebuilt from scratch with all the patches), and I even managed

[Bug c++/79512] [6/7 Regression] ICE: Segfault in gimple_build_call_1, at gimple.c:218

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79512 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Target Milestone|7.0

[Bug c++/79519] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE deleting template friend function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79519 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Target Milestone|---

[Bug fortran/79523] [7 Regression] valgrind error for gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/dtio_13.f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79523 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug fortran/79524] [5/6/7 Regression] valgrind error for gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/fimplicit_none_2.f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79524 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/79487] Invalid _Decimal32 comparison on s390x

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79487 --- Comment #25 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Feb 15 12:19:53 2017 New Revision: 245477 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245477=gcc=rev Log: PR target/79487 * real.c (real_from_integer): Call real_convert

[Bug c/79528] DFP double rounding bug

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79528 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dje at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c++/77369] incorrect noexcept specification deduction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77369 Daniel Böhmer changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug fortran/79230] [7 Regression] [OOP] Run time error: double free or corruption

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79230 vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/79522] std::regex_match always returns false

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79522 --- Comment #1 from Jim Michaels --- Tue 02/14/2017 23:45:45.01 L:\projects\find\1.0\win>g++ -static -lstdc++ -std=c++11 -o ut.exe unit-test-std-match.cpp Wed 02/15/2017 0:01:55.04 L:\projects\find\1.0\win>ut 0 0 here is updated test. I

[Bug libstdc++/79522] New: std::regex_match always returns false

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79522 Bug ID: 79522 Summary: std::regex_match always returns false Product: gcc Version: 6.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++

[Bug fortran/79344] [7 Regression] segmentation faults and run-time errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79344 vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/79523] New: valgrind error for gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/dtio_13.f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79523 Bug ID: 79523 Summary: valgrind error for gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/dtio_13.f90 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/78672] Gfortran test suite failures with a sanitized compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78672 Bug 78672 depends on bug 78958, which changed state. Bug 78958 Summary: Unallocated memory access after SOURCE-ALLOCATEing unlimited polymorphic object https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78958 What|Removed

[Bug fortran/78958] Unallocated memory access after SOURCE-ALLOCATEing unlimited polymorphic object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78958 vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/79524] [7 Regression] valgrind error for gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/fimplicit_none_2.f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79524 --- Comment #3 from David Binderman --- > Note that the test expects the -fimplicit-none option. Do you > see the valgrind error with this option? No I didn't. $ /home/dcb/gcc/results.245439/bin/gfortran -c -fimplicit-none

[Bug libstdc++/79522] std::regex_match always returns false

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79522 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/78723] [variant] P0393r3: "Making variant greater equal again" is unimplemented

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78723 --- Comment #4 from Tim Shen --- Author: timshen Date: Wed Feb 15 09:01:06 2017 New Revision: 245475 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245475=gcc=rev Log: PR libstdc++/78723 * include/std/variant (operator<(), operator>(),

[Bug libstdc++/78723] [variant] P0393r3: "Making variant greater equal again" is unimplemented

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78723 Tim Shen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/79516] ICE: unspellable token PRAGMA_EOL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79516 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/79524] valgrind error for gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/fimplicit_none_2.f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79524 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/79514] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.c:3773

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79514 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code

[Bug ada/79421] gnat.dg/trampoline3.adb fails on s390x

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79421 --- Comment #6 from Dominik Vogt --- (In reply to Dominik Vogt from comment #5) > Patch available here: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79421 Wrong link. Patch is here: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-02/msg00692.html

[Bug c++/79519] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE deleting template friend function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79519 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/79525] New: [c++1y] ICE with auto as function parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79525 Bug ID: 79525 Summary: [c++1y] ICE with auto as function parameter Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/79524] New: valgrind error for gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/fimplicit_none_2.f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79524 Bug ID: 79524 Summary: valgrind error for gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/fimplicit_none_2.f90 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/79524] [7 Regression] valgrind error for gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/fimplicit_none_2.f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79524 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|valgrind error for |[7 Regression] valgrind

[Bug c/79515] ICE: tree check: expected class 'type', have 'exceptional' (error_mark) in do_warn_double_promotion, at c-family/c-warn.c:1867

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79515 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ada/79421] gnat.dg/trampoline3.adb fails on s390x

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79421 --- Comment #7 from Andreas Krebbel --- Author: krebbel Date: Wed Feb 15 09:27:57 2017 New Revision: 245476 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245476=gcc=rev Log: PR target/79241: S/390: define TARGET_CUSTOM_FUNCTION_DESCRIPTORS.

[Bug c/79515] ICE: tree check: expected class 'type', have 'exceptional' (error_mark) in do_warn_double_promotion, at c-family/c-warn.c:1867

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79515 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug c++/79241] error wen compiling -Os, OK with another optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79241 --- Comment #6 from Andreas Krebbel --- Author: krebbel Date: Wed Feb 15 09:27:57 2017 New Revision: 245476 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245476=gcc=rev Log: PR target/79241: S/390: define TARGET_CUSTOM_FUNCTION_DESCRIPTORS.

[Bug fortran/79523] [7 Regression] valgrind error for gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/dtio_13.f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79523 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/59161] GDB pretty printers: iterator->reference not printed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59161 --- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Wed Feb 15 13:38:42 2017 New Revision: 245480 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245480=gcc=rev Log: PR59161 make pretty printers always return strings Backport from mainline

[Bug libstdc++/59170] pretty printers: end iterator invalid pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59170 --- Comment #18 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Wed Feb 15 13:38:48 2017 New Revision: 245481 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245481=gcc=rev Log: PR59170 make pretty printers check for singular iterators Backport from mainline

[Bug sanitizer/79341] Many Asan tests fail on s390

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79341 --- Comment #60 from Ulrich Weigand --- ... well, as Florian said as well :-)

[Bug sanitizer/79341] Many Asan tests fail on s390

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79341 --- Comment #62 from Dominik Vogt --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #61) > It is true that libasan calls just _Unwind_GetIP rather than > _Unwind_GetIPInfo, > but I don't see where there is that subtraction of 1, so it shouldn't

[Regression] Wrong code generation with __restrict__ and inline asm since version 6

Hello, I've posted on the mailing list because I could not get an account on Bugzilla created, as it was disabled, and contacting the overseer as instructed didn't quite work out: it's been two weeks already and no response. Anyway, this is a regression bug leading to wrong code generation with

[Bug tree-optimization/79529] [7 Regression] ICE in is_maybe_undefined (tree-ssa-loop-unswitch.c:162)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79529 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #1) > Looks reasonable, thanks. > > I would probably check for def == NULL too, just in case: > > if (!def || gimple_nop_p (def)) > return true; > > ...since I

[Bug sanitizer/79341] Many Asan tests fail on s390

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79341 --- Comment #58 from Florian Weimer --- (In reply to Dominik Vogt from comment #57) > libsanitizer miscalculates the Pcs in the backtrace: > > #0 0x1000839 in NullDeref > #1 0x10006c1 in main > #2 0x3fff6e23069 in __libc_start_main

[Bug sanitizer/79341] Many Asan tests fail on s390

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79341 --- Comment #59 from Ulrich Weigand --- (In reply to Dominik Vogt from comment #57) > libsanitizer miscalculates the Pcs in the backtrace: > > #0 0x1000839 in NullDeref > #1 0x10006c1 in main > #2 0x3fff6e23069 in __libc_start_main

[Bug tree-optimization/79529] [7 Regression] ICE in is_maybe_undefined (tree-ssa-loop-unswitch.c:162)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79529 --- Comment #1 from Aldy Hernandez --- Looks reasonable, thanks. I would probably check for def == NULL too, just in case: if (!def || gimple_nop_p (def)) return true; ...since I see that replace_ssa_name can set it to NULL: /* Now

[Bug sanitizer/79341] Many Asan tests fail on s390

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79341 --- Comment #57 from Dominik Vogt --- libsanitizer miscalculates the Pcs in the backtrace: #0 0x1000839 in NullDeref #1 0x10006c1 in main #2 0x3fff6e23069 in __libc_start_main #3 0x100073d These are all odd addresses, pointing

[Bug sanitizer/79341] Many Asan tests fail on s390

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79341 --- Comment #61 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #58) > (In reply to Dominik Vogt from comment #57) > > libsanitizer miscalculates the Pcs in the backtrace: > > > > #0 0x1000839 in NullDeref > > #1

[Bug sanitizer/79341] Many Asan tests fail on s390

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79341 --- Comment #63 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #61) > It is true that libasan calls just _Unwind_GetIP rather than > _Unwind_GetIPInfo, > but I don't see where there is that subtraction of 1, so it shouldn't

[Bug libfortran/79540] [7 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/fmt_fw_d.f90 -O0 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79540 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/40261] confusing diagnostic on ill-formed template definition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40261 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2009-08-25 15:42:13 |2017-2-15 Known to fail|

[Bug libfortran/79540] [7 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/fmt_fw_d.f90 -O0 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79540 --- Comment #3 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- I see failure in r240386 (20160923). r239642 and 239726 were okay. -- John David Anglin dave.ang...@bell.net

[Bug c++/44648] missing -Wunused warning on a const variable in if statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44648 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||5.3.0, 6.3.0, 7.0 --- Comment #5 from

[Bug c/59220] bogus warning: packed attribute is unnecessary on an overaligned char

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59220 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug c++/79548] New: missing -Wunused-variable on a typedef'd variable in a function template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79548 Bug ID: 79548 Summary: missing -Wunused-variable on a typedef'd variable in a function template Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/79548] [5/6/7 Regression] missing -Wunused-variable on a typedef'd variable in a function template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79548 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic See Also|

[Bug c/68971] -Woverflow false alarm in code unreachable after __builtin_mul_overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68971 --- Comment #12 from Paul Eggert --- Ah, sorry, I am using GCC 6.3.1, whereas __builtin_mul_overflow_p is a GCC 7-ism. Somehow I got it into my head that __builtin_mul_overflow(A,B,C) should be a constant expression if A, B, are constant

[Bug sanitizer/79341] Many Asan tests fail on s390

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79341 --- Comment #68 from Dominik Vogt --- Okay, that fixes the test failure, but the addresses further up in the backtrace are still bad, e.g. #0 0x10008d2 in NullDeref #1 0x1000759 in main #2 0x3fffce23069 in #3 0x10007d5 Maybe

[Bug c++/79533] [7 Regression] ICE in build_over_call under -std=c++17 in 'S s(static_cast(f()));'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79533 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Target

[Bug libstdc++/79114] [6 Regression] std::throw_with_nested("string literal") is rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79114 --- Comment #7 from Christophe Lyon --- I should probably mention that the test passes on trunk in the same configurations.

[Bug c++/79531] New: bad location when trying to define undeclared method

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79531 Bug ID: 79531 Summary: bad location when trying to define undeclared method Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c/79530] GCC segfault when calling weakref+alias functions within __transaction_atomic block

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79530 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/79521] [7 Regression] Bootstrap failure on i686-linux starting with r245436

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79521 --- Comment #4 from Jeffrey A. Law --- I'm testing a potential fix.

[Bug c++/79533] New: ICE in build_over_call under -std=c++17 in 'S s(static_cast(f()));'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79533 Bug ID: 79533 Summary: ICE in build_over_call under -std=c++17 in 'S s(static_cast(f()));' Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/79479] -Woverflow false alarm in unreachable expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79479 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #13 from Martin

[Bug middle-end/32003] Undocumented -fdump-tree options

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32003 --- Comment #10 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Wed Feb 15 20:13:11 2017 New Revision: 245493 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245493=gcc=rev Log: 2017-02-15 Martin Sebor PR middle-end/32003

[Bug c++/79464] [7 Regression] ICE in ipa_modify_formal_ parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79464 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/79464] [7 Regression] ICE in ipa_modify_formal_ parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79464 --- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed Feb 15 20:29:08 2017 New Revision: 245495 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245495=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/79464 - ICE in IPA with omitted constructor parms * class.c

[Bug c++/79363] [6/7 Regression] ICE with NSDMI and array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79363 --- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Wed Feb 15 20:28:32 2017 New Revision: 245494 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245494=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/79363 - ICE with NSDMI and array gcc/cp/ChangeLog: PR c++/79363

[Bug c++/79363] [6 Regression] ICE with NSDMI and array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79363 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[6/7 Regression] ICE with |[6 Regression] ICE with

[Bug rtl-optimization/78127] [5/6/7 Regression] AArch64 internal compiler error: in lra_eliminate, at lra-eliminations.c:1440

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78127 Vladimir Makarov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/79050] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE: tree code 'template_type_parm' is not supported in LTO streams

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79050 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug libfortran/79540] New: [7 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/fmt_fw_d.f90 -O0 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79540 Bug ID: 79540 Summary: [7 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/fmt_fw_d.f90 -O0 execution test Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libfortran/79540] [7 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/fmt_fw_d.f90 -O0 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79540 --- Comment #1 from John David Anglin --- Removed comment: # ./fmt_fw_d.exe print '(f2.1)',100.00 ! => : no digits Program aborted. Backtrace:

  1   2   3   >