https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79669
Bug ID: 79669
Summary: tree-loop-vectorize generates movdqa for unaligned
address
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79649
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78140
--- Comment #27 from Martin Jambor ---
I have submitted a patch to the mailing list, which re-uses
value_ranges and ipa_bits in jump functions and manages to save more
than one gigabyte of memory:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79663
--- Comment #4 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> Eventually the rev. was backported already?
Nope, it's not backported yet. Now we need to wait sometime before backport
(including this one).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79671
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79389
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79593
--- Comment #16 from Katsunori Kumatani
---
I see! It was more a side note than anything when I inspected GCC 7's output, I
am not even sure if it affects x87 only (not sure if I should have opened
another bug for it, but I guess it doesn't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79669
Lee Duhem changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79672
Bug ID: 79672
Summary: ICE with -Wduplicated-branches -fopenmp
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, openmp
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79671
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
So, I've patched the r235622 cross-compiler to:
--- tree-ssa-alias.c.xx 2017-02-21 19:17:36.0 +0100
+++ tree-ssa-alias.c2017-02-22 11:37:12.714172891 +0100
@@ -359,26 +359,31 @@
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79673
Bug ID: 79673
Summary: GIMPLE verification fails when compiling code with
__seg_gs
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78943
--- Comment #1 from Charles ---
The problem appears to have been fixed by patch r245373 made for Bug #78908.
Thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79670
Bug ID: 79670
Summary: [c++1z] cannot call member function without object in
noexcept declarator of a member function
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78301
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
N.B. it's easy to workaround the bug by using this->inner()
Possibly related to PR 66256
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79672
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79665
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79666
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
And it's fine, but re-writing -1 - _107 to -_107 + -1 is not valid. Negating
_107, that is, as done by build_symbolic_expr via
/* If the result lower bound is constant, we're done;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79587
--- Comment #9 from Martin Liška ---
Fixed on trunk so far.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79663
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79389
--- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 22 Feb 2017, ubizjak at gmail dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79389
>
> Uroš Bizjak changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78301
--- Comment #3 from Benjamin Buch ---
No, it isn't.
$ g++ -std=c++11 -o a a.cpp
a.cpp:3:41: error: invalid use of 'this' at top level
void outer() const noexcept( noexcept( this->inner() ) ) {
tested with:
$ g++ --version
g++ (GCC) 7.0.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79671
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
E.g. on 122 valgrind says:
==21905== Invalid free() / delete / delete[] / realloc()
==21905==at 0x484B224: operator delete(void*) (vg_replace_malloc.c:576)
==21905==by 0x11BB3:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79647
--- Comment #7 from Bernd Edlinger ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> >The second warning is also bogus, the -Wno-parentheses-equality was accepted
> before.
>
> Well this error message about an unknown warning option only
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79666
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79623
--- Comment #6 from Sumit ---
Hi Richard,
Do you have any more suggestion for me?
Regards,
Sumit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79666
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|7.0 |5.5
Summary|[7 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69880
--- Comment #17 from Nick Clifton ---
Hi Guys,
(In reply to Eduard Braun from comment #15)
> > Setting status to resolved/fixed.
>
> I don't think this is merged yet!
> There's only a patch MINGW-packages, if this works out it should be fixed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79672
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79584
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77895
Lee Duhem changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lee.duhem at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79587
--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Wed Feb 22 09:45:42 2017
New Revision: 245647
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245647=gcc=rev
Log:
Remove wrong assert about gcov_type (PR lto/79587).
2017-02-22 Martin Liska
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79671
Bug ID: 79671
Summary: [7 Regression] mapnik miscompilation on armv7hl since
r235622
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78301
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||benni.buch at gmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78301
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79670
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78908
--- Comment #10 from Charles ---
Verified that reported problem is fixed.
Thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79673
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
This is created by PRE, so question for Richard.
That said, the testcase is undefined behavior, even in alternate address spaces
NULL pointer can't point to any object.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79647
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79675
Bug ID: 79675
Summary: Pointless reg1 <- reg2; reg2 <- reg1 moves inside loop
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79676
Bug ID: 79676
Summary: [submodules] Compilation/linking error when module
procedures PRIVATE
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79596
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79674
prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||prathamesh3492 at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79673
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79389
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
For -O2 -m64 the reason why noce_try_addcc doesn't trigger is that we have
if_info->cond of
(unlt (reg:DF 100)
(reg:DF 97))
and reverse_comparison_code on it returns UNKNOWN.
Though, that UNLT comes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79675
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amker at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79674
Bug ID: 79674
Summary: Missed optimisation when no sequence point present
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79666
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P2
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79584
--- Comment #5 from Alan Modra ---
The patch passes ppc64le bootstrap but that isn't really the best target to
test.
I'd test powerpc64-linux bi-arch but the machine I normally use for BE testing
had a disk die, and instead of trying to set
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79361
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79666
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Feb 22 12:11:27 2017
New Revision: 245648
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245648=gcc=rev
Log:
2017-02-22 Richard Biener
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79649
--- Comment #12 from Uroš Bizjak ---
The added testcase also ICEs with -O3 -mx32:
~/gcc-build/gcc/cc1 -O3 -mx32 -quiet pr79649.c
pr79649.c: In function ‘f1’:
pr79649.c:11:1: internal compiler error: in get_use_type, at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79649
--- Comment #13 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #12)
> The added testcase also ICEs with -O3 -mx32:
>
> ~/gcc-build/gcc/cc1 -O3 -mx32 -quiet pr79649.c
> pr79649.c: In function ‘f1’:
> pr79649.c:11:1:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79389
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Well, at least in the -O2 case, it clearly shows that (RTL) if-conversion does
happen.
If SETCC + ZEXT + ADD is always a win compared to LEAL x+1 + CMOV*, then we
should just expand the cmov in that case to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79389
--- Comment #8 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6)
> Well, at least in the -O2 case, it clearly shows that (RTL) if-conversion
> does happen.
> If SETCC + ZEXT + ADD is always a win compared to LEAL x+1 + CMOV*, then
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79389
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
With:
--- ifcvt.c.jj2 2017-01-23 18:09:45.0 +0100
+++ ifcvt.c 2017-02-22 14:25:15.758296571 +0100
@@ -777,6 +777,9 @@ struct noce_if_info
/* The jump condition. */
rtx cond;
+ /*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79675
--- Comment #2 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to ktkachov from comment #1)
> I think ivopts also contributes here.
> Before ivopts the memory access and address are:
> s1_10 = s1_3 + 1;
> c1_11 = *s1_3;
>
> but ivopts transforms
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79389
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 40815
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40815=edit
gcc7-pr79389.patch
Full untested patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79676
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79389
--- Comment #11 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #10)
> Created attachment 40815 [details]
> gcc7-pr79389.patch
>
> Full untested patch.
I can confirm that MonteCarlo benchmark considerably improves with -O2, but
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79664
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79597
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79601
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79673
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Feb 22 15:00:39 2017
New Revision: 245649
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245649=gcc=rev
Log:
2017-02-22 Richard Biener
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79584
--- Comment #6 from Pat Haugen ---
(In reply to Alan Modra from comment #5)
> I'd test powerpc64-linux bi-arch but the machine I normally use for BE
> testing had a disk die, and instead of trying to set everything up again at
> midnight, I'm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79680
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77958
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bugzilla@poradnik-webmaster
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69880
--- Comment #18 from mati865 at gmail dot com ---
Nick I applied
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=ec8f76882145c71bef81a9cadf0bf51ff9fa5b35
on top of 2.27 binutils and cannot reproduce issue anymore.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79665
PeteVine changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tulipawn at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79665
--- Comment #6 from PeteVine ---
But that's related to -mcpu=cortex-a53 again, so never mind I guess.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79664
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Feb 22 22:36:20 2017
New Revision: 245662
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245662=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/79664
* parser.c (cp_parser_omp_teams,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79261
--- Comment #4 from Bill Schmidt ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Wed Feb 22 22:54:56 2017
New Revision: 245664
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245664=gcc=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2017-02-22 Bill Schmidt
Backport
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79679
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79662
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Wed Feb 22 21:28:42 2017
New Revision: 245660
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245660=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c/79662
* c-typeck.c (convert_arguments): Handle
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79679
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79664
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79261
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79681
Bug ID: 79681
Summary: ICE with constexpr and bitfield
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79662
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79261
--- Comment #3 from Bill Schmidt ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Wed Feb 22 22:52:36 2017
New Revision: 245663
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245663=gcc=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2017-02-22 Bill Schmidt
Backport
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68644
--- Comment #18 from Bill Schmidt ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Wed Feb 22 18:00:21 2017
New Revision: 245656
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245656=gcc=rev
Log:
2017-02-22 Bill Schmidt
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68644
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79680
Bug ID: 79680
Summary: format attribute cannot be used with template
parameters
Product: gcc
Version: 5.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79389
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Note that my patch doesn't bootstrap, so I'll need to debug it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79657
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79185
--- Comment #6 from Vladimir Makarov ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #5)
> Is the CLOBBER even necessary anymore? Wasn't its only purpose to tell
> dataflow that r88 was dead because our old flow analysis couldn't?
>
I guess the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79679
Bug ID: 79679
Summary: [C++17] Missing destruction of temporary within
constructor's mem-initializer-list
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79653
--- Comment #7 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Wed Feb 22 19:31:49 2017
New Revision: 245657
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245657=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/79653
* parser.c (cp_parser_std_attribute_spec): Don't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79657
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Wed Feb 22 19:33:13 2017
New Revision: 245658
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245658=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/79657
* semantics.c (finish_underlying_type): Bail out
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79653
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79682
Bug ID: 79682
Summary: [concepts] ambiguous overload with functionally
equivalent predicate constraints compiles
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79211
--- Comment #6 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Wed Feb 22 23:50:46 2017
New Revision: 245667
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245667=gcc=rev
Log:
rs6000: Fix fsel pattern (PR79211)
The fsel define_insn uses fpr_reg_operand
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79683
Bug ID: 79683
Summary: SLP vectorizer drops gs: prefix
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79211
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77958
--- Comment #3 from Daniel Fruzynski ---
This attribute should also work when some parameters are not variadic ones. One
use case presented in bug 79680 is to have two overloaded logging function: one
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79679
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61568
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79674
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79657
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79677
Bug ID: 79677
Summary: Weird handling of -Werror=
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79673
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
1 - 100 of 118 matches
Mail list logo