[Bug c/80163] New: ICE on hopefully valid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80163 Bug ID: 80163 Summary: ICE on hopefully valid code Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee:

[Bug fortran/57924] -Werror -Warray-temporaries -Wno-error=array-temporaries fails on array temporary warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57924 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #5 from

[Bug c++/80093] missed optimization opportunity with std::uniform_int_distribution

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80093 --- Comment #2 from trashyankes at wp dot pl --- ``` #include int foo (std::mt19937* x) { std::uniform_int_distribution k(0, 99); for (auto i = 0; i < 1'000'000'000; ++i) { std::uniform_int_distribution y(0, 99); volatile auto r =

[Bug fortran/80164] ICE in gfc_format_decoder at gcc/fortran/error.c:933

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80164 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/57924] -Werror -Warray-temporaries -Wno-error=array-temporaries fails on array temporary warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57924 --- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #5) 1 > Warning: Creating array temporary at (1) [-Warray-temporaries] > > Am I correct to understand that it is the expected behavior? Yes, this

[Bug fortran/57924] -Werror -Warray-temporaries -Wno-error=array-temporaries fails on array temporary warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57924 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/80162] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE on invalid code (address of register variable)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80162 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code

[Bug tree-optimization/78496] [7 Regression] Missed opportunities for jump threading

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78496 --- Comment #6 from Jeffrey A. Law --- So I've got a hack that allows me to evaluate the effect of the last example from c#5. So let's look at how the number of realized jump threads is affected by the various tweaks I'm playing with:

[Bug middle-end/80162] New: ICE on invalid code (address of register variable)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80162 Bug ID: 80162 Summary: ICE on invalid code (address of register variable) Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug translation/79423] Translation of warnings breaks IDE parsing of output

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79423 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/80148] [7 Regression] operand has impossible constraints

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80148 --- Comment #5 from Vladimir Makarov --- The fix proposed by Bernd for PR80160 does not solve the problem. So I am continuing to work on the patch.

[Bug target/80160] [7 regression] operand has impossible constraints

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80160 --- Comment #5 from Vladimir Makarov --- (In reply to Bernd Schmidt from comment #4) > Perhaps this. > > Index: lra-assigns.c > === > --- lra-assigns.c (revision 246226) > +++

[Bug rtl-optimization/80159] [7 regression] gcc takes very long time with -Os

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80159 --- Comment #3 from Vladimir Makarov --- Either patch proposed by Bernd for PR80160 or my patch on which I am working for PR80148 will solve the problem.

[Bug fortran/80164] ICE in gfc_format_decoder at gcc/fortran/error.c:933

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80164 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres --- The patch in comment 2 fixes the failures FAIL: gfortran.dg/where_operator_assign_2.f90 -O (internal compiler error) FAIL: gfortran.dg/where_operator_assign_3.f90 -O (internal compiler error)

[Bug c++/77339] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE on invalid C++ code on x86_64-linux-gnu: in cp_parser_type_name, at cp/parser.c:16532

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77339 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug c++/80150] [6 Regression] Internal compiler error when in in try_one_overload, at cp/pt.c:18903

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80150 --- Comment #5 from Gordon Brown --- That's great, thanks Jason.

[Bug fortran/80164] ICE in gfc_format_decoder at gcc/fortran/error.c:933

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80164 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- *** Bug 79888 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug fortran/79888] ICE in gfc_warning with -Warray-temporaries

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79888 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/80164] New: ICE in gfc_format_decoder at gcc/fortran/error.c:933

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80164 Bug ID: 80164 Summary: ICE in gfc_format_decoder at gcc/fortran/error.c:933 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal

[Bug target/80161] const argument hidden from AVX intrinsics due to OpenMP outlining

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80161 --- Comment #2 from Jeff Hammond --- Fair point, but the error is "error: the last argument must be scale 1, 2, 4, 8" and "const int scale = 1" sure seems like it should be interpreted by the compiler as "1", given "scale" has local scope (the

[Bug fortran/80164] ICE in gfc_format_decoder at gcc/fortran/error.c:933

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80164 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug ipa/78644] [7 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in is_gimple_reg_type with -Og -fipa-cp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78644 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Richard, could you please have a look at this?

[Bug sanitizer/79572] [6/7 Regression] reference binding to null pointer not reported with -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79572 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 41029 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41029=edit gcc7-pr79572.patch Untested fix.

[Bug target/80088] ICE: declaration and definition of function with __attribute__((target("thumb"))) and inlined assembler, with debug symbols enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80088 --- Comment #4 from Christophe Lyon --- I can confirm that Ubuntu's gcc is based on the Linaro one. And we did backport patches to support target attributes, so it's indeed likely that it is a Linaro-only issue. I've noticed you have a reported

[Bug tree-optimization/80155] [7 regression] Performance regression with code hoisting enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80155 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Created attachment 41031 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41031=edit second patch candidate Second candidate, instead of inhibiting PHI insertions this limits use of them during

[Bug testsuite/79126] [7 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr77445-2.c scan-tree-dump thread1 "Jumps threaded: 16"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79126 Thomas Preud'homme changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/80158] [7 Regression] ICE in all_phi_incrs_profitable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80158 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- #1 0x019a81e7 in all_phi_incrs_profitable (c=0x2c907b0, phi=0x76684400) at /space/rguenther/src/svn/gcc-7-branch/gcc/gimple-ssa-strength-reduction.c:3298 3298 ||

[Bug tree-optimization/80158] [7 Regression] ICE in all_phi_incrs_profitable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80158 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Target Milestone|---

[Bug fortran/80012] FIXME in diagnostic "%s procedure at %L is already declared as %s procedure" from symbol.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80012 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug sanitizer/79572] [6/7 Regression] reference binding to null pointer not reported with -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79572 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek --- Started with r230365, difference in *.original is: - foo ((const int &) (UBSAN_NULL (0B, 2B, 4);, 0B)) >; + foo (0) >;

[Bug lto/78529] [7 Regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/strcat-chk.c failed with lto/O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78529 --- Comment #33 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 22 Mar 2017, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78529 > > --- Comment #32 from Jakub Jelinek --- > It is actually the *-lib.c files that

[Bug rtl-optimization/78735] profiledbootstrap with --enable-checking=yes,rtl fails on trunk due to -Werror=strict-overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78735 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug middle-end/63155] [5/6/7 Regression] memory hog

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63155 --- Comment #14 from Richard Biener --- The plan is to re-write coalescings conflict graph by using SSA-based liveness queries according to https://hal.inria.fr/inria-00192219 Well, at least I'd like to experiment with that as it might be

[Bug target/79480] -O3 and -mfpu=neon produces crashing code on ARM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79480 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/80155] [7 regression] Performance regression with code hoisting enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80155 --- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Thu, 23 Mar 2017, thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80155 > > --- Comment #5 from Thomas Preud'homme --- > (In reply to Richard Biener from

[Bug tree-optimization/80155] [7 regression] Performance regression with code hoisting enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80155 --- Comment #8 from Thomas Preud'homme --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #6 and #7) > > The testcase shows hardly profitable PRE which the patches should > disable (I didn't verify the patches fix the testcase!) The patch does

[Bug tree-optimization/80136] [7 Regression] ICE in gimplify_modify_expr, at gimplify.c:5627

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80136 --- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Bill Schmidt from comment #15) > Jakub, thanks for the confirmation that force_gimple_operand is unnecessary. > Christophe, thanks for testing. Thus I am now regstrapping: > Would appreciate

[Bug tree-optimization/80032] [6 Regression] C++ excessive stack usage (no stack reuse)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80032 --- Comment #13 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Mar 23 08:33:41 2017 New Revision: 246414 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246414=gcc=rev Log: 2017-03-23 Richard Biener PR

[Bug tree-optimization/80153] ivopt generate wrong code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80153 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- The reason for the tree-affine oddity is that IVO calls #0 tree_to_aff_combination (expr=, type=, comb=0x7fffd310) that is, tree_to_aff_combination with a mismatched expr/type. For example from

[Bug tree-optimization/80136] [7 Regression] ICE in gimplify_modify_expr, at gimplify.c:5627

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80136 --- Comment #17 from James Greenhalgh --- I've also successfully bootstrapped and regression tested this patch native on aarch64-none-linux-gnu with no issues.

[Bug ipa/79776] [7 Regression] ICE on valid code in insert_vi_for_tree, at tree-ssa-structalias.c:2807

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79776 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Well, PTA simply assumes that cgraph_for_symbol_thunks_and_aliases will call the callback for nodes with different decls. If it's not easy to arrange for that a "simple" fix would be sth like Index:

[Bug tree-optimization/80158] New: [7 Regression] ICE in all_phi_incrs_profitable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80158 Bug ID: 80158 Summary: [7 Regression] ICE in all_phi_incrs_profitable Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/80155] [7 regression] Performance regression with code hoisting enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80155 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ipa/79776] [7 Regression] ICE on valid code in insert_vi_for_tree, at tree-ssa-structalias.c:2807

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79776 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Patch doesn't help. Note IPA PTA is a simple IPA pass running after inlining decisions are committed to the IL so there shouldn't be any inlining clones around? Oh, and it does try to handle them: /*

[Bug target/79871] i18n: document placeholders for translators

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79871 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug fortran/79968] diagnostics: merge similar diagnostics containing -fdec-structure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79968 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/80155] [7 regression] Performance regression with code hoisting enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80155 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug bootstrap/80133] [bootstrap] ICE during build on PPC64-linux.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80133 --- Comment #2 from Kirill Yukhin --- Caused by r241649.

[Bug tree-optimization/80155] [7 regression] Performance regression with code hoisting enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80155 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Created attachment 41030 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41030=edit first patch candidate First variant of an aggressive approach - never add IVs / loop carried dependencies in PRE.

[Bug middle-end/63155] [5/6/7 Regression] memory hog

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63155 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/80088] ICE: declaration and definition of function with __attribute__((target("thumb"))) and inlined assembler, with debug symbols enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80088 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/79995] Messages for iWMMXt builtins could use some cleanup

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79995 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug testsuite/79126] [7 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr77445-2.c scan-tree-dump thread1 "Jumps threaded: 16"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79126 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |trivial

[Bug target/79971] ICE in const_binop, at fold-const.c:1554 on ARM target with saturated integers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79971 --- Comment #8 from Martin Liška --- *** Bug 79898 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug tree-optimization/79898] ICE in const_binop, at fold-const.c:1554 on ARM target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79898 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/79418] ERROR: gcc.dg/torture/stackalign/builtin-apply-2.c -O0 : syntax error in targe t selector "target arm_hf_eabi || avr-*-* || riscv*-*-*" for "

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79418 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/80156] [7 Regression] Generic DTIO interface reported missing if public statement preceeds the interface block

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80156 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

asdasdasd

index.html -- View this message in context: http://gcc.1065356.n8.nabble.com/asdasdasd-tp1361259.html Sent from the gcc - bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

[Bug ipa/79776] [7 Regression] ICE on valid code in insert_vi_for_tree, at tree-ssa-structalias.c:2807

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79776 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug tree-optimization/80155] [7 regression] Performance regression with code hoisting enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80155 --- Comment #5 from Thomas Preud'homme --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4) > Can you benchmark the 2nd candidate (most appropriate at this stage I think, > would also fix 77498). > > It will cause pessimizations for code that

[Bug tree-optimization/80158] [7 Regression] ICE in all_phi_incrs_profitable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80158 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- SUBROUTINE DRPAUL(SMAT,TMAT,EPS,EPT,SIJ,TIJ,WRK,VEC,ARRAY,FMO, * XMKVIR,TMJ,XMI,YMI,ZMI,ZQQ,L1,L1EF,LNA,LNA2, * NAEF,L2,NLOC,NVIR,PROVEC,FOCKMA,MXBF,MXMO2)

[Bug fortran/80156] [7 Regression] Generic DTIO interface reported missing if public statement preceeds the interface block

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80156 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0

[Bug tree-optimization/79898] ICE in const_binop, at fold-const.c:1554 on ARM target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79898 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug testsuite/79126] [7 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr77445-2.c scan-tree-dump thread1 "Jumps threaded: 16"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79126 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/78735] profiledbootstrap with --enable-checking=yes,rtl fails on trunk due to -Werror=strict-overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78735 --- Comment #1 from Franz Sirl --- Can be worked around by bootstrapping with --disable-werror. Last reconfirmed with trunk r246380. Trunk is at 7.0.1, so --disable-werror is the default right now. I guess the only real question is if the

[Bug tree-optimization/80155] [7 regression] Performance regression with code hoisting enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80155 --- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Thu, 23 Mar 2017, thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80155 > > --- Comment #5 from Thomas Preud'homme --- > (In reply to Richard Biener from

[Bug libstdc++/80165] New: Constexpr tuple of variant doesn't work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80165 Bug ID: 80165 Summary: Constexpr tuple of variant doesn't work Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/56251] no DW_AT_const_value for static const member of a template class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56251 chihin ko changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/80164] ICE in gfc_format_decoder at gcc/fortran/error.c:933

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80164 --- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl --- On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 10:48:20PM +, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote: > > The additional errors are > > /opt/gcc/_clean/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/where_operator_assign_1.f90:82:69: > >

[Bug debug/54773] no debug info generated for rvalue reference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54773 chihin ko changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/68040] [5/6/7 Regression] Internal compiler error: Error reporting routines re-entered.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68040 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/79852] diagnostics should not end with exclamation mark

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79852 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- See also pr79840.

[Bug fortran/79840] Inconsistent exclamation mark in diagnostic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79840 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/80160] [7 regression] operand has impossible constraints

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80160 --- Comment #4 from Bernd Schmidt --- Perhaps this. Index: lra-assigns.c === --- lra-assigns.c (revision 246226) +++ lra-assigns.c (working copy) @@ -908,7 +908,8 @@

[Bug c++/80150] [6 Regression] Internal compiler error when in in try_one_overload, at cp/pt.c:18903

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80150 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Thu Mar 23 18:23:25 2017 New Revision: 246422 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246422=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/80150 - ICE with overloaded variadic deduction. * pt.c

[Bug c++/80150] [6 Regression] Internal compiler error when in in try_one_overload, at cp/pt.c:18903

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80150 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Known to work|

[Bug c++/77563] [5/6/7 Regression] explicit constructor breaks narrowing conversion overload resolution

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77563 --- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Thu Mar 23 12:50:55 2017 New Revision: 246417 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246417=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/77563 - missing ambiguous conversion error. * call.c

[Bug rtl-optimization/80025] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE w/ -O2 (-O3, -Ofast) -g -ftracer (infinite recursion in rtx_equal_for_cselib_1)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80025 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug ada/80146] [7 regression] ICE in copy_to_mode_reg, at explow.c:612

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80146 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||67205

[Bug c++/77772] Segmentation fault when running an application with gdb

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/80136] [7 Regression] ICE in gimplify_modify_expr, at gimplify.c:5627

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80136 --- Comment #18 from Bill Schmidt --- Thanks, all. I will commit the patch.

[Bug tree-optimization/80136] [7 Regression] ICE in gimplify_modify_expr, at gimplify.c:5627

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80136 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/80136] [7 Regression] ICE in gimplify_modify_expr, at gimplify.c:5627

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80136 Bug 80136 depends on bug 79908, which changed state. Bug 79908 Summary: ICE in gimplify_expr (gimplify.c:12155) gimplification failed https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79908 What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/80158] [7 Regression] ICE in all_phi_incrs_profitable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80158 --- Comment #3 from Bill Schmidt --- Richard, what flags are you using with the reduced test case? Hoping I can reproduce this on ppc64le without a cross, but so far no luck.

[Bug tree-optimization/80155] [7 regression] Performance regression with code hoisting enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80155 --- Comment #10 from Richard Biener --- asm difference -fno-code-hoisting (-) against patch (+) shows --- t.s 2017-03-23 13:04:11.010514228 +0100 +++ t.s.ok 2017-03-23 13:04:05.882432743 +0100 @@ -26,9 +26,9 @@ ldrbr3, [r4]

[Bug c++/77563] [5/6 Regression] explicit constructor breaks narrowing conversion overload resolution

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77563 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||7.0 Summary|[5/6/7

[Bug rtl-optimization/80159] [7 regression] gcc takes very long time with -Os

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80159 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/79908] ICE in gimplify_expr (gimplify.c:12155) gimplification failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79908 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/80136] [7 Regression] ICE in gimplify_modify_expr, at gimplify.c:5627

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80136 --- Comment #19 from Bill Schmidt --- Author: wschmidt Date: Thu Mar 23 13:13:44 2017 New Revision: 246418 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246418=gcc=rev Log: [gcc] 2017-03-23 Bill Schmidt

[Bug tree-optimization/79908] ICE in gimplify_expr (gimplify.c:12155) gimplification failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79908 --- Comment #9 from Bill Schmidt --- Author: wschmidt Date: Thu Mar 23 13:13:44 2017 New Revision: 246418 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246418=gcc=rev Log: [gcc] 2017-03-23 Bill Schmidt

[Bug bootstrap/79255] [6/7 Regression] PGO bootstrap fails on x86_64/ppc64le building Ada

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79255 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Short C testcase that ICEs without the patch: /* PR bootstrap/79255 */ /* { dg-do compile } */ /* { dg-options "-O2 -g -fno-toplevel-reorder -Wno-attributes" } */ static inline

[Bug target/80148] [7 Regression] operand has impossible constraints

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80148 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/80153] ivopt generate wrong code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80153 --- Comment #5 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4) > The reason for the tree-affine oddity is that IVO calls > > #0 tree_to_aff_combination (expr=, > type=, comb=0x7fffd310) > > that is,

[Bug target/71436] [7 Regression] Segmentation fault in arm_output_multireg_pop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71436 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug target/80160] [7 regression] operand has impossible constraints

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80160 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/80158] [7 Regression] ICE in all_phi_incrs_profitable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80158 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/80158] [7 Regression] ICE in all_phi_incrs_profitable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80158 --- Comment #13 from Bill Schmidt --- OK, sure, that is quite possible. Seems like something that should have popped up before, but I guess the information gathered from the old cand->stmt must have been harmless.

[Bug ipa/80159] New: [7 regression] gcc takes very link time with -Os

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80159 Bug ID: 80159 Summary: [7 regression] gcc takes very link time with -Os Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/80150] [6/7 Regression] Internal compiler error when in in try_one_overload, at cp/pt.c:18903

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80150 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug target/80160] [7 regression] operand has impossible constraints

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80160 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

  1   2   >