[Bug c++/56251] no DW_AT_const_value for static const member of a template class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56251 chihin ko changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug debug/54773] no debug info generated for rvalue reference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54773 chihin ko changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/80165] New: Constexpr tuple of variant doesn't work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80165 Bug ID: 80165 Summary: Constexpr tuple of variant doesn't work Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug fortran/79852] diagnostics should not end with exclamation mark

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79852 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- See also pr79840.

[Bug fortran/79840] Inconsistent exclamation mark in diagnostic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79840 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/80164] ICE in gfc_format_decoder at gcc/fortran/error.c:933

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80164 --- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl --- On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 10:48:20PM +, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote: > > The additional errors are > > /opt/gcc/_clean/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/where_operator_assign_1.f90:82:69: > >

[Bug fortran/68040] [5/6/7 Regression] Internal compiler error: Error reporting routines re-entered.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68040 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/80164] ICE in gfc_format_decoder at gcc/fortran/error.c:933

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80164 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres --- The patch in comment 2 fixes the failures FAIL: gfortran.dg/where_operator_assign_2.f90 -O (internal compiler error) FAIL: gfortran.dg/where_operator_assign_3.f90 -O (internal compiler error)

[Bug fortran/80164] ICE in gfc_format_decoder at gcc/fortran/error.c:933

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80164 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- *** Bug 79888 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug fortran/79888] ICE in gfc_warning with -Warray-temporaries

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79888 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/80150] [6 Regression] Internal compiler error when in in try_one_overload, at cp/pt.c:18903

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80150 --- Comment #5 from Gordon Brown --- That's great, thanks Jason.

[Bug fortran/57924] -Werror -Warray-temporaries -Wno-error=array-temporaries fails on array temporary warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57924 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/57924] -Werror -Warray-temporaries -Wno-error=array-temporaries fails on array temporary warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57924 --- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #5) 1 > Warning: Creating array temporary at (1) [-Warray-temporaries] > > Am I correct to understand that it is the expected behavior? Yes, this

[Bug fortran/80164] ICE in gfc_format_decoder at gcc/fortran/error.c:933

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80164 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/80164] ICE in gfc_format_decoder at gcc/fortran/error.c:933

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80164 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/80093] missed optimization opportunity with std::uniform_int_distribution

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80093 --- Comment #2 from trashyankes at wp dot pl --- ``` #include int foo (std::mt19937* x) { std::uniform_int_distribution k(0, 99); for (auto i = 0; i < 1'000'000'000; ++i) { std::uniform_int_distribution y(0, 99); volatile auto r =

[Bug fortran/57924] -Werror -Warray-temporaries -Wno-error=array-temporaries fails on array temporary warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57924 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #5 from

[Bug target/80148] [7 Regression] operand has impossible constraints

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80148 --- Comment #5 from Vladimir Makarov --- The fix proposed by Bernd for PR80160 does not solve the problem. So I am continuing to work on the patch.

[Bug rtl-optimization/80159] [7 regression] gcc takes very long time with -Os

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80159 --- Comment #3 from Vladimir Makarov --- Either patch proposed by Bernd for PR80160 or my patch on which I am working for PR80148 will solve the problem.

[Bug target/80160] [7 regression] operand has impossible constraints

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80160 --- Comment #5 from Vladimir Makarov --- (In reply to Bernd Schmidt from comment #4) > Perhaps this. > > Index: lra-assigns.c > === > --- lra-assigns.c (revision 246226) > +++

[Bug target/80161] const argument hidden from AVX intrinsics due to OpenMP outlining

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80161 --- Comment #2 from Jeff Hammond --- Fair point, but the error is "error: the last argument must be scale 1, 2, 4, 8" and "const int scale = 1" sure seems like it should be interpreted by the compiler as "1", given "scale" has local scope (the

[Bug middle-end/80162] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE on invalid code (address of register variable)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80162 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code

[Bug tree-optimization/78496] [7 Regression] Missed opportunities for jump threading

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78496 --- Comment #6 from Jeffrey A. Law --- So I've got a hack that allows me to evaluate the effect of the last example from c#5. So let's look at how the number of realized jump threads is affected by the various tweaks I'm playing with:

[Bug c++/77339] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE on invalid C++ code on x86_64-linux-gnu: in cp_parser_type_name, at cp/parser.c:16532

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77339 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug fortran/80164] New: ICE in gfc_format_decoder at gcc/fortran/error.c:933

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80164 Bug ID: 80164 Summary: ICE in gfc_format_decoder at gcc/fortran/error.c:933 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal

[Bug c/80163] New: ICE on hopefully valid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80163 Bug ID: 80163 Summary: ICE on hopefully valid code Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee:

[Bug translation/79423] Translation of warnings breaks IDE parsing of output

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79423 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/80162] New: ICE on invalid code (address of register variable)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80162 Bug ID: 80162 Summary: ICE on invalid code (address of register variable) Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/80148] [7 Regression] operand has impossible constraints

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80148 --- Comment #4 from Vladimir Makarov --- Thank you for reporting this. Something is wrong with processing insns for reloads. The asm-insn hash 2 the same operands mem[r263+12]. R263 is spilled for a reload. The mem becomes invalid and r263

[Bug libstdc++/80137] [6/7 Regression] std::generate_canonical calls its generator a non-constant number of times

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80137 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/80150] [6 Regression] Internal compiler error when in in try_one_overload, at cp/pt.c:18903

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80150 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Known to work|

[Bug c++/80150] [6 Regression] Internal compiler error when in in try_one_overload, at cp/pt.c:18903

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80150 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Thu Mar 23 18:23:25 2017 New Revision: 246422 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246422=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/80150 - ICE with overloaded variadic deduction. * pt.c

[Bug target/80160] [7 regression] operand has impossible constraints

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80160 --- Comment #4 from Bernd Schmidt --- Perhaps this. Index: lra-assigns.c === --- lra-assigns.c (revision 246226) +++ lra-assigns.c (working copy) @@ -908,7 +908,8 @@

[Bug libfortran/79612] missing space in diagnostic: Incorrect rank of return array in

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79612 --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Would something such as the following make sense (with a proper comment and the commented lines removed)? --- ../_clean/libgfortran/runtime/bounds.c 2017-01-01 17:39:08.0 +0100 +++

[Bug tree-optimization/80153] ivopt generate wrong code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80153 --- Comment #5 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4) > The reason for the tree-affine oddity is that IVO calls > > #0 tree_to_aff_combination (expr=, > type=, comb=0x7fffd310) > > that is,

[Bug target/80161] const argument hidden from AVX intrinsics due to OpenMP outlining

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80161 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||openmp Component|c

[Bug rtl-optimization/80159] [7 regression] gcc takes very long time with -Os

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80159 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 CC|

[Bug target/80148] [7 Regression] operand has impossible constraints

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80148 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/80160] [7 regression] operand has impossible constraints

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80160 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug bootstrap/79255] [6/7 Regression] PGO bootstrap fails on x86_64/ppc64le building Ada

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79255 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Short C testcase that ICEs without the patch: /* PR bootstrap/79255 */ /* { dg-do compile } */ /* { dg-options "-O2 -g -fno-toplevel-reorder -Wno-attributes" } */ static inline

[Bug c/80161] New: const argument hidden from AVX intrinsics due to OpenMP outlining

enable-threads=posix --enable-checking=release --with-system-zlib --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran --with-tune=native --enable-bootstrap --enable-lto --enable-gold=yes --enable-ld=yes --prefix=/opt/gcc//HEAD Thread model: posix gcc version 7.0.1 20170323 (experimental) (

[Bug testsuite/80092] Add effective-target keywords for unsupported nvptx features

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80092 --- Comment #3 from Tom de Vries --- (In reply to Thomas Schwinge from comment #2) > (In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #0) > > But it's better to introduce effective-target keywords for those features, > > and mark the tests as such. That

[Bug bootstrap/79255] [6/7 Regression] PGO bootstrap fails on x86_64/ppc64le building Ada

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79255 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- So, what I see is: #0 add_AT_unsigned (die=0x7fffedd374b0, attr_kind=DW_AT_inline, unsigned_val=2) at ../../gcc/dwarf2out.c:4150 #1 0x00ea5d65 in gen_subprogram_die (decl=0x7fffee138600,

[Bug tree-optimization/80155] [7 regression] Performance regression with code hoisting enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80155 --- Comment #15 from Thomas Preud'homme --- (In reply to Thomas Preud'homme from comment #14) > (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #13) > > On Thu, 23 Mar 2017, thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > > > >

[Bug tree-optimization/80158] [7 Regression] ICE in all_phi_incrs_profitable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80158 --- Comment #17 from Bill Schmidt --- The following fixes the reduced test case. Could you please test it on the full 416.gamess build? I'll regstrap it on x86-64 and ppc64le. Index: gcc/gimple-ssa-strength-reduction.c

[Bug testsuite/80092] Add effective-target keywords for unsupported nvptx features

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80092 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Target||nvptx Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/80158] [7 Regression] ICE in all_phi_incrs_profitable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80158 --- Comment #16 from Bill Schmidt --- Ah, that's not it at all. This is much more subtle. This has to do with candidates that have alternate interpretations (as either a CAND_ADD or a CAND_MULT). We fix up the candidate that we replace, but

[Bug ipa/79772] [6/7 Regression][CHKP] ICE on invalid code in chkp_process_stmt (tree-chkp.c:4034)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79772 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/80158] [7 Regression] ICE in all_phi_incrs_profitable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80158 --- Comment #15 from Bill Schmidt --- This is the only spot where we don't do an in-situ replacement. Testing a patch to fix that.

[Bug other/65530] [meta-bug] -mmpx -fcheck-pointer-bounds failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65530 Bug 65530 depends on bug 79772, which changed state. Bug 79772 Summary: [6/7 Regression][CHKP] ICE on invalid code in chkp_process_stmt (tree-chkp.c:4034) https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79772 What|Removed

[Bug c++/79986] [6/7 Regression][CHKP] ICE in fold_convert_loc with a flexible array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79986 --- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor --- *** Bug 79772 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug tree-optimization/80155] [7 regression] Performance regression with code hoisting enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80155 --- Comment #14 from Thomas Preud'homme --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #13) > On Thu, 23 Mar 2017, thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80155 > > > > --- Comment #12 from Thomas

[Bug fortran/78881] [F03] reading from string with DTIO procedure does not work properly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78881 --- Comment #11 from Jerry DeLisle --- I finally figured out what is happening. The parent READ begins with eating any leading spaces. If a non-space character is found, rather than seek backward (which can't be done with some units) we unget

[Bug testsuite/80092] Add effective-target keywords for unsupported nvptx features

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80092 --- Comment #1 from Tom de Vries --- Submitted "[testsuite] Add missing dg-require-effective-target alloca to gcc testsuite" ( https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-03/msg01227.html )

[Bug target/80160] [7 regression] operand has impossible constraints

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80160 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug tree-optimization/80158] [7 Regression] ICE in all_phi_incrs_profitable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80158 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/80160] [7 regression] operand has impossible constraints

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80160 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Reduced testcase with -O2 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -march=pentium-mmx -m32: typedef struct { long long a; } a_t; int *a, b; a_t *e, c; long long f; void fn (int); void fn2 (void); int fn3 (a_t); void fn4

[Bug tree-optimization/80158] [7 Regression] ICE in all_phi_incrs_profitable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80158 --- Comment #13 from Bill Schmidt --- OK, sure, that is quite possible. Seems like something that should have popped up before, but I guess the information gathered from the old cand->stmt must have been harmless.

[Bug tree-optimization/80158] [7 Regression] ICE in all_phi_incrs_profitable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80158 --- Comment #12 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Thu, 23 Mar 2017, wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80158 > > --- Comment #10 from Bill Schmidt --- > Pretty certain the problem is in this

[Bug tree-optimization/80158] [7 Regression] ICE in all_phi_incrs_profitable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80158 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/80158] [7 Regression] ICE in all_phi_incrs_profitable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80158 --- Comment #10 from Bill Schmidt --- Pretty certain the problem is in this chunk: if (bump == 0) { tree lhs = gimple_assign_lhs (c->cand_stmt); gassign *copy_stmt = gimple_build_assign (lhs, basis_name);

[Bug target/80160] [7 regression] operand has impossible constraints

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80160 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/71436] [7 Regression] Segmentation fault in arm_output_multireg_pop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71436 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug target/71436] [7 Regression] Segmentation fault in arm_output_multireg_pop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71436 --- Comment #15 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Thu Mar 23 14:55:48 2017 New Revision: 246419 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246419=gcc=rev Log: [ARM] PR target/71436: Restrict *load_multiple pattern till after

[Bug tree-optimization/80158] [7 Regression] ICE in all_phi_incrs_profitable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80158 --- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Thu, 23 Mar 2017, wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80158 > > --- Comment #5 from Bill Schmidt --- > OK, I will have to find an x86 box --

[Bug rtl-optimization/80159] [7 regression] gcc takes very long time with -Os

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80159 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||compile-time-hog, ra

[Bug tree-optimization/80158] [7 Regression] ICE in all_phi_incrs_profitable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80158 --- Comment #9 from Bill Schmidt --- Thanks, those dumps are very helpful. I found an x86 box, just need to get set up now. The SLSR dump is truncated but it still tells me what it was working on when it died, so should help me out.

[Bug target/80160] [7 regression] operand has impossible constraints

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80160 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-*-*, i?86-*-* Target

[Bug libstdc++/80137] std::generate_canonical calls its generator a non-constant number of times

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80137 --- Comment #1 from John Salmon --- The misbehavior is observable by comparing an rng that is invoked directly with one that is invoked via generate_canonical. drdws0134$ cat skippy.cpp #include #include int main() { std::mt19937 rng;

[Bug tree-optimization/80158] [7 Regression] ICE in all_phi_incrs_profitable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80158 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- Created attachment 41037 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41037=edit slsr dump probably not too helpful as it crashes

[Bug tree-optimization/80158] [7 Regression] ICE in all_phi_incrs_profitable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80158 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- Created attachment 41036 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41036=edit reassoc2 dump

[Bug target/78543] [6 Regression] ICE in push_reload, at reload.c:1349 on powerpc64le-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78543 --- Comment #18 from Michael Meissner --- Created attachment 41035 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41035=edit Proposed patch to fix the problem This patch does not allow SUBREG's in bswap functions, which confuses the

[Bug middle-end/79990] [CHKP] ICE in expand_expr_addr_expr_1, at expr.c:7790

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79990 --- Comment #2 from Alexander Ivchenko --- I proposed a fix for this: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-03/msg01222.html

[Bug tree-optimization/80155] [7 regression] Performance regression with code hoisting enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80155 --- Comment #13 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Thu, 23 Mar 2017, thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80155 > > --- Comment #12 from Thomas Preud'homme --- > (In reply to Richard Biener from

[Bug debug/80025] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE w/ -O2 (-O3, -Ofast) -g -ftracer (infinite recursion in rtx_equal_for_cselib_1)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80025 --- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Bernd Schmidt from comment #12) > That still doesn't seem to address the root cause though? Isn't the problem > that this reversible mappings code can create cycles and we should avoid >

[Bug tree-optimization/80158] [7 Regression] ICE in all_phi_incrs_profitable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80158 --- Comment #5 from Bill Schmidt --- OK, I will have to find an x86 box -- fortran cross is too challenging. Meanwhile, could you please add -fdump-tree-reassoc2 and -fdump-tree-slsr-details and post the results? Might be able to figure it out

[Bug debug/80025] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE w/ -O2 (-O3, -Ofast) -g -ftracer (infinite recursion in rtx_equal_for_cselib_1)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80025 --- Comment #12 from Bernd Schmidt --- That still doesn't seem to address the root cause though? Isn't the problem that this reversible mappings code can create cycles and we should avoid creating these in the first place?

[Bug debug/80025] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE w/ -O2 (-O3, -Ofast) -g -ftracer (infinite recursion in rtx_equal_for_cselib_1)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80025 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 41034 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41034=edit gcc7-pr80025.patch Untested alternate patch.

[Bug tree-optimization/80158] [7 Regression] ICE in all_phi_incrs_profitable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80158 --- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Thu, 23 Mar 2017, wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80158 > > --- Comment #3 from Bill Schmidt --- > Richard, what flags are you using with

[Bug tree-optimization/80155] [7 regression] Performance regression with code hoisting enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80155 --- Comment #12 from Thomas Preud'homme --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #9) > Ah, the patches do not fix the testcase because the testcase is _not_ the > PRE-creates-IV case. It's indeed simply hoisting/PRE at work transforming >

[Bug target/80160] New: [7 regression] operand has impossible constraints

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80160 Bug ID: 80160 Summary: [7 regression] operand has impossible constraints Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/80156] [7 Regression] Generic DTIO interface reported missing if public statement preceeds the interface block

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80156 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > My bisection shows r245596 as the start of the regression, r245764 > as well as r245768 fails, not passes. You are right: testing the original code I found the range r245564 (compiles) r245629

[Bug tree-optimization/80158] [7 Regression] ICE in all_phi_incrs_profitable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80158 --- Comment #3 from Bill Schmidt --- Richard, what flags are you using with the reduced test case? Hoping I can reproduce this on ppc64le without a cross, but so far no luck.

[Bug tree-optimization/80136] [7 Regression] ICE in gimplify_modify_expr, at gimplify.c:5627

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80136 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/80136] [7 Regression] ICE in gimplify_modify_expr, at gimplify.c:5627

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80136 Bug 80136 depends on bug 79908, which changed state. Bug 79908 Summary: ICE in gimplify_expr (gimplify.c:12155) gimplification failed https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79908 What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/79908] ICE in gimplify_expr (gimplify.c:12155) gimplification failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79908 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/79908] ICE in gimplify_expr (gimplify.c:12155) gimplification failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79908 --- Comment #9 from Bill Schmidt --- Author: wschmidt Date: Thu Mar 23 13:13:44 2017 New Revision: 246418 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246418=gcc=rev Log: [gcc] 2017-03-23 Bill Schmidt

[Bug tree-optimization/80136] [7 Regression] ICE in gimplify_modify_expr, at gimplify.c:5627

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80136 --- Comment #19 from Bill Schmidt --- Author: wschmidt Date: Thu Mar 23 13:13:44 2017 New Revision: 246418 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246418=gcc=rev Log: [gcc] 2017-03-23 Bill Schmidt

[Bug tree-optimization/80136] [7 Regression] ICE in gimplify_modify_expr, at gimplify.c:5627

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80136 --- Comment #18 from Bill Schmidt --- Thanks, all. I will commit the patch.

[Bug c++/80150] [6/7 Regression] Internal compiler error when in in try_one_overload, at cp/pt.c:18903

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80150 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug rtl-optimization/80159] [7 regression] gcc takes very long time with -Os

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80159 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/77563] [5/6 Regression] explicit constructor breaks narrowing conversion overload resolution

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77563 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||7.0 Summary|[5/6/7

[Bug rtl-optimization/80025] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE w/ -O2 (-O3, -Ofast) -g -ftracer (infinite recursion in rtx_equal_for_cselib_1)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80025 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/77563] [5/6/7 Regression] explicit constructor breaks narrowing conversion overload resolution

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77563 --- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Thu Mar 23 12:50:55 2017 New Revision: 246417 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246417=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/77563 - missing ambiguous conversion error. * call.c

[Bug ipa/80159] New: [7 regression] gcc takes very link time with -Os

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80159 Bug ID: 80159 Summary: [7 regression] gcc takes very link time with -Os Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug tree-optimization/80155] [7 regression] Performance regression with code hoisting enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80155 --- Comment #11 from Richard Biener --- Ok, the 2nd level opportunitues are important. So the 2nd candidate remains for the loop carried dependencies issue(s). Regresses (on x86_64): Running target unix/{,-m32} FAIL:

[Bug c++/80145] [c++1y] ICE after failed return type deduction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80145 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug tree-optimization/80155] [7 regression] Performance regression with code hoisting enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80155 --- Comment #10 from Richard Biener --- asm difference -fno-code-hoisting (-) against patch (+) shows --- t.s 2017-03-23 13:04:11.010514228 +0100 +++ t.s.ok 2017-03-23 13:04:05.882432743 +0100 @@ -26,9 +26,9 @@ ldrbr3, [r4]

[Bug tree-optimization/80155] [7 regression] Performance regression with code hoisting enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80155 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener --- Ah, the patches do not fix the testcase because the testcase is _not_ the PRE-creates-IV case. It's indeed simply hoisting/PRE at work transforming # a_14 = PHI if (!b) a_8 = a_14

[Bug ada/80146] [7 regression] ICE in copy_to_mode_reg, at explow.c:612

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80146 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||67205

  1   2   >