[Bug rtl-optimization/80233] [7 Regression] ICE in combine_instructions w/ -O2 (and above)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80233 --- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool --- Author: segher Date: Wed Mar 29 20:53:59 2017 New Revision: 246575 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246575&root=gcc&view=rev Log: combine: Fix PR80233 If combine has added an unconditional trap the

[Bug sanitizer/79993] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE in tree_to_uhwi, at tree.c:7344

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79993 --- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor --- I think it would be preferable to make VLA initialization work the way it was supposed to. A patch to handle it properly exists (bug 69517) and I plan (hope) to dust it off for GCC 8 and submit it.

[Bug libquadmath/68686] tgammaq(x) is always negative for noninteger x < 0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68686 --- Comment #4 from Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw4rd at verizon dot net> --- Created attachment 41079 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41079&action=edit Correct sign of negative arg tgammaq. Basically, return (x > 0.0Q || (int)(-x) &

[Bug ada/67205] eliminate No_Implicit_Dynamic_Code restriction violations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67205 Bug 67205 depends on bug 80146, which changed state. Bug 80146 Summary: [7 regression] ICE in copy_to_mode_reg, at explow.c:612 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80146 What|Removed |Added

[Bug ada/80117] Standard'Word_Size is wrong for aarch64 ILP32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80117 Bug 80117 depends on bug 80146, which changed state. Bug 80146 Summary: [7 regression] ICE in copy_to_mode_reg, at explow.c:612 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80146 What|Removed |Added

[Bug ada/80146] [7 regression] ICE in copy_to_mode_reg, at explow.c:612

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80146 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/80251] Is the is_aggregate meta function missing?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80251 --- Comment #1 from gcc-bugs at marehr dot dialup.fu-berlin.de --- I'm sorry for the inconvenience! I didn't see that is_aggregate was just a recent addition to the standard [1]. I just wanted to see if I can check at compile time if my data struc

[Bug target/78002] gcc.target/aarch64/stack-checking.c ICEs with -mabi=ilp32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78002 --- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou --- So the proper thing to do might be to restore Pmode as in the first version: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-11/msg01988.html

[Bug fortran/78670] [F03] Incorrect file position with namelist read under DTIO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78670 --- Comment #8 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Wed Mar 29 21:37:45 2017 New Revision: 246576 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246576&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-03-29 Jerry DeLisle PR libgfortran/78670 * io

[Bug target/80108] ICE in aggregate_value_p at function.c:2028

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80108 --- Comment #8 from Segher Boessenkool --- Hi Kelvin, 405 does not have VSX (or even VMX). The instructions enabled by -mpower9-minmax require VSX. The following behaviours all make sense, for -mcpu=405 -mpower9-minmax: 1) Ignore the latter o

[Bug middle-end/80006] loss of range information due to spurious widening conversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80006 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Component|tree-optimization |middle-end --- Comment #5 from Martin Seb

[Bug target/71294] [6 Regression] ICE in gen_add2_insn, at optabs.c:4442 on powerpc64le-linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71294 --- Comment #19 from Michael Meissner --- Author: meissner Date: Wed Mar 29 23:15:51 2017 New Revision: 246577 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246577&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [gcc] 2017-03-29 Michael Meissner Back port from trunk

[Bug target/80123] libgomp tests pr66199-2.c and pr66199-5.c fail with -mcpu=power9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80123 --- Comment #4 from Michael Meissner --- Author: meissner Date: Wed Mar 29 23:15:51 2017 New Revision: 246577 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246577&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [gcc] 2017-03-29 Michael Meissner Back port from trunk

[Bug testsuite/72757] atomic test don't run with RUNTESTFLAGS=atomic.exp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72757 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/69517] SEGV on a VLA with excess initializer elements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69517 --- Comment #17 from Martin Sebor --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #16) The bug here is in G++ accepting a VLA initializer with more elements than there is room for in the VLA, and then trashing the stack at runtime with the extra ele

[Bug c/79730] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE tree check: expected var_decl, have function_decl in finish_decl, at c/c-decl.c:5063

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79730 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Wed Mar 29 23:40:36 2017 New Revision: 246578 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246578&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c/79730 * c-decl.c (finish_decl): Check VAR_P.

[Bug c/79730] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE tree check: expected var_decl, have function_decl in finish_decl, at c/c-decl.c:5063

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79730 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/80243] c++ doesn't allow function to return a struct (or object?) - same thing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80243 Jim Michaels changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|INVALID

[Bug c++/80243] c++ doesn't allow function to return a struct (or object?) - same thing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80243 --- Comment #6 from Jim Michaels --- atoi64.cpp:1974:1: error: expected 'while' before 'ATOLDRESULT' ATOLDRESULT atold_(S str,bool oldCOctalEnabled=false,bool groupCharEnabled=true,C groupChar=',',VS dimensionArr={""},bool skipNonScientific=true

[Bug c++/80243] c++ doesn't allow function to return a struct (or object?) - same thing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80243 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/80230] error accessing struct member, error says it's size_t, but it is int

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80230 Jim Michaels changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|INVALID

[Bug c++/80230] error accessing struct member, error says it's size_t, but it is int

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80230 --- Comment #6 from Jim Michaels --- here is another incorrect type spouted out: atoi64.cpp:1101:389: error: request for member 'v' in 'vecstruct[i]', which is of non-class type 'size_t {aka long long unsigned int}' vecstruct[i].v mBaseVal is st

[Bug fortran/80256] New: Cygwin bind_c_array_params_2.f90 test fails for scan-assembler-times

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80256 Bug ID: 80256 Summary: Cygwin bind_c_array_params_2.f90 test fails for scan-assembler-times Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/80256] Cygwin bind_c_array_params_2.f90 test fails for scan-assembler-times

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80256 --- Comment #1 from nightstrike --- Created attachment 41081 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41081&action=edit Assembler output Attaching the assembler output that dejagnu is trying to scan. As mentioned in the first post,

[Bug fortran/80257] New: Cygwin test fail: pointer_check_1.f90 output test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80257 Bug ID: 80257 Summary: Cygwin test fail: pointer_check_1.f90 output test Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Componen

[Bug c++/80243] c++ doesn't allow function to return a struct (or object?) - same thing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80243 --- Comment #8 from Jim Michaels --- you are right, that code does work, my example needed debugging. so if I can return a struct here, why not in my other code, unless gcc is confused somehow? alas, I cannot supply source or .ii files because th

[Bug ipa/80258] New: On x86_64 with -fPIC, accesses to TLS can see the wrong thread's TLS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80258 Bug ID: 80258 Summary: On x86_64 with -fPIC, accesses to TLS can see the wrong thread's TLS Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug ipa/80258] On x86_64 with -fPIC, accesses to TLS can see the wrong thread's TLS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80258 --- Comment #1 from Tor Myklebust --- Created attachment 41083 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41083&action=edit A program that breaks with -O3 -fPIC

[Bug rtl-optimization/60818] ICE in validate_condition_mode on powerpc*-linux-gnu*

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60818 Arseny Solokha changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||7.0 --- Comment #17 from Arseny Solokha

[Bug ipa/80258] On x86_64 with -fPIC, accesses to TLS can see the wrong thread's TLS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80258 --- Comment #2 from Tor Myklebust --- For completeness, this issue was raised as Stackoverflow question 43081742 by user merlin2011.

[Bug ipa/80258] On x86_64 with -fPIC, accesses to TLS can see the wrong thread's TLS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80258 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- Why do you think this is a bug? swapcontext is not TLS aware at all and was not designed to be.

[Bug c++/80247] 'nullptr' was not declared in this scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80247 --- Comment #8 from Sumit --- (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #7) > (In reply to Sumit from comment #6) > > Actually, once I have -std=c++11 included in CPPFLAGS, I am able to get rid > > of nullptr problem. > > > > But still in th

[Bug ipa/80258] On x86_64 with -fPIC, accesses to TLS can see the wrong thread's TLS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80258 --- Comment #4 from Tor Myklebust --- I suppose the program attached doesn't demonstrate that. I ran: info gcc 'C ext' 'thread' I read the following text: When the address-of operator is applied to a thread-local variable, it is evalu

[Bug ipa/80258] On x86_64 with -fPIC, accesses to TLS can see the wrong thread's TLS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80258 --- Comment #5 from Tor Myklebust --- Created attachment 41084 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41084&action=edit Program referenced in comment 4

[Bug ipa/80258] On x86_64 with -fPIC, accesses to TLS can see the wrong thread's TLS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80258 --- Comment #6 from Tor Myklebust --- Created attachment 41085 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41085&action=edit Program referenced in comment 4

[Bug c++/80230] error accessing struct member, error says it's size_t, but it is int

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80230 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/80259] New: [5/6/7 Regression] ICE deleting friend function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80259 Bug ID: 80259 Summary: [5/6/7 Regression] ICE deleting friend function Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code Severity: normal

[Bug rtl-optimization/80233] [7 Regression] ICE in combine_instructions w/ -O2 (and above)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80233 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

<    1   2