[Bug c/81492] New: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (ia64 target with "-O1 -g" and __attribute__((optimize("O3"))))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81492 Bug ID: 81492 Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (ia64 target with "-O1 -g" and __attribute__((optimize("O3" Product: gcc Version: 6.3.0

[Bug tree-optimization/81489] invalid phi argument used in find_implicit_erroneous_behavior

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81489 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gcov-profile/81491] [8 Regression] PGO/LTO bootstrap: error: non-cold basic block 6 dominated by a block in the cold partition (15)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81491 --- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- Also see HJ's results, e.g. https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-regression/2017-07/msg00246.html.

[Bug tree-optimization/81369] [8 Regression] ICE in generate_code_for_partition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81369 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug lto/81487] [mingw32] ld.exe: error: asprintf failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81487 --- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay --- FYI, the build compiler identifies as $ i686-w64-mingw32-gcc -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=i686-w64-mingw32-gcc

[Bug gcov-profile/81491] New: [8 Regression] PGO/LTO bootstrap: error: non-cold basic block 6 dominated by a block in the cold partition (15)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81491 Bug ID: 81491 Summary: [8 Regression] PGO/LTO bootstrap: error: non-cold basic block 6 dominated by a block in the cold partition (15) Product: gcc Version: 8.0

[Bug target/81389] _mm_cmpestri segfault on -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81389 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/81346] Missed constant propagation into comparison

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81346 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug sanitizer/63361] Test case c-c++-common/ubsan/float-cast-overflow-1.c fails on Pentium2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63361 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||8.0 --- Comment #16 from Martin Liška

[Bug tree-optimization/81396] [7/8 Regression] Optimization of reading Little-Endian 64-bit number with portable code has a regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81396 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug go/81393] Bootstrap failure on s390x-linux while building libgo against recent glibc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81393 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek --- That is better, syscall_linux_s390.go already compiles, but syscall_linux_s390x.go still doesn't: ../../../libgo/go/syscall/syscall_linux_s390x.go:28:3: error: incompatible type for field 3 in struct

[Bug target/81389] _mm_cmpestri segfault on -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81389 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #4) > (In reply to rockeet from comment #3) > > @Martin Liška Yes, my use case is: > > > > __m128i key128 = { key }; // key is an unsigned char > > int idx =

[Bug target/81490] x86: Handling of symbol ranges for __seg_fs/__seg_gs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81490 --- Comment #10 from Richard Biener --- Am I correct that this is about __seg uses in inline asm?

[Bug target/81490] x86: Handling of symbol ranges for __seg_fs/__seg_gs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81490 --- Comment #11 from H. Peter Anvin --- Not primarily.

[Bug tree-optimization/81489] invalid phi argument used in find_implicit_erroneous_behavior

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81489 --- Comment #4 from Tom de Vries --- Author: vries Date: Thu Jul 20 07:16:01 2017 New Revision: 250378 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250378=gcc=rev Log: Fix phi arg location in find_implicit_erroneous_behavior 2017-07-20 Tom de Vries

[Bug lto/81430] nvptx acceleration compilation broken because of running pass_partition_blocks

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81430 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|trivial |normal

[Bug lto/81430] nvptx acceleration compilation broken because of running pass_partition_blocks

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81430 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch Severity|normal

[Bug c/81484] incorrect -Wint-in-bool-context warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81484 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/81434] AArch64 instruction fusing and pipeline scheduling problem

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81434 Wilco changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/81495] New: Building Ada on Linux m68k natively fails with obscure linker errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81495 Bug ID: 81495 Summary: Building Ada on Linux m68k natively fails with obscure linker errors Product: gcc Version: 7.1.0 URL:

[Bug target/81490] x86: Handling of symbol ranges for __seg_fs/__seg_gs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81490 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/81369] [8 Regression] ICE in generate_code_for_partition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81369 amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug libquadmath/65757] gfortran gives incorrect result for anint with real*16 argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65757 --- Comment #21 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Jul 20 08:29:45 2017 New Revision: 250379 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250379=gcc=rev Log: PR libquadmath/65757 * math/roundq.c: Cherry-pick upstream glibc

[Bug tree-optimization/81303] [8 Regression] 410.bwaves regression caused by r249919

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81303 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- So one useful change is the following which makes the runtime profitability threshold 6 and thus the vector loop is never entered. Even though that should be quite a predictable conditional jump it turns

[Bug gcov-profile/81491] [8 Regression] PGO/LTO bootstrap: error: non-cold basic block 6 dominated by a block in the cold partition (15)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81491 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0

[Bug sanitizer/81493] python fails to load libtsan.so: cannot allocate memory in static TLS block

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81493 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/81476] severe slow-down with range-v3 library compared to clang

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81476 --- Comment #18 from Hannes Hauswedell --- Thanks for the quick responses and the fix!

[Bug tree-optimization/81494] [8 Regression] 454.calculix miscompares with -Ofast after r249919

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81494 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0

[Bug tree-optimization/81462] [8 Regression] ICE in estimate_bb_frequencies at gcc/predict.c:3546

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81462 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/81388] [7/8 Regression] Incorrect code generation with -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81388 --- Comment #9 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: amker Date: Thu Jul 20 12:02:19 2017 New Revision: 250384 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250384=gcc=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/81388 Revert r238585:

[Bug middle-end/81030] [8 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O1 (only) on x86_64-linux-gnu: verify_flow_info failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81030 --- Comment #10 from Jan Hubicka --- Author: hubicka Date: Thu Jul 20 11:27:31 2017 New Revision: 250383 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250383=gcc=rev Log: PR middle-end/81030 * cfgbuild.c (find_many_sub_basic_blocks):

[Bug sanitizer/81493] python fails to load libtsan.so: cannot allocate memory in static TLS block

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81493 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- That is a user bug, don't do it. libtsan.so needs to be loaded early for the whole process, certainly before you start creating threads etc. You can LD_PRELOAD=libtsan.so or similar to eachive that.

[Bug tree-optimization/81494] New: [8 Regression] 454.calculix miscompares with -Ofast after r249919

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81494 Bug ID: 81494 Summary: [8 Regression] 454.calculix miscompares with -Ofast after r249919 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug gcov-profile/81491] [8 Regression] PGO/LTO bootstrap: error: non-cold basic block 6 dominated by a block in the cold partition (15)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81491 --- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka --- Hmm, I will take a look. The test is not really testing the right thing at first place. We should not look for dominance relationship, but whether BB is reachable over path that does not enter cold partition.

[Bug tree-optimization/61171] vectorization fails for a reduction in presence of subtraction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61171 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Jul 20 11:17:21 2017 New Revision: 250382 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250382=gcc=rev Log: 2017-07-20 Richard Biener PR

[Bug tree-optimization/61171] vectorization fails for a reduction in presence of subtraction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61171 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/53947] [meta-bug] vectorizer missed-optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947 Bug 53947 depends on bug 61171, which changed state. Bug 61171 Summary: vectorization fails for a reduction in presence of subtraction https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61171 What|Removed |Added

[Bug sanitizer/81493] python fails to load libtsan.so: cannot allocate memory in static TLS block

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81493 --- Comment #1 from wangzhijun2005 at hotmail dot com --- I tried to run try.py on different environments, but still failed. python 2.7.12, glibc 2.23, gcc 5.4.0 python 2.7.13,glibc 2.11.3,gcc 7.1.0 python 2.6.8, glibc 2.11.3, gcc 6.1.0 OSError:

[Bug tree-optimization/81396] [7/8 Regression] Optimization of reading Little-Endian 64-bit number with portable code has a regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81396 --- Comment #9 from Marc Glisse --- Should we open a separate PR for the transformation you suggested in comment 4, or does that seem not useful enough now, or will be part of bitfield gimple lowering when that lands?

[Bug lto/81430] nvptx acceleration compilation broken because of running pass_partition_blocks

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81430 --- Comment #6 from Tom de Vries --- https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-07/msg01210.html

[Bug sanitizer/81493] New: python fails to load libtsan.so: cannot allocate memory in static TLS block

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81493 Bug ID: 81493 Summary: python fails to load libtsan.so: cannot allocate memory in static TLS block Product: gcc Version: 5.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug target/81496] New: AVX load from adjacent memory location followed by concatenation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81496 Bug ID: 81496 Summary: AVX load from adjacent memory location followed by concatenation Product: gcc Version: 7.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug rtl-optimization/81434] AArch64 instruction fusing and pipeline scheduling problem

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81434 --- Comment #8 from Wilco --- (In reply to jim.wilson from comment #7) > On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 4:20 AM, wilco at gcc dot gnu.org > wrote: > > Do you think it might be feasible to update resource usage of a schedule

[Bug target/81496] AVX load from adjacent memory location followed by concatenation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81496 --- Comment #3 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #0) > With -O2 -mavx{,2,512f}, we get on the following testcase: > > typedef __int128 V __attribute__((vector_size (32))); > typedef long long W

[Bug c++/81237] Cannot link when class methods compiled with different levels of vectorization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81237 --- Comment #5 from Ravi --- Are there any known work-arounds to getting ABI version 11 to link against code compiled with an older ABI version?

[Bug target/81490] x86: Handling of symbol ranges for __seg_fs/__seg_gs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81490 --- Comment #12 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to Andy Lutomirski from comment #8) > I would like to see something along these lines but even stronger: a way to > instruct GCC to use a particular type of access and relocation. For > example, I

[Bug preprocessor/48839] #error should terminate compilation - similar to missing #include

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48839 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug target/81496] AVX load from adjacent memory location followed by concatenation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81496 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Maybe even better would be to emit vmovq %r1, %xmm0; vpinsrq $1, %r2, %xmm0; vpinsrq $2, %r3, %ymm0; vpinsrq $3, %r4, %ymm0; but not sure how to achieve that. For another testcase: typedef long long W

[Bug target/81496] AVX load from adjacent memory location followed by concatenation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81496 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kyukhin at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug target/81497] New: error compiling arm_acle.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81497 Bug ID: 81497 Summary: error compiling arm_acle.h Product: gcc Version: 7.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug tree-optimization/81018] [8 regression] gfortran.dg/graphite/pr14741.f90 FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81018 --- Comment #4 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- So there are couple of concerns here. A) I moved iv_canon pass after loop split so that new loop generated can be completely unrolled if niter is known and small. As a result, we don't need to

[Bug target/81495] Building Ada on Linux m68k natively fails with obscure linker errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81495 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/81434] AArch64 instruction fusing and pipeline scheduling problem

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81434 --- Comment #7 from jim.wilson at linaro dot org --- On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 4:20 AM, wilco at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > Do you think it might be feasible to update resource usage of a schedule > group? > Or would it be

[Bug middle-end/46932] Inefficient code sequence to access local variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46932 --- Comment #4 from Wilco --- Patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-07/msg01245.html

[Bug target/80846] auto-vectorized AVX2 horizontal sum should narrow to 128b right away, to be more efficient for Ryzen and Intel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80846 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Jul 20 16:36:18 2017 New Revision: 250397 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250397=gcc=rev Log: PR target/80846 * config/i386/i386.c

[Bug go/81393] Bootstrap failure on s390x-linux while building libgo against recent glibc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81393 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/81490] x86: Handling of symbol ranges for __seg_fs/__seg_gs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81490 --- Comment #14 from Andy Lutomirski --- (In reply to H. Peter Anvin from comment #13) > On July 20, 2017 10:47:54 AM PDT, ubizjak at gmail dot com > wrote: > >https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81490 >

[Bug target/81490] x86: Handling of symbol ranges for __seg_fs/__seg_gs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81490 --- Comment #13 from H. Peter Anvin --- On July 20, 2017 10:47:54 AM PDT, ubizjak at gmail dot com wrote: >https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81490 > >--- Comment #12 from Uroš Bizjak --- >(In reply to Andy

[Bug sanitizer/81493] python fails to load libtsan.so: cannot allocate memory in static TLS block

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81493 --- Comment #4 from wangzhijun2005 at hotmail dot com --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2) > That is a user bug, don't do it. > libtsan.so needs to be loaded early for the whole process, certainly before > you start creating threads

[Bug middle-end/81502] New: In some cases the data is moved to memory unnecessarily [partial regression]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81502 Bug ID: 81502 Summary: In some cases the data is moved to memory unnecessarily [partial regression] Product: gcc Version: 7.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug sanitizer/81493] python fails to load libtsan.so: cannot allocate memory in static TLS block

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81493 wangzhijun2005 at hotmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |WONTFIX

[Bug sanitizer/81493] python fails to load libtsan.so: cannot allocate memory in static TLS block

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81493 wangzhijun2005 at hotmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|VERIFIED --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/81503] New: Wrong code at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81503 Bug ID: 81503 Summary: Wrong code at -O2 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization

[Bug regression/81497] error compiling arm_acle.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81497 Ivan Nazarenko changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ivan.nazarenko at uol dot com.br

[Bug driver/81498] New: Support build static PIE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81498 Bug ID: 81498 Summary: Support build static PIE Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: driver

[Bug c++/53598] missed diagnostics / equality comparison result unused

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53598 egallager at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug go/81393] Bootstrap failure on s390x-linux while building libgo against recent glibc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81393 --- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek --- You wrote it, so go ahead ;).

[Bug c++/62182] New warning wished: operator== and "equality comparison result unused [-Wunused-comparison]"/-Wunsed-value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62182 egallager at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug go/81393] Bootstrap failure on s390x-linux while building libgo against recent glibc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81393 --- Comment #14 from Ian Lance Taylor --- Thanks. Do you want to commit or should I do it?

[Bug tree-optimization/78394] False positives of maybe-uninitialized with -Og

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78394 egallager at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/61593] Support '#pragma mark - foo' on non-Darwin targets (by simply ignoring it without warning)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61593 egallager at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot

[Bug c/78380] GCC crash with internal compiler error: in gen_reg_rtx, at emit-rtl.c:1025

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78380 egallager at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/81499] New: internal compiler error when compiling gfortran code with user-defined derived type i/o

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81499 Bug ID: 81499 Summary: internal compiler error when compiling gfortran code with user-defined derived type i/o Product: gcc Version: 7.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/71905] Values passed to -Wlarger-than= and -Wframe-larger-than= and -Wstack-usage= should accept KB and MB suffixes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71905 egallager at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/81193] PowerPC GCC __builtin_cpu_is and __builtin_cpu_supports should warn about old libraries

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81193 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/78251] config/gettext.m4 and config/iconv.m4 contaminate CPPFLAGS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78251 egallager at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/81501] New: Unneccessary calls to __tls_get_addr() in simple thread-singleton pattern

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81501 Bug ID: 81501 Summary: Unneccessary calls to __tls_get_addr() in simple thread-singleton pattern Product: gcc Version: 7.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug target/81501] Unneccessary calls to __tls_get_addr() in simple thread-singleton pattern

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81501 --- Comment #1 from Julian Andres Klode --- To qualify the performance overhead, I added empty constructors and destructors with noinline, and compiled the code with g++ and clang++, and then ran a loop 1 over the

[Bug c++/71456] missing -Wunused-variable on a static global initialized with another

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71456 egallager at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug sanitizer/78267] libsanitizer breaks bootstrap on x86_64-apple-darwin16 at r241977

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78267 egallager at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c/81500] New: ice with -O3 in process_use, at tree-vect-stmts.c:506

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81500 Bug ID: 81500 Summary: ice with -O3 in process_use, at tree-vect-stmts.c:506 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug go/81393] Bootstrap failure on s390x-linux while building libgo against recent glibc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81393 --- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #12) > That is better, syscall_linux_s390.go already compiles, but > syscall_linux_s390x.go still doesn't: > ../../../libgo/go/syscall/syscall_linux_s390x.go:28:3:

[Bug c++/81147] [avr] C++ for -mmcu=atmega2560 doesn't do NRVO or RVO when class inherits from empty base

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81147 --- Comment #7 from Georg-Johann Lay --- With your options (no -fverbose-asm for brevity), avr-gcc from trunk gives me _Z3abcv: push r28 ; 19 pushqi1/1 [length = 1] push r29 ; 20 pushqi1/1 [length

[Bug go/81393] Bootstrap failure on s390x-linux while building libgo against recent glibc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81393 --- Comment #17 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ian Date: Thu Jul 20 22:03:48 2017 New Revision: 250403 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250403=gcc=rev Log: PR go/81393 syscall: don't use GETREGS/SETREGS on s390 They were

[Bug go/81393] Bootstrap failure on s390x-linux while building libgo against recent glibc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81393 --- Comment #18 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ian Date: Thu Jul 20 22:04:02 2017 New Revision: 250404 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250404=gcc=rev Log: PR go/81393 syscall: don't use GETREGS/SETREGS on s390 They were

[Bug go/81393] Bootstrap failure on s390x-linux while building libgo against recent glibc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81393 --- Comment #16 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ian Date: Thu Jul 20 22:03:26 2017 New Revision: 250402 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250402=gcc=rev Log: PR go/81393 syscall: don't use GETREGS/SETREGS on s390 They were