https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81894
--- Comment #3 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Sat Aug 19 08:22:54 2017
New Revision: 251198
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251198=gcc=rev
Log:
PR target/81894
* doc/extend.texi (x86 Built-in Functions):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81894
--- Comment #5 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Sat Aug 19 08:25:14 2017
New Revision: 251200
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251200=gcc=rev
Log:
PR target/81894
* doc/extend.texi (x86 Built-in Functions):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81894
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81894
--- Comment #4 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Sat Aug 19 08:23:56 2017
New Revision: 251199
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251199=gcc=rev
Log:
PR target/81894
* doc/extend.texi (x86 Built-in Functions):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81894
--- Comment #2 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Sat Aug 19 08:20:20 2017
New Revision: 251197
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251197=gcc=rev
Log:
PR target/81894
* doc/extend.texi (x86 Built-in Functions):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81886
--- Comment #5 from Tom de Vries ---
AFAICT, this is the last version of the patch that was submitted:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-10/msg01771.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80529
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52801
--- Comment #2 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #1)
> Confirmed that the notes could ease up on the template spew; g++ output is
> now:
Note that I'm not complaining about the redundant notes listing the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81334
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||easyhack
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53037
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81899
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
nu --disable-bootstrap
--enable-languages=c
Thread model: posix
gcc version 8.0.0 20170819 (experimental) (GCC)
COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS='-B'
'/home/pip/git/asmjs/subrepos/gcc/host-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/gcc/' '-v' '-S' '-D'
'PERL_CORE' '-fwrapv' '-std=c90' '-O3' '-fno-strict-aliasing' '-w'
'-Wfatal-errors
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80650
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79701
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53431
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||damien at iwi dot me
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80472
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81899
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70879
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Macleod ---
oops, wasnt meant to actually attach that note to this PR.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81787
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81899
Bug ID: 81899
Summary: [8 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53431
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||akim.demaille at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80472
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||easyhack
--- Comment #3 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81900
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpelinux at gmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53215
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78387
--- Comment #11 from Jerry DeLisle ---
After thinking about this, I think I have a better idea which gets rid of the
stash completely and will avoid allocating a unit structure for internal units.
To accomplish this, I intend to pass the string,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52202
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53037
--- Comment #32 from Eric Botcazou ---
> Sparc defines STRICT_ALIGNMENT which leads to
>
> unsigned mode_align = GET_MODE_ALIGNMENT (TYPE_MODE (type));
>
> /* Don't override a larger alignment requirement coming from a user
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53360
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81863
--- Comment #7 from Arnd Bergmann ---
Created attachment 42009
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42009=edit
preprocessed net/rds/recv.i
(In reply to ard.biesheuvel from comment #6)
> FWIW, the following makes the issue go
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53037
--- Comment #33 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #32)
> > Sparc defines STRICT_ALIGNMENT which leads to
> >
> > unsigned mode_align = GET_MODE_ALIGNMENT (TYPE_MODE (type));
> >
> > /* Don't override a larger
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81903
Bug ID: 81903
Summary: compiler reports a language problem (Invalid character
in name at)
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53506
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39679
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52801
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #2)
> (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #1)
> > Confirmed that the notes could ease up on the template spew; g++ output is
> > now:
>
> Note that I'm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81900
--- Comment #2 from Mikael Pettersson ---
Started with r250767.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81794
--- Comment #3 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #2)
> Please can you turn it into a patch that contains both the fix *and* the new
> testcase? (e.g. gcc.dg/pragma-diag-8.c)
I will once I get some issues with my
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81895
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52953
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
--- Comment #2 from Mateusz Nowotynski ---
I also experienced this bug on gcc (Gentoo 6.4.0 p1.0) 6.4.0 and gcc (GCC)
8.0.0 20170819 (experimental). On version 6.4 it results in never ending
compilation and on 8.0 it trigers same error as @KevinCox.
Whats more for me it looks like regrsion since my code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81902
Bug ID: 81902
Summary: new -fsanitize=pointer-overflow option undocumented
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: documentation
Severity: normal
40 matches
Mail list logo
