[Bug target/81863] [7 regression] -mword-relocations is unreliable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81863 --- Comment #17 from Ramana Radhakrishnan --- (In reply to Arnd Bergmann from comment #0) > Created attachment 41989 [details] > preprocessed linux/mm/shmem.c file, compressed > > I ran into a few files in the linux kernel that while building

[Bug middle-end/82407] [8 Regression][meta-bug] qsort_chk fallout tracking

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82407 Bug 82407 depends on bug 82396, which changed state. Bug 82396 Summary: [8 Regression] qsort comparator non-negative on sorted output: 4 in ready_sort_real in haifa scheduler https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82396 What

[Bug rtl-optimization/82396] [8 Regression] qsort comparator non-negative on sorted output: 4 in ready_sort_real in haifa scheduler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82396 Steve Ellcey changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug c++/82405] Function not inlined for switch and suboptimal assembly is generated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82405 --- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski --- Thinking about this some more, this is a not a hoisting problem but a sinking problem. basically we have: int f(void); int h(void); int g(int a) { if (a) return f() + 10; return h() + 10; } Which

[Bug ipa/67368] Inlining failed due to no_sanitize_address and always_inline conflict

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67368 Loïc Yhuel changed: What|Removed |Added CC||loic.yhuel at gmail dot com --- Comment #4

[Bug tree-optimization/82405] Function not inlined for switch and suboptimal assembly is generated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82405 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug c++/54367] [meta-bug] lambda expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367 Bug 54367 depends on bug 71946, which changed state. Bug 71946 Summary: asm in toplevel lambda function rejected https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71946 What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/82409] Superflous pxor instructions in the generated assembly.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82409 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||antoshkka at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug target/82430] [5/6/7/8 Regression] Suboptimal code generated because of unnecessary "pxor xmm0, xmm0"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82430 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/82396] [8 Regression] qsort comparator non-negative on sorted output: 4 in ready_sort_real in haifa scheduler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82396 --- Comment #9 from Wilco --- Author: wilco Date: Wed Oct 4 16:40:44 2017 New Revision: 253419 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253419=gcc=rev Log: Revert r253399: PR rtl-optimization/82396 * haifa-sched.c

[Bug c++/71946] asm in toplevel lambda function rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71946 --- Comment #8 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Wed Oct 4 17:21:21 2017 New Revision: 253423 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253423=gcc=rev Log: /cp 2017-10-04 Paolo Carlini

[Bug ada/82393] Compilation error on cygwin64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82393 --- Comment #6 from Didier G --- Created attachment 42303 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42303=edit Trace of check ada runtests

[Bug ada/82393] Compilation error on cygwin64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82393 --- Comment #7 from Didier G --- Attached, the trace of ada run tests. Please, feel free to inform me about output files to watch. I will do my best to review and report them. Best Regards, Didier. PS : Do you know we certainly live separated

[Bug other/82368] [8 regression] with r253275 several new test cases in libbacktrace fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82368 --- Comment #6 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- The title is correct, the new failures did show up starting with r253275. I mistyped it in my description and there doesn't appear to be a way to update that, sorry.

[Bug c++/82406] [7 Regression] Rejects a valid snippet

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82406 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/80767] Eager instantiation of generic lambda body when not required

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80767 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/80935] [C++1z] incorrect error 'uninitialized variable in constexpr function' when conditionally declaring variable inside lambda inside template class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80935 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug driver/31350] gcc -v --help puts some output on std. out, and some on std. error.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31350 Ladislas de Toldi changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ladislas at leka dot io --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/82429] strcpy to stpcpy transformation disabled in strict mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82429 --- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- Strictly, that a program declares stpcpy should be irrelevant if the declaration is outside system headers, because it could declare and define it for some other purpose (even if the

[Bug c++/70029] [8 Regression] ICE with C++11 and -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70029 --- Comment #17 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed Oct 4 17:47:08 2017 New Revision: 253424 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253424=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/82406 - C++17 error with noexcept function type PR

[Bug c++/82406] [7 Regression] Rejects a valid snippet

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82406 --- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed Oct 4 17:47:08 2017 New Revision: 253424 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253424=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/82406 - C++17 error with noexcept function type PR

[Bug c++/82406] [7 Regression] Rejects a valid snippet

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82406 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed Oct 4 17:47:51 2017 New Revision: 253425 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253425=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/82406 - C++17 error with noexcept function type *

[Bug c++/81236] Crash when calling a template member function from generic lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81236 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/82373] syntax error in error message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82373 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Oct 4 16:15:36 2017 New Revision: 253418 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253418=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/82373 * error.c (dump_function_decl): If show_return, call

[Bug tree-optimization/82369] "optimizes" indexed addressing back into two pointer increments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82369 --- Comment #3 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- Given IR dump before IVOPTs: [15.00%] [count: INV]: _1 = dst_12(D) + bytes_13(D); end_dst_14 = (uintptr_t) _1; srcu_16 = (uintptr_t) src_15(D); dstu_17 = (uintptr_t) dst_12(D); _2 =

[Bug tree-optimization/82369] "optimizes" indexed addressing back into two pointer increments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82369 --- Comment #4 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- Hmm, with expansion, IVOPTs can find address type uses as: Group 0: Type: ADDRESS Use 0.0: At stmt:_25 = *_6; At pos: *_6 IV struct: Type: const __m128i_u *

[Bug c++/71946] asm in toplevel lambda function rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71946 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/81525] [7 Regression] Invalid codegen with constexpr variable template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81525 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/82430] [5/6/7/8 Regression] Suboptimal code generated because of unnecessary "pxor xmm0, xmm0"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82430 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug c++/81525] [7 Regression] Invalid codegen with constexpr variable template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81525 --- Comment #11 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed Oct 4 15:38:24 2017 New Revision: 253415 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253415=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/81525 - broken handling of auto in generic lambda. * pt.c

[Bug ada/82393] Compilation error on cygwin64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82393 --- Comment #10 from Eric Botcazou --- > PS : Do you know we certainly live separated by 3,5 km at Toulouse City ? > I live at 35, rue Edmond Rostand 31200 ... :-) OK, this is a small world. :-)

[Bug c++/80471] (gcc extension) Forwarding-reference `auto` function parameters do not follow the same rules as template functions or generic lambdas

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80471 --- Comment #1 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Wed Oct 4 21:25:20 2017 New Revision: 253432 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253432=gcc=rev Log: 2017-10-04 Paolo Carlini PR

[Bug c++/80471] (gcc extension) Forwarding-reference `auto` function parameters do not follow the same rules as template functions or generic lambdas

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80471 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/78018] [C++14] "internal compiler error: Segmentation fault" with templates and lambdas

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78018 --- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Wed Oct 4 20:34:03 2017 New Revision: 253430 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253430=gcc=rev Log: 2017-10-04 Paolo Carlini PR

[Bug c++/78131] Inconsistent evaluation for `constexpr` lambdas in templates between `static_assert`, `if constexpr(…)` and `constexpr` variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78131 --- Comment #1 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Wed Oct 4 20:58:52 2017 New Revision: 253431 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253431=gcc=rev Log: 2017-10-04 Paolo Carlini PR

[Bug c++/54367] [meta-bug] lambda expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367 Bug 54367 depends on bug 78018, which changed state. Bug 78018 Summary: [C++14] "internal compiler error: Segmentation fault" with templates and lambdas https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78018 What|Removed

[Bug c++/78018] [C++14] "internal compiler error: Segmentation fault" with templates and lambdas

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78018 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|andipeer at

[Bug c++/78131] Inconsistent evaluation for `constexpr` lambdas in templates between `static_assert`, `if constexpr(…)` and `constexpr` variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78131 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ada/82393] Compilation error on cygwin64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82393 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug ada/82393] Compilation error on cygwin64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82393 --- Comment #9 from Eric Botcazou --- > Trace of check ada runtests You can do 'make mail-report.log' after 'make -k check' to have a report. The results are acceptable although gnat.dg/entry_queues.adb and c380004, which probably come from

<    1   2