[Bug tree-optimization/80788] [8 Regression] ICE in set_value_range, at tree-vrp.c:252

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80788 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug target/80881] [7/8 Regression] null pointer access in libgomp.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80881 --- Comment #5 from jyong at gcc dot gnu.org --- Can you post the full backtrace? Meanwhile, I'll setup gcc with --enable-tls and give this a try.

[Bug target/58693] GCC aarch64 arm_neon.h missing intrinsics from ACLE 2.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58693 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug tree-optimization/83177] [7/8 Regression] ICE with -mmpx -fcheck-pointer-bounds + __builtin___bnd_narrow_ptr_bounds + _setjmp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83177 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-*-*, i?86-*-*

[Bug target/81616] Update -mtune=generic for the current Intel and AMD processors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81616 --- Comment #14 from Andrew Roberts --- It would be nice if znver1 for -march and -mtune could be improved before the gcc 8 release. At present -march=znver1 -mtune=znver1 looks be to about the worst thing you could do, and not just on this

[Bug ipa/83178] New: [8 regression] g++.dg/ipa/devirt-22.C fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83178 Bug ID: 83178 Summary: [8 regression] g++.dg/ipa/devirt-22.C fail Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: ipa

[Bug ipa/83179] [8 regression] gcc.dg/ipa/inline-1.c fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83179 --- Comment #1 from Andrey Guskov --- g++.dg/pr79095-4.C also affected: spawn -ignore SIGHUP /work/gcc/testsuite/g++2/../../xg++ -B/work/gcc/testsuite/g++2/../../ /source/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr79095-4.C -fno-diagnostics-show-caret

[Bug ipa/83179] [8 regression] gcc.dg/ipa/inline-1.c fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83179 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/83158] [8 regression] gcc.target/i386/pr78057.c fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83158 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Indeed it's related. We now have range-info for x_16 = x_15(D) + 2; and thus: Visiting conditional with predicate: if (x_16 == 0) With known ranges x_16: [-2147483646, +INF] ... Intersecting

[Bug target/58693] GCC aarch64 arm_neon.h missing intrinsics from ACLE 2.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58693 --- Comment #6 from Tamar Christina --- Sorry, I phrased it incorrectly, I meant to say, bug #71233 should supersede this one. As in deed it has more details and is more up to date.

[Bug c++/81675] [6/7/8 Regression] attribute(noreturn) of destructor in :? not honored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81675 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Nov 27 13:13:22 2017 New Revision: 255167 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255167=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/81675 * cp-gimplify.c (cp_fold) : Don't return immediately

[Bug target/82066] #pragma GCC target documentation does not say it is implemented for aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82066 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug tree-optimization/65930] Reduction with sign-change not handled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65930 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Created attachment 42730 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42730=edit WIP patch What I have sitting in my tree. Steps to make this clean is 1) refactor things to record the original

[Bug tree-optimization/80198] [6/7/8 Regression] does not vectorize generic inplace integer operation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80198 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- Jeff, any progress with this?

[Bug target/58693] GCC aarch64 arm_neon.h missing intrinsics from ACLE 2.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58693 Christophe Lyon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/58693] GCC aarch64 arm_neon.h missing intrinsics from ACLE 2.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58693 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/71233] [ARM, AArch64] missing AdvSIMD intrinsics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71233 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lennox at cs dot columbia.edu ---

[Bug middle-end/80929] [6/7/8 Regression] Division with constant no more optimized to mult highpart

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80929 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 42729 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42729=edit gcc8-pr80929.patch Like this untested patch.

[Bug ipa/83179] New: [8 regression] gcc.dg/ipa/inline-1.c fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83179 Bug ID: 83179 Summary: [8 regression] gcc.dg/ipa/inline-1.c fail Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: ipa

[Bug target/81616] Update -mtune=generic for the current Intel and AMD processors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81616 --- Comment #13 from Jan Hubicka --- > So is this option still helping with the latest microcode? Not in this case at > least. It is on my TODO list to re-benchmark 256bit vectorization for Zen. I do not think microcode is a big difference

[Bug middle-end/80929] [6/7/8 Regression] Division with constant no more optimized to mult highpart

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80929 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #8

[Bug target/83158] [8 regression] gcc.target/i386/pr78057.c fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83158 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug middle-end/83164] [8 regression] internal compiler error: verify_gimple failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83164 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #8

[Bug gcov-profile/79392] MinGW-w64 backend: programs built with --coverage do not create *.gcda files

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79392 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|WAITING Resolution|WORKSFORME

[Bug fortran/83183] New: Out of memory with option -finit-derived

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83183 Bug ID: 83183 Summary: Out of memory with option -finit-derived Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug c++/82336] [6/7/8 Regression] GCC requires but does not emit defaulted constructors in certain cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82336 --- Comment #3 from Nathan Sidwell --- When checking the default arg during parsing, we perform an implicit conversion inside an unevaluated_operand context. That's needed to fix 54198, where an ill-formed instantiation occurs otherwise.

[Bug tree-optimization/80198] [6/7/8 Regression] does not vectorize generic inplace integer operation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80198 --- Comment #10 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Yea. The code that was recording NAME = NAME conditional equivalences was largely disabled back in August. They'll only be recorded now if one name is cheaper to compute than the other. So if the

[Bug fortran/78238] [7/8 Regression] [OOP] ICE: verify_gimple failed, with -fdefault-integer-8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78238 G. Steinmetz changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gs...@t-online.de ---

[Bug ipa/83179] [8 regression] gcc.dg/ipa/inline-1.c fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83179 --- Comment #5 from Martin Jambor --- Andrey, what makes you think that the g++.dg/pr79095-4.C and regex.c issues are related to dump scan failure of ipa/inline-1.c?

[Bug target/81616] Update -mtune=generic for the current Intel and AMD processors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81616 --- Comment #15 from Jan Hubicka --- > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81616 > > --- Comment #14 from Andrew Roberts --- > It would be nice if znver1 for -march and -mtune could be improved before the > gcc 8 release. At present

[Bug target/81616] Update -mtune=generic for the current Intel and AMD processors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81616 --- Comment #17 from Andrew Roberts --- The general consensus in userland is that the znver1 optimization is much worse than 0.5%, or even 2% off. Most people are using -march=haswell if they care about performance. Just taking one part of one

[Bug c/83180] New: MINGW: Linking to libpq.dll produced with MSVC-x64 generates invalid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83180 Bug ID: 83180 Summary: MINGW: Linking to libpq.dll produced with MSVC-x64 generates invalid code Product: gcc Version: 7.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug tree-optimization/82604] [8 Regression] SPEC CPU2006 410.bwaves ~50% performance regression with trunk@253679 when ftree-parallelize-loops is used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82604 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7

[Bug tree-optimization/82604] [8 Regression] SPEC CPU2006 410.bwaves ~50% performance regression with trunk@253679 when ftree-parallelize-loops is used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82604 --- Comment #8 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7) > The #c5 approach sounds better to me, we can have memsets in the IL even > from the user, so would be nice if we handled those in the dr analysis too.

[Bug tree-optimization/46186] Clang creates code running 1600 times faster than gcc's

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46186 AK changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hiraditya at msn dot com --- Comment #27 from AK

[Bug fortran/83183] Out of memory with option -finit-derived

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83183 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/83170] ice in verify_use with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83170 Sunil Pandey changed: What|Removed |Added CC||skpgkp1 at gmail dot com --- Comment #3

[Bug target/83158] [8 regression] gcc.target/i386/pr78057.c fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83158 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Or rather && ((TYPE_PRECISION (TREE_TYPE (*vr0min)) >= TYPE_PRECISION (integer_type_node)) || POINTER_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (*vr0min)))

[Bug ipa/83179] [8 regression] gcc.dg/ipa/inline-1.c fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83179 --- Comment #3 from Martin Jambor --- Started with Honza's r255103.

[Bug rtl-optimization/81019] [6/7/8 Regression] wrong code with -O -fno-tree-ccp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81019 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug bootstrap/81470] [8 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failures in gcc/ada

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81470 --- Comment #6 from Rainer Emrich --- (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #5) > r247301 is the switch to native exceptions for the compiler proper and we > know that this works on 64-bit Windows. How do you

[Bug rtl-optimization/81020] [6/7/8 Regression] wrong code with -O -fno-tree-bit-ccp -fno-tree-coalesce-vars -fno-tree-vrp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81020 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug c/83172] -Wstack-size= doesn't detect the correct stack size with VLA or alloca

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83172 --- Comment #2 from Hao Hou --- (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #1) > What happens for -Wvla-larger-than= if you use -O0 or -O1 instead of -O3? The same result: $ gcc-7 -Wvla-larger-than=128 -Wstack-usage=102400 -O0 -c t.c t.c: In

[Bug c/83180] MINGW: Linking to libpq.dll produced with MSVC-x64 generates invalid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83180 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- I suspect this is a binutils bug and should be reported to them (https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ ).

[Bug c++/83181] New: [C++17] Invalid deduction guide accepted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83181 Bug ID: 83181 Summary: [C++17] Invalid deduction guide accepted Product: gcc Version: 7.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: accepts-invalid Severity: normal

[Bug other/83182] New: undefined behavior in generic_wide_int due to missing input validation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83182 Bug ID: 83182 Summary: undefined behavior in generic_wide_int due to missing input validation Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug bootstrap/81470] [8 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failures in gcc/ada

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81470 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/83185] New: ICE with -fsanitize=address in build_simple_mem_ref_loc, at tree.c:4696

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83185 Bug ID: 83185 Summary: ICE with -fsanitize=address in build_simple_mem_ref_loc, at tree.c:4696 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/83184] Out of memory or ICE with option -fdec

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83184 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/81616] Update -mtune=generic for the current Intel and AMD processors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81616 --- Comment #16 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #13) > > So is this option still helping with the latest microcode? Not in this case > > at > > least. > > It is on my TODO list to re-benchmark 256bit vectorization

[Bug middle-end/83164] [8 regression] internal compiler error: verify_gimple failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83164 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug middle-end/83069] [8 Regression] internal compiler error: in from_gcov_type, at profile-count.h:676

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83069 Andrey Guskov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andrey.y.guskov at intel dot com ---

[Bug ipa/83179] [8 regression] gcc.dg/ipa/inline-1.c fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83179 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0

[Bug ipa/83178] [8 regression] g++.dg/ipa/devirt-22.C fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83178 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0

[Bug middle-end/83164] [8 regression] internal compiler error: verify_gimple failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83164 --- Comment #7 from David Malcolm --- BZ mangled the underline a bit in comment #6; the caret is on the '-' character, like this simplified version: thunk->callback = LHS - RHS; ^

[Bug bootstrap/83163] bootstrap comparison failure with --enable-languages=all,jit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83163 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Host|

[Bug preprocessor/83173] C preprocessor generates incorrect linemarkers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83173 --- Comment #1 from Mike Gulick --- Just a minor update. I re-tested the reproducer on gcc 5.4 as well as 4.9.2, and the issue is present in both of those. I had originally thought the bug was not present in gcc 5.4 or earlier, however this is

[Bug c/83172] -Wstack-size= doesn't detect the correct stack size with VLA or alloca

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83172 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/83184] New: Out of memory or ICE with option -fdec

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83184 Bug ID: 83184 Summary: Out of memory or ICE with option -fdec Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug c/83180] MINGW: Linking to libpq.dll produced with MSVC-x64 generates invalid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83180 --- Comment #1 from Lars Kanis --- Created attachment 42732 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42732=edit The DLL in question produced by MSVC

[Bug ipa/83179] [8 regression] gcc.dg/ipa/inline-1.c fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83179 --- Comment #4 from Andrey Guskov --- 32-bit SPEC CPU2017::507/607 also affected: during GIMPLE pass: vect gnu/regex.c: In function 'regexec.constprop': gnu/regex.c:5751:1: internal compiler error: in vectorizable_mask_load_store, at

[Bug rtl-optimization/81019] [6/7/8 Regression] wrong code with -O -fno-tree-ccp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81019 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/81470] [8 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failures in gcc/ada

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81470 --- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou --- And what's the output of 'gcc -v' for the base compiler?

[Bug middle-end/83069] [8 Regression] internal compiler error: in from_gcov_type, at profile-count.h:676

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83069 Sudakshina Das changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sudi.das at arm dot com --- Comment #9

[Bug middle-end/83069] [8 Regression] internal compiler error: in from_gcov_type, at profile-count.h:676

from Sunil Pandey --- Seems like I hit the same bug while compiling mariadb with GCC8. $cat CMap.i.cc void a() { int b = 0; for (; b < 256; ++b) a(); } $g++ --version g++ (GCC) 8.0.0 20171127 (experimental) Copyright (C) 2017 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software;

[Bug c++/83186] New: [8 regression] internal compiler error: in build_address, at cp/typeck.c:5667

WDate.i.C class a { operator unsigned(); }; template void b() { static_cast(a{}); } $g++ --version g++ (GCC) 8.0.0 20171127 (experimental) Copyright (C) 2017 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO warranty; not even

[Bug fortran/83076] [8 Regression] ICE in gfc_deallocate_scalar_with_status, at fortran/trans.c:1598

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83076 --- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas --- Created attachment 42733 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42733=edit A partial fix for the PR This fixes the testcase and, indeed, some more elaborate versions. However,

[Bug c++/80916] Spurious "declared 'static' but never defined" warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80916 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ipa/83179] [8 regression] gcc.dg/ipa/inline-1.c fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83179 --- Comment #6 from Andrey Guskov --- Simple. Those fails are due to the same revision. I decided not to create a truckload of separate bugs (there`s also a chance that there are more cases to come, as 3 CPU2006 regressions are still not done

[Bug tree-optimization/83055] [8 Regression] ICE in operator>, at profile-count.h:834

from Sunil Pandey --- This bug also appear during Linux kernel build from LFS with GCC 8. Work fine with GCC 7. $cat main.i.c void __attribute__((__cold__)) a(void); void b(void); __attribute__((noinline)) c(void) { a(); } d(void) { b(); c(); } $gcc --version gcc (GCC) 8.0.0 20171127

[Bug c++/69638] array out of bounds access accepted in constexpr function invocation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69638 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug c++/83187] New: [8 regression] internal compiler error: in get_alias_set, at alias.c:923

cos(double); double sin(double); } template class a; template <> struct a { typedef __complex__ b; a(double c, double p2) : k{c, p2} {} b k; }; typedef double d; d e; class f { a g; void h(); }; void f::h() { const d i = e; g = a(cos(e), sin(e)); } $g++ --version g++ (GCC

[Bug c/83172] -Wstack-size= doesn't detect the correct stack size with VLA or alloca

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83172 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou

[Bug rtl-optimization/80818] LRA clobbers live hard reg clobbered during rematerialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80818 --- Comment #9 from Vladimir Makarov --- (In reply to Andreas Krebbel from comment #8) > Hi Vladimir. What do you think about the additional patch? Andreas, sorry for the delay with the answer. The patch looks reasonable for me. If your

[Bug c/83180] MINGW: Linking to libpq.dll produced with MSVC-x64 generates invalid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83180 Lars Kanis changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c/83172] -Wstack-size= doesn't detect the correct stack size with VLA or alloca

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83172 --- Comment #4 from Hao Hou --- (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #3) > > The same result: > > > > $ gcc-7 -Wvla-larger-than=128 -Wstack-usage=102400 -O0 -c t.c > > t.c: In function ‘stack_usage_only’: > > t.c:23:5: warning: stack usage

[Bug middle-end/82333] [8 Regression] powerpc64le _Float128 ICE in as_a, at machmode.h:345

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82333 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/45975] template keyword is not allowed, however, accepted by g++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45975 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid CC|

[Bug c++/70834] Incorrect warning for placement new when conditionally used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70834 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||6.4.0, 7.2.0, 8.0 --- Comment #6 from

[Bug c++/81888] [7 Regression] Structured bindings stopped working

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81888 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[7/8 Regression] Structured |[7 Regression] Structured

[Bug c++/81888] [7/8 Regression] Structured bindings stopped working

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81888 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Nov 27 21:54:25 2017 New Revision: 255180 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255180=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/81888 * parser.c (cp_parser_decomposition_declaration):

[Bug ada/83188] New: A class-wide type is considered different than itself

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83188 Bug ID: 83188 Summary: A class-wide type is considered different than itself Product: gcc Version: 7.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: rejects-valid Severity: normal

[Bug c++/83160] [8 regression] lvalue required as unary ‘&’ operand

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83160 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c++/69638] array out of bounds access accepted in constexpr function invocation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69638 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|2016-02-02

[Bug tree-optimization/81248] No ipa-sra optimization for small struct / class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81248 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/80881] [7/8 Regression] null pointer access in libgomp.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80881 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jyong at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug middle-end/80926] [7/8 Regression] longjmp not treated as noreturn during CFG build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80926 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug testsuite/83155] [8 regression] test-error-array-bounds.c.exe fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83155 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/83192] New: ICE for printing derived type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83192 Bug ID: 83192 Summary: ICE for printing derived type Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug driver/83193] New: Help for invalid -march= options from cc1 omits -march=native on x86-64, arm. aarch64, output also inconsistent

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83193 Bug ID: 83193 Summary: Help for invalid -march= options from cc1 omits -march=native on x86-64, arm. aarch64, output also inconsistent Product: gcc Version: 8.0

[Bug bootstrap/81470] [8 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failures in gcc/ada

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81470 --- Comment #4 from Rainer Emrich --- Unfortunately the issue persists. There are even more failures. Comparing stages 2 and 3 Bootstrap comparison failure! gcc/ada/ali-util.o differs gcc/ada/ali.o differs

[Bug fortran/83148] [8 regression] ICE: crash_signal from toplev.c:325

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83148 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0

[Bug target/83156] [8 regression] gcc.target/i386/pr82361-1.c fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83156 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0

[Bug target/83100] [8 Regression] powerpc: internal compiler error: in get_variable_section, at varasm.c:1150 with -fdata-sections

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83100 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Nov 27 08:34:50 2017 New Revision: 255160 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255160=gcc=rev Log: PR target/83100 * varasm.c (bss_initializer_p): Return true for

[Bug testsuite/83155] [8 regression] test-error-array-bounds.c.exe fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83155 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0

[Bug tree-optimization/83177] New: ICE with -mmpx -fcheck-pointer-bounds + __builtin___bnd_narrow_ptr_bounds + _setjmp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83177 Bug ID: 83177 Summary: ICE with -mmpx -fcheck-pointer-bounds + __builtin___bnd_narrow_ptr_bounds + _setjmp Product: gcc Version: 7.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/83177] ICE with -mmpx -fcheck-pointer-bounds + __builtin___bnd_narrow_ptr_bounds + _setjmp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83177 --- Comment #1 from Paul Eggert --- Created attachment 42727 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42727=edit Compiler output generated for crash on v.i

[Bug libfortran/83168] FAIL: gfortran.dg/fmt_f0_2.f90 with a sanitized libgfortran

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83168 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug other/83150] GCC's internal use of `abort`is unsafe in several ways

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83150 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- There's a dup about the calling of async unsafe functions during internal error handling, PR28859.

[Bug debug/83157] [8 regression] gcc.dg/guality/pr41616-1.c fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83157 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener

  1   2   >