[Bug middle-end/83653] [6/7/8 Regression] GCC fails to remove a can't-happen call on ia64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83653 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/81703] memcpy folding defeats strlen optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81703 --- Comment #2 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: prathamesh3492 Date: Thu Jan 11 04:37:48 2018 New Revision: 256475 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256475=gcc=rev Log: 2018-01-11 Martin Sebor

[Bug target/83781] [8 Regression] Bootstrap failed on x86 with --with-arch=corei7 --with-cpu=corei7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83781 --- Comment #8 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Thu Jan 11 05:13:57 2018 New Revision: 256477 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256477=gcc=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/83781 - Bootstrap failed on x86 with --with-arch=corei7

[Bug c/83782] New: Inconsistent address for hidden ifunc in a shared library

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83782 Bug ID: 83782 Summary: Inconsistent address for hidden ifunc in a shared library Product: gcc Version: 7.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/83784] New: Missed optimization with bitfield

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83784 Bug ID: 83784 Summary: Missed optimization with bitfield Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug c++/83778] [8 regression] g++.dg/ext/altivec-cell-2.C fails starting with r256448

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83778 --- Comment #2 from David Malcolm --- Presumably we should simply strip the location from arg, though there are some places with: /* Call get_element_number to validate arg1 if it is a constant. */ if (TREE_CODE (arg1) == INTEGER_CST)

[Bug middle-end/83653] [6/7/8 Regression] GCC fails to remove a can't-happen call on ia64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83653 --- Comment #5 from Matthew Wilcox --- Hi Aldy! Thanks for looking into this. Yes, I agree, there's no way that GCC can know this is a constant, but that *should* have been taken care of. Please pardon me copying and pasting from the original

[Bug c++/83778] [8 regression] g++.dg/ext/altivec-cell-2.C fails starting with r256448

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83778 --- Comment #1 from David Malcolm --- It does look like an issue with r256448, but I haven't been able to reproduce it here yet. There are 3 in-tree copies of get_element_number, in 3 backends; each has 2 users per backend; they all look like:

[Bug tree-optimization/81703] memcpy folding defeats strlen optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81703 prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/83781] [8 Regression] Bootstrap failed on x86 with --with-arch=corei7 --with-cpu=corei7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83781 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Component|target

[Bug c/83781] New: [8 Regression] Bootstrap failed on x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83781 Bug ID: 83781 Summary: [8 Regression] Bootstrap failed on x86 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug target/83781] [8 Regression] Bootstrap failed on x86 with --with-arch=corei7 --with-cpu=corei7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83781 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug target/83768] ARM: wrong optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83768 --- Comment #2 from Sergey Organov --- 4.8.3 doesn't have the issue, and I don't have fast access to any 4.9. So presumably it has been fixed between 5.4.0 and 5.4.1... It'd still be nice to know if there is some optimization switch in 5.4.0

[Bug target/83781] [8 Regression] Bootstrap failed on x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83781 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build, diagnostic Target|

[Bug target/83781] [8 Regression] Bootstrap failed on x86 with --with-arch=corei7 --with-cpu=corei7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83781 --- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor --- The gcc/hsa-dump.c warning doesn't seem to correspond to the latest sources. hsa_seg_name() returns one of a number of short strings, the longest being "UNKNOWN_SEGMENT" but the warning says the %s argument

[Bug c++/83780] New: False positive alignment error with -fsanitize=undefined with virtual base

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83780 Bug ID: 83780 Summary: False positive alignment error with -fsanitize=undefined with virtual base Product: gcc Version: 7.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug target/83781] [8 Regression] Bootstrap failed on x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83781 --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor --- Created attachment 43093 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43093=edit x86_64-linux tests summary. My x864_64 bootstrap and regression test run of the patch succeeded with the attached test

[Bug target/83781] [8 Regression] Bootstrap failed on x86 with --with-arch=corei7 --with-cpu=corei7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83781 --- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor --- Created attachment 43094 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43094=edit Preliminary patch. I'm testing the attached patch.

[Bug tree-optimization/83501] [8 Regression] strlen(a) not folded after strcpy(a, "...")

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83501 --- Comment #8 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: prathamesh3492 Date: Thu Jan 11 04:37:48 2018 New Revision: 256475 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256475=gcc=rev Log: 2018-01-11 Martin Sebor

[Bug libstdc++/83709] Inserting duplicates into an unordered associative containers causes the container to invalidate iterators

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83709 François Dumont changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/83532] [8 Regression] ICE in apply_scale, at profile-count.h:955

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83532 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/83008] [performance] Is it better to avoid extra instructions in data passing between loops?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83008 --- Comment #22 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 10 Jan 2018, sergey.shalnov at intel dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83008 > > --- Comment #21 from sergey.shalnov at intel dot com --- > Thanks Richard

[Bug target/83008] [performance] Is it better to avoid extra instructions in data passing between loops?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83008 --- Comment #23 from Richard Biener --- Created attachment 43084 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43084=edit SLP costing for constants/externs improvement

[Bug target/83008] [performance] Is it better to avoid extra instructions in data passing between loops?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83008 --- Comment #22 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 10 Jan 2018, sergey.shalnov at intel dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83008 > > --- Comment #21 from sergey.shalnov at intel dot com --- > Thanks Richard

[Bug ada/83765] LTO bootstrap with Ada fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83765 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- Doesn't seem to work :/ I guess making the old_die && declaration more prevalent might work. Index: gcc/dwarf2out.c === --- gcc/dwarf2out.c

[Bug libstdc++/67632] explicit instantiation omits copy constructor and others

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67632 --- Comment #9 from Anthony Chuah --- Forgot to add: this bug exists also for clang 5.0.0. % clang++ -std=c++11 --gcc-toolchain=/path/to/gcc t.o x.cc /tmp/x-063634.o: In function `copy(std::unordered_map

[Bug c++/81702] [7/8 Regression] ICE in gimple_get_virt_method_for_vtable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81702 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lesliezhai at llvm dot org.cn ---

[Bug middle-end/83764] internal compiler error: in gimple_get_virt_method_for_vtable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83764 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/67632] explicit instantiation omits copy constructor and others

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67632 --- Comment #10 from Andreas Schwab --- *** Bug 83766 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/83766] Bug 67632 not fixed yet

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83766 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/83008] [performance] Is it better to avoid extra instructions in data passing between loops?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83008 --- Comment #25 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 10 Jan 2018, sergey.shalnov at intel dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83008 > > --- Comment #24 from sergey.shalnov at intel dot com --- > Richard, > The

[Bug target/83687] [6/7/8 Regression] ARM NEON invalid optimisation for vabd/vabdl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83687 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug debug/83765] LTO bootstrap with Ada fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83765 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Jan 10 14:23:29 2018 New Revision: 256428 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256428=gcc=rev Log: 2018-01-10 Richard Biener PR debug/83765

[Bug ipa/83054] [8 Regression] ICE in operator>, at profile-count.h:823

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83054 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/81657] [8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/20050503-1.c scan-assembler-not call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81657 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug tree-optimization/83055] [8 Regression] ICE in operator>, at profile-count.h:834

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83055 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #4) > One another test-case with a bit different back-trace: > > $ g++ > /home/marxin/Programming/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.mike/p789a.C > /dev/null

[Bug middle-end/82004] [8 Regression] SPEC CPU2017 628.pop2_s miscompare

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82004 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug lto/81968] [8 regression] early lto debug objects make Solaris ld SEGV

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81968 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug c++/81917] [6/7/8 Regression] internal compiler error: in finish_member_declaration, at cp/semantics.c:3004

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81917 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug debug/82425] [8 regression] gcc.dg/guality/inline-params-2.c fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82425 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug debug/82425] [8 regression] gcc.dg/guality/inline-params-2.c fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82425 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Jan 10 14:41:34 2018 New Revision: 256429 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256429=gcc=rev Log: 2018-01-10 Richard Biener PR debug/82425

[Bug target/82682] [8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr50038.c scan-assembler-times movzbl 2 (found 3 times) since r253958

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82682 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug c++/82249] [8 Regression] wrong mismatched argument pack lengths

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82249 --- Comment #5 from Benjamin Buch --- The code is accepted by clang since version 4.0. Older versions probably don't support constexpr lambdas.

[Bug tree-optimization/82965] [8 regression][armeb] gcc.dg/vect/pr79347.c starts failing after r254379

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82965 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/83043] [8 Regression] FAIL: libgomp.graphite/force-parallel-1.c scan-tree-dump-times graphite "2 loops carried no dependency" 1 (found 0 times)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83043 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug preprocessor/83063] [8 Regression] ICE on an invalid preprocessor snippet

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83063 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Version|unknown

[Bug ipa/83179] [8 regression] gcc.dg/ipa/inline-1.c fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83179 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug c++/83186] [8 regression] internal compiler error: in build_address, at cp/typeck.c:5667

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83186 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug tree-optimization/83189] [8 regression] internal compiler error: in probability_in, at profile-count.h:1050

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83189 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug target/68834] ICE: in decompose_normal_address, at rtlanal.c:6086 with -O2 -fPIC --param=sched-autopref-queue-depth=1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68834 --- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool --- Likely the same issue as pr83629 .

[Bug middle-end/83764] internal compiler error: in gimple_get_virt_method_for_vtable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83764 Adam Lackorzynski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||adam at os dot inf.tu-dresden.de

[Bug target/83760] [8 Regression] [SH] ICE in maybe_record_trace_start building glibc tst-copy_file_range.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83760 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/83761] bfin: ICE: in require, at machmode.h:292

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83761 --- Comment #1 from Sebastian Huber --- Created attachment 43086 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43086=edit Makefile to build the cross GCC Use make clone make install/bin/bfin-rtems5-ld

[Bug target/83008] [performance] Is it better to avoid extra instructions in data passing between loops?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83008 --- Comment #26 from sergey.shalnov at intel dot com --- Sorry, did you meant "arm_sve.h" on ARM? In this case we have machine specific code in common part of the gcc code. Should we make it as machine dependent callback function because having

[Bug bootstrap/82831] [8 Regression] Broken PGO bootstrap after r254379

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82831 --- Comment #31 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Wed Jan 10 10:54:20 2018 New Revision: 256422 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256422=gcc=rev Log: Clean up partitioning in try_optimize_cfg (PR bootstrap/82831). 2018-01-10

[Bug tree-optimization/81184] [8 regression] gcc.dg/pr21643.c and gcc.dg/tree-ssa/phi-opt-11.c fail starting with r249450

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81184 --- Comment #6 from Christophe Lyon --- Note that I posted a related patch some time ago: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-10/msg01477.html

[Bug tree-optimization/83753] ICE: in exact_div, at poly-int.h:2139

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83753 --- Comment #4 from Vidya Praveen --- Thanks for fixing this, Richard!

[Bug c++/81843] [8 Regression] ICE on valid C++11 code with variadic templates: in tsubst_pack_expansion, at cp/pt.c:11524

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81843 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug c++/82249] [8 Regression] wrong mismatched argument pack lengths

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82249 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|diagnostic |rejects-valid Priority|P3

[Bug c++/82514] [8 Regression] ICE: in operator[], at vec.h:749

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82514 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug tree-optimization/82604] [8 Regression] SPEC CPU2006 410.bwaves ~50% performance regression with trunk@253679 when ftree-parallelize-loops is used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82604 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/82728] [8 regression] Incorrect -Wunused-but-set-variable warning with a const

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82728 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug c/78768] -Walloca-larger-than and -Wformat-length warnings disabled by -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78768 --- Comment #13 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Jan 10 14:51:07 2018 New Revision: 256430 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256430=gcc=rev Log: 2018-01-10 Richard Biener PR testsuite/78768

[Bug sanitizer/82824] [8 regression] libsanitizer fails to build: VM_MEMORY_OS_ALLOC_ONCE undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82824 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug rtl-optimization/82982] [8 Regression] ICE: qsort checking failed (error: qsort comparator non-negative on sorted output: 5) in ready_sort_real in haifa scheduler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82982 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug boehm-gc/66848] boehm-gc fails test suite on x86_64-apple-darwin15

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66848 Andrew Haley changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug ipa/83051] [8 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3: in edge_badness, at ipa-inline.c:1024

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83051 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug ipa/83054] [8 Regression] ICE in operator>, at profile-count.h:823

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83054 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug tree-optimization/83081] [8 regression][arm] gcc.dg/pr80218.c fails since r254888

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83081 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug debug/83157] [6/7/8 regression] gcc.dg/guality/pr41616-1.c fail, inline instances refer to concrete instance as abstract origin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83157 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c++/83160] [8 regression] lvalue required as unary ‘&’ operand

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83160 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug target/83629] [7/8 Regression] ICE: in decompose_normal_address, at rtlanal.c:6329 with -O2 -fPIC -frename-registers --param=sched-autopref-queue-depth=nnn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83629 --- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool --- Author: segher Date: Wed Jan 10 15:13:07 2018 New Revision: 256432 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256432=gcc=rev Log: rs6000: Wrap diff of immediates in const (PR83629) In various of our 32-bit

[Bug target/83330] [7/8 Regression] generating unaligned store to stack for SSE register with -mno-push-args

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83330 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c++/83769] New: Statement expression inside lambda defined and evaluated in global scope fails to compile with optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83769 Bug ID: 83769 Summary: Statement expression inside lambda defined and evaluated in global scope fails to compile with optimizations Product: gcc Version: 4.8.2

[Bug target/81535] [8 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr79439.c fails starting with r250442

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81535 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Any further progress? I see you've posted something, but no further follow-ups from you nor Segher.

[Bug tree-optimization/81635] [8 Regression] nvptx SLP test cases regressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81635 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug target/82005] [8 regression] early lto debug creates invalid assembly on Darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82005 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug middle-end/82362] [8 Regression] SPEC CPU2006 436.cactusADM ~7% performance deviation with trunk@251713

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82362 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wilco at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug testsuite/82770] [8 regression] gcc.dg/pr78768.c xpass

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82770 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/81033] [8 Regression] Revision r249019 breaks bootstrap on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81033 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/83768] New: ARM: wrong optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83768 Bug ID: 83768 Summary: ARM: wrong optimization Product: gcc Version: 5.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug tree-optimization/83055] [8 Regression] ICE in operator>, at profile-count.h:834

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83055 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Version|7.0

[Bug lto/83121] [8 Regression] ICE: in linemap_ordinary_map_lookup, at libcpp/line-map.c:995

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83121 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug ipa/83178] [8 regression] g++.dg/ipa/devirt-22.C fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83178 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug target/83203] [8 Regression] Inefficient int to avx2 vector conversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83203 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Version|7.2.1

[Bug c++/81327] [8 Regression] cast to void* does not suppress -Wclass-memaccess

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81327 --- Comment #8 from Ville Voutilainen --- I can confirm that this fixes the woes in building and using Qt as far as QVector is concerned. Now that we have this fix, I see that there are other bit-blasts that don't use casts. Would it be possible

[Bug tree-optimization/83288] [8 Regression] polyhedron gas_dyn 2-fold compile-time regression caused by r255103

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83288 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener

[Bug tree-optimization/83435] [8 Regression] ICE in set_value_range, at tree-vrp.c:211

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83435 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|NEW

[Bug target/83629] [7/8 Regression] ICE: in decompose_normal_address, at rtlanal.c:6329 with -O2 -fPIC -frename-registers --param=sched-autopref-queue-depth=nnn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83629 --- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool --- Fixed on trunk; awaiting backports.

[Bug rtl-optimization/83770] New: [8 Regression] ICE in create_preheader, at cfgloopmanip.c:1536

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83770 Bug ID: 83770 Summary: [8 Regression] ICE in create_preheader, at cfgloopmanip.c:1536 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code

[Bug rtl-optimization/83575] [8 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error: multiple hot/cold transitions found)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83575 --- Comment #7 from Arseny Solokha --- Is it safe to close this PR now?

[Bug target/83781] [8 Regression] Bootstrap failed on x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83781 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #0) > > r256454 is OK and r25646 failed. It may be caused by r256457. Oops. r256463 failed.

[Bug fortran/79383] USE statement error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79383 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/83781] [8 Regression] Bootstrap failed on x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83781 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/83781] [8 Regression] Bootstrap failed on x86 with --with-arch=corei7 --with-cpu=corei7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83781 --- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu --- On i686, it failed with --prefix=/usr/8.0.0 --enable-clocale=gnu --with-system-zlib --enable-shared --with-demangler-in-ld --enable-libmpx i686-linux --with-fpmath=sse

[Bug c++/81327] [8 Regression] cast to void* does not suppress -Wclass-memaccess

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81327 --- Comment #13 from Ville Voutilainen --- I understand that, but considering that I plan to convince the committee that the bit-blasts like Qt does should be well-defined, the warning is a bit eager, cast or no cast. And since it does break

[Bug other/83737] [nvptx] FAIL: gcc.dg/stdint-width-1.c (test for excess errors) for with newlib stdint.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83737 --- Comment #5 from Tom de Vries --- (In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #4) > Most configurations (for which the libc used has a working stdint.h) > should probably be using use_gcc_stdint=wrap, so that GCC's stdint.h > includes

[Bug target/83775] Segfault in arm_declare_function_name()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83775 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug middle-end/81897] [6/7 Regression] spurious -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81897 --- Comment #20 from Aldy Hernandez --- (In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #18) > (In reply to Arnd Bergmann from comment #16) > > Created attachment 43056 [details] > > linux/net/ipv6/route.c, preprocessed and compressed > > > > To test

[Bug fortran/82841] Segfault in gfc_simplify_transfer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82841 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

  1   2   3   >