[Bug rtl-optimization/80481] Unoptimal additional copy instructions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80481 Vladimir Makarov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug libstdc++/80276] pretty printer for std::unique_ptr<T[]> shows type as std::unique_ptr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80276 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- unique_ptr>[]> is shown as: type = std::unique_ptr*, std::default_delete*> >,

[Bug fortran/82392] Allign arrays for faster execution

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82392 Wilco changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wilco at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 from

[Bug middle-end/81897] [6/7 Regression] spurious -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81897 --- Comment #19 from Aldy Hernandez --- (In reply to Arnd Bergmann from comment #17) > Created attachment 43057 [details] > linux/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_bsg.c, preprocessed and compressed > > A possibly related warning I just saw this week,

[Bug c++/81327] [8 Regression] cast to void* does not suppress -Wclass-memaccess

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81327 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c++/81327] [8 Regression] cast to void* does not suppress -Wclass-memaccess

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81327 --- Comment #15 from Ville Voutilainen --- I would like to have the change be a DR. Anyway, I looked at the cast-less cases, they are in qtransform.h, which is included by at least QImage and QtGui, so there will be a fair amount of code that

[Bug c++/81327] [8 Regression] cast to void* does not suppress -Wclass-memaccess

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81327 --- Comment #16 from Martin Sebor --- The GCC warning detects several distinct kinds of undefined behavior, most of which cannot very well be made well-defined. Making changes to the checker just because a subset of the undefined cases are

[Bug libstdc++/80276] pretty printer for std::unique_ptr<T[]> shows type as std::unique_ptr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80276 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug tree-optimization/83774] New: ICE at -O3 with -Wall: Segmentation fault

/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/8.0.0/lto-wrapper Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Configured with: ../gcc-source-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto --prefix=/home/su/software/tmp/gcc/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap Thread model: posix gcc version 8.0.0 20180110 (experimental) [trunk revision 256427] (GCC

[Bug middle-end/81897] [6/7 Regression] spurious -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81897 --- Comment #18 from Aldy Hernandez --- (In reply to Arnd Bergmann from comment #16) > Created attachment 43056 [details] > linux/net/ipv6/route.c, preprocessed and compressed > > To test the patch, I reverted the workaround that was added to

[Bug middle-end/82694] [8 regression] Linux kernel miscompiled since r250765

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82694 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug fortran/82841] Segfault in gfc_simplify_transfer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82841 --- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Wed Jan 10 18:44:12 2018 New Revision: 256444 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256444=gcc=rev Log: 2018-01-10 Steven G. Kargl Backport

[Bug middle-end/81897] [6/7 Regression] spurious -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81897 --- Comment #21 from Jeffrey A. Law --- I'm pretty sure the testcase from c#16 is a different underlying issue and an DUP of an existing BZ. Note the ASMs. Jump threading is (overly) conservative when it encounters an ASM on the path and

[Bug libstdc++/81584] Pretty Printer for string* doesn't work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81584 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/83178] [8 regression] g++.dg/ipa/devirt-22.C fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83178 --- Comment #7 from Martin Jambor --- We create an additional clone because the edge that brings the context now satisfies maybe_hot_p and previously it didn't. The reason is that the caller (which is called sort) now has frequency

[Bug target/83775] New: Segfault in arm_declare_function_name()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83775 Bug ID: 83775 Summary: Segfault in arm_declare_function_name() Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug fortran/82841] Segfault in gfc_simplify_transfer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82841 --- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Wed Jan 10 18:47:44 2018 New Revision: 256445 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256445=gcc=rev Log: 2018-01-10 Steven G. Kargl Backport

[Bug c++/83769] Statement expression inside lambda defined and evaluated in global scope fails to compile with optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83769 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/71946] asm in toplevel lambda function rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71946 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||giel+gcc at mortis dot eu --- Comment

[Bug c++/81327] [8 Regression] cast to void* does not suppress -Wclass-memaccess

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81327 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/83766] New: Bug 67632 not fixed yet

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83766 Bug ID: 83766 Summary: Bug 67632 not fixed yet Product: gcc Version: 6.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee:

[Bug target/81616] Update -mtune=generic for the current Intel and AMD processors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81616 --- Comment #43 from Jan Hubicka --- Author: hubicka Date: Wed Jan 10 11:02:55 2018 New Revision: 256424 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256424=gcc=rev Log: PR target/81616 * i386.c (ix86_vectorize_builtin_gather): Check

[Bug debug/83157] [6/7/8 regression] gcc.dg/guality/pr41616-1.c fail, inline instances refer to concrete instance as abstract origin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83157 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|8.0 |6.5 Summary|[8 regression]

[Bug ipa/83532] [8 Regression] ICE in apply_scale, at profile-count.h:955

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83532 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #1) > Does this help? Seems we omit adjustment when producing partial function > clone. > > Index: tree-inline.c >

[Bug ada/83765] New: LTO bootstrap with Ada fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83765 Bug ID: 83765 Summary: LTO bootstrap with Ada fails Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: ada

[Bug c++/83756] gcc (mingw64) 7.2.0 ICE in gimplify_expr on boost::call_once

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83756 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needs-reduction --- Comment #6 from

[Bug ada/83765] LTO bootstrap with Ada fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83765 --- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 10 Jan 2018, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83765 > > Eric Botcazou changed: > >What|Removed

[Bug target/83008] [performance] Is it better to avoid extra instructions in data passing between loops?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83008 --- Comment #24 from sergey.shalnov at intel dot com --- Richard, The latest "SLP costing for constants/externs improvement" patch generates the same code as baseline for the test example. Are you sure that "num_vects_to_check" should 1 if

[Bug tree-optimization/83189] [8 regression] internal compiler error: in probability_in, at profile-count.h:1050

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83189 --- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka --- The fix at updating time is to promote to non-guessed 0 when it is demanded. Index: tree-ssa-loop-manip.c === --- tree-ssa-loop-manip.c

[Bug lto/81968] [8 regression] early lto debug objects make Solaris ld SEGV

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81968 --- Comment #55 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #54 from Richard Biener --- > Created attachment 43075 > --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43075=edit > Updated patch with SHT_GROUP and extended

[Bug target/83726] [8 Regression] ICE: in final_scan_insn, at final.c:3063

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83726 --- Comment #6 from Wilco --- (In reply to Steve Ellcey from comment #4) > This looks like the same thing as PR 83632. It likely is, I don't see it failing with my patch. Older compilers don't appear to like the Fortran syntax...

[Bug fortran/83762] ICE on variable declaration with undefined PDT parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83762 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/83763] PDT variable sees content deallocated if variable is passed as an input to a function, and the function result is assigned to that same variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83763 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug testsuite/83706] [8 regression] gcc.dg/ipa/inline-2.c and gcc.dg/ipa/inline-3.c fail starting with r256279

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83706 --- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka --- Yep, those rounding issues are anoying. It won't buy us any code quality but I guess using sreals for change prob is most consistent way around. It seems that sreals are quite prone to rounding issues :(.

[Bug rtl-optimization/83723] [8 Regression] ICE: in gen_rtx_SUBREG, at emit-rtl.c:1010

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83723 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Do you perhaps have the unreduced preprocessed source + full command line?

[Bug ada/83765] LTO bootstrap with Ada fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83765 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/83740] [8 Regression] ICE in maybe_legitimize_operand, at optabs.c:7140

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83740 --- Comment #6 from Janne Blomqvist --- Should be fixed by r256425 (and r256426). Gerhard, can you verify whether the ICE you reported also goes away, given that neither me nor Jakub in #c3 were able to reproduce it?

[Bug bootstrap/82831] [8 Regression] Broken PGO bootstrap after r254379

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82831 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/81918] [7/8 Regression] muddles Concept confuses compiler (segfault)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81918 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug testsuite/83706] [8 regression] gcc.dg/ipa/inline-2.c and gcc.dg/ipa/inline-3.c fail starting with r256279

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83706 --- Comment #7 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #6) > Yep, those rounding issues are anoying. It won't buy us any code quality but > I guess using sreals for change prob is most consistent way around. It > seems that

[Bug libstdc++/67632] explicit instantiation omits copy constructor and others

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67632 Anthony Chuah changed: What|Removed |Added CC||achuah at drwsg dot com --- Comment #8

[Bug target/83726] [8 Regression] ICE: in final_scan_insn, at final.c:3063

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83726 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 43085 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43085=edit gcc8-pr83726.patch Actually, because *movdi_aarch64 can handle any (DImode) CONST_INT operand, there is no reason why

[Bug debug/83765] LTO bootstrap with Ada fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83765 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added CC||derodat at adacore dot com --- Comment

[Bug target/83008] [performance] Is it better to avoid extra instructions in data passing between loops?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83008 --- Comment #27 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 10 Jan 2018, sergey.shalnov at intel dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83008 > > --- Comment #26 from sergey.shalnov at intel dot com --- > Sorry, did you

[Bug target/83740] [8 Regression] ICE in maybe_legitimize_operand, at optabs.c:7140

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83740 Janne Blomqvist changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jb at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/83740] [8 Regression] ICE in maybe_legitimize_operand, at optabs.c:7140

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83740 --- Comment #5 from Janne Blomqvist --- Author: jb Date: Wed Jan 10 11:34:45 2018 New Revision: 256426 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256426=gcc=rev Log: PR 83740 Wrong string length type in bounds check This patch fixes up the

[Bug debug/83157] [6/7/8 regression] gcc.dg/guality/pr41616-1.c fail, inline instances refer to concrete instance as abstract origin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83157 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener --- A workaround might be in dwarf2out_function_decl push/pop the decl_die_table like with a "simple" undo stack: Index: gcc/dwarf2out.c === ---

[Bug target/83726] [8 Regression] ICE: in final_scan_insn, at final.c:3063

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83726 --- Comment #7 from Steve Ellcey --- I tested the patch on my aarch64 box, I got three regressions: FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/pr78733.c scan-assembler adr FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/pr79041-2.c scan-assembler adr FAIL:

[Bug target/83514] ABRT in arm_declare_function_name passing a null pointer to std::string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83514 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug go/83308] Missing platform definitions for SH in libgo

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83308 --- Comment #19 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz --- (In reply to Ian Lance Taylor from comment #18) > OK, the SH support patch is committed, and the exp directory has been > removed. > > Is there anything else to do here? I don't think so. But

[Bug go/83308] Missing platform definitions for SH in libgo

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83308 --- Comment #20 from Ian Lance Taylor --- This will be in GCC 8. Backports to GCC 7 are fine with me but I'm not going to do them myself.

[Bug ipa/60871] [4.9 Regression] internal compiler error: in possible_polymorphic_call_targets, at ipa-devirt.c:1510

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60871 Neil Kindlon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||neil.kindlon at jax dot org --- Comment

[Bug ipa/60871] [4.9 Regression] internal compiler error: in possible_polymorphic_call_targets, at ipa-devirt.c:1510

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60871 --- Comment #21 from Neil Kindlon --- Hi, I regret to report that I encountered what appears to be a similar error in gcc version 7.1.0. This is my first bug report here, so please correct me if this information is not helpful or incomplete.

[Bug target/83775] Segfault in arm_declare_function_name()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83775 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org See

[Bug other/83508] [8 regression][arm] c-c++-common/Wrestrict.c fails since r255836

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83508 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor

[Bug go/83308] Missing platform definitions for SH in libgo

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83308 --- Comment #18 from Ian Lance Taylor --- OK, the SH support patch is committed, and the exp directory has been removed. Is there anything else to do here?

[Bug target/81535] [8 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr79439.c fails starting with r250442

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81535 --- Comment #8 from Yury Gribov --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7) > Any further progress? I see you've posted something, but no further > follow-ups from you nor Segher. Jakub, I didn't contribute for few months now due to health

[Bug target/83399] Power8 ICE During LRA with 2-op rtl pattern for lvx instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83399 --- Comment #13 from Peter Bergner --- Author: bergner Date: Wed Jan 10 20:49:36 2018 New Revision: 256453 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256453=gcc=rev Log: gcc/ PR target/83399 * config/rs6000/rs6000.c (print_operand)

[Bug target/83726] [8 Regression] ICE: in final_scan_insn, at final.c:3063

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83726 --- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Steve Ellcey from comment #7 > pr83081.f90 looks like a new test so it may not actually be a regression > related to this patch, but the first two are. pr79041-2 generates: > > t: > mov

[Bug c++/43486] Preserve variable-use locations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43486 --- Comment #11 from David Malcolm --- Author: dmalcolm Date: Wed Jan 10 19:40:55 2018 New Revision: 256448 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256448=gcc=rev Log: Preserving locations for variable-uses and constants (PR c++/43486) This patch

[Bug c++/43486] Preserve variable-use locations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43486 --- Comment #12 from David Malcolm --- (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #11) > Author: dmalcolm > Date: Wed Jan 10 19:40:55 2018 > New Revision: 256448 > > URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256448=gcc=rev > Log: > Preserving locations

[Bug target/83761] bfin: ICE: in require, at machmode.h:292

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83761 --- Comment #2 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Could you attached preprocessed source?

[Bug fortran/83746] Errors using the max intrinsic in a PDT length parameter expression for a function result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83746 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/83718] [8 Regression] ICE: Floating point exception in profile_count::apply_scale

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83718 --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška --- Created attachment 43087 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43087=edit test-case

[Bug debug/83157] [6/7/8 regression] gcc.dg/guality/pr41616-1.c fail, inline instances refer to concrete instance as abstract origin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83157 --- Comment #12 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 10 Jan 2018, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83157 > > --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek --- > Isn't that related to PR68860, where

[Bug rtl-optimization/83475] [8 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error: non-cold basic block 3 reachable only by paths crossing the cold partition)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83475 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/81997] [7/8 Regression] segfault while instantiating constrained function template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81997 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug target/81535] [8 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr79439.c fails starting with r250442

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81535 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug fortran/83744] ICE in ../../gcc/gcc/fortran/dump-parse-tree.c:3093 while using -fc-prototypes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83744 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug debug/83157] [6/7/8 regression] gcc.dg/guality/pr41616-1.c fail, inline instances refer to concrete instance as abstract origin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83157 --- Comment #10 from Richard Biener --- I'm quite sure older GCC must be somehow affected - or I'm really curious how they are not. While the patch fixes the dwarf for the small C testcase it doesn't fix the pr41616-1.c execute fail. The dwarf

[Bug middle-end/83718] [8 Regression] ICE: Floating point exception in profile_count::apply_scale

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83718 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|marxin at

[Bug tree-optimization/83753] ICE: in exact_div, at poly-int.h:2139

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83753 --- Comment #2 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rsandifo Date: Wed Jan 10 13:07:54 2018 New Revision: 256427 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256427=gcc=rev Log: Don't use permutes for single-element accesses (PR83753) After

[Bug tree-optimization/81184] [8 regression] gcc.dg/pr21643.c and gcc.dg/tree-ssa/phi-opt-11.c fail starting with r249450

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81184 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug c++/81327] [8 Regression] cast to void* does not suppress -Wclass-memaccess

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81327 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug fortran/83745] New: Errors using the max intrinsic in a PDT length parameter expression for a function result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83745 Bug ID: 83745 Summary: Errors using the max intrinsic in a PDT length parameter expression for a function result Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/83746] Errors using the max intrinsic in a PDT length parameter expression for a function result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83746 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- *** Bug 83745 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug debug/83157] [6/7/8 regression] gcc.dg/guality/pr41616-1.c fail, inline instances refer to concrete instance as abstract origin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83157 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek --- Isn't that related to PR68860, where because of LTO breaking DECL_ABSTRACT_ORIGINs we don't emit the more advanced DWARF extensions (or DWARF5) stuff, like DW_OP_GNU_parameter_ref etc.?

[Bug target/83687] [6/7/8 Regression] ARM NEON invalid optimisation for vabd/vabdl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83687 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/81067] [8 regression] g++.dg/template/nontype10.C FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81067 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug lto/81968] [8 regression] early lto debug objects make Solaris ld SEGV

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81968 --- Comment #56 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 10 Jan 2018, ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81968 > > --- Comment #55 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE

[Bug boehm-gc/66848] boehm-gc fails test suite on x86_64-apple-darwin15

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66848 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #34 from Eric

[Bug tree-optimization/83753] ICE: in exact_div, at poly-int.h:2139

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83753 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/81791] [8 Regression] ICE in cfg_layout_redirect_edge_and_branch, at cfgrtl.c:4422

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81791 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/83767] New: -Wsuggest-override suggests to mark as override in methods marked as final

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83767 Bug ID: 83767 Summary: -Wsuggest-override suggests to mark as override in methods marked as final Product: gcc Version: 7.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c++/78010] --Wsuggest-override reports a redundant warning on a 'final' method

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78010 Albert Astals Cid changed: What|Removed |Added CC||albert.astals.cid at kdab dot com

[Bug c++/83767] -Wsuggest-override suggests to mark as override in methods marked as final

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83767 Albert Astals Cid changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/81167] [8 Regression] ICE on valid C++ code in deferred_printed_type, at cp/error.c:118

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81167 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug target/81550] [8 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/loop_align.c fails starting with r250482

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81550 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug target/83735] [8 Regression] generating unaligned store to stack with vmovaps

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83735 --- Comment #10 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hjl Date: Wed Jan 10 15:37:49 2018 New Revision: 256436 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256436=gcc=rev Log: i386: Also adjust stack frame for stack slot alignment We should also

[Bug target/83768] ARM: wrong optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83768 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/81055] [6/7 Regression] ICE with invalid initializer for array new

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81055 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[6/7/8 Regression] ICE with |[6/7 Regression] ICE with

[Bug testsuite/83772] ICE in new test case gfortran.fortran-torture/compile/pr83081.f90 in r256423

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83772 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/81550] [8 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/loop_align.c fails starting with r250482

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81550 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug rtl-optimization/83771] New: [8 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error: non-cold basic block 3 reachable only by paths crossing the cold partition)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83771 Bug ID: 83771 Summary: [8 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error: non-cold basic block 3 reachable only by paths crossing the cold partition) Product: gcc

[Bug c++/82541] Wduplicated-branches triggers in template context

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82541 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/82541] Wduplicated-branches triggers in template context

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82541 --- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Wed Jan 10 17:05:14 2018 New Revision: 256441 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256441=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/82541 * call.c (build_conditional_expr_1): Check complain

[Bug c++/82541] Wduplicated-branches triggers in template context

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82541 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/82770] [8 regression] gcc.dg/pr78768.c xpass

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82770 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug testsuite/83772] New: ICE in new test case gfortran.fortran-torture/compile/pr83081.f90 in r256423

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83772 Bug ID: 83772 Summary: ICE in new test case gfortran.fortran-torture/compile/pr83081.f90 in r256423 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/83740] [8 Regression] ICE in maybe_legitimize_operand, at optabs.c:7140

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83740 --- Comment #7 from G. Steinmetz --- Thanks for working on this issue, Janne. I will check it and do some more tests with upcoming snapshot 20180114.

<    1   2   3   >