[Bug target/82941] Missing vzeroupper with -march=skylake-avx512 -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82941 Bug 82941 depends on bug 82942, which changed state. Bug 82942 Summary: Generate vzeroupper with -mavx512f -mno-avx512er -O2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82942 What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/82942] Generate vzeroupper with -mavx512f -mno-avx512er -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82942 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/82256] [6/7/8 Regression] clones created by create_version_clone_with_body are not observable to insertion hooks

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82256 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug target/83925] [SPARC/Solaris] __int128 aligned(8) as function argument is passed in wrong register

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83925 --- Comment #2 from Марина Полякова --- No, I can't because pkgutil has only gcc 4 or 5 :-(

[Bug c++/81013] [7/8 Regression] ICE with invalid union in class hierarchy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81013 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug target/83926] ICE during RTL pass: ira, in elimination_costs_in_insn, at reload1.c:3633

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83926 Will Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||willschm at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/83925] [SPARC/Solaris] __int128 aligned(8) as function argument is passed in wrong register

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83925 --- Comment #3 from Марина Полякова --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > Note GCC 5 is no longer maintained - can you test a newer version? No, I can't because pkgutil has only gcc 4 or 5 :-(

[Bug debug/83728] [8 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr68037-1.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83728 --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2) > So, one problem here is that the debug marker for line 33 is moved by sched2 > too early (unnecessarily), before the prologue, before statement frontiers >

[Bug libgomp/83589] [nvptx] mode-transitions.c and private-variables.{c,f90} execution FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83589 --- Comment #1 from Tom de Vries --- Using the patch from PR83920 comment 3 and testing libgomp.oacc-c/c.exp makes the libgomp.oacc-c/c.exp failures of this PR go away. So, this might be a duplicate.

[Bug fortran/83927] New: Type-Bound Procedure on element of Derived Type PARAMETER Array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83927 Bug ID: 83927 Summary: Type-Bound Procedure on element of Derived Type PARAMETER Array Product: gcc Version: 7.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug debug/83728] [8 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr68037-1.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83728 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- That latter bug has been introduced with PR79793.

[Bug target/82941] Missing vzeroupper with -march=skylake-avx512 -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82941 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug other/70268] add option -ffile-prefix-map to map one directory name (old) to another (new) in __FILE__, __BASE_FILE__and __builtin_FILE()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70268 --- Comment #16 from boris at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: boris Date: Thu Jan 18 13:17:37 2018 New Revision: 256847 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256847=gcc=rev Log: Add ability to remap file names in __FILE__, etc (PR other/70268) This

[Bug target/83926] New: ICE during RTL pass: ira, in elimination_costs_in_insn, at reload1.c:3633

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83926 Bug ID: 83926 Summary: ICE during RTL pass: ira, in elimination_costs_in_insn, at reload1.c:3633 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug debug/83728] [8 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr68037-1.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83728 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug bootstrap/48879] Compilation cannot find file asm/errno.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48879 --- Comment #9 from Georg-Johann Lay --- Hi, installing linux-libc-dev:i386 resolved this issue for me (linux-libc-dev was already installed).

[Bug target/83920] [nvptx] bad predicate reset

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83920 --- Comment #3 from Tom de Vries --- (In reply to cesar from comment #0) > I think there > might be other PTX JIT bugs lurking here, because the test program still > works as intended. I can make it fail on trunk, by changing the workaround to

[Bug target/83920] [nvptx] bad predicate reset

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83920 --- Comment #4 from Tom de Vries --- (In reply to cesar from comment #0) > the underlying problem is present > in og7 and impacts da-1.c). That's a failure I did not manage to reproduce. For me, at commit

[Bug middle-end/60725] [-Wreturn-type] false positive in trivial switch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60725 --- Comment #8 from Eric Gallager --- Worth returning to this issue now that -Wreturn-type is enabled by default for gcc8.

[Bug lto/83816] [6/7 Regression] lto1: internal compiler error: compressed stream: data error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83816 --- Comment #17 from Oleg Endo --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #15) > > I can reproduce it: > Nice. (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #16) > Note your testcase only reproduces on the GCC 6 branch. It is expected that >

[Bug c/83925] New: [SPARC/Solaris] __int128 aligned(8) as function argument is passed in wrong register

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83925 Bug ID: 83925 Summary: [SPARC/Solaris] __int128 aligned(8) as function argument is passed in wrong register Product: gcc Version: 5.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/83875] [feature request] target_clones compatible SIMD capability/length check

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83875 --- Comment #8 from Roland Schulz --- I would suggest that: - inside multi-versioned (target_clones/target) function it depends on the active target - inside a constexpr context (function/variable, your examples) or always_inline function it

[Bug middle-end/81443] gcc-7.1.0/MIPS N32: build/genrecog.o: virtual memory exhausted: Cannot allocate memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81443 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #12 from Eric Botcazou

[Bug c++/83929] New: implicit conversion of literal class type can not be used as bit-field length

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83929 Bug ID: 83929 Summary: implicit conversion of literal class type can not be used as bit-field length Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug target/83925] [SPARC/Solaris] __int128 aligned(8) as function argument is passed in wrong register

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83925 --- Comment #5 from Rainer Orth --- Created attachment 43175 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43175=edit unpreprocessed input

[Bug ipa/82107] [6/7/8 Regression] O2 optimisation on amd64 leads to error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82107 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug tree-optimization/83651] [7/8 regression] 20% slowdown of linux kernel AES cipher

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83651 --- Comment #6 from Arnd Bergmann --- Created attachment 43177 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43177=edit Single-file version of aes benchmark I've managed to condense the 'openssl speed aes-256-cbc' test into a single file

[Bug middle-end/61037] array-bounds false positive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61037 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic CC|

[Bug c++/80956] [7/8 Regression] ICE with abstract class vector

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80956 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug target/83920] [nvptx] bad predicate reset

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83920 --- Comment #7 from Tom de Vries --- (In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #6) > (In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #3) > > Likewise, reversing the if-then-else order in gemm.f90 makes the testcase > > fail on trunk without this patch. > >

[Bug target/83925] [SPARC/Solaris] __int128 aligned(8) as function argument is passed in wrong register

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83925 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/83925] [SPARC/Solaris] __int128 aligned(8) as function argument is passed in wrong register

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83925 Tom Lane changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tgl at sss dot pgh.pa.us --- Comment #8 from

[Bug target/83930] New: [7/8 Regression] ICE: RTL check: expected code 'const_int', have 'mem' in simplify_binary_operation_1, at simplify-rtx.c:3302

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83930 Bug ID: 83930 Summary: [7/8 Regression] ICE: RTL check: expected code 'const_int', have 'mem' in simplify_binary_operation_1, at simplify-rtx.c:3302 Product: gcc

[Bug middle-end/81443] [7/8 regression] build/genrecog.o: virtual memory exhausted: Cannot allocate memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81443 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/81013] [7/8 Regression] ICE with invalid union in class hierarchy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81013 --- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Thu Jan 18 17:11:43 2018 New Revision: 256856 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256856=gcc=rev Log: /cp 2018-01-18 Paolo Carlini PR

[Bug c++/83928] New: implicit conversion of literal class type to unscoped enumeration can not be used as array size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83928 Bug ID: 83928 Summary: implicit conversion of literal class type to unscoped enumeration can not be used as array size Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/83928] implicit conversion of literal class type to unscoped enumeration can not be used as array size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83928 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid

[Bug ipa/83619] [8 Regression] ICE in inliner: caller edge count does not match BB count

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83619 --- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka --- Author: hubicka Date: Thu Jan 18 15:57:48 2018 New Revision: 256850 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256850=gcc=rev Log: PR ipa/83619 * g++.dg/torture/pr83619.C: New testcase. *

[Bug target/83925] [SPARC/Solaris] __int128 aligned(8) as function argument is passed in wrong register

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83925 --- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou --- 128-bit types requite 128-bit alignment on SPARC64 so we cannot support that.

[Bug target/83920] [nvptx] bad predicate reset

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83920 --- Comment #6 from Tom de Vries --- (In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #3) > Likewise, reversing the if-then-else order in gemm.f90 makes the testcase > fail on trunk without this patch. Minimal version: ... ! { dg-do run }

[Bug target/82964] gfortran.dg/class_array_1.f03 regression since r254388

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82964 --- Comment #5 from Wilco --- Author: wilco Date: Thu Jan 18 16:37:44 2018 New Revision: 256854 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256854=gcc=rev Log: [AArch64] Fix fp16 test failures after PR82964 fix This fixes test failures in

[Bug debug/83728] [8 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr68037-1.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83728 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug target/83925] [SPARC/Solaris] __int128 aligned(8) as function argument is passed in wrong register

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83925 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug ipa/83619] [8 Regression] ICE in inliner: caller edge count does not match BB count

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83619 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/82256] [6/7/8 Regression] clones created by create_version_clone_with_body are not observable to insertion hooks

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82256 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug ipa/82256] [6/7/8 Regression] clones created by create_version_clone_with_body are not observable to insertion hooks

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82256 --- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka --- Author: hubicka Date: Thu Jan 18 16:26:54 2018 New Revision: 256853 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256853=gcc=rev Log: PR ipa/82256 patch by PaX Team * cgraphclones.c

[Bug tree-optimization/83651] [7/8 regression] 20% slowdown of linux kernel AES cipher

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83651 Arnd Bergmann changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #43177|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug c++/81013] [7 Regression] ICE with invalid union in class hierarchy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81013 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[7/8 Regression] ICE with |[7 Regression] ICE with

[Bug target/83925] [SPARC/Solaris] __int128 aligned(8) as function argument is passed in wrong register

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83925 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- Given the issues we had on ARM, AArch64 (see exempli gratia PR65956 and associated discussions), et cetera with overaligned/underaligned scalars, I think the right thing is not to consider alignment for the

[Bug c++/83929] implicit conversion of literal class type can not be used as bit-field length

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83929 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid

[Bug middle-end/81657] [8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/20050503-1.c scan-assembler-not call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81657 Wilco changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wilco at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5 from

[Bug c++/83931] New: Add support for -nostdlib++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83931 Bug ID: 83931 Summary: Add support for -nostdlib++ Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug middle-end/81657] [8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/20050503-1.c scan-assembler-not call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81657 --- Comment #7 from Wilco --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #6) > (In reply to Wilco from comment #5) > > Note there are other optimizations which can block a tailcall, for example: > > > > void *f (void *p) { return __builtin_strchr (p,

[Bug fortran/83927] Type-Bound Procedure on element of Derived Type PARAMETER Array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83927 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug tree-optimization/83651] [7/8 regression] 20% slowdown of linux kernel AES cipher

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83651 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #8 from Aldy Hernandez

[Bug c++/83931] Add support for -nostdlib++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83931 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Anderson --- From the LLVM CL description: Alternatively, they could use clang instead of clang++, but that already disables implicit addition of -lm on some toolchains. Not sure if this is the same for gcc though.

[Bug middle-end/81657] [8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/20050503-1.c scan-assembler-not call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81657 --- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Wilco from comment #9) > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8) > > That just means r240568 caused another regression. > > Again, on various targets strchr is efficient, just on a few ones it is

[Bug middle-end/81657] [8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/20050503-1.c scan-assembler-not call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81657 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek --- No matter what, I don't see how you could use much common infrastructure here. Say if the tailcall pass sees strlen (something) + something being returned, it could turn that into strchr (something, 0),

[Bug c++/83931] Add support for -nostdlib++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83931 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Use gcc for linking instead of g++ seems like the correct way.

[Bug fortran/83864] ICE in gfc_apply_init, at fortran/expr.c:4271

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83864 --- Comment #6 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Thu Jan 18 18:27:22 2018 New Revision: 256857 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256857=gcc=rev Log: 2018-01-18 Harald Anlauf Backport from

[Bug target/83920] [nvptx] bad predicate reset

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83920 --- Comment #8 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org --- I tweaked your proposed fix as follows: diff --git a/gcc/config/nvptx/nvptx.c b/gcc/config/nvptx/nvptx.c index 55c7e3cbf90..24625cd303f 100644 --- a/gcc/config/nvptx/nvptx.c +++

[Bug middle-end/81657] [8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/20050503-1.c scan-assembler-not call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81657 --- Comment #9 from Wilco --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8) > That just means r240568 caused another regression. > Again, on various targets strchr is efficient, just on a few ones it is not > and the change was unfortunately done

[Bug middle-end/81657] [8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/20050503-1.c scan-assembler-not call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81657 --- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Wilco from comment #5) > Note there are other optimizations which can block a tailcall, for example: > > void *f (void *p) { return __builtin_strchr (p, 0); } This is irrelevant since this refers to

[Bug c++/83932] New: No diagnostic issued for missing default argument in lambda-expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83932 Bug ID: 83932 Summary: No diagnostic issued for missing default argument in lambda-expression Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/83433] missing signed integer overflow diagnostic for abs(INT_MIN)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83433 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug c++/81167] [8 Regression] ICE on valid C++ code in deferred_printed_type, at cp/error.c:118

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81167 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug fortran/31237] [meta-bug] TRANSFER intrinsic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31237 Bug 31237 depends on bug 83864, which changed state. Bug 83864 Summary: ICE in gfc_apply_init, at fortran/expr.c:4271 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83864 What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/81657] [8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/20050503-1.c scan-assembler-not call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81657 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- That just means r240568 caused another regression. Again, on various targets strchr is efficient, just on a few ones it is not and the change was unfortunately done generically.

[Bug fortran/83864] ICE in gfc_apply_init, at fortran/expr.c:4271

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83864 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/83874] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE initializing character array from derived type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83874 Harald Anlauf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/81657] [8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/20050503-1.c scan-assembler-not call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81657 --- Comment #13 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Wilco from comment #12) > > > > Do you have data to show that? > > Yes, on x64 I get these timings for a simple function containing just the > library call: > > size 1024 - 13845 21025 14449

[Bug target/83933] New: [8 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/vsx-vector-6-le.c fails starting with r256798

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83933 Bug ID: 83933 Summary: [8 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/vsx-vector-6-le.c fails starting with r256798 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c++/83806] [6/7/8 Regression] Spurious -Wunused-but-set-parameter with nullptr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83806 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug tree-optimization/83651] [7/8 regression] 20% slowdown of linux kernel AES cipher

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83651 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c++/80956] [7/8 Regression] ICE with abstract class vector

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80956 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2) > Reduced testcase: > namespace std { > template class initializer_list; > } > template struct B { B (std::initializer_list); }; > struct C { virtual int foo ();

[Bug fortran/53298] ICE in gfc_conv_scalarized_array_ref for ARRAY + substring

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53298 Harald Anlauf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gmx dot de --- Comment #4

[Bug target/83815] Enhance addressing for long double on PowerPC with -mabi=ieeelongdouble

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83815 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/83933] [8 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/vsx-vector-6-le.c fails starting with r256798

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83933 Carl Love changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/83920] [nvptx] bad predicate reset

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83920 --- Comment #9 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org --- I figured out why my patch does work. Here's the assembly code for your C test case at -O0: { .reg.u32%x; mov.u32 %x, %tid.x;

[Bug middle-end/81657] [8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/20050503-1.c scan-assembler-not call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81657 --- Comment #12 from Wilco --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #10) > (In reply to Wilco from comment #9) > > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8) > > > That just means r240568 caused another regression. > > > Again, on various targets

[Bug c++/81167] [8 Regression] ICE on valid C++ code in deferred_printed_type, at cp/error.c:118

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81167 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- In gcc/testsuite/ we apparently have just g++.old-deja/g++.benjamin/16077.C and g++.old-deja/g++.other/overcnv2.C testcases covering those and in both cases source is a POINTER_TYPE. With check-c++-all

[Bug libstdc++/82644] Non-standard hypergeometric special functions defined in strict modes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82644 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Thu Jan 18 20:31:32 2018 New Revision: 256863 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256863=gcc=rev Log: PR libstdc++/82644 document IS 29124 support Backport from mainline 2017-10-23

[Bug fortran/82992] ICE in create_int_parameter_array, at fortran/module.c:6586

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82992 Harald Anlauf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gmx dot de --- Comment #2

[Bug middle-end/81812] [7/8 Regression] Empty virtual function fails to compile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81812 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||paolo.carlini at oracle dot com ---

[Bug target/83920] [nvptx] bad predicate reset

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83920 --- Comment #10 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org --- And here is the working code in -O2: { .reg.u32%x; mov.u32 %x, %tid.x; setp.ne.u32 %r71, %x, 0; } @%r71 bra

[Bug c++/82461] [7/8 Regression] Temporary required for brace-initializing (non-literal-type) member variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82461 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Thu Jan 18 20:02:06 2018 New Revision: 256860 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256860=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/82461 - constexpr list-initialized member * constexpr.c

[Bug c++/81167] [8 Regression] ICE on valid C++ code in deferred_printed_type, at cp/error.c:118

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81167 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 43180 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43180=edit gcc8-pr81167.patch Untested fix. This assumes that the type we want as source is always some class type, which seems

[Bug testsuite/83934] New: [8 regression] new test case g++.dg/torture/pr83619.C fails starting with its introduction in r256850

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83934 Bug ID: 83934 Summary: [8 regression] new test case g++.dg/torture/pr83619.C fails starting with its introduction in r256850 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status:

[Bug sanitizer/81715] asan-stack=1 redzone allocation is too inflexible

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81715 --- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Jan 18 20:30:33 2018 New Revision: 256861 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256861=gcc=rev Log: PR sanitizer/81715 PR testsuite/83882 * function.h

[Bug testsuite/83882] FAIL: g++.dg/opt/pr81715.C -std=gnu++98 (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83882 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Jan 18 20:30:33 2018 New Revision: 256861 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256861=gcc=rev Log: PR sanitizer/81715 PR testsuite/83882 * function.h

[Bug testsuite/83882] FAIL: g++.dg/opt/pr81715.C -std=gnu++98 (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83882 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/82461] [7/8 Regression] Temporary required for brace-initializing (non-literal-type) member variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82461 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill --- Fixed for 8 so far.

[Bug c/51628] __attribute__((packed)) is unsafe in some cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51628 --- Comment #46 from Alexey Salmin --- Tested the latest patch, behavior looks very reasonable even in tricky cases. 1) No warning, gcd(12, 8) == 4 struct tuple_t { char c[12]; __int128_t i; } __attribute__((packed,

[Bug testsuite/83934] [8 regression] new test case g++.dg/torture/pr83619.C fails starting with its introduction in r256850

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83934 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug debug/83758] ICE building gccgo on powerpc64le --with-cpu=power8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83758 --- Comment #14 from acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org --- I've narrowed this down a bit --- copying libcommon-target.a from the working build on willow2 makes the build on genoa work, even with -O2. So it is something in there. I'll continue narrowing

[Bug c++/83937] New: [REGRESSION] C++17 binds braced init of a type T to default arg of a ctor instead of using T's own default ctor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83937 Bug ID: 83937 Summary: [REGRESSION] C++17 binds braced init of a type T to default arg of a ctor instead of using T's own default ctor Product: gcc Version:

[Bug tree-optimization/83510] [8 Regression] Recent changes for -Warray-bounds trigger false positive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83510 --- Comment #5 from David Malcolm --- Candidate patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-01/msg01693.html

[Bug target/83920] [nvptx] bad predicate reset

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83920 --- Comment #5 from Tom de Vries --- This ( PR83589 - "[nvptx] mode-transitions.c and private-variables.{c,f90} execution FAILs at GOMP_NVPTX_JIT=-O0" ) may be a duplicate.

[Bug target/83925] [SPARC/Solaris] __int128 aligned(8) as function argument is passed in wrong register

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83925 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ABI Target|

[Bug target/81959] PowerPC __float128 optimization fails with integer PRE_INC addresses

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81959 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

  1   2   >