https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84154
--- Comment #1 from Michael Meissner ---
Created attachment 43310
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43310=edit
Example code to show the problem.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81084
Andrew Jenner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84155
--- Comment #2 from Jürgen Reuter ---
This regression has been also introduced within revisions r256722 and r257131.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81084
Andrew Jenner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84141
--- Comment #17 from Jürgen Reuter ---
Maybe also look at the PR84155 with a similar (possibly the same?) problem, and
a workaround, or a direct case for the culprit in a single line.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84141
--- Comment #18 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> I get the ICE with r257065.
r257064 is OK.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84155
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Also caused by r257065 as pr84141.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84113
--- Comment #15 from Douglas Mencken ---
another question: what is so special with "darwin" (besides that long story
when apple ditched gcc due to gpl v3 and created llvm'n'stuff which is still
unavail for powerpc) to have all these
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84155
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Priority|P3
/gcc/gcc-trunk/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/8.0.1/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-source-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto
--prefix=/home/su/software/tmp/gcc/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 8.0.1 20180131 (experimental) [trunk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84159
Bug ID: 84159
Summary: filesystem::path::operator/= with has root directory
path
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84141
--- Comment #13 from Thomas Koenig ---
The abort comes from the I/O library.
Here's a backtrace:
#0 _gfortrani_internal_error (cmp=0x0, message=0x10117a80 "type_name(): Bad
type") at ../../../trunk/libgfortran/runtime/error.c:410
#1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84013
--- Comment #2 from Katsunori Kumatani ---
I'm not familiar with tree-ssa-structalias, but it appears to me that the "fix"
is quite simple? Or am I missing something? Here's the snippet from it, updated
with my attempt:
if (restrict_var)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84113
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek ---
No, it means anybody can fix it, just the release will not be blocked if it is
not fixed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82641
--- Comment #27 from Arnd Bergmann ---
(In reply to Richard Earnshaw from comment #26)
> (In reply to Arnd Bergmann from comment #25)
>
> > or to apply more force and add the ".arch" to each inline
> > asm individually.
>
> No, that would not
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84153
Brett Neumeier changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84158
Bug ID: 84158
Summary: missing -Wreturn-type due to incorrect handling of
attributes for template specializations
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83503
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83503
--- Comment #16 from Martin Sebor ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #4)
Jason, I'm only starting to look into it but if I understand your suggestion
correctly, I don't think the bug can be fixed by relying on attribute
exclusions.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84158
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84153
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69869
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jan 31 08:31:52 2018
New Revision: 257220
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257220=gcc=rev
Log:
PR preprocessor/69869
* traditional.c (skip_macro_block_comment):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81360
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84130
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84117
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
This started to ICE in particular with r256644. The other PR we have about
-ftrapv and vectorization is PR81661 (and probably others).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84141
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68746
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84100
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jan 31 08:26:52 2018
New Revision: 257219
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257219=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c/84100
* common.opt (falign-functions=, falign-jumps=,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79975
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|i?86-pc-solaris2.*, |i?86-*-*, x86_64-*-*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83954
--- Comment #11 from Rainer Orth ---
Author: ro
Date: Wed Jan 31 09:07:55 2018
New Revision: 257221
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257221=gcc=rev
Log:
Fix gnat.dg/lto20.adb XPASS
PR lto/83954
* gnat.dg/lto20.adb: Remove
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84135
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84136
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84100
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[7/8 Regression] Function |[7 Regression] Function
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69869
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7/8 Regression] internal |[6/7 Regression] internal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84145
Bug ID: 84145
Summary: Wrong CET options processing
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84132
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84037
--- Comment #17 from Jan Hubicka ---
We already have
/* This function adjusts the unroll factor based on
the hardware capabilities. For ex, bdver3 has
a loop buffer which makes unrolling of smaller
loops less important. This function
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83618
--- Comment #2 from Julia Koval ---
Author: jkoval
Date: Wed Jan 31 11:06:20 2018
New Revision: 257229
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257229=gcc=rev
Log:
PR target/83618
gcc/
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_expand_builtin): Handle
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83618
--- Comment #3 from Julia Koval ---
Fixed by r257229
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84117
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84037
--- Comment #18 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #17)
> We already have
> /* This function adjusts the unroll factor based on
>the hardware capabilities. For ex, bdver3 has
>a loop buffer which makes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80641
--- Comment #10 from Paul Gotch ---
I'm afraid the changes made to libstdc++ have only solved part of the
regression if you say something like
std::vector v;
if(c.size() > 0)
c.resize(c.size() - 1);
then you no longer get a warning in 7.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83024
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84117
--- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 31 Jan 2018, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84117
>
> Jakub Jelinek changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84088
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82641
--- Comment #24 from Tamar Christina ---
Do you have a repro for this one? compiling the kernel with
`CFLAGS="march=-armv4t"` doesn't seem to reproduce the original issue.
But the scenario should be working without needing to separate out the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64946
--- Comment #23 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Wed Jan 31 10:06:45 2018
New Revision: 257225
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257225=gcc=rev
Log:
[AArch64] PR tree-optimization/64946: XFAIL
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82518
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84141
Jürgen Reuter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8 Regression] Internal |[8.0.1 regression] Internal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84138
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84105
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82256
--- Comment #7 from PaX Team ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #5)
> I am going to test the patch against mainline and commit it. However about
> backporting, can you produce some issue with this bug?
well, the thing is that i ran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84089
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84132
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
So the difference is that before this rev.
difference = chrec_fold_minus (type, chrec_a, chrec_b);
for
(gdb) p debug_generic_expr (chrec_a)
(signed int) {{(unsigned int) h_10(D), +, 1}_1, +, 6}_2
(record_dead_and_set_regs_1): Record the source unmodified
for a paradoxical SUBREG on a WORD_REGISTER_OPERATIONS target.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/20180131-1.c
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/combine.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
(record_dead_and_set_regs_1): Record the source unmodified
for a paradoxical SUBREG on a WORD_REGISTER_OPERATIONS target.
Added:
branches/gcc-7-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/20180131-1.c
- copied unchanged from r257224,
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/20180131-1.c
Modified
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84141
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Summary|[8.0.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84138
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84071
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82518
--- Comment #8 from Nick Clifton ---
Hi Aldy,
> Do we have a way of testing armeb, either through a simulator or through
> some aarch64 with magic flags?
GDB has an ARM simulator which is OK unless you need to test some of the newer
features
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84105
--- Comment #8 from Aldy Hernandez ---
Author: aldyh
Date: Wed Jan 31 10:42:52 2018
New Revision: 257228
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257228=gcc=rev
Log:
PR lto/84105
* tree-pretty-print.c (dump_generic_node): Handle a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82641
--- Comment #25 from Arnd Bergmann ---
(In reply to Tamar Christina from comment #24)
> Do you have a repro for this one? compiling the kernel with
> `CFLAGS="march=-armv4t"` doesn't seem to reproduce the original issue.
It needs to be a kernel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84160
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84157
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83705
--- Comment #8 from Janne Blomqvist ---
Author: jb
Date: Thu Feb 1 07:41:03 2018
New Revision: 257281
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257281=gcc=rev
Log:
PR 83705 Repeat with large values
This patch fixes the regression by increasing the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84160
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84088
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84156
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83705
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
101 - 169 of 169 matches
Mail list logo
