[Bug target/54063] [6/7/8 regression] on powerpc64 gcc 4.9/6/7/8 generates larger code for global variable accesses than gcc 4.7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54063 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org Target

[Bug fortran/84141] [8 regression] Internal error: type_name(): Bad type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84141 --- Comment #34 from Jürgen Reuter --- So, to summarise all of our code, at least our basic and extended tests, work again with this (second) patch by Paul Thomas, for all different kind types of our default reals (64, 80, emulated 128 bit).

[Bug c/84190] [7 Regression] double arithmetic on x86 no longer rounds to nearest

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84190 --- Comment #1 from Bruno Haible --- It works when I declare ys1, ys2, zs1, zs2 as 'volatile double' instead of 'double'. But I should not be needing to do this, because the only uses of these 4 variables is as arguments to equalfn, which takes

[Bug c/84173] Support glibc multiarch interpreter names

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84173 Javier Serrano Polo changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/84155] [8 Regression] program hangs on valid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84155 --- Comment #13 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > There is an important caveat to this fix, which has me very worried: > On top of removal of uncalled code making the bug disappear, I cannot > see any difference in the tree dump between the

[Bug tree-optimization/57218] [6/7/8 Regression] Excessive inlining even at -Os

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57218 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2013-05-10 00:00:00 |2018-2-3 CC|

[Bug middle-end/58479] [6/7/8 Regression] slow var-tracking on x86_64-linux at -O1 (and above) with -g, but checking disabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58479 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c/84190] [7 Regression] double arithmetic on x86 no longer rounds to nearest

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84190 --- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse --- IIRC, the standard provides guarantees for volatile objects. Here, you are accessing a non-volatile object through a volatile type, and if the compiler can find out about the underlying object, it can ignore

[Bug middle-end/84184] gcc generates wrong relocations with negative offsets in struct arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84184 --- Comment #11 from Eric Botcazou --- > Why those are handled differently? First looks like it works, second does > not. It was my main signal to file a bug against gcc as asymmetry looked > fishy. Because the problematic bitfield path is only

[Bug c++/81057] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE with broken default template parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81057 Volker Reichelt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/57193] [6/7/8 Regression] suboptimal register allocation for SSE registers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57193 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2015-06-01 00:00:00 |2018-2-3 CC|

[Bug c++/84192] New: [7/8 Regression] ICE with statement expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84192 Bug ID: 84192 Summary: [7/8 Regression] ICE with statement expression Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/84155] [8 Regression] program hangs on valid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84155 --- Comment #16 from Thomas Koenig --- The statements are removed upon conversion to gimple: --- Falsch/a.f90.004t.gimple2018-02-03 15:08:29.370147886 +0100 +++ Korrekt/a.f90.004t.gimple 2018-02-03 15:07:16.428178637 +0100 @@ -893,6

[Bug fortran/84141] [8 regression] Internal error: type_name(): Bad type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84141 Bug 84141 depends on bug 84155, which changed state. Bug 84155 Summary: [8 Regression] program hangs on valid code https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84155 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/84141] [8 regression] Internal error: type_name(): Bad type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84141 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/84190] New: [7 Regression] double arithmetic on x86 no longer rounds to nearest

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84190 Bug ID: 84190 Summary: [7 Regression] double arithmetic on x86 no longer rounds to nearest Product: gcc Version: 7.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/84191] New: Compiler ICEs when trying to resolve impossible arithmetic operations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84191 Bug ID: 84191 Summary: Compiler ICEs when trying to resolve impossible arithmetic operations Product: gcc Version: 7.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug other/84193] New: Document the limitations of -fcheck-pointer-bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84193 Bug ID: 84193 Summary: Document the limitations of -fcheck-pointer-bounds Product: gcc Version: 7.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/84155] [8 Regression] program hangs on valid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84155 --- Comment #14 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com --- Hi Dominique, Thanks for doing that. It was to have been my final step in the process. I will commit the patch and then will go back to diagnose why an unchanged tree dump yields

[Bug fortran/84155] [8 Regression] program hangs on valid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84155 --- Comment #15 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sat Feb 3 14:06:44 2018 New Revision: 257356 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257356=gcc=rev Log: 2018-02-03 Paul Thomas PR fortran/84141 PR

[Bug fortran/84141] [8 regression] Internal error: type_name(): Bad type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84141 --- Comment #35 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sat Feb 3 14:06:44 2018 New Revision: 257356 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257356=gcc=rev Log: 2018-02-03 Paul Thomas PR fortran/84141 PR

[Bug fortran/84155] [8 Regression] program hangs on valid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84155 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/84195] New: newlines in deprecated diagnostics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84195 Bug ID: 84195 Summary: newlines in deprecated diagnostics Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug target/84113] [7/8 Regression] libgcc/unwind.inc:136:1: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2311

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84113 --- Comment #20 from Douglas Mencken --- $ git bisect good good: [270b838d816f8a2c372eac0121adcdf570feccfa] Regenerate .pot files. Bisecting: 90 revisions left to test after this (roughly 7 steps) [6f2116bed6e87668a914dc27fff34c7a68576d4e]

[Bug fortran/68746] FAIL: gfortran.dg/read_dir.f90 -O0 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68746 --- Comment #12 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2018-01-31 3:17 AM, tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > Is there anything than can be done to debug this? > What happens if you compile the test with -g and > run it under a debgger? It's

[Bug target/84113] [7/8 Regression] libgcc/unwind.inc:136:1: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2311

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84113 --- Comment #19 from Douglas Mencken --- I got repo from git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git and begun to bisect it to find the cause of regression "good" here means reaching build of libstdc++-v3 after than problem libgcc $ git bisect start $ git

[Bug c++/84192] [7/8 Regression] ICE with statement expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84192 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/84196] New: invalid instantiation of a function template on a vector type silently accepted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84196 Bug ID: 84196 Summary: invalid instantiation of a function template on a vector type silently accepted Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug fortran/84122] Incorrect statement sequence in PDT definition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84122 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c/84190] [7 Regression] double arithmetic on x86 no longer rounds to nearest

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84190 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug c++/84186] nested template qualified-id not parsed correctly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84186 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug fortran/84122] Incorrect statement sequence in PDT definition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84122 --- Comment #3 from Neil Carlson --- Here's a related invalid example that gfortran accepts: module mod type foo(dim) integer,len,public :: dim integer :: array(dim) end type end module PUBLIC/PRIVATE attributes are not valid attributes

[Bug c++/84194] New: fails to pack structs with template members

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84194 Bug ID: 84194 Summary: fails to pack structs with template members Product: gcc Version: 7.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/84196] [6/7/8 Regression] invalid call to a function template with a vector argument silently accepted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84196 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid Known to work|