[Bug c++/84197] Segmentation fault when setting -g

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84197 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code

[Bug c++/84196] [6/7/8 Regression] invalid call to a function template with a vector argument silently accepted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84196 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.5

[Bug c++/70401] [c++1z on mingw]compile variadic template failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70401 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jyong at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug c++/84192] [7/8 Regression] ICE with statement expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84192 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unknown |7.3.1 Target Milestone|---

[Bug c/84190] [7/8 Regression] double arithmetic on x86 no longer rounds to nearest

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84190 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code

[Bug c++/82782] ICE: nested template alias and specialized template with auto template parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82782 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/82782] ICE: nested template alias and specialized template with auto template parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82782 --- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Mon Feb 5 11:15:55 2018 New Revision: 257388 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257388=gcc=rev Log: 2018-02-05 Paolo Carlini PR

[Bug tree-optimization/84188] assume non-null malloc pointers are distinct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84188 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/13962] [tree-ssa] make "fold" use alias information to optimize pointer comparisons

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13962 --- Comment #14 from Richard Biener --- *** Bug 84188 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c/84179] -save-temps breaks implicit-fallthrough comment heuristic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84179 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Version|unknown

[Bug target/27855] [6/7/8 regression] reassociation causes the RA to be confused

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27855 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/27827] [4.0 Regression] gcc 4 produces worse x87 code on all platforms than gcc 3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27827 Bug 27827 depends on bug 27855, which changed state. Bug 27855 Summary: [6/7/8 regression] reassociation causes the RA to be confused https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27855 What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/84172] option "-O3" create slower code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84172 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/84171] [8 Regression] ICE with -Wsign-compare

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84171 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug target/27855] [6/7/8 regression] reassociation causes the RA to be confused

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27855 --- Comment #57 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Mon, 5 Feb 2018, aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27855 > > --- Comment #56 from Aldy Hernandez --- > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment

[Bug ipa/57218] [6/7/8 Regression] Excessive inlining even at -Os

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57218 --- Comment #13 from Aldy Hernandez --- (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #12) > Set component as IPA so it stays at my radar. It is probably too late for > GCC 8 but I will try to finally take a look next stage1. Inlining those >

[Bug lto/81004] [7/8 Regression] linking failed with -flto and static libboost_program_options

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81004 --- Comment #20 from Martin Liška --- It's really fixed on trunk since r257023.

[Bug target/27855] [6/7/8 regression] reassociation causes the RA to be confused

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27855 --- Comment #56 from Aldy Hernandez --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #55) > Note the original report used -O and Aldhy used -O2 but we are talking > about a benchmark and when you use -ffast-math you also use -O3. Thanks, I will

[Bug sanitizer/84210] New: __ubsan_handle_builtin_unreachable shoun't be const

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84210 Bug ID: 84210 Summary: __ubsan_handle_builtin_unreachable shoun't be const Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/84209] [avr] Don't split SP in split2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84209 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Target|

[Bug target/84209] New: [avr] Don't split SP in split2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84209 Bug ID: 84209 Summary: [avr] Don't split SP in split2 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug lto/70929] [6/7/8 regression] Cross-module inlining for functions having argument passed by reference is no longer working.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70929 --- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Mon, 5 Feb 2018, hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70929 > > --- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka --- > Hmm, this actually looks reasonable for me

[Bug tree-optimization/39612] [6/7/8 Regression] LIM inserts loads from uninitialized local memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39612 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2009-10-05 20:09:44 |2018-2-5 --- Comment #30 from Richard

[Bug tree-optimization/38785] [6/7/8 Regression] huge performance regression on EEMBC bitmnp01

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38785 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|NEW Last reconfirmed|2010-02-19

[Bug gcov-profile/84137] Typo in gcov online documentation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84137 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||8.0 Known to fail|

[Bug gcov-profile/84137] Typo in gcov online documentation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84137 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Mon Feb 5 09:59:16 2018 New Revision: 257384 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257384=gcc=rev Log: Fix GCOV documentation (PR gcov-profile/84137). 2018-02-05 Martin Liska

[Bug target/27855] [6/7/8 regression] reassociation causes the RA to be confused

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27855 --- Comment #55 from Richard Biener --- I think the original report is about x87 math vs. SSE math. It's a bit hard to benchmark this through the releases given changes in tuning and vector feature sets (-march=native is out of the question).

[Bug lto/81004] [7/8 Regression] linking failed with -flto and static libboost_program_options

for copying conditions. There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. but not with $ ~/8-install-slow/bin/g++ --version g++ (GCC) 8.0.1 20180205 (experimental) Copyright (C) 2018 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source

[Bug c++/81917] [6/7/8 Regression] internal compiler error: in finish_member_declaration, at cp/semantics.c:3004

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81917 --- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini --- This variant causes the same ICE and it's a tad cleaner: template using a = void; template struct b { typedef int c; }; template class b; template ::c> class f;

[Bug lto/81004] [7/8 Regression] linking failed with -flto and static libboost_program_options

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81004 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug gcov-profile/83879] __gcov_dump doesn't work with dlopen-ed libraries

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83879 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Known to work|

[Bug gcov-profile/83879] __gcov_dump doesn't work with dlopen-ed libraries

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83879 --- Comment #6 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Mon Feb 5 09:19:18 2018 New Revision: 257383 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257383=gcc=rev Log: Document --dynamic-list-data option for --coverage usage. 2018-02-05 Martin Liska

[Bug target/68028] [6/7/8 regression] Compilation error "lto1: error: target attribute or pragma changes single precision floating point" with LTO on PowerPC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68028 --- Comment #10 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #9) > Created attachment 43318 [details] > Proposed patch > > Hi Guys, > > Richard was right - there is code that sets extra flags based upon the > setting of

[Bug tree-optimization/82518] [8 regression] gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/in-pack.f90 fails on armeb since r252917

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82518 --- Comment #11 from Christophe Lyon --- My setup uses armeb-none-linux-gnueabihf (as opposed to armeb-eabi as you report). I have never tried armeb-eabi. I am also using qemu as simulator (in user mode, not in system mode). The failure in

[Bug gcov-profile/84137] Typo in gcov online documentation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84137 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug gcov-profile/84107] indirect call profiling broken with multiple DSOs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84107 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/84106] loop distribution cost-model needs work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84106 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ipa/65797] [6/7/8 regression] IPA ICF causes function to be emitted with no debug line info

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65797 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|hubicka at ucw dot cz |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug ipa/80726] [7/8 Regression] Destructor not inlined anymore (regression)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80726 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug lto/70929] [6/7/8 regression] Cross-module inlining for functions having argument passed by reference is no longer working.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70929 --- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka --- Hmm, this actually looks reasonable for me too. Shall I give it a try and figure out what incompatibilities we get here? What about K prototypes?

[Bug middle-end/84200] r256888 causes 30% performance regression of 519.lbm_r at -Ofast generic tuning on Zen

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84200 Sebastian Peryt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sebastian.peryt at intel dot com ---

[Bug ipa/57218] [6/7/8 Regression] Excessive inlining even at -Os

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57218 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug sanitizer/84208] fsanitize-address-use-after-scope Not working for ARM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84208 --- Comment #2 from Akhilesh Kumar --- > Does it work on non-changed gcc 7.2 on arm? Not yet verified because unable to cross compile gcc 7.2. > And with arm do mean arm-linux-gnueabi as the target or aarch64-linux-gnu? I am using

<    1   2