[Bug target/84248] [8 Regression] r257414 failed too bootstrap in libitm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84248 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||doko at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6 from

[Bug tree-optimization/84224] [7/8 Regression] ICE in execute, at gimple-ssa-warn-alloca.c:448

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84224 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Version|unknown

[Bug target/84259] [8 Regression] bootstrap fails in libitm on x86 targets (ICE in ix86_option_override_internal, at config/i386/i386.c:4948)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84259 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/84227] [8 Regression] ICE in lra_set_insn_recog_data, at lra.c:998

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84227 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unknown |8.0 Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/84221] [6/7/8 Regression] spurious -Wunused warning on a variable of a template type declared unused

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84221 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.5

[Bug target/84226] [8 Regression] ICE in simplify_const_unary_operation, at simplify-rtx.c:1974 on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84226 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unknown |8.0 Target Milestone|---

[Bug c/84229] A valid code rejected with -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84229 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid CC|

[Bug c/84229] A valid code rejected with -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84229 --- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka --- > Huh, __builtin_va_arg_pack_len is only valid within varargs functions. The > difference seems to be that without LTO we simply emit a library call and > not emit aa.i:open (which is invalid) but with LTO we

[Bug middle-end/84217] [8 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84217 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/84261] New: gcc fails to call a simd-vectorized function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84261 Bug ID: 84261 Summary: gcc fails to call a simd-vectorized function Product: gcc Version: 7.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug middle-end/84233] [7/8 Regression] ICE (segfault) in gimple_assign_rhs_code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84233 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/84234] #pragma omp declare simd is ignored on forward declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84234 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization, openmp

[Bug tree-optimization/84235] [8 Regression] Miscompilation of floating point code by dom2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84235 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/84240] Error in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2246

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84240 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug lto/84241] [8 regression] test case g++.dg/torture/pr67600.C fails starting with r257412

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84241 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0

[Bug fortran/84245] [7/8 Regression] ICE in delete_root, at fortran/bbt.c:150

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84245 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.4

[Bug middle-end/84234] #pragma omp declare simd is ignored on forward declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84234 --- Comment #2 from Florian Lemaitre --- Well, I should mention that using __attribute((simd)) also has the issue. So I don't think the problem lies in OpenMP front end.

[Bug middle-end/84251] [8 Regression] Performance regression in gcc 8 when comparing floating point numbers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84251 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/84262] Header file initialization of a static constant causes linker error if code is compiled without optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84262 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/84234] #pragma omp declare simd is ignored on forward declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84234 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- The forward declaration is not ignored, but you either need to use #pragma omp simd on the loop you want to vectorize, or tell the compiler your function doesn't have any side-effects that would prevent

[Bug c/84261] gcc fails to vectorize a function call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84261 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization

[Bug sanitizer/84250] Symbol collision when using both Address and Undefined Behavior sanitizers (-fsanitize=address,undefined)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84250 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c/84261] gcc fails to vectorize a function call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84261 --- Comment #2 from Marcin Krotkiewski --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > This is because reduction operations like 'exp' are not supported. Also > vectorization of loops with using vectors isn't supported. > > So not sure what

[Bug middle-end/63311] [6/7/8 Regression] -O1 optimization introduces valgrind warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63311 --- Comment #13 from Richard Biener --- Please leave the bug open - it does point at an undesirable transform which would conflict with GCC ever treating the use of uninitialized vars as "more" undefined as it does right now.

[Bug middle-end/84234] #pragma omp declare simd is ignored on forward declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84234 --- Comment #4 from Florian Lemaitre --- Ah... ok. I understand. Indeed, declaring the function const works as expected. So, I guess we can say it is not a bug, and close the bug report? However, I really think this should be documented

[Bug debug/84252] [8 Regression] ICE in get_tracked_reg_offset when building libvpx for aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84252 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/84262] Header file initialization of a static constant causes linker error if code is compiled without optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84262 --- Comment #2 from Serguei Kolos --- If you read my original message through the end you should have noticed that I have admitted that already. My question was different: Is it normal that the same code (seemingly bogus) compiles fine with

[Bug c/84261] gcc fails to vectorize a function call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84261 --- Comment #3 from Marcin Krotkiewski --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > Also vectorization of loops with using vectors isn't supported. Not sure what you mean. If instead of a function call I do some floating point

[Bug middle-end/84234] #pragma omp declare simd is ignored on forward declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84234 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- #pragma omp declare simd or simd attribute say that on the definition compiler should create alternate entry point(s) for the vectorized variants, and on declarations that on the definition they were

[Bug c/82210] [6/7/8 Regression] Having _Alignas in a struct with VLAs causes writing to one array to overwrite another

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82210 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c++/84263] New: [8 Regression] ICE in lookup_page_table_entry at gcc/ggc-page.c:646 on valid C++ code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84263 Bug ID: 84263 Summary: [8 Regression] ICE in lookup_page_table_entry at gcc/ggc-page.c:646 on valid C++ code Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/84263] [8 Regression] ICE in lookup_page_table_entry at gcc/ggc-page.c:646 on valid C++ code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84263 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug target/84265] New: ICE in vect_permute_load_chain, at tree-vect-data-refs.c:5933

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84265 Bug ID: 84265 Summary: ICE in vect_permute_load_chain, at tree-vect-data-refs.c:5933 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug c++/84059] [8 Regression] ICE in ix86_get_function_versions_dispatcher, at config/i386/i386.c:32429

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84059 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Wed Feb 7 13:16:04 2018 New Revision: 257451 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257451=gcc=rev Log: Revert behavior to r251316. 2018-02-07 Martin Liska PR

[Bug c++/84262] Header file initialization of a static constant causes linker error if code is compiled without optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84262 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Serguei Kolos from comment #0) > According to the article 9.4.2/4 of the C++ standard the code is probably > missing definitions of the c1, c2 and c3 constants: > > "If a static data member

[Bug c/82210] [6/7/8 Regression] Having _Alignas in a struct with VLAs causes writing to one array to overwrite another

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82210 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- This changed with r146817, so I'd look at a problem in expansion rather than much earlier. DECL_SIZE_UNIT should match what sizeof is, so you can't just change it at will, it is part of the ABI. Arrays of

[Bug target/84265] ICE in vect_permute_load_chain, at tree-vect-data-refs.c:5933

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84265 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needs-bisection Priority|P3

[Bug c++/84262] Header file initialization of a static constant causes linker error if code is compiled without optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84262 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Serguei Kolos from comment #2) > If you read my original message through the end you should have noticed that > I have admitted that already. My question was different: > > Is it normal that

[Bug c++/84263] [8 Regression] ICE in lookup_page_table_entry at gcc/ggc-page.c:646 on valid C++ code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84263 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/84264] New: ICE in rs6000_emit_le_vsx_store, at config/rs6000/rs6000.c:10367

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84264 Bug ID: 84264 Summary: ICE in rs6000_emit_le_vsx_store, at config/rs6000/rs6000.c:10367 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug debug/84252] [8 Regression] ICE in get_tracked_reg_offset when building libvpx for aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84252 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 43358 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43358=edit gcc8-pr84252.patch Full untested fix.

[Bug middle-end/84234] #pragma omp declare simd is ignored on forward declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84234 --- Comment #6 from Florian Lemaitre --- I want auto-vectorization, not guided vectorization. Basically, I try to write a fast RSQRT that will not break auto vectorization, and this will be integrated in a large scale project where it is easy to

[Bug c/82210] [6/7/8 Regression] Having _Alignas in a struct with VLAs causes writing to one array to overwrite another

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82210 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Though, in e.g. *.ehcleanup2 dump we still have: pretmp.25_64 = D.1613_19 /[ex] 16; D.2749_73 = _61->b{off: pretmp.25_64 * 16}[0]; ivtmp.35_86 = (long unsigned int) D.2749_73; both before and after

[Bug c/82210] [6/7/8 Regression] Having _Alignas in a struct with VLAs causes writing to one array to overwrite another

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82210 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- The difference with that revision is: addq$2, %rax cmpq%rcx, %rax jne .L3 - leaq(%r12,%rdx), %rdx + andq$-16, %rdx xorl%eax, %eax +

[Bug tree-optimization/82518] [8 regression] gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/in-pack.f90 fails on armeb since r252917

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82518 --- Comment #38 from Christophe Lyon --- (In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #37) > (In reply to Christophe Lyon from comment #31) > > Created attachment 43352 [details] > > Reduced testcase > > > > I commented out most calls, since

[Bug target/84265] ICE in vect_permute_load_chain, at tree-vect-data-refs.c:5933

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84265 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW CC|

[Bug target/84264] ICE in rs6000_emit_le_vsx_store, at config/rs6000/rs6000.c:10367

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84264 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/83204] [6/7/8 Regression] c++ -std=c++14 ICE in maybe_undo_parenthesized_ref, at cp/semantics.c:1694

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83204 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||paolo.carlini at oracle dot com ---

[Bug c/82210] [6/7/8 Regression] Having _Alignas in a struct with VLAs causes writing to one array to overwrite another

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82210 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- I think the bug is in the ARRAY_REF design, because at least in C one can have arrays of over-aligned types the design choice that ARRAY_REF TREE_OPERAND (, 3) is measured in multiplies of TYPE_ALIGN_UNIT of

[Bug lto/84241] [8 regression] test case g++.dg/torture/pr67600.C fails starting with r257412

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84241 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Target|powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu | |, aarch64-none-linux-gnu,

[Bug debug/84252] [8 Regression] ICE in get_tracked_reg_offset when building libvpx for aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84252 --- Comment #6 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5) > Created attachment 43358 [details] > gcc8-pr84252.patch > > Full untested fix. Thanks. Bootstrapped & regression-tested on aarch64-linux-gnu,

[Bug c/82210] [6/7/8 Regression] Having _Alignas in a struct with VLAs causes writing to one array to overwrite another

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82210 --- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 7 Feb 2018, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82210 > > --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- > I think the bug is in the ARRAY_REF design,

[Bug other/80589] Typing mistakes in two messages

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80589 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|ASSIGNED

[Bug other/80589] Typing mistakes in two messages

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80589 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work|8.0 | Known to fail|

[Bug target/84264] ICE in rs6000_emit_le_vsx_store, at config/rs6000/rs6000.c:10367

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84264 --- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool --- It ICEs on gcc_assert (!lra_in_progress && !reload_completed); but this is called from the movv4si expander, and that is something LRA is allowed to use.

[Bug lto/84241] [8 regression] test case g++.dg/torture/pr67600.C fails starting with r257412

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84241 --- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka --- I am testing fix for the missing resolution info. It turns out to be related to rather early LTO hack to not put into symbol table symbols used only by external definitions. Concerning multiversioning this is

[Bug c/82210] [6/7/8 Regression] Having _Alignas in a struct with VLAs causes writing to one array to overwrite another

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82210 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #10) > On Wed, 7 Feb 2018, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82210 > > > > --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c/84240] Error in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2246

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84240 --- Comment #2 from xvl5190 at psu dot edu --- Please try this example with optimization level -O1/-O2/-O3: /* Executable testcase for 'output flags.' */ /* { dg-do rund *nbum; } */ char TestC() { char r; __asm__("stc": "=@ccc" (r)); if

[Bug c/84258] Bogus -Wformat warning "wide character string" for const unsigned char

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84258 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/84266] New: mmintrin.h intrinsic headers for PowerPC code fails on power9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84266 Bug ID: 84266 Summary: mmintrin.h intrinsic headers for PowerPC code fails on power9 Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/84037] [8 Regression] Speed regression of polyhedron benchmark since r256644

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84037 --- Comment #21 from Richard Biener --- So after r257453 we improve the situation pre-IVOPTs to just 6 IVs (duplicated but trivially equivalent) plus one counting IV. But then when SLP is enabled IVOPTs comes along and adds another 4 IVs which

[Bug tree-optimization/84037] [8 Regression] Speed regression of polyhedron benchmark since r256644

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84037 --- Comment #22 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Feb 7 15:46:17 2018 New Revision: 257453 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257453=gcc=rev Log: 2018-02-07 Richard Biener PR

[Bug tree-optimization/84037] [8 Regression] Speed regression of polyhedron benchmark since r256644

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84037 --- Comment #23 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #21) > So after r257453 we improve the situation pre-IVOPTs to just > 6 IVs (duplicated but trivially equivalent) plus one counting IV. But then > when

[Bug target/84266] mmintrin.h intrinsic headers for PowerPC code fails on power9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84266 Bill Seurer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||munroesj at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/84181] [8 Regression] ICE in variadic lambda inside a template when accessing any member after decltype

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84181 --- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed Feb 7 16:02:50 2018 New Revision: 257454 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257454=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/84182 - ICE with captured lambda PR c++/84181 *

[Bug c++/84182] [8 Regression] ICE in variadic lambda inside a template when calling a captured lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84182 --- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed Feb 7 16:02:50 2018 New Revision: 257454 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257454=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/84182 - ICE with captured lambda PR c++/84181 *

[Bug c++/84182] [8 Regression] ICE in variadic lambda inside a template when calling a captured lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84182 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/84181] [8 Regression] ICE in variadic lambda inside a template when accessing any member after decltype

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84181 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug lto/84212] -Wno-* does not disable warnings from -flto link stage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84212 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug rtl-optimization/83530] [8 Regression] ICE in reset_sched_cycles_in_current_ebb, at sel-sched.c:7150

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83530 --- Comment #9 from Pat Haugen --- (In reply to Andrey Belevantsev from comment #8) > I will take a look. The ICE is within the code that models the scheduling > loop in order to get the proper insn ticks and everything for later MD >

[Bug rtl-optimization/83530] [7/8 Regression] ICE in reset_sched_cycles_in_current_ebb, at sel-sched.c:7150

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83530 Pat Haugen changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8 Regression] ICE in |[7/8 Regression] ICE in

[Bug bootstrap/84257] Extremely slow compilation from gcc source code under macOS 10.13

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84257 --- Comment #3 from 191919 <191919 at gmail dot com> --- In macOS 10.12.6 with SIP disabled, the value of DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH was modified to the same as in macOS 10.13.3, but the compilation speed was not affected. I guess this is a regression of

[Bug c/82210] [6/7/8 Regression] Having _Alignas in a struct with VLAs causes writing to one array to overwrite another

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82210 --- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 7 Feb 2018, aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82210 > > Aldy Hernandez changed: > >What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/84263] [8 Regression] ICE in lookup_page_table_entry at gcc/ggc-page.c:646 on valid C++ code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84263 --- Comment #2 from Nathan Sidwell --- Martin has confirmed i686 host & target. (not just target)

[Bug tree-optimization/82518] [8 regression] gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/in-pack.f90 fails on armeb since r252917

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82518 --- Comment #39 from Christophe Lyon --- Maybe we can demote this from P1? I'm sure armeb is getting a lot of attention, given other bug reports.

[Bug lto/84213] [8 Regression] 521.wrf_r from SPEC 2017 fails to build (link) with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84213 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- So the issue here is that the early debug generated for module_ra_gfdleta.F90 contains relocations to text symbols. That's a no-no. So this is reproducible with just compiling this file with -flto -g, the

[Bug lto/84213] [8 Regression] 521.wrf_r from SPEC 2017 fails to build (link) with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84213 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- MODULE MODULE_RA_GFDLETA REAL , SAVE :: EM1(28,180) REAL ,SAVE, DIMENSION(5040):: EM1V EQUIVALENCE (EM1V(1),EM1(1,1)) END MODULE module_RA_GFDLETA

<    1   2