https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84564
Bug ID: 84564
Summary: error: unable to find a register to spill with
-mforce-indirect-call
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84564
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2018-2-26
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84565
Bug ID: 84565
Summary: ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2304
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84565
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
Summary|ICE in extract_ins
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84566
Bug ID: 84566
Summary: error: qsort comparator not anti-commutative: -1, -1
on aarch64 in sched1
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84567
Bug ID: 84567
Summary: ICE in vectorize_fold_left_reduction, at
tree-vect-loop.c:6224
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84567
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2018-2-26
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84548
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84533
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28564
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82862
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84466
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84567
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84567
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83965
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
*** Bug 84567 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84521
--- Comment #15 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Author: ramana
Date: Mon Feb 26 09:25:21 2018
New Revision: 257984
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257984&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[Patch AArch64] Turn on frame pointer / partial fix for PR84521
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84229
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Version|unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83327
--- Comment #11 from Tom de Vries ---
(In reply to Vladimir Makarov from comment #10)
> Any news about the patch testing on MIPS. It would be nice to move forward
> with the PR.
Pinged Matthew here: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-02/ms
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84229
--- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka ---
I am not sure it is really fixed. We no longer ICE, howeverw we need
backporting to release branches and also I think we miss fortification whenever
we fail to inline (that is with -Os). I have some patches to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32957
--- Comment #6 from dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dominiq
Date: Mon Feb 26 09:55:39 2018
New Revision: 257985
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257985&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-26 Dominique d'Humieres
PR fortran/32957
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84568
Bug ID: 84568
Summary: libstdc++-v3 configure checks for atomic operations
fail on riscv
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84568
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84229
--- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 26 Feb 2018, hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84229
>
> --- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka ---
> I am not sure it is really fixed. We no lon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84229
--- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka ---
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84229
>
> --- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
> On Mon, 26 Feb 2018, hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84556
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Feb 26 10:18:31 2018
New Revision: 257986
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257986&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/84556
* g++.dg/gomp/pr84556.C: New test.
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84556
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Fixed by r257820 on the trunk already.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84430
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bisqwit at iki dot fi
--- Comment #5 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84548
--- Comment #4 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
Created attachment 43502
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43502&action=edit
preproccessed src file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84556
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84229
--- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 26 Feb 2018, hubicka at ucw dot cz wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84229
>
> --- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka ---
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83327
mpf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpf at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84566
--- Comment #1 from Alexander Monakov ---
Sorry, I cannot reproduce this. I've built a cross-compiler from today's trunk
via 'configure --target aarch64-linux-gnu && make all-gcc' (i.e. just to
cc1plus, no binutils etc.) and it doesn't abort.
If
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84566
--- Comment #2 from Alexander Monakov ---
Bah, built a wrong branch, not the trunk. I'll recheck later, sorry for the
noise.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84569
Bug ID: 84569
Summary: g++ -g -O3 consumes all memory
Product: gcc
Version: 6.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84548
Dmitry G. Dyachenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #43502|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84548
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
Ok, and please can you attach full command line how you invoke that?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84548
--- Comment #7 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.
-I/home/dimhen/src/CSPbuild/CSP/unittest/CpCapi20UnitTest -I../../..
-I/home/dimhen/src/CSPbuild -I/home/dimhen/src/CSPbuild/CSP/src/include
-I/home/dimhen/src/CSPbuild/shared/i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84548
--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška ---
Thanks and can you please attach also:
/home/dimhen/src/CSPbuild/CSP/unittest/CpCapi20UnitTest/CryptDefaultProviderTest.h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84548
--- Comment #9 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
Created attachment 43505
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43505&action=edit
header
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84569
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||compile-time-hog
Status|UNCON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84569
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Feel free to backport it if it is backportable.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84569
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84381
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84094
Bug 84094 depends on bug 84381, which changed state.
Bug 84381 Summary: replace non-std 'call abort' by 'stop 1' in gfortran
testsuite
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84381
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84570
Bug ID: 84570
Summary: [og7, openacc, nvptx] Unused offloaded function
parameters
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84557
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84571
Bug ID: 84571
Summary: [og7, openacc, nvptx] 32-bit value passed in 64 bits
to offloading function
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84548
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #10 from Martin Liška --
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84548
--- Comment #11 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #10)
> Thank you very much for help. So I see 2 problems:
...
> Is the project you are building public so I can build it locally and debug
> case b) ?
Alas, its
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84548
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #12 from Martin Lišk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84548
--- Comment #13 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
Created attachment 43507
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43507&action=edit
gcno+gcda: rebuild
2 functions at 18:5:18
and 4 at 20:5:20
Its issue b) -- I am understand correctly?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84548
--- Comment #14 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 43508
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43508&action=edit
Patch candidate
For reduced test-case:
$ cat test.cc
struct A { static int foo () { return 1; }; static int ba
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84548
--- Comment #15 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Dmitry G. Dyachenko from comment #13)
> Created attachment 43507 [details]
> gcno+gcda: rebuild
>
> 2 functions at 18:5:18
> and 4 at 20:5:20
>
> Its issue b) -- I am understand correctly?
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84545
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|hppa-unknown-linux-gnu |hppa-linux-gnu,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84548
--- Comment #16 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #14)
> Created attachment 43508 [details]
> Patch candidate
...
> Which is correct in my opinion. Can you please Dmitry test the patch?
Thank you Martin!
I'll tr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84325
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
Unfortunately the patch for 83692 didn't fix it; the ICE now looks like:
$ ./cc1plus -quiet 84325.C
84325.C:10:45: internal compiler error: tree check: did not expect class
‘type’, have ‘type’ (record_type)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84545
--- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou ---
-fno-delayed-branch seems to be the workaround.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83496
--- Comment #31 from Eric Botcazou ---
> Just a note. I'm tracking a separate problem with delay slot filling that
> looks like it's related to handling of debug insns. I doubt it's the same
> problem, but if you stumble over it, be aware I'm t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84297
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84566
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84548
--- Comment #17 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
No ICE!
Thank Martin!
And once more strangeness
I have (at least) 2 messages 'YYY.gcda:stamp mismatch with notes file'
from 3K gcno-files in full project.
$ ~/build/gcc_current/prev-gcc/gcov cpcapi2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84548
--- Comment #18 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Dmitry G. Dyachenko from comment #17)
> No ICE!
> Thank Martin!
Good. Can you please attach gcov file for the problematic invocation of gcov
tool?
>
> And once more strangeness
>
> I have (at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84297
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Reduced, hopefully still valid. But clang++ accepts it.
struct integral_constant {};
template using __bool_constant = integral_constant;
template
struct A : __bool_constant < __is_trivially_constructi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84558
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84558
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84559
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Vers
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83496
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #43499|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84559
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
That said, we accept:
void foo(int i)
{
constexpr char x[i] = {1, 2, 3};
}
clang++ rejects both: error: constexpr variable cannot have non-literal type
'char const[i]'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84572
Bug ID: 84572
Summary: Wrong number of execution of a line
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: gcov-profil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84572
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84548
--- Comment #19 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #18)
> (In reply to Dmitry G. Dyachenko from comment #17)
> > No ICE!
> > Thank Martin!
>
> Good. Can you please attach gcov file for the problematic invocation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83496
--- Comment #33 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
No. THe one I'm currently chasing is not 84545. I'm chasing a ton of ICEs due
to debug insns appearing in places we didn't expect.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84564
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84537
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84537
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Mon Feb 26 14:12:25 2018
New Revision: 257988
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257988&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/84537
* name-lookup.c (suggest_alternative_in_ex
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84537
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84564
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84572
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84548
--- Comment #20 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Dmitry G. Dyachenko from comment #19)
> (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #18)
> > (In reply to Dmitry G. Dyachenko from comment #17)
> > > No ICE!
> > > Thank Martin!
> >
> > Good. Can you
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84548
--- Comment #21 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Dmitry G. Dyachenko from comment #19)
> (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #18)
> > (In reply to Dmitry G. Dyachenko from comment #17)
> > > No ICE!
> > > Thank Martin!
> >
> > Good. Can you
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84545
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84572
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.0 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84405
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Feb 26 14:37:45 2018
New Revision: 257989
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257989&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR bootstrap/84405
* vec.h (vec_default_construct): For BR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84548
--- Comment #22 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #20)
...
> Isn't that
> an old data file you forgot to remove?
I'll rebuild all and 'll report
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84545
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Do the:
if (CALL_P (insn))
{
rtx note = find_reg_note (insn, REG_CALL_ARG_LOCATION, NULL_RTX);
if (note)
remove_note (insn, note);
}
also for insns inside
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84461
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84565
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84533
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Mon Feb 26 15:00:44 2018
New Revision: 257991
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257991&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2018-02-26 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/84533
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84533
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[7/8 Regression] ICE with |[7 Regression] ICE with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84541
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84563
--- Comment #1 from Ruslan Nikolaev ---
See also discussion in the gcc mailing list
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84545
--- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou ---
> Do the:
> if (CALL_P (insn))
> {
> rtx note = find_reg_note (insn, REG_CALL_ARG_LOCATION, NULL_RTX);
> if (note)
> remove_note (insn, note);
> }
> also
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84530
--- Comment #3 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Mon Feb 26 15:29:30 2018
New Revision: 257992
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257992&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
i386: Update -mfunction-return= for return with pop
When -mfunctio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84461
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84545
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Is it guaranteed that no target puts calls into delay slots?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84565
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The aarch64_cmpeqdf instruction no longer matches, because the CONST0_RTX
(DFmode) operand doesn't match the aarch64_simd_reg_or_zero predicate.
Either aarch64_simd_reg_or_zero predicate should use
aarch64_si
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84565
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 43512
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43512&action=edit
gcc8-pr84565.patch
This works for me.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84545
--- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Mon Feb 26 15:40:18 2018
New Revision: 257993
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257993&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR debug/84545
* final.c (rest_of_clean_state): Also l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84545
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84540
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code |ice-on-valid-code
Status|NEW
1 - 100 of 183 matches
Mail list logo
