[Bug c++/71784] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE on valid code in push_access_scope, at cp/pt.c:229

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71784 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P4 |P2 Status|NEW

[Bug target/52991] [6/7/8 Regression] attribute packed broken on mingw32?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52991 --- Comment #34 from Benjamin Robin --- Thank you a lot for the fix. I have no idea what I did yesterday when I did test bf-ms-layout-2.c (Yes the test was wrong, and by default cannot compile under Visual Studio VC) The test can be slightly

[Bug c++/84618] [8 Regression] ICE in build_capture_proxy, at cp/lambda.c:460

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84618 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||error-recovery, |

[Bug c++/84609] [8 Regression] internal compiler error: in cp_parser_abort_tentative_parse, at cp/parser.c:28960 (cp_parser_member_declaration())

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84609 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Feb 28 18:57:38 2018 New Revision: 258080 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258080=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/84609 * parser.c (cp_parser_attributes_opt): Formatting fix.

[Bug c++/84611] [5/67/8 Regression] ICE in operator[], at vec.h:826 (local_class_index())

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84611 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/70321] [6/7/8 Regression] STV generates less optimized code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70321 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||itsimbal at gcc dot gnu.org Target

[Bug target/82258] [8 regression] allocate_zerosize_3.f fails since r251949

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82258 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC|

[Bug target/84014] [6/7 Regression] ICE in setup_min_max_allocno_live_range_point, at ira-build.c:2762

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84014 --- Comment #4 from David Edelsohn --- Author: dje Date: Wed Feb 28 19:53:24 2018 New Revision: 258081 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258081=gcc=rev Log: PR target/84014 * gcc.target/powerpc/pr84014.c: Use ilp32, not -m32

[Bug target/70321] [6/7/8 Regression] STV generates less optimized code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70321 --- Comment #17 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #16) > We didn't do that in stage1, stage4 is too risky for that. Can somebody > from Intel try that for GCC9 stage1? > I'm willing to help, but will have lots of work on

[Bug testsuite/84617] [8 Regression] new test cases g++.dg/ext/attr-const.C and g++.dg/ext/attr-pure.C fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84617 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/80293] [6/7 Regression] unnecessary code at -O2 (-O1 is fine)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80293 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||peter at cordes dot ca --- Comment #11

[Bug target/80837] [7/8 regression] x86 accessing a member of a 16-byte atomic object generates terrible code: splitting/merging the bytes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80837 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/84618] [8 Regression] ICE in build_capture_proxy, at cp/lambda.c:460

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84618 --- Comment #2 from David Malcolm --- Failing here in build_capture_proxy (member=, init=) at ../../src/gcc/cp/lambda.c:458: 458 gcc_assert (VAR_P (init) || TREE_CODE (init) == PARM_DECL); where init is a component_ref.

[Bug c++/84610] [5/6/7/8 Regression] ICE in synthesize_implicit_template_parm, at cp/parser.c:38843

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84610 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/84614] [8 Regression] wrong code with u16->u128 extension at aarch64 -fno-split-wide-types -g3 --param=max-combine-insns=3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84614 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Target

[Bug c++/84618] [8 Regression] ICE in build_capture_proxy, at cp/lambda.c:460

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84618 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Target

[Bug c++/84610] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE in synthesize_implicit_template_parm, at cp/parser.c:38843

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84610 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Target

[Bug testsuite/84617] [8 Regression] new test cases g++.dg/ext/attr-const.C and g++.dg/ext/attr-pure.C fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84617 --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Wed Feb 28 18:28:53 2018 New Revision: 258077 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258077=gcc=rev Log: PR testsuite/84617 - new test cases g++.dg/ext/attr-const.C and

[Bug c++/84616] funsafe-math-optimizations leads to incorrect results for 4x4 matrix inversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84616 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/83871] wrong code for attribute const and pure on distinct template specializations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83871 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Feb 28 18:56:36 2018 New Revision: 258079 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258079=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/83871 PR c++/83503 * pt.c (INCLUDE_STRING): Remove

[Bug c++/83503] [8 Regression] bogus -Wattributes for const and pure on function template specialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83503 --- Comment #23 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Feb 28 18:56:36 2018 New Revision: 258079 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258079=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/83871 PR c++/83503 * pt.c (INCLUDE_STRING): Remove

[Bug c++/84609] [8 Regression] internal compiler error: in cp_parser_abort_tentative_parse, at cp/parser.c:28960 (cp_parser_member_declaration())

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84609 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/52285] [6/7/8 Regression] libgcrypt _gcry_burn_stack slowdown

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52285 --- Comment #21 from Vladimir Makarov --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #20) > Vlad, your thoughts on this? Can it be done in LRA or postreload-gcse or > some other post-LRA pass (if they do have loops)? I don't think it can be done

[Bug c++/84621] New: bogus -Wresturn-type on a template instantiated on a function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84621 Bug ID: 84621 Summary: bogus -Wresturn-type on a template instantiated on a function Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/84622] New: [F08] gfortran accepts invalid intent(out) polymorphic dummy argument with coarray component

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84622 Bug ID: 84622 Summary: [F08] gfortran accepts invalid intent(out) polymorphic dummy argument with coarray component Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/71784] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE on valid code in push_access_scope, at cp/pt.c:229

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71784 --- Comment #15 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed Feb 28 21:34:07 2018 New Revision: 258085 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258085=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/71784 - ICE with ref-qualifier and explicit specialization.

[Bug c++/84621] bogus -Wreturn-type on a template instantiated on a function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84621 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Summary|bogus

[Bug c++/84294] attributes on a function template redeclaration silently discarded

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84294 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/84622] [F08] gfortran accepts invalid intent(out) polymorphic dummy argument with coarray component

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84622 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/71784] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE on valid code in push_access_scope, at cp/pt.c:229

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71784 --- Comment #17 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed Feb 28 21:34:56 2018 New Revision: 258087 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258087=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/71784 - ICE with ref-qualifier and explicit specialization.

[Bug c++/71784] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE on valid code in push_access_scope, at cp/pt.c:229

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71784 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/71784] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE on valid code in push_access_scope, at cp/pt.c:229

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71784 --- Comment #16 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed Feb 28 21:34:31 2018 New Revision: 258086 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258086=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/71784 - ICE with ref-qualifier and explicit specialization.

[Bug regression/84623] New: [8 Regression] "-fcompare-debug failure (length)" testing pr46066.c start with r257826 on mips

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84623 Bug ID: 84623 Summary: [8 Regression] "-fcompare-debug failure (length)" testing pr46066.c start with r257826 on mips Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/84628] attribute(warning/error) should be evaluated before optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84628 --- Comment #1 from Jay --- Also occurs with git trunk ef8d0c5bff3c11a5d67617df2f43775f7a26fad2 8.0.1 20180228.

[Bug target/44002] need to #include unistd.h for pid_t on alpha-dec-vms

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44002 --- Comment #4 from Jay --- Incorrect bug.

[Bug sanitizer/84629] sanitizer warnings and errors on Linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84629 --- Comment #4 from Jay --- -disable-multilib fixed the errors. I didn't watch for the warnings.

[Bug target/84626] New: powerpc toc register is reloaded unnecessarily

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84626 Bug ID: 84626 Summary: powerpc toc register is reloaded unnecessarily Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug inline-asm/84625] ICE with empty constraint and vector constant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84625 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug ipa/84628] attribute(warning/error) functions should not be merged together

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84628 --- Comment #6 from Jay --- Misplaced comment: But, the thing is, because optimization can remove the use of such functions, people are now advocating that we noinline along with the attribute, which hypothetically is unwarranted damage.

[Bug target/84627] powerpc excess padding generated for POWER9 target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84627 --- Comment #2 from Nicholas Piggin --- Ah sorry, target is powerpc64le

[Bug rtl-optimization/83327] Spilling into hard regs not taken into account in lra liveness analysis

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83327 --- Comment #13 from Tom de Vries --- Author: vries Date: Thu Mar 1 05:51:08 2018 New Revision: 258093 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258093=gcc=rev Log: Fix liveness analysis in lra for spilled-into hard regs 2018-03-01 Tom de Vries

[Bug target/71657] Wrong code on trunk gcc (std::out_of_range), westmere

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71657 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added Status|SUSPENDED |NEW --- Comment #13 from Tom de Vries

[Bug sanitizer/84629] sanitizer warnings and errors on Linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84629 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug inline-asm/84625] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE with empty constraint and vector constant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84625 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code

[Bug ipa/84628] attribute(warning/error) functions should not be merged together

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84628 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Jay from comment #3) > The original case said something about "localalias" in the error, so aliases > don't seem to address it. I can dig that up probably. > > Shouldn't it warn for: > if (0)

[Bug sanitizer/84629] sanitizer warnings and errors on Linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84629 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- The __NR_* macros are actually provided by kernel headers rather than glibc, /usr/include/asm*/unistd*.h So this looks like a distro bug to me.

[Bug ipa/84628] attribute(warning/error) functions should not be merged together

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84628 --- Comment #3 from Jay --- The original case said something about "localalias" in the error, so aliases don't seem to address it. I can dig that up probably. Shouldn't it warn for: if (0) banned_function() ? I believe we want it to. You

[Bug ipa/84628] attribute(warning/error) functions should not be merged together

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84628 --- Comment #5 from Jay --- I know. We just noticed and were surprised. It isn't clear if this is what users would expect or not. Warn because they wrote code that "merely looks bad", or only if the compiler decides after analysis that it really

[Bug regression/84623] [8 Regression] "-fcompare-debug failure (length)" testing pr46066.c start with r257826 on mips

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84623 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug sanitizer/84629] New: sanitizer warnings and errors on Linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84629 Bug ID: 84629 Summary: sanitizer warnings and errors on Linux Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: sanitizer

[Bug inline-asm/84625] New: ICE with constexpr and inline asm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84625 Bug ID: 84625 Summary: ICE with constexpr and inline asm Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: inline-asm

[Bug target/84627] New: powerpc excess padding generated for POWER9 target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84627 Bug ID: 84627 Summary: powerpc excess padding generated for POWER9 target Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug rtl-optimization/83327] Spilling into hard regs not taken into account in lra liveness analysis

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83327 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/84628] attribute(warning/error) functions should not be merged together

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84628 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/44002] need to #include unistd.h for pid_t on alpha-dec-vms

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44002 --- Comment #3 from Jay --- But, the thing is, because optimization can remove the use of such functions, people are now advocating that we noinline along with the attribute, which hypothetically is unwarranted damage. Noinline being a partial

[Bug tree-optimization/84624] New: bogus -Wstringop-truncation in a catch statement and nul assignment outside it

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84624 Bug ID: 84624 Summary: bogus -Wstringop-truncation in a catch statement and nul assignment outside it Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug target/84626] powerpc toc register is reloaded unnecessarily

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84626 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Target|

[Bug target/84627] powerpc excess padding generated for POWER9 target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84627 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Target|

[Bug c/84628] New: attribute(warning/error) should be evaluated before optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84628 Bug ID: 84628 Summary: attribute(warning/error) should be evaluated before optimization Product: gcc Version: 7.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug sanitizer/84629] sanitizer warnings and errors on Linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84629 --- Comment #3 from Jay --- This is ubuntu xenial I think, on WSL. Which doesn't have multi-arch. So I'll try configure -disable-multilib.

[Bug ipa/84628] attribute(warning/error) functions should not be merged together

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84628 --- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski --- deprecated deprecated (msg) The deprecated attribute results in a warning if the function is used anywhere in the source file. This is useful when identifying functions that are expected to be removed in a

[Bug c/84631] make check in fixincludes fails seemingly due to star in directory names, on WSL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84631 --- Comment #2 from Jay --- Err oops let me look again. Failure must be something else then.

[Bug c++/84616] funsafe-math-optimizations leads to incorrect results for 4x4 matrix inversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84616 --- Comment #2 from michael at moekadu dot de --- Created attachment 43532 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43532=edit Preprocessed test-program Here the preprocessed test-programmed (g++ -Ieigen test.cpp -O3

[Bug c++/84630] New: internal compiler error: tree check: expected class 'type', have 'exceptional' (error_mark) in tsubst_lambda_expr, at cp/pt.c:17141

tion /home/vegard/git/gcc/gcc/cp/parser.c:12879 $ xgcc --version xgcc (GCC) 8.0.1 20180228 (experimental) Built from git fd1990b25777e5f1307eac1447e8fb5fefe747b4 (r258063). 7.3.0 says: :2:13: error: ISO C++ forbids declaration of 'parameter' with no type [-fpermissive] template __att

[Bug debug/84637] New: gcc/dbxout.c:684:14: runtime error: negation of -9223372036854775808 cannot be represented in type 'long int'; cast to an unsigned type to negate this value to itself

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84637 Bug ID: 84637 Summary: gcc/dbxout.c:684:14: runtime error: negation of -9223372036854775808 cannot be represented in type 'long int'; cast to an unsigned type to negate this

[Bug c++/84630] internal compiler error: tree check: expected class 'type', have 'exceptional' (error_mark) in tsubst_lambda_expr, at cp/pt.c:17141

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84630 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||error-recovery, |

[Bug rtl-optimization/84635] New: gcc/regrename.c:1706:64: runtime error: index -1 out of bounds for type 'machine_mode [30]'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84635 Bug ID: 84635 Summary: gcc/regrename.c:1706:64: runtime error: index -1 out of bounds for type 'machine_mode [30]' Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/84636] New: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (identifier_p()/grokdeclarator())

:38880 0x15a51f5 c_common_parse_file() /home/vegard/git/gcc/gcc/c-family/c-opts.c:1132 $ xgcc --version xgcc (GCC) 8.0.1 20180228 (experimental) Built from git fd1990b25777e5f1307eac1447e8fb5fefe747b4 (r258063). Seems like versions all the way back to 4.4.7 (the oldest gcc on godbolt.org

[Bug c/84631] New: make check in fixincludes fails seemingly due to star in directory names, on WSL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84631 Bug ID: 84631 Summary: make check in fixincludes fails seemingly due to star in directory names, on WSL Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/84631] make check in fixincludes fails seemingly due to star in directory names, on WSL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84631 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/84634] [8 Regression] gcc/tree-vect-stmts.c:6786:19: runtime error: member access within null pointer of type 'struct _loop_vec_info

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84634 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0

[Bug tree-optimization/84634] New: [8 Regression] gcc/tree-vect-stmts.c:6786:19: runtime error: member access within null pointer of type 'struct _loop_vec_info

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84634 Bug ID: 84634 Summary: [8 Regression] gcc/tree-vect-stmts.c:6786:19: runtime error: member access within null pointer of type 'struct _loop_vec_info Product: gcc

[Bug ipa/84628] attribute(warning/error) functions should not be merged together

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84628 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- The warning/error attributes have been added for purposes like glibc memset inline, which does: if (__builtin_constant_p (__len) && __len == 0 && (!__builtin_constant_p (__ch) || __ch != 0)) {

[Bug c++/84632] New: internal compiler error: tree check: expected record_type or union_type or qual_union_type, have array_type in reduced_constant_expression_p, at cp/constexpr.c:1778

2 0xff9893 cp_parser_translation_unit /home/vegard/git/gcc/gcc/cp/parser.c:4559 0xff9893 c_parse_file() /home/vegard/git/gcc/gcc/cp/parser.c:38880 0x15a51f5 c_common_parse_file() /home/vegard/git/gcc/gcc/c-family/c-opts.c:1132 $ xgcc --version xgcc (GCC) 8.0.1 20180228 (experiment

[Bug ipa/84628] attribute(warning/error) functions should not be merged together

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84628 --- Comment #8 from Jay --- Aha, kinda the same thing, but before or after analysis. And this “deprecated” somewhat matches msvc - I was wondering about that but didn’t see it. It’d be nice to be able to customize the deprecated message but

[Bug c++/84633] New: internal compiler error: in lvalue_kind, at cp/tree.c:206

0x1001295 cp_parser_declaration /home/vegard/git/gcc/gcc/cp/parser.c:12776 $ xgcc --version xgcc (GCC) 8.0.1 20180228 (experimental) Built from git fd1990b25777e5f1307eac1447e8fb5fefe747b4 (r258063). Similar message to #52596 but that is an old bug. 7.3.0 seems fine. Test case was reduced by C

[Bug c++/84596] [8 Regression] internal compiler error: unexpected expression '(bool)c' of kind implicit_conv_expr (cxx_eval_constant_expression)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84596 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug testsuite/84597] [8 regression] test case g++.dg/ext/timevar2.C fails starting with r258029

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84597 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug testsuite/84597] [8 regression] test case g++.dg/ext/timevar2.C fails starting with r258029

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84597 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED CC|

[Bug lto/84592] [openacc,openmp] lto1: ICE in input_varpool_node, at lto-cgraph.c:1424: for CSWTCH symbol

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84592 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- So it's equivalent to: $ cat ~/Programming/testcases/pr84592-3.c #include int main (void) { int n[1]; n[0] = 4; #pragma omp target { static const int test[] = {1,2,3,4}; n[1] += test[n[0]];

[Bug libstdc++/66146] call_once not C++11-compliant on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66146 --- Comment #20 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Anthony Williams from comment #16) > Would it be worth ignoring pthread_once and using an implementation of > call_once based on Mike Burrows' algorithm? > >

[Bug lto/84592] [openacc] lto1: ICE in input_varpool_node, at lto-cgraph.c:1424: for CSWTCH symbol

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84592 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška

[Bug c/84607] [6/7 Regression] Side effects discarded in address computation inside 'if'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84607 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/84615] [8 Regression] Executable Segfault for tests compiled with -fdefault-integer-8 and -m32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84615 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||32770 --- Comment #2 from

[Bug c/84607] [6/7/8 Regression] Side effects discarded in address computation inside 'if'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84607 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Feb 28 13:40:41 2018 New Revision: 258061 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258061=gcc=rev Log: 2018-02-28 Richard Biener PR middle-end/84607

[Bug testsuite/84597] [8 regression] test case g++.dg/ext/timevar2.C fails starting with r258029

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84597 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Wed Feb 28 13:45:59 2018 New Revision: 258063 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258063=gcc=rev Log: Fix timevar format and fix tests (PR testsuite/84597). 2018-02-28 Martin Liska

[Bug other/84613] [meta-bug] SPEC compiler performance issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84613 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Use bug 26163. This is a dup of that one.

[Bug c++/84609] [8 Regression] internal compiler error: in cp_parser_abort_tentative_parse, at cp/parser.c:28960 (cp_parser_member_declaration())

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84609 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug fortran/84615] New: [8 Regression] Executable Segfault for tests compiled with -fdefault-integer-8 and -m32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84615 Bug ID: 84615 Summary: [8 Regression] Executable Segfault for tests compiled with -fdefault-integer-8 and -m32 Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/84615] [8 Regression] Executable Segfault for tests compiled with -fdefault-integer-8 and -m32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84615 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug middle-end/84603] -finline-limit not accepted in attribute and #pragma optimize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84603 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug preprocessor/84517] [8 Regression] "string literal"__FILE__ no longer accepted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84517 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug preprocessor/84517] [8 Regression] "string literal"__FILE__ no longer accepted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84517 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Wed Feb 28 15:27:17 2018 New Revision: 258069 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258069=gcc=rev Log: PR preprocessor/84517 allow double-underscore macros after string literals

[Bug tree-optimization/84584] [8 Regression] [graphite] ICE: Segmentation fault (in dominated_by_p)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84584 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/84584] [8 Regression] [graphite] ICE: Segmentation fault (in dominated_by_p)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84584 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Feb 28 15:33:33 2018 New Revision: 258070 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258070=gcc=rev Log: 2018-02-28 Richard Biener PR

[Bug target/82411] const is not always read-only

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82411 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #5 from Segher

[Bug c++/84616] New: funsafe-math-optimizations leads to incorrect results for 4x4 matrix inversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84616 Bug ID: 84616 Summary: funsafe-math-optimizations leads to incorrect results for 4x4 matrix inversion Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/83399] Power8 ICE During LRA with 2-op rtl pattern for lvx instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83399 --- Comment #18 from Peter Bergner --- Author: bergner Date: Wed Feb 28 15:43:41 2018 New Revision: 258071 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258071=gcc=rev Log: PR target/83399 * gcc.target/powerpc/pr83399.c: Only run on

[Bug c/84607] [6/7 Regression] Side effects discarded in address computation inside 'if'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84607 --- Comment #4 from Stephen Dolan --- Thanks for the quick fix!

[Bug debug/84550] [8 Regression] stepping through gcc does not work with gdb 8.0.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84550 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

  1   2   >