[Bug tree-optimization/85756] New: wrong code at -Os on x86-64-linux-gnu in 32-bit mode

-wrapper Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Configured with: ../gcc-source-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto --prefix=/home/su/software/tmp/gcc/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap Thread model: posix gcc version 9.0.0 20180511 (experimental) [trunk revision 260178] (GCC) $ $ gcctk -m32 -O0 small.c; ./a.out

[Bug target/85755] PowerPC Gcc's -mupdate produces inefficient code on power8/power9 machines

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85755 --- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool --- That is, that GCC 8 did not do pre-increment, but it did no silliness with float registers.

[Bug target/85755] PowerPC Gcc's -mupdate produces inefficient code on power8/power9 machines

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85755 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/85755] PowerPC Gcc's -mupdate produces inefficient code on power8/power9 machines

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85755 --- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool --- Sigh, i forgot -mcpu=power8 on that last test. GCC 7 was just fine, stdu, everything. GCC 8 was bad already.

[Bug tree-optimization/85724] strspn of one-element arrays can be assumed to return zero

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85724 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libffi/85722] testsuite failure in libffi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85722 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- Created attachment 44115 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44115=edit libffi test log (In reply to Chris Giorgi from comment #6) > Sorry, only pasted one link, here's the libffi test

[Bug c++/85746] Premature evaluation of __builtin_constant_p?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85746 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization

[Bug sanitizer/85556] attribute no_sanitize does not accept multiple options as documented

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85556 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Fri May 11 07:37:35 2018 New Revision: 260154 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260154=gcc=rev Log: Support LLVM style of no_sanitize attribute (PR sanitizer/85556). 2018-05-11

[Bug tree-optimization/85725] strchr and strstr of a one-element array with a non-empty string can be assumed to return null

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85725 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- doesn't strchr (a, '1') return a if a[0] == '1'? You seem to read "in the string s" as imposing s to be properly null-terminated. I don't.

[Bug c++/85746] New: Premature evaluation of __builtin_constant_p?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85746 Bug ID: 85746 Summary: Premature evaluation of __builtin_constant_p? Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug middle-end/85740] Non-optimal determining maximum in a loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85740 --- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > These functions are not functional equivalent. > > In the b.c, it records the max location but it is the last element which > contains that value. While in

[Bug target/85744] Returning INT_FAST64_MIN become zero

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85744 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/85744] Returning INT_FAST64_MIN become zero

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85744 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/85733] [8 regression] ARM -mbe8 behaviour doesn't match documentation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85733 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug rtl-optimization/85745] New: variable with asm register assignment allocated in wrong reg

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85745 Bug ID: 85745 Summary: variable with asm register assignment allocated in wrong reg Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/80617] [missed optimization] Storing constant in two possibly-aliased locations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80617 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/85720] bad codegen for looped assignment of primitives at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85720 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization

[Bug c/85696] OpenMP with variably modified and default(none) won't compile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85696 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri May 11 07:42:50 2018 New Revision: 260156 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260156=gcc=rev Log: PR c/85696 * c-omp.c (c_omp_predetermined_sharing): Return

[Bug tree-optimization/85692] Two source permute not used for vector initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85692 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri May 11 07:38:49 2018 New Revision: 260155 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260155=gcc=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/85692 * tree-ssa-forwprop.c

[Bug tree-optimization/80617] [missed optimization] Storing constant in two possibly-aliased locations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80617 --- Comment #13 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Fri, 11 May 2018, glisse at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80617 > > --- Comment #12 from Marc Glisse --- > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment

[Bug target/85744] Returning INT_FAST64_MIN become zero

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85744 --- Comment #7 from cerlane --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #5) > You should have read https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/ which explains what we need > for a valid bug report, and would have done that before reporting it. > > You probably

[Bug tree-optimization/85726] [6/7/8/9 Regression] div C1 to div C2 match.pd suboptimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85726 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization

[Bug libffi/85722] testsuite failure in libffi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85722 --- Comment #6 from Chris Giorgi --- Sorry, only pasted one link, here's the libffi test log: http://termbin.com/vzy5

[Bug libffi/85722] testsuite failure in libffi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85722 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely --- (Based on discussion on IRC these log files are just copy from the terminal connected to the machines where gcc is being built, because of some weird restricted system with limited access which also

[Bug c++/19808] miss a warning about uninitialized member usage in member initializer list in constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19808 --- Comment #44 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #40) > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #39) > > so - how do I make X::X used and thus prevail? It looks like it doesn't > > really exist > > True, for

[Bug target/85744] Returning INT_FAST64_MIN become zero

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85744 cerlane changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/85721] bad codegen for looped copy of primitives at -O2 and -O3 (differently bad)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85721 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ipa/85734] --suggest-attribute=malloc misdiagnoses static functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85734 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug fortran/85738] internal compiler error: verify_gimple failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85738 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid

[Bug middle-end/85740] Non-optimal determining maximum in a loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85740 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization

[Bug c/85696] OpenMP with variably modified and default(none) won't compile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85696 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Fixed for 9.1+ so far, backports queued.

[Bug c++/85739] internal compiler error: in finish_member_declaration, at cp/semantics.c:3057

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85739 --- Comment #1 from Freddie Chopin --- I'm currently in the process of reducing the test case with the wonderful tool that I've found yesterday - C-Reduce (; I hope that I'll be able to upload something short and generic (not requiring

[Bug target/85606] [8 regression] Assembly file generated for ARM Cortex-M0 should not specify `.arch armv6-m` at all or use `.arch armv6s-m`

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85606 --- Comment #2 from Richard Earnshaw --- Author: rearnsha Date: Fri May 11 09:28:10 2018 New Revision: 260157 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260157=gcc=rev Log: [arm] PR target/85606 prefer armv6s-m for armv6-m parts When Arm introduced

[Bug c++/85747] suboptimal code without constexpr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85747 --- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse --- (In reply to Antony Polukhin from comment #0) > Could the compiler detect that `a[7]` holds values known at compile time and > force the constexpr on `sort(a + 0, a + 7);`? There has to be a limit. If I write

[Bug middle-end/85740] Non-optimal determining maximum in a loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85740 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #5) > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > > These functions are not functional equivalent. > > > > In the b.c, it records the max location but it is the

[Bug tree-optimization/23094] store ccp, or store copy prop misses an optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23094 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||herring at lanl dot gov --- Comment

[Bug c++/85715] internal compiler error: in reshape_init_class ( in anonymous union )

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85715 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/84874] [6/7 Regression] internal compiler error: in reshape_init_class, at cp/decl.c:5800

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84874 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||daffra.claudio at gmail dot com ---

[Bug libffi/85722] testsuite failure in libffi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85722 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- You are building gmp/mpfr in-tree - what versions? __i386__ isn't defined on x86_64 so the issue looks in whatever does those "testcases". The log isn't helpful as it seems to be produced with -jN and

[Bug c++/85731] [8/9 Regression] Inner class method declaration changes meaning of outer template class template method

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85731 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Target Milestone|---

[Bug tree-optimization/85692] Two source permute not used for vector initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85692 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/85733] [8 regression] ARM -mbe8 behaviour doesn't match documentation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85733 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/85717] anonymous union in initializer list : do not handle the types correctly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85717 --- Comment #4 from claudio daffra --- I expect that the compiler regardless of the location of the types always gives me the same result, error message or warning indeed : # case integer before double : union {

[Bug middle-end/85740] Non-optimal determining maximum in a loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85740 --- Comment #8 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #7) > Confirmed with a Haswell CPU as well. Without the __builtin_expect we > rightfully predict the branch to be 50%/50% which means BB re-ordering will > do either

[Bug target/85606] [8,9 regression] Assembly file generated for ARM Cortex-M0 should not specify `.arch armv6-m` at all or use `.arch armv6s-m`

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85606 Richard Earnshaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/85747] suboptimal code without constexpr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85747 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug fortran/50392] SIGSEGV in gfc_trans_label_assign

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50392 --- Comment #17 from Jürgen Reuter --- Sorry, I don't want to generate unnecessary traffic, I'm just scrolling thru old c.l.f. discussions and stumble over some old reports there from time to time.

[Bug tree-optimization/85725] strchr and strstr of a one-element array with a non-empty string can be assumed to return null

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85725 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab --- The C standard defines a string as "a contiguous sequence of characters terminated by and including the first null character" (7.1.1).

[Bug lto/82229] GCC7's LTO underperforms compared to GCC6

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82229 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|marxin at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/85742] sizeof allocatable arrays returning wrong value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85742 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/50392] SIGSEGV in gfc_trans_label_assign

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50392 Jürgen Reuter changed: What|Removed |Added CC||juergen.reuter at desy dot de ---

[Bug fortran/85742] [8/9 Regression] sizeof allocatable arrays returning wrong value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85742 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Priority|P3

[Bug fortran/50392] SIGSEGV in gfc_trans_label_assign

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50392 --- Comment #16 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > This gives in ICE now with the current trunk, while it just shows > an error message for a "Deleted feature" when using -std=f95. Confirmed from at least 4.8 up to trunk (9.0).

[Bug c++/85747] New: suboptimal code without constexpr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85747 Bug ID: 85747 Summary: suboptimal code without constexpr Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug debug/85748] dbg, gfortran: Erroneous watch of matrix rows as formal arguments using assumed shape

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85748 Eberhard Franz changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug debug/85748] New: dbg, gfortran: Erroneous watch of matrix rows as formal arguments using assumed shape

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85748 Bug ID: 85748 Summary: dbg, gfortran: Erroneous watch of matrix rows as formal arguments using assumed shape Product: gcc Version: 8.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/83687] [6 Regression] ARM NEON invalid optimisation for vabd/vabdl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83687 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/85698] [8/9 Regression] CPU2017 525.x264_r fails starting with r257581

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85698 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- I can see what the patch does to this testcase on x86_64 - it enables BB vectorization of the first two loops after runrolling. I don't see anything suspicious here on x86_64 and 525.x264_r works fine for

[Bug target/85606] [8 regression] Assembly file generated for ARM Cortex-M0 should not specify `.arch armv6-m` at all or use `.arch armv6s-m`

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85606 --- Comment #3 from Richard Earnshaw --- Author: rearnsha Date: Fri May 11 09:30:49 2018 New Revision: 260158 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260158=gcc=rev Log: [arm] PR target/85606 prefer armv6s-m for armv6-m parts When Arm introduced

Hollow Rotor - Lower Cost Rotor for Downhole PC Pump / Mud Motor

__ Even Wall Thickness Hollow Rotor For Downhole PC Pump * Well washing through hollow rotor; * Steam injection into well through hollow sucker rod and hollow rotor;   * use of same components of sucker rod pumping system for both pumping and injecting.   * The system requires the drilling

[Bug c++/85739] internal compiler error: in finish_member_declaration, at cp/semantics.c:3057

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85739 Freddie Chopin changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #44111|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug fortran/68846] Pointer function as LValue doesn't work when the assignment regards a dummy argument.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68846 --- Comment #9 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Fri May 11 09:35:55 2018 New Revision: 260160 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260160=gcc=rev Log: 2018-05-11 Paul Thomas PR fortran/68846 PR

[Bug fortran/70864] internal compiler error: in gfc_get_symbol_decl, at fortran/trans-decl.c:1403

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70864 --- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Fri May 11 09:35:55 2018 New Revision: 260160 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260160=gcc=rev Log: 2018-05-11 Paul Thomas PR fortran/68846 PR

[Bug target/83687] [6 Regression] ARM NEON invalid optimisation for vabd/vabdl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83687 --- Comment #6 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Fri May 11 09:35:31 2018 New Revision: 260159 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260159=gcc=rev Log: [arm] PR target/83687: Fix invalid combination of VSUB + VABS into

[Bug rtl-optimization/85745] variable with asm register assignment allocated in wrong reg

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85745 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug c++/85746] Premature evaluation of __builtin_constant_p?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85746 --- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2) > For different versions there is the > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-03/msg00355.html > patch. Time to ping that one? ;-) (I don't have a particular

[Bug ipa/85655] [8/9 Regression] ICE with -flto and -O2 during IPA pass: cp lto1: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85655 --- Comment #5 from Martin Jambor --- Author: jamborm Date: Fri May 11 15:55:15 2018 New Revision: 260165 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260165=gcc=rev Log: Check is_single_const in intersect_with_plats 2018-05-11 Martin Jambor

[Bug c++/85747] suboptimal code without constexpr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85747 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6

[Bug ipa/85655] [8/9 Regression] ICE with -flto and -O2 during IPA pass: cp lto1: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85655 --- Comment #6 from Martin Jambor --- Author: jamborm Date: Fri May 11 15:58:29 2018 New Revision: 260166 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260166=gcc=rev Log: Check is_single_const in intersect_with_plats 2018-05-11 Martin Jambor

[Bug target/85434] Address of stack protector guard spilled to stack on ARM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85434 --- Comment #13 from Thomas Preud'homme --- Remains now: 1) add support for PIC access to the guard 2) finish cleanup of the patch

[Bug tree-optimization/82571] missing strlen optimization for memchr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82571 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||6.4.0, 7.3.0, 8.1.0 --- Comment #1 from

[Bug c++/85746] Premature evaluation of __builtin_constant_p?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85746 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug target/84201] 549.fotonik3d_r from SPEC2017 fails verification with -mprefer-vector-width=256 or 512 on Zen

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84201 --- Comment #1 from Martin Jambor --- When benchmarking GCC 8 on an older Ivy Bridge Xeon, I also got 549.fotonik3d_r verification error just with -Ofast -g -march=native -mtune=native

[Bug target/85733] [8,9 regression] ARM -mbe8 behaviour doesn't match documentation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85733 --- Comment #4 from Richard Earnshaw --- Author: rearnsha Date: Fri May 11 13:30:55 2018 New Revision: 260163 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260163=gcc=rev Log: [arm] PR target/85733 Restore be8 linking behaviour for ARMv6-M and products

[Bug ipa/85734] --suggest-attribute=malloc misdiagnoses static functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85734 prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||prathamesh3492 at gcc

[Bug middle-end/81914] [7 Regression] gcc 7.1 generates branch for code which was branchless in earlier gcc version

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81914 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/85717] anonymous union in initializer list : do not handle the types correctly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85717 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/85733] [8,9 regression] ARM -mbe8 behaviour doesn't match documentation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85733 Richard Earnshaw changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|documentation | --- Comment #2 from Richard

[Bug target/85733] [8,9 regression] ARM -mbe8 behaviour doesn't match documentation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85733 --- Comment #3 from Richard Earnshaw --- Author: rearnsha Date: Fri May 11 13:29:41 2018 New Revision: 260162 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260162=gcc=rev Log: [arm] PR target/85733 Restore be8 linking behaviour for ARMv6-M and products

[Bug ipa/85734] --suggest-attribute=malloc misdiagnoses static functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85734 --- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka --- There is function_always_visible_to_compiler_p which should disable this sort of warning. So I suppose we want to test it prior warning about malloc attribute?

[Bug c++/85747] suboptimal code without constexpr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85747 --- Comment #3 from Antony Polukhin --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > What's the reason for writing the code as you pasted it? I've tried to provide a simplified case. In real world `generate()` function will have some

[Bug c++/85747] suboptimal code without constexpr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85747 --- Comment #4 from Antony Polukhin --- (In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #2) > (In reply to Antony Polukhin from comment #0) > > Could the compiler detect that `a[7]` holds values known at compile time and > > force the constexpr on `sort(a

[Bug lto/48200] linking shared library with LTO results in different exported symbols

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48200 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #20 from Martin

[Bug target/85733] [8,9 regression] ARM -mbe8 behaviour doesn't match documentation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85733 Richard Earnshaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/85747] suboptimal code without constexpr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85747 --- Comment #5 from Marc Glisse --- (In reply to Antony Polukhin from comment #4) > Does providing some kind of -Oon-the-fly switch solves the issue with JIT > compile times while still allows more optimizations for the traditional non > JIT

[Bug tree-optimization/85725] strchr and strstr of a one-element array with a non-empty string can be assumed to return null

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85725 --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor --- That's right: unless otherwise specified, string functions require as arguments valid strings, or as the C++ standard defines them, NTBS (nul-terminated byte string). Thus the only valid string that can be

[Bug ipa/85656] gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-icf-38.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85656 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED Known to fail|

[Bug ipa/85656] gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-icf-38.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85656 --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #3) > Created attachment 44108 [details] > i386-pc-solaris2.11 ipa-icf-38.exe.wpa.073i.icf > > It's only one part that fails > > FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-icf-38.c

[Bug c++/85717] anonymous union in initializer list : do not handle the types correctly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85717 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Given that integer literals are convertible to FP (or even are also FP literals) what do you expect?

[Bug tree-optimization/80617] [missed optimization] Storing constant in two possibly-aliased locations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80617 --- Comment #12 from Marc Glisse --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #11) > Dup of PR23094 (and fixed). Richard, comment #9 shows that the original testcase is only half-fixed (though the other half seems hard to fix). Does this mean

[Bug fortran/85521] [8/9 Regression] ICE in gfc_resolve_character_array_constructor, at fortran/array.c:2049

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85521 --- Comment #8 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Fri May 11 17:59:05 2018 New Revision: 260175 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260175=gcc=rev Log: 2018-05-11 Steven G. Kargl PR

[Bug c++/85749] Possible -Wsign-conversion false negative with std::default_random_engine

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85749 --- Comment #1 from martingalvan at sourceware dot org --- Created attachment 44119 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44119=edit Preprocessed source

[Bug fortran/85687] ICE in gfc_sym_identifier, at fortran/trans-decl.c:351

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85687 --- Comment #6 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Fri May 11 18:33:05 2018 New Revision: 260179 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260179=gcc=rev Log: 2018-05-11 Steven G. Kargl PR

[Bug fortran/85750] New: Default initialization of derived type array missing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85750 Bug ID: 85750 Summary: Default initialization of derived type array missing Product: gcc Version: 8.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug libstdc++/85749] Possible -Wsign-conversion false negative with std::default_random_engine

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85749 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/85749] New: Possible -Wsign-conversion false negative with std::default_random_engine

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85749 Bug ID: 85749 Summary: Possible -Wsign-conversion false negative with std::default_random_engine Product: gcc Version: 7.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug fortran/85521] [8/9 Regression] ICE in gfc_resolve_character_array_constructor, at fortran/array.c:2049

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85521 --- Comment #9 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Fri May 11 18:34:14 2018 New Revision: 260180 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260180=gcc=rev Log: 2018-05-11 Steven G. Kargl PR

[Bug fortran/85687] ICE in gfc_sym_identifier, at fortran/trans-decl.c:351

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85687 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/85521] [8/9 Regression] ICE in gfc_resolve_character_array_constructor, at fortran/array.c:2049

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85521 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/85751] New: RFE: option to align code using breakpoint instructions when unreachable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85751 Bug ID: 85751 Summary: RFE: option to align code using breakpoint instructions when unreachable Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

  1   2   >