https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85868
Bug ID: 85868
Summary: Subarray of a pointer array associated with a pointer
dummy argument
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85863
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80155
--- Comment #37 from bin cheng ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #36)
> On Tue, 22 May 2018, amker at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80155
> >
> > bin cheng changed:
> >
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85852
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85607
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Tue May 22 10:50:43 2018
New Revision: 260502
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260502=gcc=rev
Log:
Do not ICE for incomplete types in ICF (PR ipa/85607).
2018-05-22 Martin Liska
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85850
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-darwin
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85869
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab ---
I think your cross compiler needs to be built from the same sources as the
canadian cross build.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85862
--- Comment #1 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Tue May 22 12:25:44 2018
New Revision: 260504
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260504=gcc=rev
Log:
Handle a null lhs in expand_direct_optab_fn (PR85862)
This PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78290
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Any need for a new test on top of those included in the revision?
PING!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80155
bin cheng changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amker at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #35
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85861
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85847
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85870
Bug ID: 85870
Summary: [6/7/8/9 Regression][LTO1] ICE in linemap_line_start,
at libcpp/line-map.c:794
Product: gcc
Version: lto
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85863
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue May 22 09:55:49 2018
New Revision: 260501
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260501=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-05-22 Richard Biener
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80155
--- Comment #36 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 22 May 2018, amker at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80155
>
> bin cheng changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85834
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue May 22 11:25:14 2018
New Revision: 260503
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260503=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-05-22 Richard Biener
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85837
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
Usually diagnostics include the option that enables/disables them in []
brackets. The documentation for this option should explain things.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85841
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85834
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25290
--- Comment #14 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #12)
> (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #11)
> > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #10)
> > > Note this needs at least:
> > >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85829
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85841
--- Comment #10 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Christophe Lyon from comment #8)
> UNRESOLVED: gfortran.dg/vect/pr52580.f -O scan-tree-dump-times vect
> "LOOP VECTORIZED" 1
In addition to this one, I also see:
UNRESOLVED:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61806
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-ubuntu-gcc-tot-latest-std/builds/310/steps/test.libcxx/logs/FAIL%3A%20libc%2B%2B%3A%3Adeduct.pass.cpp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85852
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85853
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85866
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85871
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Christophe Lyon from comment #2)
> Yes I had spotted this part of gcov.exp, but saw nothing in the logs.
>
> As I put in the title, it happens randomly, and this is automated testing.
>
> And
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85868
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85607
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85869
Bug ID: 85869
Summary: libgcc fails to build in canadian cross: cet.h not
found
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85841
--- Comment #9 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Hi Christophe,
> Since this change (r260433), I've noticed that:
> UNRESOLVED: gfortran.dg/vect/pr52580.f -O scan-tree-dump-times vect
> "LOOP VECTORIZED" 1
>
> on aarch64-linux-gnu.
sorry
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85842
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85847
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85853
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85826
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Tue May 22 15:22:16 2018
New Revision: 260537
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260537=gcc=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/85826 - ICE in gimple-ssa-warn-restruct on
a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85873
Bug ID: 85873
Summary: [8 regression] GCC omits array constant in .rodata
causing a segmentation fault.
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85826
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
Fixed via r260537.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85826
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85697
--- Comment #2 from Mike Sharov ---
I previously filed bug #49127 about the non-SSE version of the same xor/mov
optimization. Perhaps both could be addressed in the same manner with a more
general capability of zeroing with a register when doing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85859
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85859
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85862
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85180
--- Comment #21 from Richard Biener ---
*** Bug 85862 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85872
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85870
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-reduction
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85867
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79832
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yaghmour.shafik at gmail dot
com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85871
--- Comment #4 from Christophe Lyon ---
I'll try to see if I can isolate that.
We run the tests on arm, aarch64, x86_32 and x86_64 all native targets.
We post the results to https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/ as "LINARO TCWG"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85855
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85871
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85864
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85866
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Reduced:
template
_Up
__declval(int);
template
_Tp
__declval(long);
template
auto declval() noexcept -> decltype(__declval<_Tp>(0));
template
using void_t = void;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85871
Bug ID: 85871
Summary: g++.dg/gcov/gcov-8.C random failures
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: gcov-profile
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85216
--- Comment #18 from Bill Schmidt ---
I asked around a bit. On x86, user-user attacks are not mitigated by default.
To enable user-user mitigation:
echo 2 > /sys/kernel/debug/x86/ibrs_enabled
My source tells me:
8<---
Red Hat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85870
Vidya Praveen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||lto
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85858
--- Comment #12 from Mike Sharov ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #10)
> It's simply not how C++ works.
Quite right. I already agreed with you here; we are arguing about whether it
/should/ work this way :)
> An object's lifetime
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81084
--- Comment #58 from Andrew Jenner ---
(In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #57)
> Andrew, could you refresh your patch for the current trunk branch?
>
> It doesn't fully apply for me.
Acknowledged. I will try to get to that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70754
bin cheng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82726
bin cheng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85871
--- Comment #2 from Christophe Lyon ---
Yes I had spotted this part of gcov.exp, but saw nothing in the logs.
As I put in the title, it happens randomly, and this is automated testing.
And it seems there is no way increasing verbosity will
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85869
Arnd Bergmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|build |
Target|x86_64-*-*,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61806
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2017-09-25 00:00:00 |2018-5-22
--- Comment #4 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85857
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
So it looks like mpfr uses internal interfaces for DFP? --with-gmp-build was
stronly discouraged back in time...
Also in-tree mpfr and system gmp is a combination that currently works (but
not with DFP
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85872
Bug ID: 85872
Summary: False positive for -Wmaybe-unitialized
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85860
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ra
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85847
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85866
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79832
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85870
sudi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code |ice-on-valid-code
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85712
--- Comment #3 from Bill Schmidt ---
There are six vulnerabilities like this in the SLSR code:
replace_mult_candidate (2)
replace_rhs_if_not_dup (1)
replace_one_candidate (3)
I'll work on a fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80318
benjamin.redelings at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|7.0.1 |8.1.0
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85874
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab ---
Does that change if you use -Wsystem-headers?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85874
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Schneider ---
If I add -Wsystem-headers I get:
In file included from /usr/include/stdlib.h:822,
from ../lib/replace/replace.h:40,
from ../lib/util/debug.c:22:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85874
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Strict overflow warnings are just so badly implemented ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85874
Bug ID: 85874
Summary: gcc points to wrong location when displaying error
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83118
Neil Carlson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Resolution|DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66476
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85883
Bug ID: 85883
Summary: class template argument deduction fails in
new-expression
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81420
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed May 23 03:52:56 2018
New Revision: 260563
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260563=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/81420 - not extending temporary lifetime.
* call.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85866
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed May 23 03:52:49 2018
New Revision: 260562
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260562=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/85866 - error with .* in default template arg.
* pt.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85866
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed May 23 03:53:14 2018
New Revision: 260564
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260564=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/85866 - error with .* in default template arg.
* pt.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85700
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49213
Neil Carlson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|8.0.1 |8.1.1
--- Comment #27 from Neil Carlson
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80485
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85882
mednafen at sent dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mednafen at sent dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85814
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85877
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85359
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85359
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Tue May 22 19:37:48 2018
New Revision: 260550
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260550=gcc=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/85359 - duplicate -Wstringop-overflow for a strcmp call with a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85643
--- Comment #8 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Tue May 22 19:46:44 2018
New Revision: 260553
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260553=gcc=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/85643 - attribute nonstring fails to squash -Wstringop-truncation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85643
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80485
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Created attachment 44167
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44167=edit
proposed fix
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-05/msg00968.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85882
--- Comment #3 from Stefan Bolus ---
btw. The code in the example is an adaption from Apache Thrift.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85868
Harald Anlauf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gmx dot de
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85712
--- Comment #4 from Bill Schmidt ---
Proposed patch here: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-05/msg01183.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85882
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Component|c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85880
--- Comment #4 from Fredrik Hederstierna
---
Ok, you are probably right. I just was surprised that all GCC 4,5,6,7 gave same
result, but something changed with 8. But you are right, its unpredictable
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63177
--- Comment #6 from Carl Love ---
Printing the results rather then aborting, we see the value of ib[1] and ib[3]
are swapped; ib[2] and ib[4] are swapped, then ib[5] and ib[7] are swapped and
ib[6] and ib[8] are swapped. The pattern continues.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85882
Bug ID: 85882
Summary: Value of local variable changes unintentionally if
certain optimization are enabled
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85882
--- Comment #2 from Stefan Bolus ---
Created attachment 44169
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44169=edit
Example to reproduce the error.
1 - 100 of 137 matches
Mail list logo