[Bug tree-optimization/86089] [9 Regression] ICE in get_string_length, at tree-ssa-strlen.c:653

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86089 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Component|c

[Bug c/86092] global constant pointer optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86092 --- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse --- (In reply to Srinivas Achary from comment #2) > Is there any possibility to make this code work, Remove the 'const', or add 'volatile'. > without changing the variable attribute. -O0 > GCC-4 has no issue

[Bug c/86093] New: volatile ignored on pointer in C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86093 Bug ID: 86093 Summary: volatile ignored on pointer in C Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/45521] [F08] GENERIC resolution with ALLOCATABLE/POINTER and PROCEDURE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45521 --- Comment #18 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Related to pr86006.

[Bug c/86092] global constant pointer optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86092 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/86091] New: [fold expression] Slow compile time and high memory usage compared to initializer_list folds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86091 Bug ID: 86091 Summary: [fold expression] Slow compile time and high memory usage compared to initializer_list folds Product: gcc Version: 7.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/85755] PowerPC Gcc's -mupdate produces inefficient code on power8/power9 machines

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85755 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added URL|https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc- |https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-

[Bug c/86092] global constant pointer optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86092 Srinivas Achary changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/86093] [8/9 Regression] volatile ignored on pointer in C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86093 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/82805] [7/8/9 Regression] SPEC CPU2006 454.calculix ~6% performance deviation in between 6.3 and 7.2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82805 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/26163] [meta-bug] missed optimization in SPEC (2k17, 2k and 2k6 and 95)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163 Bug 26163 depends on bug 82805, which changed state. Bug 82805 Summary: [7/8/9 Regression] SPEC CPU2006 454.calculix ~6% performance deviation in between 6.3 and 7.2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82805 What|Removed

[Bug other/84613] [meta-bug] SPEC compiler performance issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84613 Bug 84613 depends on bug 82805, which changed state. Bug 82805 Summary: [7/8/9 Regression] SPEC CPU2006 454.calculix ~6% performance deviation in between 6.3 and 7.2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82805 What|Removed

[Bug c/86092] global constant pointer optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86092 --- Comment #2 from Srinivas Achary --- Sorry that I am new to this. Is there any possibility to make this code work, without changing the variable attribute. GCC-4 has no issue with this code. What special flags have been included in the

[Bug sanitizer/86090] [ASAN] ASAN does not properly configure libbacktrace.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86090 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- Patches should be posted to gcc-patches mailing list. You could as well add the lstat and readlink to the same AC_CHECK_FUNCS as the other functions, no need for two AC_CHECK_FUNCS. LGTM otherwise.

[Bug fortran/30373] Option for run-time checking for aliasing amoung dummy arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30373 Jürgen Reuter changed: What|Removed |Added CC||juergen.reuter at desy dot de ---

[Bug c/86092] New: global constant pointer optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86092 Bug ID: 86092 Summary: global constant pointer optimization Product: gcc Version: 5.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug c/86092] global constant pointer optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86092 --- Comment #5 from Srinivas Achary --- thank you Marc. What I have shown here is just an example sample code. But I have code which makes use of kern_buff_p variable in many place.If I use volatile that might reduce my code speed. Any how the

[Bug target/82804] [7/8/9 Regression] SPEC CPU2006 470.lbm ~5% performance deviation with r237185

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82804 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/26163] [meta-bug] missed optimization in SPEC (2k17, 2k and 2k6 and 95)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163 Bug 26163 depends on bug 82804, which changed state. Bug 82804 Summary: [7/8/9 Regression] SPEC CPU2006 470.lbm ~5% performance deviation with r237185 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82804 What|Removed

[Bug tree-optimization/86024] Missed memcpy loop distribution with elementwise copy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86024 --- Comment #3 from bin cheng --- (In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #2) > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > > Or we may want to un-"SRA" such patterns, generating aggregate copies. > > I notice that store-merging does not merge

[Bug sanitizer/86090] New: [ASAN] ASAN does not properly configure libbacktrace.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86090 Bug ID: 86090 Summary: [ASAN] ASAN does not properly configure libbacktrace. Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug tree-optimization/86024] Missed memcpy loop distribution with elementwise copy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86024 --- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > Or we may want to un-"SRA" such patterns, generating aggregate copies. I notice that store-merging does not merge these stores, I didn't check why. SLP can do it

[Bug other/84613] [meta-bug] SPEC compiler performance issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84613 Bug 84613 depends on bug 82804, which changed state. Bug 82804 Summary: [7/8/9 Regression] SPEC CPU2006 470.lbm ~5% performance deviation with r237185 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82804 What|Removed

[Bug lto/86086] lto1: internal compiler error: in odr_types_equivalent_p, at ipa-devirt.c:1256

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86086 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/45521] [F08] GENERIC resolution with ALLOCATABLE/POINTER and PROCEDURE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45521 --- Comment #19 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- There seem to be additional issues with ASSIGNMENT interfaces: type :: t end type interface test ! accepted procedure testAlloc procedure testPtr end interface

[Bug libgomp/86088] #pragma omp parallel for freezes if other processes are running

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86088 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/81497] [7/8 Regression] error compiling arm_acle.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81497 --- Comment #6 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Fri Jun 8 08:18:43 2018 New Revision: 261305 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261305=gcc=rev Log: [arm] PR target/81497: Fix arm_acle.h for C++ Backport

[Bug fortran/63327] Poor caret location in error mesage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63327 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Component|libgomp |fortran --- Comment #4 from Jakub

[Bug target/82092] [8/9 regression] gcc fails to link genmodes on darwin (cfiStartsArray[i] != cfiStartsArray[i-1])

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82092 Francois-Xavier Coudert changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/45521] [F08] GENERIC resolution with ALLOCATABLE/POINTER and PROCEDURE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45521 --- Comment #17 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Another case that is not yet working is when polymorphic arguments are involved: type :: t end type interface test procedure testAlloc procedure testPtr end interface contains

[Bug fortran/45521] [F08] GENERIC resolution with ALLOCATABLE/POINTER and PROCEDURE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45521 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/86006] compile time error generic type bound procedure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86006 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c/86089] New: ICE in get_string_length, at tree-ssa-strlen.c:653

ge1-checking --enable-libstdcxx-time --disable-nls --disable-libquadmath --disable-libquadmath-support --with-ld=/opt/local/bin/ld --with-ar=/opt/local/bin/ar --with-as=/opt/local/bin/as --with-system-zlib --with-pkgversion=svn-revision-261305 Thread model: posix gcc version 9.0.0 20180608 (experi

[Bug middle-end/82479] missing popcount builtin detection

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82479 --- Comment #12 from Andrew Pinski --- Latest patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-06/msg00358.html

[Bug fortran/86006] compile time error generic type bound procedure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86006 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/63327] Poor caret location in error mesage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63327 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5 CC|

[Bug ipa/85960] -fipa-pta and ifunc are incompatible

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85960 --- Comment #10 from Gianni Tedesco --- Confirmed. Code from trunk works splendidly on the code-base where this bug was discovered.

[Bug fortran/78571] ICE in create_character_initializer, at fortran/data.c:191

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78571 --- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Fri Jun 8 19:06:20 2018 New Revision: 261343 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261343=gcc=rev Log: 2018-06-08 Steven G. Kargl PR fortran/78571 * data.c

[Bug target/85755] PowerPC Gcc's -mupdate produces inefficient code on power8/power9 machines

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85755 --- Comment #7 from Peter Bergner --- Author: bergner Date: Fri Jun 8 17:17:45 2018 New Revision: 261340 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261340=gcc=rev Log: gcc/ PR target/85755 * config/rs6000/rs6000.c (mem_operand_gpr):

[Bug fortran/63514] functions containing volatile are considered pure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63514 --- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl --- On Fri, Jun 08, 2018 at 03:40:40AM +, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > There is, however, a bug with respect to F2018: > > C1588 A local variable of a pure subprogram, or of a BLOCK construct > within a

[Bug fortran/78278] ICE in gfc_wide_memset, at fortran/scanner.c:153

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78278 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/85631] [8/9 Regression] Runtime error message array bound mismatch with nonzero optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85631 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||27766 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig

[Bug c++/86094] New: [8/9 Regression] Call ABI changed for small objects with defaulted ctor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86094 Bug ID: 86094 Summary: [8/9 Regression] Call ABI changed for small objects with defaulted ctor Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ABI,

[Bug fortran/86059] ICE in reduce_binary_ac, at fortran/arith.c:1308 (and others)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86059 --- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Fri Jun 8 19:11:21 2018 New Revision: 261344 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261344=gcc=rev Log: 2018-06-08 Steven G. Kargl PR fortran/86059 *

[Bug target/82092] [8/9 regression] gcc fails to link genmodes on darwin (cfiStartsArray[i] != cfiStartsArray[i-1])

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82092 --- Comment #15 from Ryan Schmidt --- Yes, I noticed Homebrew had the update, and I didn't understand why it worked there. But now I do. Some more information has turned up in a new MacPorts ticket: https://trac.macports.org/ticket/56521 In

[Bug fortran/31237] [meta-bug] TRANSFER intrinsic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31237 Bug 31237 depends on bug 46783, which changed state. Bug 46783 Summary: [OOP] TRANSFER with polymorphic MOLD= https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46783 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/46783] [OOP] TRANSFER with polymorphic MOLD=

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46783 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug libffi/84410] libffi doesn't support riscv now, but not disabled in configure.ac

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84410 Jim Wilson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libfortran/86070] [7 regression] gfortran.dg/fmt_zero_digits.f90 segmentation fault starting with r261077

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86070 --- Comment #2 from Jerry DeLisle --- Well I am not seeing this on gcc112, so will try on gcc110. Bill were your tests on a gcc compile farm machine?

[Bug fortran/85631] [8/9 Regression] Runtime error message array bound mismatch with nonzero optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85631 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig --- Author: tkoenig Date: Fri Jun 8 22:04:11 2018 New Revision: 261348 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261348=gcc=rev Log: 2018-06-08 Thomas Koenig PR fortran/85631 * trans.h (gfc_ss):

[Bug other/86095] stale documentation for -Wunsafe-loop-optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86095 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||documentation

[Bug other/86095] New: stale documentation for -Wunsafe-loop-optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86095 Bug ID: 86095 Summary: stale documentation for -Wunsafe-loop-optimizations Product: gcc Version: 8.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug rtl-optimization/86096] New: ICE: qsort checking failed (error: qsort comparator non-negative on sorted output: 0)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86096 Bug ID: 86096 Summary: ICE: qsort checking failed (error: qsort comparator non-negative on sorted output: 0) Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED