[Bug target/86798] nds32 port needs updating for CVE-2017-5753

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86798 Chung-Ju Wu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/84919] [8/9 Regression] error: passing argument 1 to restrict-qualified parameter aliases with argument 5 [-Werror=restrict]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84919 --- Comment #14 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #13) > I think this needs to defer to gcc-9. It's gcc-9 now.

[Bug c++/81932] Template arguments of type unsigned generate incorrect debugging information

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81932 --- Comment #28 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #27) > (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #26) > > The demangled names are not in a canonical/standardized format, or > > unambiguous, or portable between

[Bug c/79959] -Wimplicit-fallthrough doesn't recognize some more complex exit cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79959 --- Comment #3 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #2) > Should be possible to fix this. Mine. For gcc 9?

[Bug fortran/86837] New: Optimization breaks an unformatted read with implicit loop on Mac OS X

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86837 Bug ID: 86837 Summary: Optimization breaks an unformatted read with implicit loop on Mac OS X Product: gcc Version: 8.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/86770] UNRESOLVED: 30_threads/call_once/call_once1.cc compilation failed to produce executable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86770 Jim Wilson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/86836] internal compiler error on structured bindings with shadow parameter on templated function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86836 --- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek --- commit 357b96452a5fc70011df4f27b5d4dffc5e2f2603 Author: jason Date: Tue Nov 15 05:22:28 2016 + Various C++17 decomposition fixes. * tree.c (bitfield_p): New. * cp-tree.h:

[Bug c++/86836] internal compiler error on structured bindings with shadow parameter on templated function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86836 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code --- Comment #3 from

[Bug tree-optimization/86732] Potential nullptr dereference does not propagate knowledge about the pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86732 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/86732] Potential nullptr dereference does not propagate knowledge about the pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86732 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com --- Comment #5

[Bug middle-end/86705] [7/8/9 Regression] pr45678-2.c ICE with msp430-elf -mlarge

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86705 Jozef Lawrynowicz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/86836] internal compiler error on structured bindings with shadow parameter on templated function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86836 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/86836] internal compiler error on structured bindings with shadow parameter on templated function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86836 --- Comment #1 from Christian Shelton --- Created attachment 44496 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44496=edit preprocessed source

[Bug c++/86836] New: internal compiler error on structured bindings with shadow parameter on templated function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86836 Bug ID: 86836 Summary: internal compiler error on structured bindings with shadow parameter on templated function Product: gcc Version: 8.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/86705] [7/8/9 Regression] pr45678-2.c ICE with msp430-elf -mlarge

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86705 --- Comment #4 from jozefl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jozefl Date: Thu Aug 2 20:54:02 2018 New Revision: 263279 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263279=gcc=rev Log: 2018-08-02 Jozef Lawrynowicz Backport from mainline

[Bug target/86448] GCC 9 compiler generates slower code for spec 2006 milc on a power9 using -mcpu=power9 than using -mcpu=power8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86448 --- Comment #4 from kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org --- There are aspects of Michael's recent comment that I may not fully understand. I checked the source for milc, and it is C, so I added -fgnu89-inline to the list of OPTIMIZE options. Then I

[Bug target/86828] [6/7 Regression] wrong-code bug with "-march=knl -Ofast" (invalid memory reference)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86828 --- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > Would be nice to know what fixed this (or maybe know if it just went latent). Bisection indicates that the segfault disappeared at r254526.

[Bug middle-end/86705] [7/8/9 Regression] pr45678-2.c ICE with msp430-elf -mlarge

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86705 --- Comment #3 from jozefl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jozefl Date: Thu Aug 2 20:36:14 2018 New Revision: 263277 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263277=gcc=rev Log: 2018-08-02 Jozef Lawrynowicz Backport from mainline

[Bug tree-optimization/86835] [8/9 Regression] Bogus "is used uninitialized" warning with -ffast-math

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86835 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/86835] New: [8/9 Regression] Bogus "is used uninitialized" warning with -ffast-math

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86835 Bug ID: 86835 Summary: [8/9 Regression] Bogus "is used uninitialized" warning with -ffast-math Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/55815] switch hash function of libstdc++ hash tables to siphash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55815 --- Comment #9 from landave --- I am on Fedora with gcc 8.1.1, and it seems this issue has not been resolved yet. I have attached an example for a multicollision, as well as a small program that inserts the strings into an std::unordered_set.

[Bug target/86386] [8/9 Regression] unaligned load from stack with -Os -fno-tree-dce -mstringop-strategy=vector_loop -mavx512bw

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86386 --- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu --- I am testing this patch diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c index ee409cfe7e4..9971b369f45 100644 --- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c +++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c @@ -13281,8 +13281,7 @@

[Bug tree-optimization/86571] AIX NaNQ and NaNS output format conflicts with __builtin_sprintf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86571 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor

[Bug libstdc++/55815] switch hash function of libstdc++ hash tables to siphash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55815 landave changed: What|Removed |Added CC||blog at landave dot io --- Comment #8 from

[Bug other/86834] New: [9 regression] several tests fail with ICE starting with r263245

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86834 Bug ID: 86834 Summary: [9 regression] several tests fail with ICE starting with r263245 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/86833] New: No Warning for uninitilized array unless optimization on

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86833 Bug ID: 86833 Summary: No Warning for uninitilized array unless optimization on Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/86790] m68k port needs updating for CVE-2017-5753

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86790 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/86772] [meta-bug] tracking port status for CVE-2017-5753

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86772 Bug 86772 depends on bug 86790, which changed state. Bug 86790 Summary: m68k port needs updating for CVE-2017-5753 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86790 What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/86832] GCC v8.2.0 tries to use native TLS with -fstack-protector-strong on Windows (mingw-w64)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86832 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-w64-mingw32 --- Comment #1 from

[Bug target/85644] -fstack-protector generates invalid read to %fs:0x0 on mac

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85644 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||shane at isara dot com --- Comment #1

[Bug target/86762] Using -fstack-protector-all causes SIGSEV with gcc-8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86762 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/86790] m68k port needs updating for CVE-2017-5753

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86790 --- Comment #1 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Thu Aug 2 17:50:16 2018 New Revision: 263272 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263272=gcc=rev Log: PR target/86790 * config/m68k/m68k.c

[Bug c/30552] gcc crashes when compiling examples with GNU statement expressions in VLAs (also involved: nested functions declared K)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30552 Dave Pagan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/30552] gcc crashes when compiling examples with GNU statement expressions in VLAs (also involved: nested functions declared K)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30552 --- Comment #12 from Dave Pagan --- Yes, it did. I had assumed the bug status would get updated, but it wasn't. I'll set it to resolved.

[Bug target/86784] H8 port needs updating for CVE-2017-5753

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86784 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/86772] [meta-bug] tracking port status for CVE-2017-5753

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86772 Bug 86772 depends on bug 86784, which changed state. Bug 86784 Summary: H8 port needs updating for CVE-2017-5753 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86784 What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/86784] H8 port needs updating for CVE-2017-5753

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86784 --- Comment #1 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Thu Aug 2 17:24:59 2018 New Revision: 263270 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263270=gcc=rev Log: PR target/86784 * config/h8300/h8300.c

[Bug target/86820] [8 regression] gcc-8 miscompiles binutils on m68k

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86820 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/86820] [8 regression] gcc-8 miscompiles binutils on m68k

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86820 --- Comment #5 from Andreas Schwab --- Author: schwab Date: Thu Aug 2 17:23:13 2018 New Revision: 263269 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263269=gcc=rev Log: Fix invalid cc_status after [const_][us]mulsi3_highpart Backport from

[Bug c++/80744] Detect Divide By Zero and give a warning in C/C++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80744 --- Comment #5 from Jonny Grant --- Created attachment 44493 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44493=edit Better test case

[Bug c++/81239] std::__cxx11::string& visible in gcc warning output

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81239 --- Comment #3 from Jonny Grant --- (In reply to Jonny Grant from comment #2) > Created attachment 44492 [details] > Better test case wrong ticket. please ignore

[Bug c++/81239] std::__cxx11::string& visible in gcc warning output

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81239 --- Comment #2 from Jonny Grant --- Created attachment 44492 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44492=edit Better test case

[Bug c++/80744] Detect Divide By Zero and give a warning in C/C++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80744 --- Comment #4 from Jonny Grant --- Hi Martin Thank you for your reply. I appreciate that GCC isn't a static analyser But I think (C) is probably easier to follow though if GCC was extended, and (A) std::string harder, as needs knowledge

[Bug libgcc/86512] Incorrect sub result for float subnormal inputs in armv7(with -msoft-float).

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86512 Richard Earnshaw changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.0

[Bug libgcc/86512] Incorrect sub result for float subnormal inputs in armv7(with -msoft-float).

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86512 Richard Earnshaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libgcc/86512] Incorrect sub result for float subnormal inputs in armv7(with -msoft-float).

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86512 --- Comment #1 from Richard Earnshaw --- Author: rearnsha Date: Thu Aug 2 16:50:07 2018 New Revision: 263267 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263267=gcc=rev Log: arm - correctly handle denormal results during softfp subtraction 2018-08-02

[Bug target/86828] [6/7 Regression] wrong-code bug with "-march=knl -Ofast" (invalid memory reference)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86828 --- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #3) > I can't reproduce it with gcc version 7.3.1 20180609. Just made a fresh build off today's 7-branch: gcc version 7.3.1 20180802 [gcc-7-branch revis

[Bug c++/80744] Detect Divide By Zero and give a warning in C/C++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80744 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug c/86832] New: GCC v8.2.0 tries to use native TLS with -fstack-protector-strong on Windows (mingw-w64)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86832 Bug ID: 86832 Summary: GCC v8.2.0 tries to use native TLS with -fstack-protector-strong on Windows (mingw-w64) Product: gcc Version: lto Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/86552] missing warning for reading past the end of non-string arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86552 --- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor --- Yes, that's also (partly) why I submitted a solution for pr71625 comment 15: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-07/msg01884.html With that patch applied as well the strlen call is diagnosed.

[Bug tree-optimization/86702] [9 Regression] SPEC CPU2006 400.perlbench, CPU2017 500.perlbench_r ~3% performance drop after r262247

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86702 --- Comment #4 from Alexander Nesterovskiy --- I've noticed performance regressions on different targets and with different compilation options, not only highly optimized like "-march=skylake-avx512 -Ofast -flto -funroll-loops" but with "-O2"

[Bug target/86772] [meta-bug] tracking port status for CVE-2017-5753

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86772 Bug 86772 depends on bug 86813, which changed state. Bug 86813 Summary: xstormy16 port needs updating for CVE-2017-5753 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86813 What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/86813] xstormy16 port needs updating for CVE-2017-5753

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86813 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/86813] xstormy16 port needs updating for CVE-2017-5753

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86813 --- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton --- Author: nickc Date: Thu Aug 2 16:13:32 2018 New Revision: 263266 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263266=gcc=rev Log: PR target/86813 * config/stormy16/stormy16.c

[Bug target/86772] [meta-bug] tracking port status for CVE-2017-5753

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86772 Bug 86772 depends on bug 86810, which changed state. Bug 86810 Summary: v850 port needs updating for CVE-2017-5753 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86810 What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/86810] v850 port needs updating for CVE-2017-5753

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86810 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/86660] libgomp.c++/for-15.C ICEs with nvptx offloading

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86660 --- Comment #16 from Tom de Vries --- Author: vries Date: Thu Aug 2 15:59:01 2018 New Revision: 263265 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263265=gcc=rev Log: [nvptx] Ignore c++ exceptions The nvptx port can't support exceptions using sjlj,

[Bug target/86810] v850 port needs updating for CVE-2017-5753

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86810 --- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton --- Author: nickc Date: Thu Aug 2 15:57:06 2018 New Revision: 263264 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263264=gcc=rev Log: PR target/86810 * config/v850/v850.c

[Bug c++/86190] [6/7 Regression] -Wsign-conversion ignores explicit conversion in some cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86190 --- Comment #13 from Marek Polacek --- Thanks for taking the time to report the bug!

[Bug middle-end/86827] [8/9 Regression] -Warray-bounds produces negative indicies

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86827 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/86803] rx port needs updating for CVE-2017-5753

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86803 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/86772] [meta-bug] tracking port status for CVE-2017-5753

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86772 Bug 86772 depends on bug 86803, which changed state. Bug 86803 Summary: rx port needs updating for CVE-2017-5753 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86803 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/86190] [6/7 Regression] -Wsign-conversion ignores explicit conversion in some cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86190 --- Comment #12 from Tony E Lewis --- I confirm that Godbolt's GCC trunk now handles my testcase correctly. Thanks very much for all work on this.

[Bug target/86735] [8/9 Regression] Bad wrong-code bug with "-march=skylake-avx512 -Ofast"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86735 --- Comment #13 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/in-pack.f90 in the testsuite exhibits the same problem as comment 0, I think. It also contains Fortran array operations and fails with "-march=skylake-avx512

[Bug target/86831] three failures in gfortran.fortran-torture with "-Ofast -march=native" on skylake-avx512

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86831 --- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4) > "nan_inf_fmt" suggests that the 'fast' part in -Ofast might be the issue. > So try -O3 -march=native instead? All three tests pass with those flags.

[Bug target/86803] rx port needs updating for CVE-2017-5753

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86803 --- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton --- Author: nickc Date: Thu Aug 2 14:35:10 2018 New Revision: 263263 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263263=gcc=rev Log: PR target/86803 * config/rx/rx.c

[Bug target/86797] msp430 port needs updating for CVE-2017-5753

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86797 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/86772] [meta-bug] tracking port status for CVE-2017-5753

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86772 Bug 86772 depends on bug 86797, which changed state. Bug 86797 Summary: msp430 port needs updating for CVE-2017-5753 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86797 What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/86831] three failures in gfortran.fortran-torture with "-Ofast -march=native" on skylake-avx512

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86831 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- "nan_inf_fmt" suggests that the 'fast' part in -Ofast might be the issue. So try -O3 -march=native instead?

[Bug c++/86763] [7/8 Regression] Wrong code comparing member of copy of a 237 byte object with nontrivial default constructor on x86-64 arch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86763 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||9.0 Summary|[7/8/9

[Bug c++/86763] [7/8/9 Regression] Wrong code comparing member of copy of a 237 byte object with nontrivial default constructor on x86-64 arch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86763 --- Comment #10 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Aug 2 14:25:57 2018 New Revision: 263261 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263261=gcc=rev Log: 2018-08-02 Richard Biener PR c++/86763 * class.c

[Bug middle-end/86505] [6/7/8/9 Regression] __builtin_va_arg_pack_len() computes the number of arguments wrongly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86505 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/86831] three failures in gfortran.fortran-torture with "-Ofast -march=native" on skylake-avx512

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86831 --- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to janus from comment #0) > FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/intrinsic_nearest.f90 execution, > -Ofast -march=native > FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/nan_inf_fmt.f90

[Bug target/86831] three failures in gfortran.fortran-torture with "-Ofast -march=native" on skylake-avx512

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86831 --- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to janus from comment #0) > Running "make check-fortran" with this mod on a skylake-avx512 CPU yields > the following failures: None of them fails with -march=native alone.

[Bug target/86797] msp430 port needs updating for CVE-2017-5753

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86797 --- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton --- Author: nickc Date: Thu Aug 2 14:02:32 2018 New Revision: 263259 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263259=gcc=rev Log: PR target/86797 * config/msp430/msp430.c

[Bug target/86831] three failures in gfortran.fortran-torture with "-Ofast -march=native" on skylake-avx512

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86831 --- Comment #1 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to janus from comment #0) > Running "make check-fortran" with this mod on a skylake-avx512 CPU yields > the following failures: > > FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/in-pack.f90

[Bug target/86772] [meta-bug] tracking port status for CVE-2017-5753

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86772 Bug 86772 depends on bug 86791, which changed state. Bug 86791 Summary: mcore port needs updating for CVE-2017-5753 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86791 What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/86791] mcore port needs updating for CVE-2017-5753

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86791 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/86791] mcore port needs updating for CVE-2017-5753

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86791 --- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton --- Author: nickc Date: Thu Aug 2 13:30:40 2018 New Revision: 263258 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263258=gcc=rev Log: PR target/86791 * config/mcore/mcore.c

[Bug target/86831] New: three failures in gfortran.fortran-torture with "-Ofast -march=native" on skylake-avx512

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86831 Bug ID: 86831 Summary: three failures in gfortran.fortran-torture with "-Ofast -march=native" on skylake-avx512 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/86828] [6/7 Regression] wrong-code bug with "-march=knl -Ofast" (invalid memory reference)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86828 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- Comment #3

[Bug tree-optimization/86816] [8 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in tree-ssa-pre / tail_merge_optimize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86816 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/86816] [8/9 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in tree-ssa-pre / tail_merge_optimize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86816 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Aug 2 13:19:50 2018 New Revision: 263257 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263257=gcc=rev Log: 2018-08-02 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/86816 *

[Bug fortran/86830] New: Contiguous array pointer function result not recognized as contiguous

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86830 Bug ID: 86830 Summary: Contiguous array pointer function result not recognized as contiguous Product: gcc Version: 8.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/86829] Missing sin(atan(x)) and cos(atan(x)) optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86829 --- Comment #3 from Giuliano Belinassi --- (In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #1) > > Do you have a copyright assignment (https://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html) ? No. Sorry, but I think I may need help getting this right. Are there any tips?

[Bug target/86789] m32r port needs updating for CVE-2017-5753

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86789 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/86772] [meta-bug] tracking port status for CVE-2017-5753

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86772 Bug 86772 depends on bug 86789, which changed state. Bug 86789 Summary: m32r port needs updating for CVE-2017-5753 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86789 What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/86789] m32r port needs updating for CVE-2017-5753

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86789 --- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton --- Author: nickc Date: Thu Aug 2 12:31:29 2018 New Revision: 263256 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263256=gcc=rev Log: PR target/86789 * config/m32r/m32r.c

[Bug target/85434] Address of stack protector guard spilled to stack on ARM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85434 --- Comment #20 from Thomas Preud'homme --- (In reply to Christophe Lyon from comment #19) > Created attachment 44489 [details] > Source file causing ICE on aarch64 > > With your patch, GCC crashes with target aarch64-none-linux-gnu >

[Bug target/85434] Address of stack protector guard spilled to stack on ARM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85434 Christophe Lyon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/86828] [6/7 Regression] wrong-code bug with "-march=knl -Ofast" (invalid memory reference)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86828 --- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > Would be nice to know what fixed this (or maybe know if it just went latent). I think I remember having some intermediate versions during the

[Bug target/86787] iq2000 port needs updating for CVE-2017-5753

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86787 --- Comment #2 from Nick Clifton --- Author: nickc Date: Thu Aug 2 12:14:52 2018 New Revision: 263255 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263255=gcc=rev Log: PR target/86787 * config/iq2000/iq2000.c

[Bug target/86771] [9 Regression] gfortran.dg/actual_array_constructor_1.f90 fails on arm after combine 2 insns to 2 insns patch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86771 --- Comment #5 from Christophe Lyon --- I think in the "ok" version we have: add ip, sp, #60 ... ldm ip, {r0, r1} ... add r2, sp, #72 ldm r2, {r0, r1} in the "ko" version we have: ldr r1, [sp, #64] ... ldr r1, [sp, #76] So in the "ko" version

[Bug target/86771] [9 Regression] gfortran.dg/actual_array_constructor_1.f90 fails on arm after combine 2 insns to 2 insns patch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86771 --- Comment #4 from Christophe Lyon --- Created attachment 44488 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44488=edit Good code This is with r263197 and r263067 (your patch) reverted

[Bug target/86828] [6/7 Regression] wrong-code bug with "-march=knl -Ofast" (invalid memory reference)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86828 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needs-bisection Target|

[Bug target/86771] [9 Regression] gfortran.dg/actual_array_constructor_1.f90 fails on arm after combine 2 insns to 2 insns patch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86771 --- Comment #3 from Christophe Lyon --- Created attachment 44487 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44487=edit Wrong code generated This is with trunk @r263197

[Bug tree-optimization/86829] Missing sin(atan(x)) and cos(atan(x)) optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86829 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization, patch

[Bug target/86772] [meta-bug] tracking port status for CVE-2017-5753

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86772 Bug 86772 depends on bug 86782, which changed state. Bug 86782 Summary: frv port needs updating for CVE-2017-5753 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86782 What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/86782] frv port needs updating for CVE-2017-5753

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86782 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/86829] Missing sin(atan(x)) and cos(atan(x)) optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86829 --- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse --- You shouldn't use float_type_node directly, since the operations might be on double or long double. Do you have a copyright assignment (https://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html) ?

  1   2   >