[Bug middle-end/87099] [8/9 Regression] internal compiler error: segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87099 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-*-* i?86-*-*

[Bug target/87104] missed &, == optimization makes Emacs ~0.4% slower on x86-64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87104 --- Comment #8 from pipcet at gmail dot com --- Created attachment 44605 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44605=edit patch to illustrate the issue

[Bug tree-optimization/87105] Autovectorization [X86, SSE2, AVX2, DoublePrecision]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87105 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||alias Target|

[Bug c++/87107] Template instantiation is 50x slower than with clang++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87107 --- Comment #2 from Frédéric --- Yes, I've seen that one and saw it was fixed before 8.2.0. I wasn't sure actually if it was included in 8.2.0 as it was solved few weeks before 8.2.0 was out.

[Bug gcov-profile/87069] gcov accumulates results for identical files

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87069 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/78529] gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/strcat-chk.c failed with lto/O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78529 --- Comment #37 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Fri, 24 Aug 2018, joey.ye at arm dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78529 > > Joey Ye changed: > >What|Removed |Added >

[Bug driver/83193] Help for invalid -march= options from cc1 omits -march=native on x86-64, arm. aarch64, output also inconsistent

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83193 --- Comment #16 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Mon Aug 27 08:01:14 2018 New Revision: 263870 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263870=gcc=rev Log: Print default options selection for -march,-mcpu and -mtune for aarch64 (PR

[Bug gcov-profile/87069] gcov accumulates results for identical files

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87069 --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Mon Aug 27 08:01:54 2018 New Revision: 263871 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263871=gcc=rev Log: Do not read gcda files multiple times (PR gcov-profile/87069). 2018-08-27 Martin

[Bug rtl-optimization/87096] "Optimised" snprintf is not POSIX conformant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87096 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- I don't think we "preserve" exceptional behavior consistently. That is, we happily change code with exceptional behavior to code without if the main computation result is the same.

[Bug c/87110] [9 Regresssion] tree check fail in to_wide, at tree.h:5523

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87110 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ipa/87094] Suboptimal accounting for stack growth in inlining

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87094 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug sanitizer/87095] [8/9 Regression] UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer vptr false positive with virtual inheritance only with -fno-sanitize-recover

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87095 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c++/87107] Template instantiation is 50x slower than with clang++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87107 --- Comment #1 from Mateusz Loskot --- There was similar bug reported to GCC 8.1, fixed in 8.2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86320 However, I'm not seeing any improvement compiling the Frédéric's sample

[Bug rtl-optimization/87065] [7/8/9 Regression] combine causes ICE in trunc_int_for_mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87065 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Aug 27 08:41:22 2018 New Revision: 263872 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263872=gcc=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/87065 * combine.c (simplify_if_then_else):

[Bug ada/87100] FAIL: gnat.dg/config_pragma1.adb execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87100 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- *** Bug 87101 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug ada/87101] FAIL: gnat.dg/config_pragma1.adb execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87101 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/87104] missed &, == optimization makes Emacs ~0.4% slower on x86-64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87104 --- Comment #7 from pipcet at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5) > x86 and x86_64 uses the same back-end so yes it does seem target secific. I think it's not a target issue; we really want to be generating the same

[Bug target/87104] missed &, == optimization makes Emacs ~0.4% slower on x86-64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87104 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug sanitizer/87095] UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer vptr false positive with virtual inheritance only with -fno-sanitize-recover

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87095 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/87105] Autovectorization [X86, SSE2, AVX2, DoublePrecision]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87105 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- I've also had patches adding an early phiopt pass which would have solved the CFG mess VRP creates.

[Bug tree-optimization/87110] [9 Regresssion] tree check fail in to_wide, at tree.h:5523

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87110 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Component|c

[Bug c/80528] reimplement gnulib's "useless-if-before-free" script as a compiler warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80528 jim at meyering dot net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jim at meyering dot net ---

[Bug tree-optimization/87117] [9 Regression] ICE in eliminate_dom_walker::eliminate_cleanup(bool) at gcc/gcc/tree-ssa-sccvn.c:5431 since r263875

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87117 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/86010] [7/8/9 Regression] redundant memset with smaller size not eliminated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86010 --- Comment #8 from Martin Sebor --- I believe the fix is behind the regression reported in pr87011.

[Bug tree-optimization/87112] [9 Regression] ICE in fold_binary_loc, at fold-const.c:9334

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87112 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor

[Bug libstdc++/87116] Incorrect result of std::filesystem::path::lexically_normal() for more than 3 dot-dot elements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87116 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/87112] [9 Regression] ICE in fold_binary_loc, at fold-const.c:9334

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87112 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/57492] Optimize 2.0**i to ldexp(1.0,i)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57492 --- Comment #3 from Antony Polukhin --- More examples: double test_uns(unsigned u) { return __builtin_pow(2, u); } double test_int(int i) { return __builtin_pow(2, i); } Above two functions clang optimizes to exp2 and ldexp calls:

[Bug target/87104] missed &, == optimization makes Emacs ~0.4% slower on x86-64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87104 --- Comment #9 from pipcet at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6) > So on GIMPLE the following are not canonicalized: > >[local count: 1073741825]: > _1 = i_4(D) & 7; > _8 = (int) i_4(D); > if (_1 == 6) >

[Bug rtl-optimization/87065] [7/8/9 Regression] combine causes ICE in trunc_int_for_mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87065 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Aug 27 09:14:38 2018 New Revision: 263873 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263873=gcc=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/87065 * combine.c (simplify_if_then_else):

[Bug sanitizer/87095] [8/9 Regression] UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer vptr false positive with virtual inheritance only with -fno-sanitize-recover

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87095 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- With my very limited understanding of the inheritance and ABI, I think the testcase is valid. The problem is I believe in that if there are nearly empty virtual bases that the ABI requires to reuse the

[Bug target/87104] missed &, == optimization makes Emacs ~0.4% slower on x86-64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87104 --- Comment #10 from pipcet at gmail dot com --- Created attachment 44606 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44606=edit canonicalize to (A) == C This canonicalizes to the worse code on x86_64.

[Bug tree-optimization/57492] Optimize 2.0**i to ldexp(1.0,i)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57492 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||easyhack --- Comment #4 from Richard

[Bug c++/86993] [6/7/8/9 Regression] assignment of read-only variable error reported at wrong location

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86993 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Aug 27 18:36:23 2018 New Revision: 263891 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263891=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/86993 * cp-tree.h (cxx_readonly_error): Add location_t

[Bug c/87118] New: ICE in expand_expr_addr_expr_1, at expr.c:7862

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87118 Bug ID: 87118 Summary: ICE in expand_expr_addr_expr_1, at expr.c:7862 Product: gcc Version: 7.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal

[Bug c/53769] [C11]: Macros __STDC_NO_THREADS__ / __STDC_NO_ATOMIC__ missing.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53769 --- Comment #9 from Florian Weimer --- (In reply to Vincent Lefèvre from comment #8) > (In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #7) > > Furthermore, if I don't misread the standard, the expectation is that if an > > implementation does not

[Bug tree-optimization/87117] New: [9 Regression] ICE in eliminate_dom_walker::eliminate_cleanup(bool) at gcc/gcc/tree-ssa-sccvn.c:5431 since r263875

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87117 Bug ID: 87117 Summary: [9 Regression] ICE in eliminate_dom_walker::eliminate_cleanup(bool) at gcc/gcc/tree-ssa-sccvn.c:5431 since r263875 Product: gcc Version:

[Bug middle-end/80283] [6/7/8/9 Regression] bad SIMD register allocation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80283 --- Comment #25 from Michael_S --- Just a reminder 16 months later: x86-64 case - both 8.2 and trunk are as bad as they were. ARM-Neon case - 8.2 appears to be worse (by 5%) than either 6.x or 7.x. I didn't check trunk.

[Bug c/87119] New: ice in set_value_range, at tree-vrp.c:289

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87119 Bug ID: 87119 Summary: ice in set_value_range, at tree-vrp.c:289 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug middle-end/87099] [8/9 Regression] internal compiler error: segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87099 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug libstdc++/78113] std::variant and std::visit's current implementations do not get optimized out (compared to "recursive visitation")

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78113 --- Comment #1 from Antony Polukhin --- Note that this bug is related to Bug 86912. Fixing Bug 86912 should automatically resolve this issue (but not vice versa).

[Bug tree-optimization/86702] [9 Regression] SPEC CPU2006 400.perlbench, CPU2017 500.perlbench_r ~3% performance drop after r262247

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86702 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Mon Aug 27 12:17:54 2018 New Revision: 263877 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263877=gcc=rev Log: Fix probabilities for jump table (PR tree-optimization/86702). 2018-08-27 Martin

[Bug tree-optimization/86847] [9 Regression] Switch code size growth

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86847 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Mon Aug 27 12:21:11 2018 New Revision: 263879 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263879=gcc=rev Log: Improve switch code emission for a balanced tree (PR tree-optimization/86847).

[Bug libstdc++/78113] std::variant and std::visit's current implementations do not get optimized out (compared to "recursive visitation")

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78113 --- Comment #2 from Antony Polukhin --- Here's another example: #include struct A {}; struct B : A {}; struct C : A {}; struct D : A {}; struct E : A {}; struct X : A {}; struct visitor { template A& operator()(T& v) const noexcept

[Bug c++/87113] New: ICE in adjust_temp_type at cp/constexpr.c:1205

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87113 Bug ID: 87113 Summary: ICE in adjust_temp_type at cp/constexpr.c:1205 Product: gcc Version: 7.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug libstdc++/87071] libstdc++ crashes during GPU driver initialization with suspected attempt to execute unsupported instruction by Athlon64 X2 TK-57

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87071 --- Comment #9 from Sergey Kondakov --- (In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #8) > You should have mentioned you were using a custom-compiled Mesa, not the > distribution package (both here and in the original report to Mesa project). >

[Bug tree-optimization/86010] [7/8/9 Regression] redundant memset with smaller size not eliminated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86010 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7

[Bug middle-end/86121] [9 Regression] missing -Wstringop-overflow on strcpy followed by strcat

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86121 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug sanitizer/86962] [8 Regression] ICE in sanitize_rewrite_addressable_params, at sanopt.c:1173 with nested functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86962 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work|8.2.0 |9.0 Summary|[9 Regression]

[Bug sanitizer/86962] [9 Regression] ICE in sanitize_rewrite_addressable_params, at sanopt.c:1173 with nested functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86962 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Mon Aug 27 13:21:28 2018 New Revision: 263882 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263882=gcc=rev Log: Sanopt: ignore params with DECL_HAS_VALUE_EXPR_P (PR sanitizer/86962). 2018-08-27

[Bug target/81685] [7/8/9 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline-ns-2.C -std=gnu++* (internal compiler error) on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81685 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- So fixed for 9+ so far?

[Bug bootstrap/81033] [8/9 Regression] there are cases where ld64 is not able to determine correct atom boundaries from the output GCC currently produces

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81033 --- Comment #46 from Jakub Jelinek --- Is this fixed for 9+ so far?

[Bug middle-end/85817] [9 Regression] ICE in expand_call at gcc/calls.c:4291

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85817 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/86927] [8/9 Regression] Gcc miscompiles at -O3 on valid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86927 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Created attachment 44607 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44607=edit patch I am testing the attached.

[Bug tree-optimization/85859] [6/7/8/9 Regression] wrong code with -fno-isolate-erroneous-paths-dereference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85859 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6

[Bug target/85512] [8/9 Regression] gcc generating non-existing sshr with immh == 0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85512 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/87113] ICE in adjust_temp_type at cp/constexpr.c:1205

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87113 --- Comment #1 from smehringer --- Created attachment 44609 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44609=edit workaround of error Inserting a member variable into the struct prevents ICE.

[Bug target/87085] with -march=i386, gcc should not generate code including endbr instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87085 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/87112] [9 Regression] ICE in fold_binary_loc, at fold-const.c:9334

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87112 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug middle-end/87099] [8/9 Regression] internal compiler error: segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87099 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/86706] [8 Regression] ICE in build_base_path, at cp/class.c:294

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86706 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9 Regression] ICE in |[8 Regression] ICE in

[Bug middle-end/85817] [9 Regression] ICE in expand_call at gcc/calls.c:4291

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85817 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug lto/85583] [9 Regression] lto1: internal compiler error: in lto_balanced_map, at lto/lto-partition.c:833

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85583 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/87112] New: [9 Regression] ICE in fold_binary_loc, at fold-const.c:9334

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87112 Bug ID: 87112 Summary: [9 Regression] ICE in fold_binary_loc, at fold-const.c:9334 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code

[Bug tree-optimization/87112] [9 Regression] ICE in fold_binary_loc, at fold-const.c:9334

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87112 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/86847] [9 Regression] Switch code size growth

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86847 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/26163] [meta-bug] missed optimization in SPEC (2k17, 2k and 2k6 and 95)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163 Bug 26163 depends on bug 86702, which changed state. Bug 86702 Summary: [9 Regression] SPEC CPU2006 400.perlbench, CPU2017 500.perlbench_r ~3% performance drop after r262247 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86702 What

[Bug tree-optimization/86702] [9 Regression] SPEC CPU2006 400.perlbench, CPU2017 500.perlbench_r ~3% performance drop after r262247

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86702 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/87065] [7 Regression] combine causes ICE in trunc_int_for_mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87065 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/85805] [7/8/9 Regression] Wrong code for 64 bit comparisons on avr-gcc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85805 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #9

[Bug lto/85583] [9 Regression] lto1: internal compiler error: in lto_balanced_map, at lto/lto-partition.c:833

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85583 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #8

[Bug c++/87113] ICE in adjust_temp_type at cp/constexpr.c:1205

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87113 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/85699] [9 regression] gcc.dg/nextafter-2.c fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85699 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/81033] [8/9 Regression] there are cases where ld64 is not able to determine correct atom boundaries from the output GCC currently produces

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81033 --- Comment #47 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #46) > Is this fixed for 9+ so far? Yes, fixed on trunk .. leaving it open pending backports.

[Bug c++/87091] Malformed fix-it hint for missing header

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87091 --- Comment #4 from David Malcolm --- Author: dmalcolm Date: Mon Aug 27 13:46:32 2018 New Revision: 263884 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263884=gcc=rev Log: diagnostics: show an extra line of context in line-insertion fix-it hints (PR

[Bug c++/87091] Malformed fix-it hint for missing header

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87091 --- Comment #5 from David Malcolm --- Author: dmalcolm Date: Mon Aug 27 14:02:05 2018 New Revision: 263885 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263885=gcc=rev Log: Less verbose fix-it hints for missing header files (PR 87091) This patch tweaks

[Bug target/81685] [7/8 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline-ns-2.C -std=gnu++* (internal compiler error) on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81685 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[7/8/9 Regression] FAIL:|[7/8 Regression] FAIL:

[Bug tree-optimization/86991] [8/9 Regression] ICE in vectorizable_reduction, at tree-vect-loop.c:6919

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86991 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Hmm. To me it looks like the assert that triggers: if (orig_stmt_info) gcc_assert (tmp == orig_stmt_info || REDUC_GROUP_FIRST_ELEMENT (tmp) == orig_stmt_info); else /* We

[Bug tree-optimization/87114] New: [9 regression] ICE in gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/strnlen.c starting with r263855

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87114 Bug ID: 87114 Summary: [9 regression] ICE in gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/strnlen.c starting with r263855 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status:

[Bug middle-end/86554] [7/8/9 Regression] Incorrect code generation with signed/unsigned comparison

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86554 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- So on trunk the remaining offender now is code hoisting. We still do value-numbering the same but correctly do _not_ use the values definition to simplify the comparison: Value numbering stmt = ret_13 =

[Bug target/87115] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/split-5.c execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87115 Bug ID: 87115 Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/split-5.c execution test Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug rtl-optimization/85805] [7/8/9 Regression] Wrong code for 64 bit comparisons on avr-gcc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85805 --- Comment #10 from Segher Boessenkool --- It is fixed for 9 yes, and I am still pondering it for 8. I guess that's not going to happen.

[Bug tree-optimization/86865] [9 Regression] Wrong code w/ -O2 -floop-parallelize-all -fstack-reuse=none -fwrapv -fno-tree-ch -fno-tree-dce -fno-tree-dominator-opts -fno-tree-loop-ivcanon

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86865 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- We code-generate [local count: 107374]: xy = 0; [local count: 107374]: # graphite_IV.7_4 = PHI <0(2), graphite_IV.7_2(17)> _21 = (int) graphite_IV.7_4; _22 = ~_21; sa = {}; ...

[Bug c++/87120] New: gcc incorrectly accepts uniform-initializing bool values from double

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87120 Bug ID: 87120 Summary: gcc incorrectly accepts uniform-initializing bool values from double Product: gcc Version: 8.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/87112] [9 Regression] ICE in fold_binary_loc, at fold-const.c:9334

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87112 --- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Tue Aug 28 00:10:46 2018 New Revision: 263900 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263900=gcc=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/87112 - ICE in fold_binary_loc on strnlen of mixed integer

[Bug tree-optimization/87112] [9 Regression] ICE in fold_binary_loc, at fold-const.c:9334

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87112 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/87109] Wrong overload picked with ref-qualifiers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87109 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/87110] [9 Regresssion] tree check fail in to_wide, at tree.h:5523

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87110 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com --- Comment #2

[Bug c++/87121] New: wrong 128-bit integer multiplication with mixed bit size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87121 Bug ID: 87121 Summary: wrong 128-bit integer multiplication with mixed bit size Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/86328] [8/9 Regression] Runtime segfault reading an allocatable class(*) object in allocate statements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86328 --- Comment #12 from martin --- The workaround mentioned by Paul in comment #9 is working only partially. For character sequences (and possibly other data types), valgrind still complains. Surprisingly, using a single character works as well. On

[Bug tree-optimization/87110] [9 Regresssion] tree check fail in to_wide, at tree.h:5523

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87110 --- Comment #4 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Tue Aug 28 04:02:11 2018 New Revision: 263906 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263906=gcc=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/87110 * tree-ssa-dse.c (compute_trims): Handle

[Bug tree-optimization/87110] [9 Regresssion] tree check fail in to_wide, at tree.h:5523

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87110 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/87121] wrong 128-bit integer multiplication with mixed bit size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87121 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|target |c++ --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski

[Bug c++/87121] wrong 128-bit integer multiplication with mixed bit size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87121 --- Comment #2 from Mihai Preda --- OK my bad. I don't understand exactly why the or the std:: pow() version is preferred, but this seems to be what's happening, and explains the behavior. Feel free to close this.

[Bug libstdc++/87116] Incorrect result of std::filesystem::path::lexically_normal() for more than 3 dot-dot elements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87116 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- The problem is in this step of the normalisation algorithm: - As long as any appear, remove a non-dot-dot filename immediately followed by a directory-separator and a dot-dot filename, along with

[Bug c++/63392] poor error recovery with missing typename

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63392 --- Comment #3 from David Malcolm --- Author: dmalcolm Date: Mon Aug 27 23:33:02 2018 New Revision: 263899 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263899=gcc=rev Log: C++: fix-it hint for missing "typename" (PR c++/63392) This patch adds a fix-it

[Bug tree-optimization/87110] [9 Regresssion] tree check fail in to_wide, at tree.h:5523

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87110 --- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law --- It's different, but related.

[Bug tree-optimization/86914] [8/9 Regression] -O2 generates wrong code with strlen() of pointers within one-element arrays of structures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86914 --- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Tue Aug 28 00:25:50 2018 New Revision: 263905 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263905=gcc=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/86914 - wrong code with strlen() of poor-man's flexible array

[Bug tree-optimization/86914] [8 Regression] -O2 generates wrong code with strlen() of pointers within one-element arrays of structures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86914 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9 Regression] -O2|[8 Regression] -O2

[Bug sanitizer/86962] [8 Regression] ICE in sanitize_rewrite_addressable_params, at sanopt.c:1173 with nested functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86962 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

  1   2   >