https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87615
--- Comment #2 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #1)
> How much does -fno-ipa-cp help (on gcc-8 I see incredibly deep recursion in
> walk_aliased_vdefs_1 under IPA-CP analysis)?
New execution time is about 8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87597
--- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus ---
Author: burnus
Date: Mon Oct 15 18:58:17 2018
New Revision: 265175
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265175=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-10-15 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/87597
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84849
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87607
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |INVALID
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87495
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87615
--- Comment #3 from Alexander Monakov ---
On gcc-8 -fno-ipa-cp does not affect time, I brought it up prematurely:
-O2 -time
# cc1 207.15 0.22
-O2 -time -fno-ipa-cp
# cc1 207.57 0.18
-O2 -time -fno-inline
# cc1 21.13 0.10
Looks like gcc-9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87617
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87617
Bug ID: 87617
Summary: New test case gfortran.dg/inline_matmul_24.f90 from
r265126 doesn't work quite right
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87617
--- Comment #1 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Maybe fixed by r265175?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87556
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87615
--- Comment #4 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #3)
> Looks like gcc-9 regressed here.
Not sure. Adding flag -fno-inline to the compile line:
$ time ~/gcc/results.265139.release/bin/gcc -w -I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77385
--- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #1)
> Confirmed from 4.7 up to trunk (7.0), Polymorphic arrays are not yet
> supported on 4.6.
>
> Note that the following variant
>
> MODULE a
>IMPLICIT
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87614
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87608
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87609
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87618
Bug ID: 87618
Summary: Missing symbol for std::__cxx11::basic_stringbuf, std::allocator
>::basic_stringbuf()
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87619
Bug ID: 87619
Summary: sizeof(std::variant) can be reduced if its
variant_size is UCHAR_MAX
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85593
--- Comment #9 from Austin Morton ---
Apologies for letting this sit so long.
I spent an afternoon digging through some of the mentioned functions trying to
familiarize myself with everything but I didn't make it further than that.
That was a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84648
--- Comment #3 from bin cheng ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> So we run into
>
> /* Ignore loops of while (i-- < 10) type. */
> if (code != NE_EXPR)
> {
> if (iv0->step && tree_int_cst_sign_bit (iv0->step))
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51628
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87607
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54613
--- Comment #16 from Thomas Koenig ---
Here are test cases. I tried to walk through most of the
code paths.
! { dg-do run }
! Various tests with findloc.
program main
implicit none
real, dimension(2,2) :: a, b
integer, dimension(2,3) :: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80260
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58618
--- Comment #10 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #9)
> With the patch in comment 8, the wrong-code is replaced with an ICE
>
> pr58618.f90:2:0:
>
> 2 | associate (x=>s(1)(1:1))
> |
> internal compiler
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87610
Bug ID: 87610
Summary: [6/7/8/9 Regression] wrong-code with restrict
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87610
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54613
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #44834|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87610
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Oct 15 10:58:28 2018
New Revision: 265160
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265160=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-10-15 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/87610
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87288
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58906
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87602
Cheng Wen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Integer Overflow in |Integer Overflow in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58618
--- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
With the patch in comment 8, the wrong-code is replaced with an ICE
pr58618.f90:2:0:
2 | associate (x=>s(1)(1:1))
|
internal compiler error: in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2425
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77385
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87609
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82077
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87024
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Oct 15 10:50:57 2018
New Revision: 265159
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265159=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-10-15 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2018-08-23
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86505
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87024
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86505
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Oct 15 10:50:57 2018
New Revision: 265159
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265159=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-10-15 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2018-08-23
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87022
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||9.0
Summary|[8/9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68800
Bernhard Reutner-Fischer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldot at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84761
--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Oct 15 13:43:09 2018
New Revision: 265164
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265164=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-10-15 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2018-03-19
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86751
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Oct 15 11:52:48 2018
New Revision: 265162
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265162=gcc=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/86751 default assignment operators for std::pair
The solution for PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77537
--- Comment #16 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Oct 15 11:52:48 2018
New Revision: 265162
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265162=gcc=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/86751 default assignment operators for std::pair
The solution for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44756
Bug 44756 depends on bug 87587, which changed state.
Bug 87587 Summary: [...]/libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/cxx11-shim_facets.cc:271:28:
error: empty class 'std::integral_constant' parameter passing ABI
changes in -fabi-version=12 (GCC 8)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87587
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Oct 15 12:58:51 2018
New Revision: 265163
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265163=gcc=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/87587 prevent -Wabi warnings
The warnings about changes to empty
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87611
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Oct 15 12:58:51 2018
New Revision: 265163
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265163=gcc=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/87587 prevent -Wabi warnings
The warnings about changes to empty
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87022
--- Comment #4 from bin cheng ---
Author: amker
Date: Mon Oct 15 11:35:56 2018
New Revision: 265161
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265161=gcc=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/87022
* tree-loop-distribution.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87611
Bug ID: 87611
Summary: Cannot suppress warning with #pragma GCC diagnostic
warning "-Wabi=12"
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87587
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86751
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87610
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87612
Bug ID: 87612
Summary: Bad diagnostic for conflicting mcpu and march options
on aarch64
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87614
Bug ID: 87614
Summary: User related warnings are hidden in system headers
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87614
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87613
Bug ID: 87613
Summary: Non-reachable default required in switch statement to
get optimal code
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84648
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amker at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87563
--- Comment #4 from Renlin Li ---
Author: renlin
Date: Mon Oct 15 16:49:05 2018
New Revision: 265172
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265172=gcc=rev
Log:
[PR87563][AARCH64-SVE]: Don't keep ifcvt loop when COND_ ifn could not be
vectorized.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87566
--- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas ---
Fixed on trunk.
I am going back on my original intention to backport the recent patches to
8-branch. Or, rather, I will do them one at a time if at all. The trouble is
that an omnibus patch doesn't work for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87615
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87566
--- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Mon Oct 15 16:31:15 2018
New Revision: 265171
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265171=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-10-15 Paul Thomas
Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/87566
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87562
Renlin Li changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||renlin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87572
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Oct 15 16:08:09 2018
New Revision: 265169
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265169=gcc=rev
Log:
PR target/87572
* common/config/i386/i386-common.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87615
Bug ID: 87615
Summary: Possible excessive compile time with -O2
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87616
Bug ID: 87616
Summary: Compiler segfaults on dependent templated friend
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87616
--- Comment #1 from Michael Gorbovitski ---
> g++ prog.cc -Wall -Wextra
prog.cc:8:36: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
8 | friend class friender::cls;
|^
0xb3 crash_signal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87616
--- Comment #2 from Michael Gorbovitski ---
Slightly simplified test case (no need for double-argument template):
struct foo{};
template struct friender {
using cls=foo;
};
class bar {
template
friend class friender::cls;
int
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87616
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87607
Håkon Høines changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |FIXED
--- Comment #2 from Håkon Høines
69 matches
Mail list logo
