[Bug fortran/87797] New: Enhancement: Warning for potential name clash of variables/intrinsics...

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87797 Bug ID: 87797 Summary: Enhancement: Warning for potential name clash of variables/intrinsics... Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/86567] [8/9 Regression] -Wnonnull/-Wformat/-Wrestrict affect code generation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86567 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug c/87795] Excessive alignment permitted for functions and labels

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87795 Joel Sherrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||joel at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug c/87795] Excessive alignment permitted for functions and labels

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87795 --- Comment #1 from pkoning at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 44923 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44923=edit variable and function alignment test case

[Bug c/87795] New: Excessive alignment permitted for functions and labels

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87795 Bug ID: 87795 Summary: Excessive alignment permitted for functions and labels Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c/87795] Excessive alignment permitted for functions and labels

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87795 --- Comment #2 from pkoning at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 44924 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44924=edit label alignment test case

[Bug bootstrap/87788] [9 Regression] Bootstrap fails for x86_64-apple-darwin* with default languages selection after D addition.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87788 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/87795] Excessive alignment permitted for functions and labels

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87795 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab --- *** Bug 87794 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c/87794] Excessive alignment permitted for functions and labels

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87794 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/71613] Useful warnings silenced when macros from system headers are used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71613 --- Comment #9 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- On Mon, 29 Oct 2018, egallager at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71613 > > --- Comment #8 from Eric Gallager --- > (In reply to

[Bug c/87794] New: Excessive alignment permitted for functions and labels

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87794 Bug ID: 87794 Summary: Excessive alignment permitted for functions and labels Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug rtl-optimization/87780] [9 regression] ICE error: unrecognizable insn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87780 --- Comment #6 from Segher Boessenkool --- That sounds like a clang problem; without more information, anyway.

[Bug libstdc++/59472] Many warnings "type of 'X' does not match original declaration" when linking with libstdc++ static library compiled with -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59472 --- Comment #7 from Paul Scruby --- Feel free to close this ticket. > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59472 > > --- Comment #6 from Eric Gallager --- > (In reply to Paul Scruby from comment #5) >> Is there a patch to fix or

[Bug middle-end/87798] New: EH lowering is creating a gimple_switch statement with type-incompatible index and case labels

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87798 Bug ID: 87798 Summary: EH lowering is creating a gimple_switch statement with type-incompatible index and case labels Product: gcc Version: tree-ssa Status: UNCONFIRMED

<    1   2