https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81878
--- Comment #52 from Eric Botcazou ---
> for native builds, I mean. hmm, I wonder if we can test for a native build
> in config-lang.in...
Yes, that would be ideal.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87898
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87885
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87874
--- Comment #4 from Alexandre Oliva ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-11/msg00332.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81878
--- Comment #51 from Alexandre Oliva ---
for native builds, I mean. hmm, I wonder if we can test for a native build in
config-lang.in...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83648
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asolokha at gmx dot com
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85787
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asolokha at gmx dot com
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87895
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.4
Summary|ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87896
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81878
--- Comment #50 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Do we want lang_requires="c c++" in ada's config-lang.in, then?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87898
Bug ID: 87898
Summary: [8/9 Regression] ICE in
separate_decls_in_region_debug, at tree-parloops.c:961
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87891
--- Comment #11 from Douglas Mencken ---
That’s what I did
sudo ln -s /usr/bin/as /usr/bin/powerpc64-unknown-darwin-as
sudo ln -s /usr/bin/ld /usr/bin/powerpc64-unknown-darwin-ld
sudo ln -s /usr/bin/ar /usr/bin/powerpc64-unknown-darwin-ar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87891
--- Comment #10 from Douglas Mencken ---
And this one is beyond my understanding
/bin/sh ../../../gcc-8.2.0/libgcc/../mkinstalldirs .
/Volumes/hfsplushd/Development/gcc-toolchain/_build/./gcc/xgcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82857
--- Comment #5 from Tom de Vries ---
Created attachment 44962
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44962=edit
WIP patch, handles DW_FORM_GNU_strp_alt
With this patch, the test-case from comment 1 passes:
...
Non-stripped
1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87892
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87895
--- Comment #1 from Arseny Solokha ---
And compiling the testcase w/ -O1 -fopenmp yeilds:
% x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc-9.0.0-alpha20181104 -O1 -fopenmp -c i5qefyvy.c
during GIMPLE pass: local-pure-const
i5qefyvy.c: In function 'vm.simdclone.0':
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87886
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> I've long said that the FE using built-in annotated decls with improper
> prototype is a bug...
>
> That said, generic-match.c uses get_call_combined_fn which
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81878
--- Comment #49 from Eric Botcazou ---
> But doesn't reverting everything will bring it back to the state it was
> before, in that `--disable-bootstrap` is still broken.
No, --disable-bootstrap alone works fine, see the subject of the PR.
> A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87889
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87886
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
I've long said that the FE using built-in annotated decls with improper
prototype is a bug...
That said, generic-match.c uses get_call_combined_fn which probably
should do what gimple_call_combined_fn does
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87896
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
One another test-case:
$ cat generic.i
enum { a, b, c } d;
e;
static f(h) {
int count;
for (;;) {
int g = 0;
while (count--) {
if (e)
continue;
g = 1;
break;
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87583
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P4 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87889
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81878
--- Comment #48 from Tamar Christina ---
But doesn't reverting everything will bring it back to the state it was before,
in that `--disable-bootstrap` is still broken.
So it seems we have two seemingly incompatible behaviors.
the fix for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87889
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87894
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87269
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81878
--- Comment #47 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Tue Nov 6 08:43:10 2018
New Revision: 265831
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265831=gcc=rev
Log:
PR ada/81878
Revert
2018-11-02 Tamar Christina
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87897
Bug ID: 87897
Summary: [9 Regression] ICE in maybe_constant_value, at
cp/constexpr.c:5255 since r265788
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87897
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||8.2.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81878
--- Comment #46 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Tue Nov 6 08:42:56 2018
New Revision: 265830
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265830=gcc=rev
Log:
PR ada/81878
Revert
2018-10-29 Tamar Christina
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19466
Bug 19466 depends on bug 18041, which changed state.
Bug 18041 Summary: OR of two single-bit bitfields is inefficient
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18041
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81161
Bug 81161 depends on bug 18041, which changed state.
Bug 18041 Summary: OR of two single-bit bitfields is inefficient
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18041
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18041
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87891
--- Comment #9 from Douglas Mencken ---
(In reply to self from comment 8)
> I found that I can add to configure line
>
> AS_FOR_TARGET=as \
> AR_FOR_TARGET=ar \
> LD_FOR_TARGET=ld \
> NM_FOR_TARGET=nm \
> RANLIB_FOR_TARGET=ranlib \
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87896
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.0
Summary|ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81878
--- Comment #45 from Eric Botcazou ---
> native --disable-bootstrap build on x86_64-linux-gnu now fails on trunk:
> gnattools uses g++ -B../../ to link, which fails because g++ 8 does not
> understand the %@ specs. We really shouldn't be mixing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87896
Bug ID: 87896
Summary: ICE in verify_flow_info failed
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87895
Bug ID: 87895
Summary: ICE in purge_dead_edges, at cfgrtl.c:3246
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code, openmp
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87893
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60497
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely ---
No, comment 9 still fails.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86946
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18041
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Nov 6 08:09:03 2018
New Revision: 265829
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265829=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-11-06 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/18041
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81878
--- Comment #44 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 6 Nov 2018, aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81878
>
> Alexandre Oliva changed:
>
>What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87894
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2018-11-6
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87894
Bug ID: 87894
Summary: ICE inslpeel_duplicate_current_defs_from_edges at
tree-vect-loop-manip.c:984 since r265812
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87583
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
101 - 147 of 147 matches
Mail list logo
