https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88162
Bug ID: 88162
Summary: GCC does not accept non-type template parameters of
class type
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
||2018-11-22
CC||jb at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Janne Blomqvist ---
Confirmed. This also occurs on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu with the latest trunk (9.0.0
20181122). Apparently
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88146
--- Comment #1 from David Binderman ---
svn blame says
11362mrs default:
229756 miyuki /* We shouldn't get here, but keep going if
!flag_checking. */
229756 miyuki if (flag_checking)
229756 miyuki
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80864
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80916
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
||2018-11-22
CC||jb at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Janne Blomqvist ---
Confirmed on latest trunk (9.0.0 20181122), x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Changing the example to execute 10 iterations
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83588
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84682
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
*** Bug 84677 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84677
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88138
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88112
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Nov 22 09:54:14 2018
New Revision: 266372
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266372=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-11-22 Richard Biener
PR lto/87229
PR lto/88112
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87229
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Nov 22 09:54:14 2018
New Revision: 266372
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266372=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-11-22 Richard Biener
PR lto/87229
PR lto/88112
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88151
Bug ID: 88151
Summary: Define iterator_traits::* for output iterators to
actual values when possible (rather than to void)
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84757
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Vlad, is this something that can be still done for GCC 9 or should we defer to
GCC 10?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87824
--- Comment #15 from Iain Buclaw ---
Still to do are:
- runnable/cppa.d: (Remove struct __c_{u}long detection and tests)
- runnable/eh.d: (Have -fno-reorder-blocks-and-partitions default for D)
- runnable/nulltype.d (Set TYPE_TRANSPARENT_AGGR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88017
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Thu Nov 22 09:13:19 2018
New Revision: 266368
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266368=gcc=rev
Log:
Do not mix -fsanitize=thread and -mabi=ms (PR sanitizer/88017).
2018-11-22 Martin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88017
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Fixed on trunk, not planning to backport.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88143
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86828
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53182
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to sandra from comment #3)
> I also think there are other compilers that have
> copied the GCC attribute syntax; do they also recognize both the underscore
> and non-underscore name variants?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88147
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88146
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88134
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|UNCONFIRMED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86832
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Can somebody please test this on mingw (on the trunk)? Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88150
Bug ID: 88150
Summary: Use sections_elf_shared.d on Solaris
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84014
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85136
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85114
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88116
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88146
ensadc at mailnesia dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ensadc at mailnesia dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88146
Bug ID: 88146
Summary: ice in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:16014
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83020
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82364
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88137
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88148
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88148
Bug ID: 88148
Summary: [9 Regression] ICE in tree_nop_conversion_p at
gcc/tree.c:12550 since r264273
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88146
--- Comment #3 from David Binderman ---
Created attachment 45065
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45065=edit
C++ source code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88148
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88129
--- Comment #8 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #7)
> Let's keep the PR open for the eventual removal of the remaining blockage
> instruction for targets that emit unwind information in the epilogue.
FTR, the following
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88149
--- Comment #1 from tisch...@mpi-cbg.de ---
Created attachment 45066
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45066=edit
Preprocessed source of fail9.cpp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88139
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88074
--- Comment #24 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 21 Nov 2018, joseph at codesourcery dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88074
>
> --- Comment #23 from joseph at codesourcery dot com dot com> ---
> And, yes,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86828
--- Comment #9 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #8)
> More details are needed here.
What exactly do you need?
$ gfortran-7 -march=knl -Ofast -g c0.f90
$ gdb ./a.out
[..]
(gdb) run
Starting program:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88148
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
So the issue is that VN done after unrolling removes SSA defs that are still
referenced from loop->nb_iterations. CFG cleanup makes sure to update
it when doing replace_uses_by (which is a quite expensive
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86828
--- Comment #10 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to janus from comment #9)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #8)
> > More details are needed here.
>
> What exactly do you need?
Can you try with valgrind?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88103
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78380
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-apple-darwin*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88137
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jb at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82961
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84191
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84540
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88147
Bug ID: 88147
Summary: [9 Regression] ICE in linemap_line_start, at
libcpp/line-map.c:781 starting from r265875
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85227
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88147
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88144
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Maybe -Wdeprecated or -Wdeprecated-declarations
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87386
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Nov 22 09:26:29 2018
New Revision: 266369
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266369=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/87386
* parser.c (cp_parser_operator): Use str.get_value ()
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53182
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Vincent Lefèvre from comment #0)
> Attributes without underscores can conflict with the ISO C standard. For
> instance, if the C11 header is included, this breaks GCC's
>
> __attribute__
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85644
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Nov 22 09:48:43 2018
New Revision: 266370
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266370=gcc=rev
Log:
PR target/85644
PR target/86832
* config/i386/i386.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86832
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Nov 22 09:48:43 2018
New Revision: 266370
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266370=gcc=rev
Log:
PR target/85644
PR target/86832
* config/i386/i386.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88149
Bug ID: 88149
Summary: internal compiler error: in vect_transform_stmt
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88150
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83796
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83712
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener ---
The series of LRA changes are not going to be backported.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88143
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86608
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86586
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88141
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||documentation
--- Comment #2 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88069
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Nov 22 09:50:58 2018
New Revision: 266371
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266371=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-11-22 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/88069
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85644
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Can somebody please test this on darwin (on the trunk)? Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88143
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86828
--- Comment #11 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #10)
> (In reply to janus from comment #9)
> > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #8)
> > > More details are needed here.
> >
> > What exactly do you
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88149
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85598
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
In theory the jump-threading code could go down and make the
evrp_range_analyzer
process the new blocks but I'm not sure how well this works out given the
actual code transform is done after all analysis
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85726
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85930
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu Nov 22 13:42:39 2018
New Revision: 266376
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266376=gcc=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/87520 Always pass type-punned type_info reference
The
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87520
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9 Regression] ODR|[8 Regression] ODR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87520
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu Nov 22 13:42:39 2018
New Revision: 266376
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266376=gcc=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/87520 Always pass type-punned type_info reference
The
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88150
--- Comment #4 from Iain Buclaw ---
(In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #3)
> > --- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw ---
> > Thanks, I will write up a small documentation of how the sections modules
> > interacts with runtime -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88111
--- Comment #8 from Jozef Lawrynowicz ---
Created attachment 45068
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45068=edit
testsuite_abi.cc __int20 hack
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45179
epagone changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||epagone at email dot it
--- Comment #6 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88150
--- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
A couple of issues in the patch bear commenting:
* The core/sys/solaris/dlfcn.d change was needed to silence
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87864
--- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
>> --- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw ---
>> Is there another way to get a section in earlier versions of Solaris?
>
> What I initially did in LLVM's compiler-rt (which prompted the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88076
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Koenig ---
> Once you are done on this, you might consider implementing a -parallel as in
> ifort.
>
> This could conveniently be triggered in frontend-passes.c, I suspect. ie.
> this would be a good place to check
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85930
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9 Regression] Misaligned |[8 Regression] Misaligned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86828
--- Comment #12 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to janus from comment #9)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #8)
> > More details are needed here.
>
> What exactly do you need?
>
>
> $ gfortran-7 -march=knl -Ofast -g c0.f90
> $ gdb ./a.out
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86952
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot
gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87229
Bug 87229 depends on bug 88112, which changed state.
Bug 88112 Summary: [9 regression] ICE in lto1: TYPE_FIELDS defined in
incomplete type
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88112
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88112
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85598
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88111
--- Comment #7 from Jozef Lawrynowicz ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #6)
> This should be fixed now.
>
> If you're able to run the tests for these components that would be very much
> appreciated. To run just the tests, run the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88150
--- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw ---
> Thanks, I will write up a small documentation of how the sections modules
> interacts with runtime - along with compiler support.
Great, thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82961
--- Comment #14 from Tom de Vries ---
Author: vries
Date: Thu Nov 22 13:12:41 2018
New Revision: 266375
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266375=gcc=rev
Log:
Backport "[vms] Add missing vmsdbgout_early_finish"
2018-11-22 Tom de Vries
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85598
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6)
> Or, couldn't e.g. number of iterations analysis if it determines linear IV
> adjust the value range?
It indeed could if it's just the PHI that is lacking.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88017
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88133
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88111
--- Comment #9 from Jozef Lawrynowicz ---
Created attachment 45069
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45069=edit
mlarge memory_resource tests libstdc++.log
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85598
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Note, while the _8 SSA_NAME above is created during:
#1 0x01442100 in copy_ssa_name_fn (fn=0x7fffefdcb000, name=, stmt=)
at ../../gcc/tree-ssanames.c:728
#2 0x014425aa in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88150
--- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw ---
Thanks, I will write up a small documentation of how the sections modules
interacts with runtime - along with compiler support.
As its heavily dependent on compiler and object format, I'll move the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85598
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Or, couldn't e.g. number of iterations analysis if it determines linear IV
adjust the value range?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88111
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Or just +__x instead of (__x + 0).
I'm assuming that the non-standard integer type will promote to one of the
standard integers, which is true for __int20 but maybe not in general.
1 - 100 of 190 matches
Mail list logo
