https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88910
Bug ID: 88910
Summary: FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr88414.c 1 blank line(s) in
output
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88911
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #0)
> tmp$ g++14 q.cc -fdumpspecs
Oops, ignore the "14" there, it's just a shell alias I use, but I missed one
instance that I meant to change to "g++"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88912
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86926
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
But 8 still ICEs.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88915
Bug ID: 88915
Summary: Try smaller vectorisation factors in scalar fallback
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88044
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88912
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86926
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88913
Bug ID: 88913
Summary: [GCOV] Wrong frequencies when a global variable is in
a while expression in gcov
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88914
Bug ID: 88914
Summary: [GCOV] Wrong frequencies when unreachable statements
within the body of the for loop in gcov
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84481
--- Comment #8 from Martin Jambor ---
And even my own measurements show 6% slowdown at both -O2 and -Ofast with
generic march/tuning against GCC 7 and now also 5% slowdown at -Ofast and
native march/tuning against GCC 8.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88916
Bug ID: 88916
Summary: [x86] suboptimal code generated for integer
comparisons joined with boolean operators
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65873
--- Comment #17 from Jan Hubicka ---
The underlying problem of inlining across target/optimization boundary not
being fully reliable is still there. I am not quite sure how we would want to
fix it w/o allowing to attach different optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88903
Bug ID: 88903
Summary: [8/9 Regression] wrong-code with SLP vectorized shift
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88757
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88911
Bug ID: 88911
Summary: No "did you mean" for incorrect -dumpspecs option
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
Severity: enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88899
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87064
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dje at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88900
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88912
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
#define TARGET_F951_OPTIONS "%{!nostdinc:\
%:fortran-preinclude-file(-fpre-include= math-vector-fortran.h finclude%s/)}"
in config/gnu-user.h adds that if the file is found.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37845
Yibiao Yang changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yangyibiao at nju dot edu.cn
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88890
--- Comment #1 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Fri Jan 18 17:13:59 2019
New Revision: 268082
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268082=gcc=rev
Log:
PR libbacktrace/88890
* mmapio.c (backtrace_get_view):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87064
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek ---
So, both the following patches should fix it IMHO, but no idea which one if any
is right.
With
--- gcc/config/rs6000/vsx.md.jj 2019-01-01 12:37:44.305529527 +0100
+++ gcc/config/rs6000/vsx.md2019-01-18
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88423
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88912
Bug ID: 88912
Summary: Fortran compiler segfaults when pre-include file is
not found
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88912
--- Comment #3 from Steve Ellcey ---
It is quite possible I am using the option incorrectly (though that should not
result in a segfault of course). Should some other flag be adding this to the
command line for me?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88587
--- Comment #14 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Jan 18 14:33:46 2019
New Revision: 268079
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268079=gcc=rev
Log:
Update PR middle-end/88587 tests
It is wrong to use -m32 in dg-options. {
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86926
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|mpolacek at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87064
--- Comment #12 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Yes, I think so (just the vec_select arg?)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86926
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Fri Jan 18 16:42:57 2019
New Revision: 268080
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268080=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/86926
* g++.dg/cpp1z/constexpr-lambda23.C: New test.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88903
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Target Milestone|8.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88902
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88902
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The problem is that gfc_add_decl_to_parent_function is called multiple times on
and thus for that VAR_DECL DECL_CHAIN
(decl) == decl (or in theory there could be longer loop, but any loop in
DECL_CHAIN is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88902
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
nux-gnu --host=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
--target=i686-pc-linux-gnu --with-ld=/usr/bin/i686-pc-linux-gnu-ld
--with-as=/usr/bin/i686-pc-linux-gnu-as --disable-libstdcxx-pch
--prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-268059-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-i686
Thread model: posix
gcc version 9.0.0 20190118 (experimen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88334
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The library patches aren't in yet.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88846
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88877
--- Comment #12 from Alan Modra ---
I suspect that the patch in comment #1 will break libcalls in other situations,
eg.
void f1 (int y)
{
extern double d;
d = y;
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88904
Bug ID: 88904
Summary: Basic block incorrectly skipped in jump threading.
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88904
--- Comment #1 from Matthew Malcomson ---
Created attachment 45458
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45458=edit
Problematic testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88902
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lkrupp at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88905
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88850
--- Comment #5 from Tamar Christina ---
So yeah it seems that there are three issues here:
1) We should probably have an r -> r alternative for *neon_mov.
2) The costs are now flipped from what they were before, for some reason the
VFP regs are
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88900
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #3)
> Is this the same as PR 87214?
No, this one is probably related to RPO VN, I'm not finished with bisection.
And it also happens on non-avx512 targets.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86214
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9 Regression] Strongly |[8 Regression] Strongly
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88901
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|marxin at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88902
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|lto, needs-bisection|
Component|lto
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88900
--- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka ---
> What a surprise, started with r267883. I'll carry on bisection with --param
> inline-unit-growth=40.
Well, I guess I can't claim that this is not gcc bug but it is the
benchmark that is broken :)
Honza
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88903
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
In the end a mistake of the PR48616 fix (r172638).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88799
--- Comment #2 from Richard Earnshaw ---
Author: rearnsha
Date: Fri Jan 18 11:49:56 2019
New Revision: 268072
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268072=gcc=rev
Log:
PR target/88799 Add +mp and +sec extensions to ARMv7-a
Most armv7-a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88907
Bug ID: 88907
Summary: Variadic template function deduction failure.
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88908
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88908
Bug ID: 88908
Summary: [9 Regression] ICE in tree check: expected tree that
contains ‘decl common’ structure, have ‘indirect_ref’
in gfc_conv_gfc_desc_to_cfi_desc, at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88903
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Jan 18 13:13:21 2019
New Revision: 268076
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268076=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-01-18 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/88903
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88906
--- Comment #2 from Zdenek Sojka ---
I was getting either wrong code with 5+, or ICE with 4.9, or unknown compiler
argument with 4.8 -> I didn't find any gcc version where this was working.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86214
--- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jan 18 10:07:27 2019
New Revision: 268067
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268067=gcc=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/86214
* tree-inline.h (struct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88903
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
Started with:
SVN revision: r224221
Author: rguenth
2015-06-08 Richard Biener
* tree-vect-stmts.c (vectorizable_load): Compute the pointer
adjustment for gaps at the end of a SLP load
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88904
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88799
--- Comment #3 from Richard Earnshaw ---
Author: rearnsha
Date: Fri Jan 18 13:25:37 2019
New Revision: 268077
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268077=gcc=rev
Log:
[arm] PR target/88799 Add +mp and +sec extensions to ARMv7-a (gcc-8 backport)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88799
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88909
Bug ID: 88909
Summary: struct builtin_description doesn't support
ix86_isa_flags2
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88900
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88906
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88850
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88902
Bug ID: 88902
Summary: [9 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in
DFS::DFS_write_tree_body)
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: GC,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87835
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Created attachment 45457
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45457=edit
[WIP] libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/asyncwait-1.c debug
(In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #2)
> (In reply to Tom
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58200
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
RFA posted at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2019-01/msg00142.html.
-build=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu --host=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
--target=i686-pc-linux-gnu --with-ld=/usr/bin/i686-pc-linux-gnu-ld
--with-as=/usr/bin/i686-pc-linux-gnu-as --disable-libstdcxx-pch
--prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-268059-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-i686
Thread model: posix
gcc version 9.0.0 20190118 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88664
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88900
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52813
--- Comment #9 from Christophe Lyon ---
Author: clyon
Date: Fri Jan 18 09:57:41 2019
New Revision: 268066
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268066=gcc=rev
Log:
[ARM][testsuite] follow-up to PR target/52813 and target/11807 fix.
2019-01-18
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88794
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51628
--- Comment #61 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Jan 18 13:05:18 2019
New Revision: 268075
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268075=gcc=rev
Log:
c-family: Update unaligned adress of packed member check
Check unaligned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88664
--- Comment #8 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Jan 18 13:05:18 2019
New Revision: 268075
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268075=gcc=rev
Log:
c-family: Update unaligned adress of packed member check
Check unaligned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88902
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86214
--- Comment #19 from Steinar H. Gunderson ---
Thanks for fixing. IIRC we just added a noinline attribute somewhere in the
code, so we already have a workaround.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88903
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84842
--- Comment #16 from Arseny Solokha ---
(In reply to Arseny Solokha from comment #15)
> Finally.
As of r267906 it doesn't ICE for me anymore, but
gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/dependency_36.f90 does:
%
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88903
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88901
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88905
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88850
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88903
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||9.0
Summary|[7/8/9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80836
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I'm unsure what exactly this report is about. The first half seems to be about
building GCC itself, and ensuring it can find the libs that GCC relies on,
right?
That's simple, just build the support libs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83618
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88920
Bug ID: 88920
Summary: [9 regression] GCC is not configured to support
amdgcn-unknown-amdhsa as offload target
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87326
--- Comment #2 from Nathan Weeks ---
I think that would be appropriate, especially since I submitted a patch that
attempts to address those two simultaneously:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2019-01/msg00131.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87064
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek ---
And, if I disable that define_insn_and_split altogether (add 0 && to the
condition), the assembly change is:
--- reduction-3.s2 2019-01-18 18:19:42.184057246 +0100
+++ reduction-3.s4 2019-01-18
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88890
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88911
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88875
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88871
--- Comment #13 from Jürgen Reuter ---
Is this ready to be submitted?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88560
--- Comment #5 from Vladimir Makarov ---
We have too many tests checking expected generated code. We should more focus
on overall effect of the change. SPEC would be a good criterium although it is
hard to check SPEC for each patch.
I've
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88918
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87939
--- Comment #2 from Nathan Weeks ---
The following patch attempts to address this issue & pr87326:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2019-01/msg00131.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88892
--- Comment #13 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Fri Jan 18 18:01:56 2019
New Revision: 268083
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268083=gcc=rev
Log:
rs6000: Fix *movsi_from_df (PR88892)
The memory store instructions
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88877
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
0.0 20190118 (experimental) (GCC)
Interestingly, -fno-isolate-erroneous-paths-dereference prevents the problem,
even though the UB is not dereference, but potential divide by zero.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80836
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88918
Bug ID: 88918
Summary: [meta-bug] x86 intrinsic issues
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
1 - 100 of 144 matches
Mail list logo
