https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88044
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek
_startproc
vpmovzxbd (%rdi), %ymm0
vcvtdq2ps %ymm0, %ymm0
ret
.cfi_endproc
.LFE5186:
.size load_bytes_to_m256, .-load_bytes_to_m256
.ident "GCC: (GNU) 9.0.0 20190118 (experimental)"
.section.note.GNU-stack,"",@progbits
[hjl@gnu-cfl-1 gcc]$
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88875
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jan 18 20:35:57 2019
New Revision: 268085
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268085=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/88875 - error with explicit list constructor.
In my patch for CWG
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88918
Bug 88918 depends on bug 59071, which changed state.
Bug 59071 Summary: sse2 intrinsics and constant expressions
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59071
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59071
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88877
--- Comment #13 from Kamlesh Kumar ---
(In reply to Alan Modra from comment #12)
> I suspect that the patch in comment #1 will break libcalls in other
> situations, eg.
>
> void f1 (int y)
> {
> extern double d;
> d = y;
> }
Thanks Alan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80862
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88919
Bug ID: 88919
Summary: New test case gcc.dg/vect/pr88903-1.c in r268076 fails
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88917
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88293
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88923
Bug ID: 88923
Summary: abi::__cxa_demangle segfault on a specific string
Product: gcc
Version: 7.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88923
--- Comment #1 from Vasilii Babich ---
Created attachment 45466
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45466=edit
test.cpp to reproduce the segfault
This program crashes for me when compiled with "gcc test.cpp -lstdc++" on both
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88897
--- Comment #3 from Rafael Avila de Espindola ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> Some of the time, the uninitialized is due to using the object after the
> lifetime of the object has gone out of scope. I have not checked if that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88443
Bug 88443 depends on bug 79220, which changed state.
Bug 79220 Summary: missing -Wstringop-overflow= on a memcpy overflow with a
small power-of-2 size
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79220
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79220
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87064
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88921
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87106
--- Comment #17 from Arthur O'Dwyer ---
(In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #16)
> (In reply to Arthur O'Dwyer from comment #15)
> > @Marc, it only now occurs to me that if libstdc++ uses
> > `__is_trivially_relocatable` as its userspace
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88920
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ams at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88871
--- Comment #14 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #13)
> Is this ready to be submitted?
Already done - https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2019-01/msg00135.html .
I'll commit tomorrow unless somebody has furher to add.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88560
--- Comment #6 from Wilco ---
(In reply to Vladimir Makarov from comment #5)
> We have too many tests checking expected generated code. We should more
> focus on overall effect of the change. SPEC would be a good criterium
> although it is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88922
Bug ID: 88922
Summary: Merge identical constants with different modes
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87106
--- Comment #16 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Arthur O'Dwyer from comment #15)
> @Marc, it only now occurs to me that if libstdc++ uses
> `__is_trivially_relocatable` as its userspace type-trait name, then GCC
> won't be able to use
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87106
--- Comment #15 from Arthur O'Dwyer ---
@Marc, it only now occurs to me that if libstdc++ uses
`__is_trivially_relocatable` as its userspace type-trait name, then GCC won't
be able to use `__is_trivially_relocatable(T)` as the name of its
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88920
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Have you configured gcc with --enable-offload-targets= that includes
amdgcn-unknown-amdhsa ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88782
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Jan 18 21:28:48 2019
New Revision: 268086
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268086=gcc=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/88782 avoid ODR problems in std::make_shared
The old version of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87514
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Jan 18 21:28:48 2019
New Revision: 268086
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268086=gcc=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/88782 avoid ODR problems in std::make_shared
The old version of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87520
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Jan 18 21:28:48 2019
New Revision: 268086
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268086=gcc=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/88782 avoid ODR problems in std::make_shared
The old version of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88921
Bug ID: 88921
Summary: inconsistent warning on a power-of-2 memcpy with
out-of-bounds offset
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88920
--- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The configure is pretty simple:
/home/seurer/gcc/gcc-test2/configure
--prefix=/home/seurer/gcc/install/gcc-test2 --enable-languages=c,fortran,c++
--with-cpu=power8 --disable-bootstrap
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88489
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jan 18 09:14:18 2019
New Revision: 268063
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268063=gcc=rev
Log:
Reapply:
2018-12-15 Jakub Jelinek
PR target/88489
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88734
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jan 18 09:15:36 2019
New Revision: 268064
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268064=gcc=rev
Log:
PR target/88734
* config/arm/arm_neon.h: Fix #pragma GCC target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88714
--- Comment #26 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 45455
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45455=edit
gcc9-pr88714.patch
I needed a temporary solution for our distro packages and with this patch
armv7hl passes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85596
--- Comment #2 from Christophe Lyon ---
Author: clyon
Date: Fri Jan 18 09:20:41 2019
New Revision: 268065
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268065=gcc=rev
Log:
PR target/85596 Add --with-multilib-list doc for aarch64
2019-01-18 Christophe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88734
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9 Regression] AArch64's |[8 Regression] AArch64's
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85596
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88900
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88900
Bug ID: 88900
Summary: [9 Regression] 502.gcc_r SPEC benchmark miscompiles
with LTO and PGO
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88901
Bug ID: 88901
Summary: [9.0 Regression] ICE when using
-fsanitize=pointer-compare
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88901
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88896
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The compiler optimizes the program with the assumption that undefined behavior
doesn't happen. So, e.g. it can remove loop condition if it proves that
undefined behavior happens before the last iteration
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88898
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88892
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88901
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dodji at gcc dot gnu.org,
101 - 144 of 144 matches
Mail list logo
