[Bug rtl-optimization/89195] [7/8/9 regression] Corrupted stack offset after combine

2019-02-05 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89195 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Priority|P3

[Bug libstdc++/89194] [9 regression] build failure with libstdc++ with std=c++2a

2019-02-05 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89194 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.0

[Bug ipa/88936] [7/8/9 Regression] -fipa-pta breaks bash (incorrect optimisation of recursive static function)

2019-02-05 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88936 --- Comment #11 from Richard Biener --- Created attachment 45605 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45605=edit prototype conservative fix So this is a very conservative fix computing what automatic variables "escape" and

[Bug middle-end/87489] [8/9 Regression] Spurious -Wnonnull warning

2019-02-05 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87489 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #9

[Bug rtl-optimization/89195] [7/8/9 regression] Corrupted stack offset after combine

2019-02-05 Thread wilco at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89195 --- Comment #4 from Wilco --- (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #3) > (In reply to Wilco from comment #1) > > len is unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT, so bits_to_bytes_round_down does an unsigned > > division... > > That shouldn't make a

[Bug fortran/89204] New: -floop-interchange has no effect on Fortran code

2019-02-05 Thread chinoune.mehdi at hotmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89204 Bug ID: 89204 Summary: -floop-interchange has no effect on Fortran code Product: gcc Version: 8.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/89186] [9 Regression] ICE in mark_addressable at gcc/gimple-expr.c:894 since r268138

2019-02-05 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89186 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/45591] gcc generates illegal asm at -O2 with -fdollars-in-identifiers

2019-02-05 Thread pskocik at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45591 pskocik at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pskocik at gmail dot com ---

[Bug fortran/89103] Allow blank format items in format strings

2019-02-05 Thread mark.eggleston at codethink dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89103 MarkEggleston changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #4|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug fortran/89100] Default widths for i, f and g format specifiers in format strings

2019-02-05 Thread mark.eggleston at codethink dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89100 MarkEggleston changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #45549|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug libstdc++/87106] Group move and destruction of the source, where possible, for speed

2019-02-05 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87106 --- Comment #18 from Marc Glisse --- Author: glisse Date: Tue Feb 5 09:33:36 2019 New Revision: 268532 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268532=gcc=rev Log: Rename __is_trivially_relocatable to __is_bitwise_relocatable. 2019-02-05 Marc

[Bug other/89203] New: Linux S/390: Unable to build GCC 8.2.0 on Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.9

2019-02-05 Thread m.marko08154711 at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89203 Bug ID: 89203 Summary: Linux S/390: Unable to build GCC 8.2.0 on Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.9 Product: gcc Version: 8.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/89186] [9 Regression] ICE in mark_addressable at gcc/gimple-expr.c:894 since r268138

2019-02-05 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89186 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Feb 5 09:17:18 2019 New Revision: 268531 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268531=gcc=rev Log: PR target/89186 * optabs.c (prepare_cmp_insn): Pass x and y to

[Bug web/89032] Missing documentation for GCC 7.4.0

2019-02-05 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89032 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/89090] vector.tcc uses "if constexpr" in C++11 mode

2019-02-05 Thread csaba_22 at yahoo dot co.uk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89090 --- Comment #4 from Csaba Ráduly --- svn blame vector.tcc claims that the inner, apparently redundant "#if __cplusplus >= 201103L" appeared at this change: r265485 | glisse | 2018-10-25 15:03:13 +0200 (Thu, 25 Oct 2018) | 24 lines Relocation

[Bug fortran/89200] [9 Regression] Erroneous copying of a derived type with a deferred-length character array component

2019-02-05 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89200 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug testsuite/86404] UNRESOLVED/UNSUPPORTED gcov test results due to Permission error mapping pages

2019-02-05 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86404 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug gcov-profile/85206] [GCOV] a return statement in the body of for(;0;) loop is wrongly marked as executed in gcov

2019-02-05 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85206 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug gcov-profile/88914] [GCOV] Wrong frequencies when unreachable statements within the body of the for loop in gcov

2019-02-05 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88914 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gcov-profile/88930] [GCOV] Wrong frequences when a if statement is after a ?: statement in gcov

2019-02-05 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88930 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/89150] [9 regression] Tree form bitmaps break GC

2019-02-05 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89150 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/89082] Feature request: provide annotation for code that's unlikely to be executed

2019-02-05 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89082 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug middle-end/89150] [9 regression] Tree form bitmaps break GC

2019-02-05 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89150 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Feb 5 08:32:16 2019 New Revision: 268530 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268530=gcc=rev Log: 2019-02-05 Richard Biener PR middle-end/89150 * bitmap.h

[Bug target/63651] Lot of failures in obj(c|-c++) with yosemite

2019-02-05 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63651 --- Comment #21 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #20) > (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #18) > > For the record with darwin15 I had to add > > > >

[Bug fortran/88438] [F08] A pointer function reference can denote a variable in any variable definition context.

2019-02-05 Thread juergen.reuter at desy dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88438 --- Comment #2 from Jürgen Reuter --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #1) > At https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Fortran2008Status I see > > Unimplemented features -- based on the list in the "Introduction" of the > F2008 standard > ... >

<    1   2   3