[Bug c++/84536] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE with non-type template parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84536 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug preprocessor/89373] macro expansion not counting braces correctly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89373 mdblack98 at yahoo dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/89372] Incorrect PMULHRSW

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89372 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/89378] New: [9 regression][MIPS] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr88598-3.c -mmsa (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89378 Bug ID: 89378 Summary: [9 regression][MIPS] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr88598-3.c -mmsa (internal compiler error) Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/87689] PowerPC64 ELFv2 function parameter passing violation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87689 --- Comment #20 from Alan Modra --- That is what I thought too at first, and why I though that making calls with hidden args to be varargs was not going to be a problem. However, calling build_varargs_function_type_vec with an empty typelist

[Bug target/89271] [9 Regression] gcc.target/powerpc/vsx-simode2.c stopped working in GCC 9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89271 --- Comment #4 from Alan Modra --- Author: amodra Date: Sun Feb 17 03:01:41 2019 New Revision: 268968 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268968=gcc=rev Log: [RS6000] Fix _ and tf_ splitters This patch fixes a bug that can result in "insn

[Bug fortran/71066] [7/8 Regression] ICE in set_loop_bounds, at fortran/trans-array.c:4680

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71066 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[7/8/9 Regression] ICE in |[7/8 Regression] ICE in

[Bug tree-optimization/89376] New: ICE: Segmentation fault (in oacc_entry_exit_ok_1)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89376 Bug ID: 89376 Summary: ICE: Segmentation fault (in oacc_entry_exit_ok_1) Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, openacc Severity:

[Bug middle-end/89371] missed vectorisation with "#pragma omp simd collapse(2)"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89371 --- Comment #2 from Arnaud Desitter --- In my original report, I meant to write: "built by gcc 8.2 on x86_64 with "-std=c++14 -O3 -mavx -fopenmp-simd" results in **NO** simd instruction emitted." subroutine ff(res, a, b, ncell, neq) integer ::

[Bug target/89372] Incorrect PMULHRSW

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89372 --- Comment #1 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hjl Date: Sat Feb 16 22:16:04 2019 New Revision: 268964 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268964=gcc=rev Log: i386: Add ssse3_pmulhrswv4hi3 expander There is no V4HI pmulhrsw in

[Bug rtl-optimization/66152] [9 Regression] suboptimal load bytes to stack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66152 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/71066] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE in set_loop_bounds, at fortran/trans-array.c:4680

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71066 --- Comment #14 from Thomas Koenig --- Author: tkoenig Date: Sat Feb 16 16:12:51 2019 New Revision: 268960 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268960=gcc=rev Log: 2019-02-17 Thomas Koenig PR fortran/71066 * trans-decl.c

[Bug c++/88826] ICE (segfault) when compiling invalid C++ code with -std=c++2a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88826 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/87689] PowerPC64 ELFv2 function parameter passing violation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87689 --- Comment #19 from Thomas Koenig --- This is worse than I thought. It seems that, if we compile subroutine foo(a) real :: a end subroutine foo program main real :: x call foo(x) end program main we call build_function_type_vec (type,

[Bug libgomp/89377] New: [OMPVV SOLLVE] map of class member array with no modifier illegal memory access

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89377 Bug ID: 89377 Summary: [OMPVV SOLLVE] map of class member array with no modifier illegal memory access Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libgomp/89377] [OMPVV SOLLVE] map of class member array with no modifier illegal memory access

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89377 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- I don't believe this is well defined in OpenMP 4.5, it is in 5.0, but eventhough GCC 9 implements parts of OpenMP 5.0, this part is not implemented. So, you need something like: int *p = h_array; before the

[Bug libgomp/89377] [OMPVV SOLLVE] map of class member array with no modifier illegal memory access

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89377 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Note, OpenMP 5.0 allows much wider set of expressions in map clause, allows e.g. map(this[:1]) which is not valid in 4.5 and says that is the default when referencing non-static data members of a class in a

[Bug c++/88680] [9 Regression] bogus -Wtype-limits for constant expressions after r267272

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88680 --- Comment #3 from David Malcolm --- Author: dmalcolm Date: Sat Feb 16 16:17:17 2019 New Revision: 268961 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268961=gcc=rev Log: Fix excess warnings from -Wtype-limits with location wrappers (PR c++/88680) PR

[Bug c++/88680] [9 Regression] bogus -Wtype-limits for constant expressions after r267272

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88680 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/89129] [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Wtype-limits warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89129 Bug 89129 depends on bug 88680, which changed state. Bug 88680 Summary: [9 Regression] bogus -Wtype-limits for constant expressions after r267272 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88680 What|Removed

[Bug libfortran/89274] Inconsistent list directed output of INTEGER(16)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89274 Janne Blomqvist changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jb at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug tree-optimization/88074] [7/8/9 Regression] g++ hangs on math expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88074 --- Comment #29 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Sat Feb 16 18:46:04 2019 New Revision: 268962 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268962=gcc=rev Log: PR middle-end/88074 * simplify.c

[Bug tree-optimization/89209] [9 Regression] ICE in build_ref_for_model, at tree-sra.c:1791

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89209 --- Comment #6 from Martin Jambor --- I have proposed a fix on the mailing list: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-02/msg01315.html

[Bug rtl-optimization/66152] [9 Regression] suboptimal load bytes to stack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66152 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Sat Feb 16 11:20:33 2019 New Revision: 268957 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268957=gcc=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/66152 * builtins.h (c_readstr): Declare.

[Bug ipa/87254] Inlining clones in trivial wrappers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87254 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/89375] fortran/expr.c:4723:5: warning: logical ‘or’ of equal expressions [-Wlogical-op]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89375 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug fortran/89374] New: gfortran does not respect privacy of types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89374 Bug ID: 89374 Summary: gfortran does not respect privacy of types Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug fortran/89374] gfortran does not respect privacy of types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89374 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/89374] gfortran does not respect privacy of types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89374 --- Comment #2 from Jürgen Reuter --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #1) > Related to/duplicate of pr36383? Related to most likely yes, could have the same origin. Probably the fortran DT is cast into an internal C

[Bug fortran/89364] Assumed rank object with incorrect values for shape and bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89364 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/89375] New: fortran/expr.c:4723:5: warning: logical ‘or’ of equal expressions [-Wlogical-op]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89375 Bug ID: 89375 Summary: fortran/expr.c:4723:5: warning: logical ‘or’ of equal expressions [-Wlogical-op] Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug fortran/89375] fortran/expr.c:4723:5: warning: logical ‘or’ of equal expressions [-Wlogical-op]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89375 David Binderman changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com,

[Bug go/89171] FAIL: go/build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89171 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab --- There are prebuilt images in that are set up to execute via qemu linux-user emulation.

[Bug d/89177] unaligned memory access in libphobos

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89177 Johannes Pfau changed: What|Removed |Added CC||johannespfau at gmail dot com ---