[Bug tree-optimization/89570] [9 Regression] ICE in prepare_cmp_insn, at optabs.c:4001

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89570 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug libstdc++/88322] Implement C++20 library features.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88322 Bug 88322 depends on bug 88340, which changed state. Bug 88340 Summary: Implement P0019R8, C++20 std::atomic_ref. https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88340 What|Removed |Added

[Bug libstdc++/88340] Implement P0019R8, C++20 std::atomic_ref.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88340 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/88305] Implement P0019R8, C++20 std::atomic_ref

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88305 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- *** Bug 88340 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/88334] Implement P0482R6, C++20 char8_t.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88334 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/88323] implement C++20 language features.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88323 Bug 88323 depends on bug 88334, which changed state. Bug 88334 Summary: Implement P0482R6, C++20 char8_t. https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88334 What|Removed |Added

[Bug libstdc++/88322] Implement C++20 library features.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88322 Bug 88322 depends on bug 88334, which changed state. Bug 88334 Summary: Implement P0482R6, C++20 char8_t. https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88334 What|Removed |Added

[Bug sanitizer/86899] [8/9 regression] TSAN incorrect warning: control reaches end of non-void function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86899 Sergey Semushin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||Predelnik at gmail dot com ---

[Bug rtl-optimization/14504] Missed Bit Twiddling Optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14504 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2009-04-22 23:02:33 |2019-3-4 --- Comment #9 from Steven

[Bug target/89570] [9 Regression] ICE in prepare_cmp_insn, at optabs.c:4001

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89570 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- At the minimum guarding those simplifications with something like expand_vec_cmp_expr_p test for @0 if we can figure out mask type somehow (what would IFN_COND_* need), and a check whether IFN_COND_* is

[Bug c++/71425] GCC does not implement C++/WG21 DR 1399/1388

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71425 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid

[Bug c++/87603] [C++17] noexcept isn't special cased for constant expressions anymore

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87603 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||barry.revzin at gmail dot com ---

[Bug c++/89568] constexpr functions are implicitly noexcept

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89568 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/89570] [9 Regression] ICE in prepare_cmp_insn, at optabs.c:4001

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89570 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Or perhaps as an alternative, we shouldn't use the match.pd code here to tweak the conditions of VEC_COND_EXPRs exactly because the conditions themselves might be valid solely in VEC_COND_EXPR's first

[Bug target/89570] [9 Regression] ICE in prepare_cmp_insn, at optabs.c:4001

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89570 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/44532] x86-64 unnecessary parameter extension

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44532 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Last

[Bug tree-optimization/19792] Missed optimizations due to signedness in the way

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19792 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- I think for foo the "solution" is to only consider indices with well-defined behavior, that is, for size_lookup[] indices in [0,257] which means we should be safely able to truncate the index to unsigned

[Bug testsuite/19095] testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect.exp is not precise enough on x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19095 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2006-03-05 03:54:36 |2019-3-4 --- Comment #7 from Steven

[Bug rtl-optimization/45026] struct passed as argument in memory compiles to dead stores

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45026 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Target|ia64-unknown-linux-gnu | Last reconfirmed|2011-02-25

[Bug tree-optimization/55629] Missed value numbering to a constant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55629 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2012-12-09 00:00:00 |2019-3-4 --- Comment #2 from Steven

[Bug c/89573] -fexcess-precision=standard doesn't work for conversion to integer of multiplication

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89573 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug middle-end/56770] Partial sums loop optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56770 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|steven at gcc

[Bug fortran/89574] New: internal compiler error: in conv_function_val, at fortran/trans-expr.c:3792

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89574 Bug ID: 89574 Summary: internal compiler error: in conv_function_val, at fortran/trans-expr.c:3792 Product: gcc Version: 8.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug tree-optimization/19792] Missed optimizations due to signedness in the way

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19792 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2016-08-06 00:00:00 |2019-3-4 CC|

[Bug middle-end/89551] [9 regression] Test case gcc.dg/uninit-pred-8_b.c fails after r269302

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89551 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug c++/88368] [7/8 Regression] Improper ``use of deleted function''

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88368 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- The above change introduced PR89571.

[Bug c++/89571] [9 Regression] ICE in nothrow_spec_p, at cp/except.c:1238

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89571 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/89572] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE in dyn_cast(gimple*) / get_loop_exit_condition(loop const*)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89572 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Target

[Bug tree-optimization/89566] [9 Regression] ICE on compilable C++ code: in gimple_call_arg, at gimple.h:3166

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89566 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c/89573] New: -fexcess-precision=standard doesn't work for conversion to integer of multiplication

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89573 Bug ID: 89573 Summary: -fexcess-precision=standard doesn't work for conversion to integer of multiplication Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ipa/89567] [missed-optimization] Should not be initializing unused struct parameter members

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89567 --- Comment #2 from Eyal Rozenberg --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > You are looking for IPA DSE I'm not a compiler expert and don't know what this means. Even literally, I don't know what these acronyms stand for. > by

[Bug tree-optimization/89572] ICE in dyn_cast(gimple*) / get_loop_exit_condition(loop const*)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89572 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/89570] [9 Regression] ICE in prepare_cmp_insn, at optabs.c:4001

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89570 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Component|middle-end

[Bug c++/89571] [9 Regression] ICE in nothrow_spec_p, at cp/except.c:1238

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89571 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Target Milestone|---

[Bug ipa/89567] [missed-optimization] Should not be initializing unused struct parameter members

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89567 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/89561] feature request: undefined behaviour compile-time configuration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89561 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/89560] [9 regression] ICE In function 'rtx_def* gen_vec_extract_lo_v64qi(rtx, rtx)'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89560 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-*-*, i?86-*-* Target

[Bug preprocessor/66505] -Wno-error=pedantic does not reverse -Werror -Wpedantic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66505 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug target/89557] [7/8/9 regression] 4*movq to 2*movaps IPC performance regression on znver1 with -Og

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89557 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-*-*, i?86-*-*

[Bug c++/89550] [8/9 Regression] Spurious array-bounds warning when using __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ as a string_view

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89550 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Target Milestone|---

[Bug middle-end/89551] [9 regression] Test case gcc.dg/uninit-pred-8_b.c fails after r269302

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89551 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/89549] [7/8/9 Regression] -Wmisleading-indentation is disabled from this point onwards, since column-tracking was disabled due to the size of the code/headers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89549 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/86952] Avoid jump table for switch statement with -mindirect-branch=thunk

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86952 --- Comment #17 from Martin Liška --- > I leave that up to you guys, but I would at min probably implement something > like s390 folks did for gcc, commit db7a90aa0de5 ("S/390: Disable prediction > of indirect branches"), see

[Bug c/89549] [7/8/9 Regression] -Wmisleading-indentation is disabled from this point onwards, since column-tracking was disabled due to the size of the code/headers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89549 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- Unreduced test-case: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Fp8OE7frCHNglDQ5CTGyBaQXHkeeD-vZ/view?usp=sharing

[Bug c/89549] [7/8/9 Regression] -Wmisleading-indentation is disabled from this point onwards, since column-tracking was disabled due to the size of the code/headers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89549 --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška --- Created attachment 45877 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45877=edit test-case

[Bug rtl-optimization/88652] sel-sched.c:1545:11: runtime error: index 2 out of bounds for type 'long unsigned int [2]'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88652 --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- Any progress on this please?

<    1   2