[Bug gcov-profile/89675] [GCOV] A complex statement in while (1) block is wrongly marked as not-executed in gcov

2019-03-12 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89675 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gcov-profile/89674] [GCOV] A label in if block is not used in reference or goto label is wrongly marked as executed in gcov

2019-03-12 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89674 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug gcov-profile/89673] [GCOV] A label followed with a blank(empty) statement will be wrongly marked as executed in gcov

2019-03-12 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89673 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/89654] [8/9 Regression] Invalid reload with -march=skylake -m32

2019-03-12 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89654 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/69693] Wrong mode is used to load spilled register

2019-03-12 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69693 --- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu --- *** Bug 89654 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug tree-optimization/89664] [8 Regression] ICE in free_bb, at tree-ssa-math-opts.c:522

2019-03-12 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89664 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug rtl-optimization/89654] [8/9 Regression] Invalid reload with -march=skylake -m32

2019-03-12 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89654 --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu --- Is this a dup of PR 69693?

[Bug ipa/89666] FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-icf-39.c scan-ipa-dump-times icf "Unified;" 2

2019-03-12 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89666 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/89663] [7/8 Regression] ICE in expand_builtin_int_roundingfn_2, at builtins.c:2831

2019-03-12 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89663 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||9.0 Summary|[7/8/9

[Bug middle-end/89663] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE in expand_builtin_int_roundingfn_2, at builtins.c:2831

2019-03-12 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89663 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Mar 12 08:17:08 2019 New Revision: 269605 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269605=gcc=rev Log: PR middle-end/89663 * builtins.c (expand_builtin_int_roundingfn,

[Bug c/89670] __builtin_ctz(_mm256_movemask_epi8(foo)) assumed to be <31 ?

2019-03-12 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89670 --- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Jörn Engel from comment #13) > None of those examples convince me. If you or I know that a zero-argument > is impossible, but the compiler doesn't know, wouldn't that still be UB? > And if

[Bug gcov-profile/89675] New: [GCOV] A complex statement in while (1) block is wrongly marked as not-executed in gcov

2019-03-12 Thread yangyibiao at nju dot edu.cn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89675 Bug ID: 89675 Summary: [GCOV] A complex statement in while (1) block is wrongly marked as not-executed in gcov Product: gcc Version: 8.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/89672] NULL pointer check optimized out for the return value of memchr(NULL, c, 0)

2019-03-12 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89672 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/89664] [8/9 Regression] ICE in free_bb, at tree-ssa-math-opts.c:522

2019-03-12 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89664 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Mar 12 07:56:23 2019 New Revision: 269604 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269604=gcc=rev Log: 2019-03-12 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/89664 *

[Bug gcov-profile/89674] New: [GCOV] A label in if block is not used in reference or goto label is wrongly marked as executed in gcov

2019-03-12 Thread yangyibiao at nju dot edu.cn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89674 Bug ID: 89674 Summary: [GCOV] A label in if block is not used in reference or goto label is wrongly marked as executed in gcov Product: gcc Version: 8.2.0 Status:

[Bug gcov-profile/89673] New: [GCOV] A label followed with a blank(empty) statement will be wrongly marked as executed in gcov

2019-03-12 Thread yangyibiao at nju dot edu.cn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89673 Bug ID: 89673 Summary: [GCOV] A label followed with a blank(empty) statement will be wrongly marked as executed in gcov Product: gcc Version: 8.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/87644] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE due to variable named "parameters"

2019-03-12 Thread foreese at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87644 Fritz Reese changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

<    1   2