https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89675
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89674
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89673
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89654
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69693
--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu ---
*** Bug 89654 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89664
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89654
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
Is this a dup of PR 69693?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89666
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89663
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||9.0
Summary|[7/8/9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89663
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Mar 12 08:17:08 2019
New Revision: 269605
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269605=gcc=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/89663
* builtins.c (expand_builtin_int_roundingfn,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89670
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Jörn Engel from comment #13)
> None of those examples convince me. If you or I know that a zero-argument
> is impossible, but the compiler doesn't know, wouldn't that still be UB?
> And if
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89675
Bug ID: 89675
Summary: [GCOV] A complex statement in while (1) block is
wrongly marked as not-executed in gcov
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89672
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89664
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Mar 12 07:56:23 2019
New Revision: 269604
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269604=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-03-12 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/89664
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89674
Bug ID: 89674
Summary: [GCOV] A label in if block is not used in reference or
goto label is wrongly marked as executed in gcov
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.0
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89673
Bug ID: 89673
Summary: [GCOV] A label followed with a blank(empty) statement
will be wrongly marked as executed in gcov
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87644
Fritz Reese changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
101 - 117 of 117 matches
Mail list logo