[Bug tree-optimization/90021] [9 Regression] ICE in index_in_loop_nest, at tree-data-ref.h:587 since r270203

2019-04-09 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90021 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/90020] [7/8/9 regression] -O2 -Os x86-64 wrong code generated for GNU Emacs

2019-04-09 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90020 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/90019] [8 regression] Bogus ambiguous overload error for NTTP pack of disjoint enable_ifs unless there is an unsupplied default argument

2019-04-09 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90019 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/90018] [8/9 Regression] r265453 miscompiled 527.cam4_r in SPEC CPU 2017

2019-04-09 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90018 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- > Martin, if you can help with a testcase that would be great (in case you > have a working setup / methology to track this down). Otherwise I'll of > course see to do that myself. I'll do it for you.

[Bug tree-optimization/90018] [8/9 Regression] r265453 miscompiled 527.cam4_r in SPEC CPU 2017

2019-04-09 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90018 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Priority|P3

[Bug bootstrap/89864] [9 regression] gcc fails to build/bootstrap with XCode 10.2

2019-04-09 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89864 --- Comment #43 from Iain Sandoe --- Created attachment 46110 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46110=edit Proof-of-principle path Does this work for you? - my local testing says it generates the right wrapped include file.

[Bug c++/90010] [8/9 Regression] valgrind error with snprintf and -Wall

2019-04-09 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90010 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code

[Bug target/88834] [SVE] Poor addressing mode choices for LD2 and ST2

2019-04-09 Thread wilco at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88834 --- Comment #16 from Wilco --- (In reply to kugan from comment #15) > (In reply to Wilco from comment #11) > > There is also something odd with the way the loop iterates, this doesn't > > look right: > > > > whilelo p0.s, x3, x4 > >

[Bug c++/89900] [9 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in check_instantiated_arg)

2019-04-09 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89900 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Priority|P4

[Bug tree-optimization/90021] [9 Regression] ICE in index_in_loop_nest, at tree-data-ref.h:587 since r270203

2019-04-09 Thread amker at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90021 --- Comment #2 from bin cheng --- We have {{0, +, 1}_6, +, 1}_4 in this case, and _6 is an outer loop of loop_nest. Function add_multivariate_self_dist was intentionally skipped in PR89725 patch, but control flow gets to it because 1) In

[Bug tree-optimization/46590] long compile time with -O2 and many loops

2019-04-09 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46590 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/90010] [8/9 Regression] valgrind error with snprintf and -Wall

2019-04-09 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90010 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug preprocessor/64965] __FILE__ doesn't work if the filename contains newline

2019-04-09 Thread rv at rasmusvillemoes dot dk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64965 Rasmus Villemoes changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/90020] [7/8/9 regression] -O2 -Os x86-64 wrong code generated for GNU Emacs

2019-04-09 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90020 --- Comment #6 from Martin Liška --- I bisected GCC 4.9.x branch and it started with r215059, which is a backport of 3 patches. I reverted changes in: patching file gcc/recog.c patching file gcc/tree-ssa-loop-niter.c patching file

[Bug gcov-profile/90023] The coverage of a label is incorrect when it is after a return statement and followed by a blank statement

2019-04-09 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90023 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/90018] [8 Regression] r265453 miscompiled 527.cam4_r in SPEC CPU 2017

2019-04-09 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90018 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug tree-optimization/90020] [7/8/9 regression] -O2 -Os x86-64 wrong code generated for GNU Emacs

2019-04-09 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90020 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/90020] [7/8/9 regression] -O2 -Os x86-64 wrong code generated for GNU Emacs

2019-04-09 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90020 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- Created attachment 46109 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46109=edit Reduced test-case #1

[Bug tree-optimization/90020] [7/8/9 regression] -O2 -Os x86-64 wrong code generated for GNU Emacs

2019-04-09 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90020 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/90020] [7/8/9 regression] -O2 -Os x86-64 wrong code generated for GNU Emacs

2019-04-09 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90020 --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška --- Created attachment 46108 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46108=edit Reduced test-case #0

[Bug gcov-profile/90023] New: The coverage of a label is incorrect when it is after a return statement and followed by a blank statement

2019-04-09 Thread yangyibiao at nju dot edu.cn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90023 Bug ID: 90023 Summary: The coverage of a label is incorrect when it is after a return statement and followed by a blank statement Product: gcc Version: 8.2.0 Status:

[Bug bootstrap/89864] [9 regression] gcc fails to build/bootstrap with XCode 10.2

2019-04-09 Thread juergen.reuter at desy dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89864 --- Comment #42 from Jürgen Reuter --- I filed an APPLE bug report: https://bugreport.apple.com/web/?problemID=49727047

[Bug target/90015] riscv: typo "intterupt" in diagnostic

2019-04-09 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90015 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/89893] Segmentation fault always occurs when node app is generated by gcc-8-branch@268745

2019-04-09 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89893 --- Comment #34 from Martin Liška --- > It seems your solution works. But it doesn't work if I add > "-fno-strict-aliasing" through 'export CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -O3 > -fno-strict-aliasing..." export CXXFLAGS="$CXXFLAGS -O3 > -fno-strict-aliasing..."

[Bug ipa/89893] Segmentation fault always occurs when node app is generated by gcc-8-branch@268745

2019-04-09 Thread kangshan0910 at hotmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89893 --- Comment #33 from 康 珊 --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #32) > I can confirm it works for me with: > > diff --git a/common.gypi b/common.gypi > index 9502e92..3d8f04f 100644 > --- a/common.gypi > +++ b/common.gypi > @@ -195,8 +195,8

[Bug fortran/90022] Issue with CFI_is_contigous and CFI base address

2019-04-09 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90022 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/90022] New: Issue with CFI_is_contigous and CFI base address

2019-04-09 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90022 Bug ID: 90022 Summary: Issue with CFI_is_contigous and CFI base address Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug tree-optimization/90020] [8 regression] -O2 -Os x86-64 wrong code generated for GNU Emacs

2019-04-09 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90020 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/90015] riscv: typo "intterupt" in diagnostic

2019-04-09 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90015 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Apr 9 06:38:07 2019 New Revision: 270221 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270221=gcc=rev Log: PR target/90015 * config/riscv/riscv.c (riscv_get_interrupt_type):

[Bug tree-optimization/90021] [9 Regression] ICE in index_in_loop_nest, at tree-data-ref.h:587 since r270203

2019-04-09 Thread amker at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90021 --- Comment #1 from bin cheng --- Sorry for the breakage, I will have a look.

[Bug tree-optimization/90021] [9 Regression] ICE in index_in_loop_nest, at tree-data-ref.h:587 since r270203

2019-04-09 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90021 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/90021] New: [9 Regression] ICE in index_in_loop_nest, at tree-data-ref.h:587 since r270203

2019-04-09 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90021 Bug ID: 90021 Summary: [9 Regression] ICE in index_in_loop_nest, at tree-data-ref.h:587 since r270203 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug d/90013] wrong quotes in diagnostics

2019-04-09 Thread ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90013 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug d/90012] untranslateable placeholder in expressionsem.c

2019-04-09 Thread ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90012 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/89864] [9 regression] gcc fails to build/bootstrap with XCode 10.2

2019-04-09 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89864 --- Comment #41 from Iain Sandoe --- inconclusive so far, it's agreed that _Atomic is not a C++ keyword, but not clear what is best solution to the SDK use. If you filed a radar, please copy the number here (no-one else can see it, but at least

<    1   2