https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89953
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90001
--- Comment #5 from Roman Zhuykov ---
Retested patch separately, everything works.
Have found 2 more slow Fortran examples on (obsolete) spu platform and with
additional options like -O1/O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops
-ftrace
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85164
--- Comment #3 from David Binderman ---
I'd be happy to help out with any testing of any speculative patch
for this bug.
I am surprised that more than 64 bits of precision are required.
Would a data type like float or double do the job ? Less p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89953
--- Comment #7 from rene.r...@fu-berlin.de ---
Created attachment 46177
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46177&action=edit
preprocessed source file from gcc8 (no ICE)
This is the compressed but unreduced preprocessed source fi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89953
--- Comment #6 from rene.r...@fu-berlin.de ---
Here is the code snippet that triggers the ICE:
#include
#include
#include
int main()
{
std::vector v{0, 1, 2, 3, 4};
for (auto e : v | ranges::view::reverse)
{
std::cout << e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86243
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90103
--- Comment #2 from Alexey Brodkin ---
Indeed, proposed back-port fixes that problem!
May we get it back-ported to 8.3.0 branch?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89693
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90112
Bug ID: 90112
Summary: internal procedure using module procedure instead of
"sibling" internal procedure
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90111
Bug ID: 90111
Summary: Placement of Fortran OpenACC 'routine' directive
inside 'specification-part'
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: open
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90050
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Although if you link with -lstdc++fs then it should work OK, because the
incompatible std::filesystem symbols in libstdc++.so.6.0.26 won't be used.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90109
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wilson at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90050
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88075
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90107
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90085
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65799
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90103
--- Comment #1 from Claudiu Zissulescu ---
Probably,this patch needs to be backported:
[ARC] Update fma expansions.
Accept at most a single constant for fma patterns.
gcc/
2018-03-21 Claudiu Zissulescu
* config/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90110
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90110
Bug ID: 90110
Summary: [9 Regression] libgo fails to build against glibc 2.19
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90088
--- Comment #4 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> We have two related tunables, X86_TUNE_OPT_AGU and
> X86_TUNE_AVOID_LEA_FOR_ADDR.
>
> Probably related is that most uarchs have extra cost for complex addressing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90090
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||9.0
Summary|[7/8/9 Regression
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90082
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89864
--- Comment #72 from Jürgen Reuter ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #71)
> (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #70)
> > (In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #69)
> > > (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #68)
>
> > Does this mean
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90109
Bug ID: 90109
Summary: gstabs flag generates wrong entry for long on x86_64
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.5
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90096
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Apr 16 08:40:58 2019
New Revision: 270381
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270381&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/90096
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_target_string):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89864
--- Comment #71 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #70)
> (In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #69)
> > (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #68)
> Does this mean, "when building LLVM on OSX 10.14.2 using GCC as the
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89864
--- Comment #70 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #69)
> (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #68)
> > Created attachment 46176 [details]
> > revised fixincludes patch.
> >
> > The patch attached include the generated
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90082
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Apr 16 08:26:26 2019
New Revision: 270380
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270380&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/90082
* dce.c (can_delete_call): New f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90090
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Apr 16 08:24:47 2019
New Revision: 270379
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270379&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/90090
* tree-ssa-math-opts.c (is_divi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90078
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to bin cheng from comment #6)
> (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #5)
> > (In reply to bin cheng from comment #4)
> > > In get_scaled_computation_cost_at, we have very big ratio between
> > > bb
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89864
--- Comment #69 from Jürgen Reuter ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #68)
> Created attachment 46176 [details]
> revised fixincludes patch.
>
> The patch attached include the generated files, and I'd be grateful if folks
> would test it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90108
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90078
--- Comment #6 from bin cheng ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #5)
> (In reply to bin cheng from comment #4)
> > In get_scaled_computation_cost_at, we have very big ratio between
> > bb_count/loop_count:
> >
> > (gdb) p data->current_l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56049
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90059
--- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE Uni-Bielefeld.DE> ---
>> --- Comment #3 from Iain Buclaw ---
>> Definitions added in r270372. I made a couple of tweaks to the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56049
--- Comment #24 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Apr 16 07:55:41 2019
New Revision: 270378
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270378&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-04-16 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/56049
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87042
Vittorio Zecca changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zeccav at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90059
--- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #3 from Iain Buclaw ---
> Definitions added in r270372. I made a couple of tweaks to the original patch
> so that only mcontext_t and ucontext_t are public in the module,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85164
Vittorio Zecca changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zeccav at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90095
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P1
Summary|[8/9 Regression] w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90095
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P2
Target Milestone|9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90095
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Blocks|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90094
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90108
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90104
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
101 - 146 of 146 matches
Mail list logo
