[Bug c++/90243] New: diagnostic notes that belong to a suppressed error about an uninitialized variable in a constexpr function are still shown

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90243 Bug ID: 90243 Summary: diagnostic notes that belong to a suppressed error about an uninitialized variable in a constexpr function are still shown Product: gcc

[Bug c++/86932] [8 Regression] Empty non-type template parameter pack not considered for SFINAE.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86932 Bug 86932 depends on bug 90227, which changed state. Bug 90227 Summary: [9 Regression] trunk rejects polymake since r269965 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90227 What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/90245] A data race with a segmentation fault handler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90245 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2019-4-25 CC|

[Bug translation/90119] Merge translation msgids that only differ in placeholders

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90119 --- Comment #8 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Roland Illig from comment #7) > I didn't want to sound that harsh in my previous comment. > > What I wanted to say is: to make the linter reliable and be able to handle > the full syntax of .po

[Bug target/90204] [8/9 Regression] C code is optimized worse than C++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90204 --- Comment #8 from Hongtao.liu --- Cost_model for Function vect_enhance_data_refs_alignment are quite tunable. More benchmarks are needed if we want to do so.

[Bug target/89929] __attribute__((target("avx512bw"))) doesn't work on non avx512bw systems

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89929 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|marxin at gcc dot gnu.org |hjl.tools at gmail dot com ---

[Bug c/90241] [UBSAN]: in ao_ref_init_from_ptr_and_size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90241 --- Comment #1 from David Binderman --- Flag -O2 required.

[Bug tree-optimization/90245] New: A data race with a segmentation fault handler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90245 Bug ID: 90245 Summary: A data race with a segmentation fault handler Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug libstdc++/90239] New: [C++20] scoped_allocator_adaptor should support nested pair

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90239 Bug ID: 90239 Summary: [C++20] scoped_allocator_adaptor should support nested pair Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/90240] [9 Regression] ICE in try_improve_iv_set, at tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c:6694

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90240 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/90241] New: [UBSAN]: in ao_ref_init_from_ptr_and_size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90241 Bug ID: 90241 Summary: [UBSAN]: in ao_ref_init_from_ptr_and_size Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug lto/90229] Interaction among -Wl,--as-needed and LTO results in an undefined symbol

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90229 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška

[Bug target/90235] Unnecessary save and restore frame pointer with AVX/AVX512 pseudo registers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90235 --- Comment #1 from Hongtao.liu --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #0) > From PR 90202: > > [hjl@gnu-cfl-1 pr90202]$ cat x.ii > struct v { > int val[16]; > }; > > struct v test(struct v a, struct v b) { > struct v res; > > for

[Bug c/90242] [UBSAN]: in vn_reference_compute_hash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90242 --- Comment #1 from David Binderman --- Only flag -O2 required.

[Bug libstdc++/89819] [9 Regression] std::variant operators regressed since GCC 8.3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89819 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/90240] [9 Regression] ICE in try_improve_iv_set, at tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c:6694

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90240 --- Comment #4 from bin cheng --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3) > Graphite, so IMHO not a release blocker. but the issue is critical, it could happen with general optimization level for loop nest with huge scaling factor. So,

[Bug middle-end/85164] poly-int.h:845:5: runtime error: signed integer overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85164 --- Comment #21 from David Binderman --- (In reply to rsand...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #20) > Thanks for the testing. You are welcome. > Could you open new PRs for the new backtraces? Done. Most of them were already mentioned in bugzilla,

[Bug tree-optimization/90245] A data race with a segmentation fault handler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90245 Florian Weimer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fw at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug tree-optimization/90240] [9 Regression] ICE in try_improve_iv_set, at tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c:6694

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90240 bin cheng changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/90240] [9 Regression] ICE in try_improve_iv_set, at tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c:6694

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90240 --- Comment #2 from bin cheng --- Also, cost in inner loop is scaled by big number: Scaling cost based on bb prob by 1.00: 0 (scratch: 0) -> 0 (1/1) Scaling cost based on bb prob by 1.00: 32 (scratch: 0) -> 32 (1/1) Scaling

[Bug rtl-optimization/87871] [9 Regression] testcases fail after r265398 on arm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87871 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P1 |P2 --- Comment #60 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug rtl-optimization/87763] [9 Regression] aarch64 target testcases fail after r265398

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87763 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P1 |P2 --- Comment #55 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug libstdc++/89760] [9 Regression] libstdc++ experimental testsuite failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89760 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|rejects-valid | Status|NEW

[Bug libstdc++/89819] [9 Regression] std::variant operators regressed since GCC 8.3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89819 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/83118] [7/8/9 Regression] Bad intrinsic assignment of class(*) array component of derived type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83118 --- Comment #19 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #18 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE Uni-Bielefeld.DE> --- [...] > I've just applied the patch to trunk, rebuilt f951 on > sparc-sun-solaris2.11 and tested

[Bug tree-optimization/90240] New: [9 Regression] ICE in try_improve_iv_set, at tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c:6694

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90240 Bug ID: 90240 Summary: [9 Regression] ICE in try_improve_iv_set, at tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c:6694 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/90240] [9 Regression] ICE in try_improve_iv_set, at tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c:6694

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90240 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 CC|

[Bug c/90219] Wrong source location for "cannot convert to a pointer type" warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90219 --- Comment #2 from Timm Bäder --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1) > Well if you took the address you wouldn't need to cast it to (float*) Sure, this was just a dumbed-down version of the original code.

[Bug c/90244] New: [UBSAN]: in get_object_alignment_2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90244 Bug ID: 90244 Summary: [UBSAN]: in get_object_alignment_2 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug c++/90243] diagnostic notes that belong to a suppressed error about an uninitialized variable in a constexpr function are still shown

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90243 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/90204] [8/9 Regression] C code is optimized worse than C++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90204 --- Comment #7 from Hongtao.liu --- Yes, C++ with NRV optization, so the alignment of (res) is 4. and the alignment of res is 16 in C. g++/test.i.158t.vect: ../test.i:8:23: note: recording new base alignment for & alignment:4

[Bug c++/90172] [8/9 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in contains_struct_check)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90172 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Summary|[9 Regression]

[Bug target/47093] [meta-bug]: broken configurations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47093 Bug 47093 depends on bug 90045, which changed state. Bug 90045 Summary: [9 Regression] fails to build a rx-elf cross toolchain with C++ enabled https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90045 What|Removed

[Bug libstdc++/90045] [9 Regression] fails to build a rx-elf cross toolchain with C++ enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90045 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/90242] New: [UBSAN]: in vn_reference_compute_hash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90242 Bug ID: 90242 Summary: [UBSAN]: in vn_reference_compute_hash Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug gcov-profile/47618] Collecting multiple profiles and using all for PGO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47618 --- Comment #24 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to qinzhao from comment #23) > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #7) > > Created attachment 27869 [details] > > Patch for adding merge-gcda > > > > here is the patch which adds merge-gcda .

[Bug c++/90227] [9 Regression] trunk rejects polymake since r269965

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90227 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/90204] [8/9 Regression] C code is optimized worse than C++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90204 --- Comment #9 from Hongtao.liu --- Also what's better between aligned load/store of smaller size VS unaligned load/store of bigger size? aligned load/store of smaller size: movq%rdx, (%rdi) movq-56(%rsp), %rdx

[Bug libstdc++/90246] New: std::bad_variant_access messages are not useful

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90246 Bug ID: 90246 Summary: std::bad_variant_access messages are not useful Product: gcc Version: 8.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug libstdc++/90246] std::bad_variant_access messages are not useful

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90246 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/90247] Reconsider OpenACC implicit data attributes for pointers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90247 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |SUSPENDED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/90245] A data race with a segmentation fault handler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90245 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/89929] __attribute__((target("avx512bw"))) doesn't work on non avx512bw systems

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89929 --- Comment #22 from Nikolay Bogoychev --- Hey, I was reading through the mailing list discussion ( https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-04/msg00757.html ) and I want to say that currently code like void __attribute__

[Bug middle-end/90244] [UBSAN]: in get_object_alignment_2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90244 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/90248] [8/9 Regression] larger than 0 compare fails with -ffinite-math-only -funsafe-math-optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90248 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Yeah, all those look quite questionable, -fno-signed-zeros doesn't mean 0.0 or -0.0 won't appear, just that it shouldn't matter if 0.0 or -0.0 appears. So the > 0.0 and <= 0.0 cases look completely bogus and

[Bug debug/90194] ICE in expand_debug_expr, at cfgexpand.c:5244

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90194 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Apr 25 11:15:35 2019 New Revision: 270569 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270569=gcc=rev Log: 2019-04-25 Richard Biener PR middle-end/90194 * match.pd:

[Bug debug/90194] ICE in expand_debug_expr, at cfgexpand.c:5244

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90194 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Known to work|

[Bug target/90204] [8/9 Regression] C code is optimized worse than C++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90204 --- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Thu, 25 Apr 2019, crazylht at gmail dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90204 > > --- Comment #9 from Hongtao.liu --- > Also what's better between aligned

[Bug tree-optimization/90242] [UBSAN]: in vn_reference_compute_hash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90242 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/90240] [9 Regression] ICE in try_improve_iv_set, at tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c:6694

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90240 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P2 |P1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/90248] larger than 0 compare fails with -ffinite-math-only -funsafe-math-optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90248 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code

[Bug tree-optimization/90213] UBSAN: signed integer overflow: -5621332293356458048 * 8 cannot be represented in type 'long int'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90213 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Apr 25 11:17:49 2019 New Revision: 270570 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270570=gcc=rev Log: 2019-04-24 Richard Biener PR middle-end/90213 *

[Bug tree-optimization/90213] UBSAN: signed integer overflow: -5621332293356458048 * 8 cannot be represented in type 'long int'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90213 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Known to work|

[Bug target/90235] Unnecessary save and restore frame pointer with AVX/AVX512 pseudo registers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90235 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization, ra

[Bug middle-end/90241] [UBSAN]: in ao_ref_init_from_ptr_and_size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90241 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/90247] New: Reconsider OpenACC implicit data attributes for pointers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90247 Bug ID: 90247 Summary: Reconsider OpenACC implicit data attributes for pointers Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: openacc

[Bug c++/90248] New: larger than 0 compare fails with -ffinite-math-only -funsafe-math-optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90248 Bug ID: 90248 Summary: larger than 0 compare fails with -ffinite-math-only -funsafe-math-optimizations Product: gcc Version: 8.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug debug/90232] gcc drops top-level dies with -fdebug-types-section

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90232 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-debug

[Bug bootstrap/81963] ICE in stage 2 compiler while configuring libgcc in stage2, during GIMPLE pass: cfg

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81963 rick at snowlight dot net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rick at snowlight dot net

[Bug middle-end/90238] Bogus warning from -Warray-bounds, triggered by zero-length character literal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90238 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug target/89929] __attribute__((target("avx512bw"))) doesn't work on non avx512bw systems

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89929 --- Comment #23 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Nikolay Bogoychev from comment #22) > Hey, > > I was reading through the mailing list discussion ( > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-04/msg00757.html ) and I want to say > that

[Bug c++/44648] missing -Wunused warning on a const variable in if statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44648 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Apr 25 12:18:07 2019 New Revision: 270572 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270572=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/44648 * g++.dg/warn/Wunused-var-35.C: Remove xfail.

[Bug middle-end/90248] larger than 0 compare fails with -ffinite-math-only -funsafe-math-optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90248 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW CC|

[Bug bootstrap/81963] ICE in stage 2 compiler while configuring libgcc in stage2, during GIMPLE pass: cfg

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81963 --- Comment #3 from rick at snowlight dot net --- Comment on attachment 46243 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46243 32-bit libgcc config.log for *86*-sun-solaris2.10 note that this was part of a multi-stage build starting

[Bug middle-end/90248] larger than 0 compare fails with -ffinite-math-only -funsafe-math-optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90248 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- In fact the copysign transform, for the cases where we negate X _relies_ on signed zeros... Only exact /* Transform (X >= 0.0 ? 1.0 : -1.0) into copysign(1, X). */ and /* Transform (X < 0.0 ? -1.0 :

[Bug middle-end/90248] [8/9 Regression] larger than 0 compare fails with -ffinite-math-only -funsafe-math-optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90248 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/89929] __attribute__((target("avx512bw"))) doesn't work on non avx512bw systems

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89929 --- Comment #24 from Nikolay Bogoychev --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #23) > (In reply to Nikolay Bogoychev from comment #22) > > Hey, > > > > I was reading through the mailing list discussion ( > >

[Bug bootstrap/87338] gcc 8.2 fails to bootstrap on ia64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87338 James Clarke changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jrtc27 at jrtc27 dot com --- Comment #6

[Bug target/89765] Multiple problems with vec-insert implementation on PowerPC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89765 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug bootstrap/87338] gcc 8.2 fails to bootstrap on ia64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87338 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wilson at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug bootstrap/87338] gcc 8.2 fails to bootstrap on ia64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87338 --- Comment #8 from James Clarke --- Oh, and the reason it didn't show up with an older binutils is because it didn't support dwarf2 debug_view: > checking assembler for dwarf2 debug_view support... no

[Bug middle-end/89765] Multiple problems with vec-insert implementation on PowerPC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89765 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- Actually we use is_gimple_val so testing fallback & fb_rvalue.

[Bug target/88809] do not use rep-scasb for inline strlen/memchr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88809 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.0

[Bug sanitizer/89832] confusing error message when there is a problem with ASAN_OPTIONS "ERROR: expected '='"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89832 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.0 |10.0

[Bug sanitizer/88277] ASAN stack poisoning is using unaligned stores on e.g. x86_64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88277 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|marxin at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/88154] [F18] ICE: Intrinsic function '_gfortran_caf_get_team' (119) not recognized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88154 --- Comment #3 from Zaak --- Some additional test cases from the OC bug tracker. These fail using gfortran -fcoarray=single and when linking against opencoarrays, so it seems there is an issue on the GCC side (possibly the OC side too, but

[Bug fortran/90237] Bogus warning from -Wdo-subscript

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90237 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/86172] [meta-bug] issues with -Wnull-dereference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86172 Bug 86172 depends on bug 90037, which changed state. Bug 90037 Summary: [9 Regression] -Wnull-dereference false positive after r269302 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90037 What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/89765] Multiple problems with vec-insert implementation on PowerPC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89765 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/90037] [9 Regression] -Wnull-dereference false positive after r269302

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90037 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/90204] [8/9 Regression] C code is optimized worse than C++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90204 --- Comment #12 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Thu, 25 Apr 2019, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90204 > > --- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu --- > (In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #7) > >

[Bug tree-optimization/90037] [9 Regression] -Wnull-dereference false positive after r269302

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90037 --- Comment #14 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Thu Apr 25 14:32:16 2019 New Revision: 270574 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270574=gcc=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/90037 * Makefile.in (OBJS): Remove

[Bug target/89765] Multiple problems with vec-insert implementation on PowerPC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89765 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- I think the issue is that we gimplify VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR<__int128 unsigned>(<<< Unknown tree: compound_literal_expr V D.2833 = y; >>>) via 12399 case VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR: 12400 if

[Bug middle-end/90248] [8/9 Regression] larger than 0 compare fails with -ffinite-math-only -funsafe-math-optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90248 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4) > Yeah, all those look quite questionable, -fno-signed-zeros doesn't mean 0.0 > or -0.0 won't appear, just that it shouldn't matter if 0.0 or -0.0 appears. Yeah,

[Bug rtl-optimization/90249] New: [9 regression] Code size regression on thumb2 due to sub-optimal register allocation.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90249 Bug ID: 90249 Summary: [9 regression] Code size regression on thumb2 due to sub-optimal register allocation. Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug d/90250] New: libphobos: segfault in runtime caused by unexpected GC of TLS data.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90250 Bug ID: 90250 Summary: libphobos: segfault in runtime caused by unexpected GC of TLS data. Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/88154] [F18] ICE: Intrinsic function '_gfortran_caf_get_team' (119) not recognized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88154 Zaak changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zbeekman at gmail dot com --- Comment #2 from

[Bug target/89765] Multiple problems with vec-insert implementation on PowerPC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89765 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- That is not the right thing to do. Anyway, as for the wrong-code, do you see any gcc version where it actually passes? Tried various versions, e.g. r205000, r235000, r250907 and r268427 and all of them

[Bug middle-end/89765] [9 Regression] Multiple problems with vec-insert implementation on PowerPC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89765 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- Btw, the C notation typedef unsigned __int128 V __attribute__((vector_size (sizeof (__int128; V foo (unsigned __int128 x, V y, int z) { y[0] = x; } on x86_64 prouces { VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR<__int128

[Bug d/90250] libphobos: segfault in runtime caused by unexpected GC of TLS data.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90250 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug d/90250] libphobos: segfault in runtime caused by unexpected GC of TLS data.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90250 --- Comment #1 from ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ibuclaw Date: Thu Apr 25 15:31:35 2019 New Revision: 270576 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270576=gcc=rev Log: libphobos: Fix segfault in runtime caused by unexpected GC of TLS

[Bug target/89765] Multiple problems with vec-insert implementation on PowerPC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89765 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug rtl-optimization/90249] [9 regression] Code size regression on thumb2 due to sub-optimal register allocation.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90249 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Target

[Bug target/90204] [8/9 Regression] C code is optimized worse than C++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90204 --- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #7) > Yes, C++ with NRV optization, so the alignment of (res) is 4. > and the alignment of res is 16 in C. > > g++/test.i.158t.vect: > > ../test.i:8:23: note: recording

[Bug target/89765] Multiple problems with vec-insert implementation on PowerPC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89765 --- Comment #3 from kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org --- I have found that removing the pattern in match.pd resolves this issue with no regressions on various powerpc targets. I have not tested on other platforms. Index: gcc/match.pd

[Bug middle-end/89765] [9 Regression] Multiple problems with vec-insert implementation on PowerPC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89765 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.0 Summary|Multiple

[Bug other/90257] 8% degradation on cpu2006 403.gcc starting with r270484

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90257 --- Comment #1 from Segher Boessenkool --- This patch from a few days ago craters our specint scores by a few percent. I'm marking this P1.

[Bug other/90257] 8% degradation on cpu2006 403.gcc starting with r270484

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90257 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug libstdc++/90246] std::bad_variant_access messages are not useful

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90246 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/90236] bogus error with auto non-type template argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90236 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

  1   2   >