[Bug sanitizer/90337] sanitizer_linux.cc Fails to compile on Illumos-derived Solaris

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90337 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- Patches to sanitizer should be sent upstream first.

[Bug sanitizer/90337] New: sanitizer_linux.cc Fails to compile on Illumos-derived Solaris

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90337 Bug ID: 90337 Summary: sanitizer_linux.cc Fails to compile on Illumos-derived Solaris Product: gcc Version: 9.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/90338] New: member function pointer non-type template parameter compile fail while matching

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90338 Bug ID: 90338 Summary: member function pointer non-type template parameter compile fail while matching Product: gcc Version: 9.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug sanitizer/90337] sanitizer_linux.cc Fails to compile on Illumos-derived Solaris

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90337 --- Comment #6 from Fazal Majid --- @Andrew Pinski I looked for the files in question at https://github.com/google/sanitizers and couldn't find them, so I assumed they were the GCC-specific port of the LLVM sanitizer code.

[Bug sanitizer/90337] sanitizer_linux.cc Fails to compile on Illumos-derived Solaris

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90337 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Fazal Majid from comment #6) > @Andrew Pinski > > I looked for the files in question at https://github.com/google/sanitizers > and couldn't find them, so I assumed they were the GCC-specific

[Bug c/90340] New: Not optimal code when compiling C library for vsnprintf, code size increase 17%

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90340 Bug ID: 90340 Summary: Not optimal code when compiling C library for vsnprintf, code size increase 17% Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug sanitizer/90337] sanitizer_linux.cc Fails to compile on Illumos-derived Solaris

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90337 --- Comment #1 from Fazal Majid --- Another error, due to glob_t having gained some extra fields in newer versions of Illumos (apparently based on BSD code contributed by Guide van Rossum). Oracle Solaris: typedef struct glob_t {

[Bug sanitizer/90337] sanitizer_linux.cc Fails to compile on Illumos-derived Solaris

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90337 --- Comment #3 from Fazal Majid --- Created attachment 46283 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46283=edit Patch for the glob_t issue

[Bug c/86407] Ignore function attributes in function type declarations?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86407 --- Comment #5 from Alex Henrie --- The fundamental problem here is that some people want to combine calling convention attributes and certain other attributes in a macro and then use that macro everywhere, whereas other people want to place

[Bug c++/90339] New: Change default c++ dialect to -std=gnu++17 in gcc 10 ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90339 Bug ID: 90339 Summary: Change default c++ dialect to -std=gnu++17 in gcc 10 ? Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug sanitizer/90337] sanitizer_linux.cc Fails to compile on Illumos-derived Solaris

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90337 --- Comment #5 from Fazal Majid --- Yet another compile issue: mordac ~/build/gcc-9.1.0/obj/x86_64-pc-solaris2.11/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common>/bin/ksh ../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=compile /home/majid/build/gcc-9.1.0/obj/./gcc/xgcc

[Bug sanitizer/90337] sanitizer_linux.cc Fails to compile on Illumos-derived Solaris

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90337 --- Comment #2 from Fazal Majid --- Created attachment 46282 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46282=edit Patch for the O_DIRECTORY issue

[Bug libobjc/90268] compile failure for gcc9, missing libtool in that directory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90268 Carl Hansen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/90335] New: ICE with lambda as cnttp in a templated struct (segfault). C++2a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90335 Bug ID: 90335 Summary: ICE with lambda as cnttp in a templated struct (segfault). C++2a Product: gcc Version: 9.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug rtl-optimization/90174] Bad register spill due to top-down allocation order

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90174 --- Comment #4 from Vladimir Makarov --- (In reply to Feng Xue from comment #0) > Current regional RA uses a top-down allocation order, which may not properly > split a long live range that crosses sub-region with high register pressure. > >

[Bug debug/90336] New: gcc generates wrong debug information at -O1 to -O3

". $ gcc-trunk -v Thread model: posix gcc version 10.0.0 20190503 (experimental) [trunk revision 270847] (GCC) $ gdb -v GNU gdb (Ubuntu 7.11.1-0ubuntu1~16.5) 7.11.1 #Expected output# $ gcc-trunk -g abc.c outer.c $ gdb -x cmds -batch a.out Breakpoint 1 at 0x4004ad: file abc.c, line 11. Br

[Bug c++/90335] ICE with lambda as cnttp in a templated struct (segfault). C++2a

: posix gcc version 9.1.1 20190503 (GCC)

[Bug c++/90335] ICE with lambda as cnttp in a templated struct (segfault). C++2a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90335 --- Comment #2 from Boris Rúra --- Created attachment 46281 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46281=edit More minimal example. Removing the templates from aliases makes the code compile.

[Bug target/88963] gcc generates terrible code for vectors of 64+ length which are not natively supported

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88963 --- Comment #11 from Richard Biener --- The issue RTL expansion spills is the inner MEM_REF is expanded to (mem:BLK (reg/v/f:DI 88 [ a ]) [1 *a_7(D)+0 S64 A256]) and somehow if (MEM_P (to_rtx)) { /* If the

[Bug c++/90313] [7/8/9/10 Regression] Is an assignment elided with gcc7.3 -O2?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90313 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/90314] [10 Regression] clang gives error about exception specification in declaration not matching definition after change in move.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90314 --- Comment #6 from Peter Smith --- Thank you very much for the quick update.

[Bug ada/89493] [9/10 Regression] Stack smashing on armv7hl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89493 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.0 |9.2 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug ipa/57218] [7/8/9/10 Regression] Excessive inlining even at -Os

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57218 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.0 |9.2 --- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug rtl-optimization/84058] RTl partitioning fixup should drag very small blocks back to hot partition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84058 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.0 |9.2 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug middle-end/89765] [9/10 Regression] Multiple problems with vec-insert implementation on PowerPC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89765 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.0 |9.2 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug fortran/89925] [9/10 Regression] Wrong array bounds from ALLOCATE with SOURCE or MOLD

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89925 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.0 |9.2 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug fortran/85839] [F2018] warn for obsolescent features

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85839 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.0 |9.2 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug tree-optimization/87034] [9/10 Regression] missing -Wformat-overflow on a sprintf %s with a wide string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87034 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.0 |9.2 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c++/90172] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in contains_struct_check)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90172 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.0 |9.2 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c++/53281] poor error message for calling a non-const method from a const object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53281 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.0 |9.2 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c/82013] better error message for missing semicolon in prototype

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82013 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.0 |9.2 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug d/89254] std.net.curl and std.parallelism unittests hang

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89254 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.0 |9.2 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug gcov-profile/85336] [GCOV] wrong coverage for builtin functions and "||" logic operators in return statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85336 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.0 |9.2 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c++/84895] Smarter suggestions for "private" accessor hints

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84895 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.0 |9.2 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c/69558] [7/8 Regression] glib2 warning pragmas stopped working

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69558 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.0 |9.2 --- Comment #27 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug fortran/88356] [9/10 Regression] ICE with -Werror in reduce_binary_ac, at fortran/arith.c:1318 (and others)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88356 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.0 |9.2 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug ada/86916] Constraint_Error erroneous memory access instead of error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86916 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.0 |9.2 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug gcov-profile/85349] [GCOV] struct varaible definition in while(1) will cause incorrect coverage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85349 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.0 |9.2 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/86681] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2304 on s390x

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86681 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.0 |9.2 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug rtl-optimization/87902] [9/10 Regression] Shrink-wrapping multiple conditions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87902 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.0 |9.2 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c++/90291] [8/9/10 Regression] Inline namespace erroneously extends another namespace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90291 --- Comment #10 from Igor A. Goussarov --- Having reflected on my feelings about the described scenario, I came up with a slightly different wording for my complaints about the behaviour of gcc-8.x: The fact that using an inline namespace at

[Bug pch/90326] Using any precompiled header breaks definition of FLT_MAX

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90326 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug tree-optimization/87314] pointless comparison of malloc result to a string not eliminated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87314 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri May 3 10:44:17 2019 New Revision: 270845 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270845=gcc=rev Log: 2019-05-03 Richard Biener PR middle-end/87314 * match.pd

[Bug ada/90325] ICE on Unchecked_Conversion to a discriminated type in a Lock_Free protected type body

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90325 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/90071] [7/8 Regression] internal compiler error: SSA corruption

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90071 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri May 3 08:18:48 2019 New Revision: 270841 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270841=gcc=rev Log: 2019-05-03 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 2019-03-14

[Bug c++/89698] [7/8 Regression] Run-time error due to optimization of field access after cast at -Os/-O2 and higher

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89698 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri May 3 08:18:48 2019 New Revision: 270841 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270841=gcc=rev Log: 2019-05-03 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 2019-03-14

[Bug target/88474] Inline built-in hypot for -ffast-math

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88474 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.0 |9.2 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug rtl-optimization/84753] GCC does not fold xxswapd followed by vperm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84753 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.0 |9.2 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug rtl-optimization/87552] [9/10 regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20010102-1.c -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87552 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.0 |9.2 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug d/90136] [d] Merge UDAs between function prototype and definitions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90136 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.0 |9.2 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug fortran/87352] [7/8/9/10 Regression] Large stack usage with new gfortran

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87352 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.0 |9.2 --- Comment #22 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug gcov-profile/85201] [GCOV] A statement with two && operators and a comma operator in the for loop body is wrongly marked in gcov

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85201 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.0 |9.2 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/90178] [9 Regression] Missed optimization: duplicated terminal basic block with -mavx

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90178 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.0 |9.2 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c/84919] [8/9/10 Regression] error: passing argument 1 to restrict-qualified parameter aliases with argument 5 [-Werror=restrict]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84919 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.0 |9.2 --- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/70321] [7/8/9/10 Regression] STV generates less optimized code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70321 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.0 |9.2 --- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug ipa/89584] [9/10 Regression] CPU2000 degradations with r268448 (172.mgrid -22%, 252.eon -8%)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89584 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.0 |9.2 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug rtl-optimization/90249] [9/10 Regression] Code size regression on thumb2 due to sub-optimal register allocation starting with r265398

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90249 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.0 |9.2 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug tree-optimization/84053] [7/8/9/10 Regression] missing -Warray-bounds accessing a local array across inlined function boundaries

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84053 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.0 |9.2 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c++/49129] confusing diagnostic for missing semi-colon after member template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49129 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.0 |9.2 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c++/25814] Request for warning for parser ambiguity of function declarations and variable declarations with initializations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25814 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.0 |9.2 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/89271] [9/10 Regression] gcc.target/powerpc/vsx-simode2.c stopped working in GCC 9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89271 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.0 |9.2 --- Comment #22 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c/69602] [7/8/9/10 Regression] over-ambitious logical-op warning on EAGAIN vs EWOULDBLOCK

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69602 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.0 |9.2 --- Comment #24 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c++/84920] Better handling of unmatched/ambiguous calls

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84920 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.0 |9.2 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug preprocessor/84864] Issues with large line numbers >= 2^31

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84864 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.0 |9.2 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug pch/90326] New: Using any precompiled header breaks definition of FLT_MAX

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90326 Bug ID: 90326 Summary: Using any precompiled header breaks definition of FLT_MAX Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/88809] do not use rep-scasb for inline strlen/memchr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88809 --- Comment #8 from dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: dominiq Date: Fri May 3 10:00:27 2019 New Revision: 270843 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270843=gcc=rev Log: 2019-05-03 Dominique d'Humieres PR target/88809 *

[Bug tree-optimization/90316] large compile time increase in opt / alias stmt walking for Go example

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90316 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- GCC 8 got enhanced get_continuation_for_phi, previously we gave up for this kind of CFG. 2017-05-04 Richard Biener * tree-ssa-alias.c (get_continuation_for_phi): Improve looking for the

[Bug middle-end/88963] gcc generates terrible code for vectors of 64+ length which are not natively supported

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88963 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Component|target |middle-end --- Comment #13 from

[Bug tree-optimization/87314] pointless comparison of malloc result to a string not eliminated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87314 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/89518] missed optimisation for array address calculations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89518 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libquadmath/90298] libquadmath/math/catanhq.c:113: possibly redundant code ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90298 --- Comment #5 from David Binderman --- Thanks for the explanation. Is it worthwhile to add a short comment summarising why it is not redundant code, to stop other folks falling into the same trap ? I'll look into enhancing cppcheck to avoid

[Bug tree-optimization/89710] [7/8 Regression] ICE in dyn_cast(gimple*) / should_duplicate_loop_header_p

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89710 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri May 3 08:18:48 2019 New Revision: 270841 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270841=gcc=rev Log: 2019-05-03 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 2019-03-14

[Bug target/89711] [8 Regression] ICE in insert_vi_for_tree, at tree-ssa-structalias.c:2832

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89711 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri May 3 08:18:48 2019 New Revision: 270841 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270841=gcc=rev Log: 2019-05-03 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 2019-03-14

[Bug tree-optimization/89595] [8 Regression] DOM miscompiles code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89595 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri May 3 08:18:48 2019 New Revision: 270841 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270841=gcc=rev Log: 2019-05-03 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 2019-03-14

[Bug target/89711] [8 Regression] ICE in insert_vi_for_tree, at tree-ssa-structalias.c:2832

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89711 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug target/86984] invalid relocation accessing a const char array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86984 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri May 3 08:18:48 2019 New Revision: 270841 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270841=gcc=rev Log: 2019-05-03 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 2019-03-14

[Bug tree-optimization/89595] [8 Regression] DOM miscompiles code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89595 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug other/90315] [10 regression] help text (or test for help text) problem after r270788

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90315 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch Target Milestone|---

[Bug tree-optimization/88771] Misleading -Werror=array-bounds error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88771 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.0 |9.2 --- Comment #23 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug tree-optimization/85947] gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-div-1.c XPASSes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85947 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.0 |9.2 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/88343] [7/8 Regression] R31 is unconditionally saved/restored on powerpc-darwin even when it's not necessary.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88343 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.0 |9.2 --- Comment #36 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug tree-optimization/78902] Add malloc(0) into -Walloc-zero warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78902 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.0 |9.2 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug tree-optimization/85175] [8/9/10 regression] false-positive -Wformat-overflow= warning with gcc-8 -Os

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85175 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.0 |9.2 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug gcov-profile/85225] [GCOV] An array reference in the for(;;) loop will lead the loop has incorrect execution times in gcov

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85225 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.0 |9.2 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug driver/83193] Help for invalid -march= options from cc1 omits -march=native on x86-64, arm. aarch64, output also inconsistent

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83193 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.0 |9.2 --- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug rtl-optimization/85409] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in alloc_succs_info, at sel-sched-ir.c:4730

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85409 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.0 |9.2 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug fortran/49213] [OOP] gfortran rejects structure constructor expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49213 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.0 |9.2 --- Comment #30 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug libstdc++/83077] sso-string @ gnu-versioned-namespace.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83077 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.0 |9.2 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/88494] [9/10 Regression] polyhedron 10% mdbx runtime regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88494 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.0 |9.2 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c++/86661] g++ ICE:tree check: expected tree that contains ‘decl minimal’ structure, have ‘overload’ in note_name_declared_in_class, at cp/class.c:8288

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86661 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.0 |9.2 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug translation/90121] extra space in error message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90121 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.0 |9.2 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug gcov-profile/85199] [GCOV] A cond-expr with a iterative variable in a for loop is marked as "-" in gcov

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85199 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.0 |9.2 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/89355] Unnecessary ENDBR

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89355 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.0 |9.2 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug libstdc++/85998] feature request: support C++17 parallel STL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85998 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.0 |9.2 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/85005] Redesign and cleanup arm.c wrt to flag_stack_clash_protection and flag_stack_check

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85005 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.0 |9.2 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c/70618] better error messages for missing/too many arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70618 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.0 |9.2 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug middle-end/90139] [7/8 Regression] ICE in emit_block_move_hints, at expr.c:1601

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90139 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.0 |9.2 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c/78568] [7/8/9/10 Regression] Wtype-limits warning regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78568 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.0 |9.2 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/89229] Incorrect xmm16-xmm31/ymm16-ymm31 in vector move

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89229 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.0 |9.2 --- Comment #25 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug tree-optimization/84050] [7/8/9/10 Regression] missing -Warray-bounds accessing a struct array member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84050 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.0 |9.2 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek

  1   2   3   >