https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90623
Bug ID: 90623
Summary: compilation error with fold expression and parameter
pack
Product: gcc
Version: 9.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90626
Bug ID: 90626
Summary: fold strcmp(a, b) == 0 to zero when one string length
is exact and the other is unequal
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90624
Bug ID: 90624
Summary: nt_spawnve() may use stack variable escape_char
uninitialized (in gcc/ada/terminals.c)
Product: gcc
Version: 9.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90625
Bug ID: 90625
Summary: fold strcmp(a, b) == 0 to zero for strings of unequal
but non-const lengths
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69020
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90627
Bug ID: 90627
Summary: : internal compiler error when compiling
cython-generated python3 modules
Product: gcc
Version: 9.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90530
--- Comment #20 from John David Anglin ---
Author: danglin
Date: Fri May 24 23:17:09 2019
New Revision: 271613
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271613=gcc=rev
Log:
PR target/90530
* config/pa/pa.c (pa_can_change_mode_class):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90530
--- Comment #19 from John David Anglin ---
Author: danglin
Date: Fri May 24 23:15:49 2019
New Revision: 271612
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271612=gcc=rev
Log:
PR target/90530
* config/pa/pa.c (pa_can_change_mode_class):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81772
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88814
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill |
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90530
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85598
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||9.0
Summary|[7/8 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90530
--- Comment #21 from John David Anglin ---
Author: danglin
Date: Fri May 24 23:20:25 2019
New Revision: 271614
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271614=gcc=rev
Log:
PR target/90530
* config/pa/pa.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90530
--- Comment #18 from John David Anglin ---
Author: danglin
Date: Fri May 24 23:12:16 2019
New Revision: 271611
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271611=gcc=rev
Log:
PR target/90530
* config/pa/pa.c (pa_can_change_mode_class):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71124
--- Comment #5 from Giulio Benetti ---
Sorry for the noise, I didn't know how it worked here.
Anyway this duplicates Bug 85180.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90622
Bug ID: 90622
Summary: Suboptimal code generated for
__builtin_avr_insert_bits
Product: gcc
Version: 5.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90572
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.2
Summary|Wrong
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90572
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|wrong-code |patch
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90570
--- Comment #10 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Fri May 24 07:44:15 2019
New Revision: 271594
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271594=gcc=rev
Log:
Backport r271548
2019-05-24 Martin Liska
Backport from mainline
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90570
--- Comment #9 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Fri May 24 07:43:48 2019
New Revision: 271593
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271593=gcc=rev
Log:
Backport r271548
2019-05-24 Martin Liska
Backport from mainline
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90570
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90607
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88784
--- Comment #12 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Qi Feng from comment #11)
> I tried 2 patterns for the following test
>
> /* 1. x > y && x != 0 --> x > y */
> /* 2. y < x && x != 0 --> y < x */
> /* 3. x != 0 &&
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88784
--- Comment #14 from Qi Feng ---
Checking .original and .optimized file is just a quick method I use to check
whether an optimization happened (if not happen in first and last pass,
probably it didn't happen). I didn't mean or think the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90597
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.2
Summary|FAIL:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90601
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
Well, fix_trunc_expr isn't an lvalue you can pre-increment ... if D means
to pre-increment a temporary (and not a) then it has to say so explicitely.
Note GENERIC doesn't allow floating types on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90608
Bug ID: 90608
Summary: Inline masked minlo/maxloc calls
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
Priority:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90600
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
In 325462 SDM vol 1-2abcd-3abcd in 3.1.1.10 Intel ® C/C++ Compiler Intrinsics
Equivalents Section, it is actually written:
"The declarations of Intel C/C++ compiler intrinsic functions may reference
some
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90607
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88440
--- Comment #25 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri May 24 08:48:14 2019
New Revision: 271595
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271595=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-05-23 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/88440
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90585
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri May 24 08:59:37 2019
New Revision: 271597
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271597=gcc=rev
Log:
PR libgomp/90585
* plugin/plugin-hsa.c: Include gstdint.h. Include
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90517
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri May 24 10:15:16 2019
New Revision: 271598
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271598=gcc=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/90106
PR testsuite/90517
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90106
--- Comment #21 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri May 24 10:15:16 2019
New Revision: 271598
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271598=gcc=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/90106
PR testsuite/90517
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90610
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88784
--- Comment #13 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 24 May 2019, glisse at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88784
>
> --- Comment #12 from Marc Glisse ---
> (In reply to Qi Feng from comment #11)
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90607
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88783
--- Comment #3 from Richard Earnshaw ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #2)
> Hi tfx,
>
> Thank you vert much for reporting this bug. Unfortunately the binutils
> project does not maintain the libiberty library (which contains the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88784
--- Comment #17 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 24 May 2019, glisse at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88784
>
> --- Comment #16 from Marc Glisse ---
> (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90609
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90568
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri May 24 08:58:50 2019
New Revision: 271596
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271596=gcc=rev
Log:
PR target/90568
* config/i386/x86-tune-sched.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88784
--- Comment #16 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #15)
> It can matter because we might have gimplified the && to
> control flow.
Indeed. You want to look at the forwprop1 dump to see what gimple-match would
need
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90585
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Fixed on the trunk, guess for the backport we could do a simpler thing (as we
included inttypes.h unconditionally and nobody complained on the branch, just
use the PRIu64 and nothing else). On the trunk it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90568
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90610
Bug ID: 90610
Summary: [10 Regression] 526.blender_r miscompared on znver1
with -Ofast -march=native since r271463
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90588
--- Comment #2 from Matthew Malcomson ---
Author: matmal01
Date: Fri May 24 10:39:38 2019
New Revision: 271599
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271599=gcc=rev
Log:
[aarch64] Change two function declaration types
Commit r271514 missed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90599
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88784
--- Comment #15 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 24 May 2019, ffengqi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88784
>
> --- Comment #14 from Qi Feng ---
> Checking .original and .optimized file is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90609
Bug ID: 90609
Summary: Compilation error in std::function default member
initialization inside template class with defaulted
constructor
Product: gcc
Version:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88783
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69864
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|redi at gcc dot gnu.org|
--- Comment #14 from Jonathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90611
Bug ID: 90611
Summary: Generating a bad sse instruction for 32 bit
Product: gcc
Version: 8.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90611
--- Comment #1 from Aaron Greig ---
actually it seems that vector_size(16) creates a type that is over aligned, the
following assert fails:
static_assert(std::alignment_of::value <= alignof(max_align_t), "over
aligned!");
so I think I should
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90610
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
The problematic one is:
910/ 1040: blender/source/blender/render/intern/source/zbuf.o: different
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90610
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
First change is in zbuf.c.170t.veclower21:
GOOD:
vect_shuffle3_high_369 = VEC_PERM_EXPR ;
vect_shuffle3_low_444 = VEC_PERM_EXPR ;
vect_shuffle3_high_368 = VEC_PERM_EXPR ;
MEM[(float *
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90614
--- Comment #1 from martin ---
Created attachment 46406
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46406=edit
libgo gen-sysinfo.go
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90611
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Aaron Greig from comment #0)
> Created attachment 46403 [details]
> cpp file that triggers the bug
>
> I am finding that when I compile the attached file, with the following
> command:
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90613
Bug ID: 90613
Summary: [10 Regression] Debug info size increase after r271467
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90612
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
N.B. for GCC9 you don't need to use -lstdc++fs for std::filesystem, only for
std::experimental::filesystem.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90614
Bug ID: 90614
Summary: gcc-9.1.0/libgo/go/syscall/wait.c:54:22: error: unused
parameter ‘w’ [-Werror=unused-parameter] Continued
(uint32_t *w)
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90607
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri May 24 11:31:11 2019
New Revision: 271601
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271601=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-05-24 Richard Biener
PR testsuite/90607
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90607
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90610
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Happens also for --size=train and following files are different after the
revision:
56/ 1040: blender/source/blender/blenkernel/intern/camera.o: different
64/ 1040:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90611
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Oh, I forgot that I already implemented another option in
__gnu_cxx::malloc_allocator, which is to check the alignment of the returned
memory and only fail if it isn't suitably aligned:
pointer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90612
--- Comment #1 from M Welinder ---
fs_path.cc line 281 reads...
std::uninitialized_copy (to + oldsize, new_size - oldsize,
from + oldsize);
1st and 3rd arguments are swapped.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90557
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||terra at gnome dot org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90612
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90613
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90610
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 46407
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46407=edit
Veclower dump files
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90611
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||i?86-*-*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90611
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Aaron Greig from comment #1)
> actually it seems that vector_size(16) creates a type that is over aligned,
> the following assert fails:
>
> static_assert(std::alignment_of::value <=
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90611
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
We could do this in std::allocator:
--- a/libstdc++-v3/include/ext/new_allocator.h
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/ext/new_allocator.h
@@ -110,6 +110,9 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90609
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
Target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90609
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-reduction |
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90612
Bug ID: 90612
Summary: std::filesystem::path crash
Product: gcc
Version: 9.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90588
Matthew Malcomson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89782
--- Comment #5 from Jerry DeLisle ---
It appears that
character(len=*),parameter :: VALUES(*)=[character(len=10) ::
is being marked as a variable when it should be BT_CONSTANT.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90616
Bug ID: 90616
Summary: Suboptimal code generated for accessing an aligned
array.
Product: gcc
Version: 5.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90320
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90617
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
> for (int x = *_container_.i;
> ;
> __extension__ ({--_container_.brk; break;})) {
>
> std::cout << "x = " << x << std::endl;
>}
Hmmm, the question here becomes where is that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90618
--- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Sorry, I looked but didn't see a fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90614
--- Comment #2 from martin ---
Created attachment 46408
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46408=edit
wait.h in /usr/include/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90617
Bug ID: 90617
Summary: GCC 9 miscompiles Qt4 "foreach" macro
Product: gcc
Version: 9.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90618
Bug ID: 90618
Summary: new test case
testsuite/20_util/shared_ptr/cons/alias-rval.cc
introduced in r271583 fails
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78667
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88783
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|MOVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90615
Bug ID: 90615
Summary: [10 regression] several vector test cases fail
starting with r271553
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90614
--- Comment #3 from martin ---
Created attachment 46409
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46409=edit
wait.h /usr/include/sys/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90320
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Adam Mitz from comment #0)
> May be related to https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87605 but
> this doesn't involve the ternary operator.
It's similar, but I don't think it's the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90618
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90621
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69401
Giulio Benetti changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||giulio.benetti@micronovasrl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90621
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
More to the point is that if multi-arch is not used, then it is empty. This is
true on Linux as it is true under mingw.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68485
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||thomas.petazzoni@free-elect
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69401
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90619
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc64le-unknown-linux-g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90619
Bug ID: 90619
Summary: [10 regression] spec 2017 tests 527.cam4_r and
521.wrf_r segfault while running after r271386
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85965
--- Comment #17 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri May 24 16:09:28 2019
New Revision: 271607
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271607=gcc=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/85965 move is_invocable assertions again
This is another attempt to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90617
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab ---
According to [stmt.for] the expression is supposed to be evaluated in the scope
of the inner loop.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90620
Bug ID: 90620
Summary: Microblaze: ICE similar to bug 16267
Product: gcc
Version: 9.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90621
Bug ID: 90621
Summary: [mingw] Command line switch -print-multiarch prints
nothing
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
100 matches
Mail list logo
