[Bug libstdc++/91170] [9/10 Regression] Crash in pdns resolver

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91170 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2) > That mostly just adds static_assert checks, which can't change anything at > runtime. It changes how we get to keys/values besides moving static asserts but

[Bug target/89190] [ARM] armv8-m.base invalid ldm ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89190 Wilco changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/91173] [9/10 Regression] ICE: in int_mode_for_mode, at stor-layout.c:403

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91173 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug target/91130] [9/10 Regression] -MF clashes with -flto on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91130 --- Comment #6 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #5) > Why does it clash only on arm and aarch64? I'll debug that, it's really strange.

[Bug tree-optimization/91181] New: Failing as_as type conversion in vect_build_slp_tree_1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91181 Bug ID: 91181 Summary: Failing as_as type conversion in vect_build_slp_tree_1 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/89222] [7/8 regression] ARM thumb-2 misoptimisation of func ptr call with -O2 or -Os

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89222 --- Comment #10 from Wilco --- Author: wilco Date: Tue Jul 16 12:37:14 2019 New Revision: 273526 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273526=gcc=rev Log: [ARM] Fix PR89222 The GCC optimizer can generate symbols with non-zero offset from simple

[Bug target/91130] [9/10 Regression] -MF clashes with -flto on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91130 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Target|aarch64-linux-gnu |aarch64-*-* arm*-*-*

[Bug lto/91163] ARM lto optimalization fail in big-endian case (error: could not unlink output file)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91163 Richard Earnshaw changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|WONTFIX |INVALID --- Comment #10 from Richard

[Bug target/91174] Suboptimal code for arithmetic with bool and char

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91174 --- Comment #2 from Antony Polukhin --- (In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #1) > For which ABI do you propose the change? It's not correct for GNU/Linux: As far as I understand the proposed change does not touch ABI. `lea eax, [rdi +

[Bug testsuite/91175] [9 regression] g++.old-deja/g++.pt/instantiate4.C fails starting with r273489

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91175 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Tue Jul 16 10:21:57 2019 New Revision: 273521 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273521=gcc=rev Log: Do not use -Werror in a test that has -frepo warning (PR testsuite/91175).

[Bug tree-optimization/83518] [8/9 Regression] Missing optimization: useless instructions should be dropped

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83518 Wilco changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug tree-optimization/91157] [10 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: position plus size exceeds size of referenced object in 'bit_field_ref')

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91157 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug target/91174] Suboptimal code for arithmetic with bool and char

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91174 --- Comment #3 from Florian Weimer --- (In reply to Antony Polukhin from comment #2) > (In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #1) > > For which ABI do you propose the change? It's not correct for GNU/Linux: > > As far as I understand the

[Bug tree-optimization/91178] [9/10 Regression] Infinite recursion in split_constant_offset in slp after r260289

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91178 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- The main issue is that loop vectorization creates a chain of increments # vectp_f.21_116 = PHI vect__16.23_118 = MEM [(int *)vectp_f.21_116]; vectp_f.21_119 = vectp_f.21_116 + 16; vectp_f.21_121

[Bug tree-optimization/91181] [10 Regression] Failing as_as type conversion in vect_build_slp_tree_1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91181 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Known to work|

[Bug bootstrap/91176] [10 regression] AArch64 bootstrap fails since r273479

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91176 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.0

[Bug testsuite/91175] [9 regression] g++.old-deja/g++.pt/instantiate4.C fails starting with r273489

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91175 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/91174] Suboptimal code for arithmetic with bool and char

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91174 Florian Weimer changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/91180] New: [10 Regression] wrong code at -O and above with __builtin_memset()

rtl-df-extra-amd64 Thread model: posix Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd gcc version 10.0.0 20190716 (experimental) (GCC) This seems to be a quite recent regression affecting various targets.

[Bug target/89222] [7 regression] ARM thumb-2 misoptimisation of func ptr call with -O2 or -Os

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89222 --- Comment #11 from Wilco --- Author: wilco Date: Tue Jul 16 13:13:26 2019 New Revision: 273527 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273527=gcc=rev Log: [ARM] Fix PR89222 The GCC optimizer can generate symbols with non-zero offset from simple

[Bug target/91174] Suboptimal code for arithmetic with bool and char

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91174 --- Comment #4 from Antony Polukhin --- Sorry, now I understood that the bug is invalid. Please close.

[Bug testsuite/91175] [9 regression] g++.old-deja/g++.pt/instantiate4.C fails starting with r273489

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91175 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug testsuite/91175] [9 regression] g++.old-deja/g++.pt/instantiate4.C fails starting with r273489

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91175 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/91164] [10 Regression] ICE in verify_dominators, at dominance.c:1184 (error: dominator of 114 should be 112, not 16)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91164 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/89190] [8 regression][ARM] armv8-m.base invalid ldm ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89190 --- Comment #5 from Wilco --- Author: wilco Date: Tue Jul 16 12:06:55 2019 New Revision: 273524 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273524=gcc=rev Log: Add missing testcase for PR89190 testsuite/ PR target/89190 *

[Bug target/89222] [7 regression] ARM thumb-2 misoptimisation of func ptr call with -O2 or -Os

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89222 Wilco changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/91164] [10 Regression] ICE in verify_dominators, at dominance.c:1184 (error: dominator of 114 should be 112, not 16)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91164 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jul 16 11:37:05 2019 New Revision: 273522 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273522=gcc=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/91164 * dse.c (rest_of_handle_dse): If dead

[Bug target/89190] [8 regression][ARM] armv8-m.base invalid ldm ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89190 --- Comment #7 from Wilco --- Backported to GCC8 branch, and added missing testcase to trunk and GCC9. All fixed.

[Bug target/89190] [8 regression][ARM] armv8-m.base invalid ldm ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89190 --- Comment #6 from Wilco --- Author: wilco Date: Tue Jul 16 12:12:01 2019 New Revision: 273525 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273525=gcc=rev Log: Add missing testcase for PR89190 testsuite/ PR target/89190 *

[Bug target/89190] [8 regression][ARM] armv8-m.base invalid ldm ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89190 --- Comment #4 from Wilco --- Author: wilco Date: Tue Jul 16 12:00:42 2019 New Revision: 273523 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273523=gcc=rev Log: [ARM] Fix Thumb-1 ldm (PR89190) This patch fixes an ICE in the Thumb-1 LDM peepholer.

[Bug tree-optimization/91181] [10 Regression] Failing as_as type conversion in vect_build_slp_tree_1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91181 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||alejandro at gcc dot gnu.org Known

[Bug target/91130] [9/10 Regression] -MF clashes with -flto on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91130 --- Comment #8 from Martin Liška --- It's not related to .d FE as it fails also with a different file name: $ echo "int main() {}" > main.c && gcc -c -flto main.c && gcc -o a.out main.o -flto -MMD -MF deps gcc: error: deps: No such file or

[Bug c++/91182] New: deprecated attribute string-literal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91182 Bug ID: 91182 Summary: deprecated attribute string-literal Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug target/91130] [9/10 Regression] -MF clashes with -flto on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91130 --- Comment #11 from Richard Earnshaw --- Some pass in the compilation process must create that temporary file with the options to gcc; but whichever pass this is doesn't appear in the output of "gcc -v"

[Bug target/91130] [9/10 Regression] -MF clashes with -flto on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91130 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug target/91130] [9/10 Regression] -MF clashes with -flto on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91130 --- Comment #12 from Richard Earnshaw --- How do I invoke lto-wrapper inside gdb? it seems to pick up some magic options via the environment...

[Bug target/91130] [9/10 Regression] -MF clashes with -flto on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91130 --- Comment #7 from Martin Liška --- Ok, we have a -dumpspecs option. If I use it for x86_64 and aarch64 I get a small difference that should be fine: --- x86_64.spec 2019-07-16 16:48:03.923522778 +0200 +++ aarch64.spec2019-07-16

[Bug target/89222] [7 regression] ARM thumb-2 misoptimisation of func ptr call with -O2 or -Os

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89222 Wilco changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|8.5 |7.5

[Bug driver/90684] New alignment options incorrectly report error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90684 --- Comment #4 from Wilco --- Author: wilco Date: Tue Jul 16 16:17:39 2019 New Revision: 273533 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273533=gcc=rev Log: Fix alignment option parser (PR90684) Fix the alignment option parser to always allow up

[Bug rtl-optimization/91173] [9 Regression] ICE: in int_mode_for_mode, at stor-layout.c:403

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91173 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[9/10 Regression] ICE: in |[9 Regression] ICE: in

[Bug rtl-optimization/91173] [9/10 Regression] ICE: in int_mode_for_mode, at stor-layout.c:403

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91173 --- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Tue Jul 16 14:44:44 2019 New Revision: 273529 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273529=gcc=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/91173 * tree-ssa-address.c (addr_for_mem_ref):

[Bug rtl-optimization/91173] [9 Regression] ICE: in int_mode_for_mode, at stor-layout.c:403

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91173 --- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Tue Jul 16 14:57:51 2019 New Revision: 273531 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273531=gcc=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/91173 * g++.dg/pr91173.C: New test. Added:

[Bug tree-optimization/91180] [10 Regression] wrong code at -O and above with __builtin_memset()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91180 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug driver/90684] New alignment options incorrectly report error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90684 Wilco changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/91130] [9/10 Regression] -MF clashes with -flto on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91130 --- Comment #10 from Richard Earnshaw --- I'm not particularly familiar with how LTO is supposed to work. I can reproduce the crash on ARM as Martin described (but not on AArch64). The problem seems to be an assert that the number of files to

[Bug tree-optimization/91183] strlen of a strcpy result with a conditional source not folded

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91183 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Blocks|

[Bug c++/91184] memory leak with enable_shared_from_this and pthread

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91184 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug regression/91185] -Og miscompiles code causing runtime segfault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91185 --- Comment #1 from Dávid Bolvanský --- (gdb) r bw Starting program: /home/xbolva00/IFJ16/src/ifj16c bw Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0xeac5 in eval (op=0x55768b80) at interpret.c:37 37 tVar

[Bug c++/91187] New: Is it possible to make -Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant learn about extern "C"?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91187 Bug ID: 91187 Summary: Is it possible to make -Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant learn about extern "C"? Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/91187] Is it possible to make -Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant learn about extern "C"?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91187 --- Comment #1 from Albert Astals Cid --- This is with gcc version 9.1.0

[Bug c++/91120] broken template instantiation for std::string_view values

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91120 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug regression/91185] New: -Og miscompiles code causing runtime segfault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91185 Bug ID: 91185 Summary: -Og miscompiles code causing runtime segfault Product: gcc Version: 7.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug middle-end/61577] [4.9.0] can't compile on hp-ux v3 ia64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577 --- Comment #70 from EML --- Created attachment 46606 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46606=edit islower pre-processed code (-E flag) Attached the pre-processed code from -E

[Bug lto/91186] New: gcc-9.1.0 fails to to fins a .symver symbol

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91186 Bug ID: 91186 Summary: gcc-9.1.0 fails to to fins a .symver symbol Product: gcc Version: 9.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: lto

[Bug lto/91186] gcc-9.1.0 fails to to fins a .symver symbol

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91186 --- Comment #1 from Sergei Trofimovich --- Created attachment 46605 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46605=edit gcc-lto-partition-bug.tar.gz

[Bug regression/91185] -Og miscompiles code causing runtime segfault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91185 Dávid Bolvanský changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug lto/91186] gcc-9.1.0 fails to to fins a .symver symbol

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91186 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- There are known issues with top-level inline-asm and LTO and you are running into one of those. FUSE_SYMVER(".symver fuse_setup_compat2,__fuse_setup@"); FUSE_SYMVER(".symver

[Bug c++/86375] Lambda call in template parameter causes compile time error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86375 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/91148] PowerPC build gets several warnings due to -Wformat-diag

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91148 --- Comment #12 from David Edelsohn --- Dumping work onto all other target maintainers at a time not of their choosing isn't acceptable either.

[Bug fortran/90903] Implement runtime checks for bit manipulation intrinsics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90903 --- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: anlauf Date: Tue Jul 16 19:58:15 2019 New Revision: 273535 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273535=gcc=rev Log: 2019-07-16 Harald Anlauf PR fortran/90903 *

[Bug fortran/90903] Implement runtime checks for bit manipulation intrinsics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90903 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/91183] New: strlen of a strcpy result with a conditional source not folded

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91183 Bug ID: 91183 Summary: strlen of a strcpy result with a conditional source not folded Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/90980] Missing AVX512 unaligned intrinsics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90980 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/88918] [meta-bug] x86 intrinsic issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88918 Bug 88918 depends on bug 90980, which changed state. Bug 90980 Summary: Missing AVX512 unaligned intrinsics https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90980 What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/91148] PowerPC build gets several warnings due to -Wformat-diag

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91148 --- Comment #11 from Martin Sebor --- Most of the issues were fixed before the warning was enabled: see r271338. The cleanup was done on x86 and it was expected that other targets would need some minor changes before the warning could be

[Bug c++/91184] New: memory leak with enable_shared_from_this and pthread

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91184 Bug ID: 91184 Summary: memory leak with enable_shared_from_this and pthread Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c/81453] relational expression involving null pointer not diagnosed with -Wall

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81453 --- Comment #2 from Eric Gallager --- The name -Wordered-pointer-comparison was suggested for this warning here: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-01/msg00608.html

[Bug c++/91187] Is it possible to make -Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant learn about extern "C"?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91187 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic CC|

[Bug c++/68897] No option to disable just "warning: enumeral and non-enumeral type in conditional expression"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68897 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/91130] [9/10 Regression] -MF clashes with -flto on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91130 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug lto/91163] ARM lto optimalization fail in big-endian case (error: could not unlink output file)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91163 jdobry at centrum dot cz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/91179] New: Spurious -Wconversion warning after promotion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91179 Bug ID: 91179 Summary: Spurious -Wconversion warning after promotion Product: gcc Version: 7.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug tree-optimization/91178] [9/10 Regression] Infinite recursion in split_constant_offset in slp after r260289

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91178 Serge Belyshev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/91176] [10 regression] AArch64 bootstrap fails since r273479

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91176 --- Comment #10 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rsandifo Date: Tue Jul 16 08:12:05 2019 New Revision: 273507 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273507=gcc=rev Log: PR91176: Skip debug insns when computing inline costs Apply

[Bug go/91172] Command line option for a wrong language is not reported with -Werror=warning_name syntax

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91172 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/91176] [10 regression] AArch64 bootstrap fails since r273479

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91176 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/91178] [9/10 Regression] Infinite recursion in split_constant_offset in slp after r260289

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91178 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned