https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91154
--- Comment #21 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Aug 14 08:31:54 2019
New Revision: 274422
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274422=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-08-14 Richard Biener
PR target/91154
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91434
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91438
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #4)
> Is this related to PR 91404?
Maybe. The stack trace is different, so maybe a different story. I'll check it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91440
--- Comment #1 from R Copley ---
The recipe isn't as stable as I thought. The same recipe on a different machine
doesn't reproduce the issue. Apologies.
On that machine with a real project (sorry, no minimal example) I'm now seeing
this error:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91441
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2019-8-14
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91441
Bug ID: 91441
Summary: ICE in asan_shadow_offset at asan.c:342 on riscv64
target
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40976
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91438
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89832
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91325
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91376
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91440
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to R Copley from comment #3)
> Yes, I'll try and bisect.
>
> Apologies for my confusion: ASLR is enabled in the 9.2 binaries and not in
> the 9.1 binaries (see below).
> This change isn't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91434
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Rajabharathi s from comment #3)
> But since m_a is member variable of other object FSPI, this memory exists in
> stack until its destruction.
The memory exists, but that is just some bytes of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42122
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig ---
Also crashes with -fdump-global-original:
MAIN__ setpointer main==4365== Invalid read of size 8
==4365==at 0x8F8B0D: gfc_traverse_gsymbol(gfc_gsymbol*, void
(*)(gfc_gsymbol*, void*), void*)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91442
Bug ID: 91442
Summary: Wrong "may be used uninitialized" warning with
allocation on assignment
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91154
--- Comment #23 from Richard Biener ---
Fixed for {x86_64,i?86}-*-* (hopefully).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91154
--- Comment #22 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Aug 14 12:04:05 2019
New Revision: 274481
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274481=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-08-14 Richard Biener
Uroš Bizjak
PR target/91154
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91442
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91449
Bug ID: 91449
Summary: [10 regression] new test case gcc.dg/strlenopt-73.c
fails
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88076
Nicolas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #45669|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88076
--- Comment #14 from Nicolas Koenig ---
Created attachment 46715
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46715=edit
Library Diff
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82328
Jack Lloyd changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lloyd at randombit dot net
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90969
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91294
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91449
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91439
--- Comment #5 from Johannes Altmanninger ---
Great, thanks! I should have used -Og in the first place.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85506
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91451
Bug ID: 91451
Summary: Do not warn about duplicate __STDC_WANT_* definitions
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91222
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91360
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83819
Bug 83819 depends on bug 91294, which changed state.
Bug 91294 Summary: [10 Regression] wrong strlen result of a conditional with an
offset
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91294
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83819
Bug 83819 depends on bug 91183, which changed state.
Bug 91183 Summary: strlen of a strcpy result with a conditional source not
folded
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91183
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91183
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91449
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor ---
The difference in the memcpy folding (done in gimple_fold_builtin_memory_op) is
due to i386 target (an a few others) defining the MOVE_MAX macro to 16 while
powerpc64 (and many others to 8), and quite a few
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88944
--- Comment #2 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #1)
> Thanks.
>
> FWIW trunk (gcc 9) no longer suggests "_Bool".
>
> I have a patch pending (for gcc 10) which implements the header suggestion.
it's gcc 10 now
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88076
--- Comment #15 from Steve Kargl ---
On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 08:33:04PM +, koenigni at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> Yes, I'm still working on it (slowly, though, sorry :( ). Here is a diff of my
> current trunk. I don't know what exactly
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91440
--- Comment #6 from R Copley ---
> Yes, I'll try and bisect.
Just to check, I rebuilt GCC 9.1 using the version of the MSYS2 package-build
from before the update to 9.2, and the binaries have ASLR enabled and do show
failures with using PCH.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83819
Bug 83819 depends on bug 91449, which changed state.
Bug 91449 Summary: [10 regression] new test case gcc.dg/strlenopt-73.c fails
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91449
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91449
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91449
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Wed Aug 14 22:26:40 2019
New Revision: 274495
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274495=gcc=rev
Log:
PR testsuite/91449 - new test case gcc.dg/strlenopt-73.c fails on powerpc64
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90947
--- Comment #10 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Wed Aug 14 20:36:46 2019
New Revision: 274494
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274494=gcc=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
2019-08-01 Martin Sebor
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91294
--- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Wed Aug 14 20:36:46 2019
New Revision: 274494
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274494=gcc=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
2019-08-01 Martin Sebor
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91450
Bug ID: 91450
Summary: __builtin_mul_overflow(A,B,R) wrong code if product <
0, *R is unsigned, and !(A)
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80454
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91448
--- Comment #1 from John David Anglin ---
I also see the following fails:
FAIL: g++.dg/warn/Warray-bounds-4.C -std=gnu++98 (test for warnings, line 25)
FAIL: g++.dg/warn/Warray-bounds-4.C -std=gnu++98 (test for excess errors)
FAIL:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91448
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91419
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91091
Bug 91091 depends on bug 91419, which changed state.
Bug 91419 Summary: [10 Regression]: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr91091-2.c, ssa-fre-61.c,
ssa-fre-61.c with r273232
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91419
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90393
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90947
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91452
Bug ID: 91452
Summary: tls_preserve_1.c fails with -O3 -fpic
-march=armv8.2-a+sve
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91436
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed Aug 14 19:52:58 2019
New Revision: 274492
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274492=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/91436 fix C++ dialect for std::make_unique fix-it hint
The
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91447
Bug ID: 91447
Summary: FAIL: g++.dg/ipa/ipa-icf-4.C -std=gnu++98
scan-ipa-dump icf "(Unified; Variable alias has been
created)|(Symbol aliases are not supported by target)"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91436
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed Aug 14 20:10:00 2019
New Revision: 274493
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274493=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/91436 fix C++ dialect for std::make_unique fix-it hint
The
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91448
Bug ID: 91448
Summary: FAIL: g++.dg/opt/flifetime-dse2.C -std=gnu++98
execution test
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91438
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #5)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #4)
> > Is this related to PR 91404?
>
> Maybe. The stack trace is different, so maybe a different story. I'll check
> it.
It's
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90706
--- Comment #3 from Berni ---
There is no improvement with gcc 9.2.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91440
--- Comment #3 from R Copley ---
Yes, I'll try and bisect.
Apologies for my confusion: ASLR is enabled in the 9.2 binaries and not in the
9.1 binaries (see below).
This change isn't explicit in the MSYS2 PKGBUILD change[1] going from 9.1 to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89832
--- Comment #9 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Wed Aug 14 08:47:11 2019
New Revision: 274426
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274426=gcc=rev
Log:
Libsanitizer merge from trunk r368656.
2019-08-14 Martin Liska
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91441
--- Comment #1 from Kito Cheng ---
Confirmed, a hot fix here, will send to gcc-patch after test.
diff --git a/gcc/toplev.c b/gcc/toplev.c
index 7e0b9216dea..5dd5b66b89c 100644
--- a/gcc/toplev.c
+++ b/gcc/toplev.c
@@ -1744,20 +1744,12 @@
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91325
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Wed Aug 14 08:47:11 2019
New Revision: 274426
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274426=gcc=rev
Log:
Libsanitizer merge from trunk r368656.
2019-08-14 Martin Liska
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91440
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |pch
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91421
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to rsand...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #5)
> Fixed on trunk (I hope).
Yes, I can confirm that. Thanks for the patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91419
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Aug 14 09:38:15 2019
New Revision: 27
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=27=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-08-14 Richard Biener
PR testsuite/91419
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42122
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2009-12-17 05:41:16 |2019-8-14
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42122
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91390
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40976
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||valera.veryazov at teokem dot
lu.s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68401
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91439
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91439
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
We rewrite:
main (int argc, char * * argv)
{
int D.2275;
int _3;
:
f ();
into:
main (int argc, char * * argv)
{
int argc;
int D.2275;
int _3;
:
argc = argc_4(D);
:
f ();
when I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91443
Bug ID: 91443
Summary: -Wargument-mismatch does not catch mismatch for global
procedure
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91439
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91445
Bug ID: 91445
Summary: After memset, logical && operator produces false
result, optimization level >=O1
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91445
--- Comment #1 from Ryan Frishberg ---
Created attachment 46708
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46708=edit
test1.cpp
Test case #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91445
--- Comment #2 from Ryan Frishberg ---
Created attachment 46709
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46709=edit
test2.cpp
Test case #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91445
--- Comment #3 from Ryan Frishberg ---
Created attachment 46710
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46710=edit
test1.ii
Test case #1 pre-processed file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91445
--- Comment #4 from Ryan Frishberg ---
Created attachment 46711
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46711=edit
test2.ii
Test case #2 pre-processed file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91443
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91391
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91430
--- Comment #2 from Vladimir Makarov ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1)
> Fixed on trunk with r273357, thus probably a dup of PR91102.
> Vladimir?
Yes, it is definitely a dup.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91391
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Wed Aug 14 14:44:55 2019
New Revision: 274483
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274483=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/91391 - bogus -Wcomma-subscript warning.
* parser.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91444
Bug ID: 91444
Summary: [10 regression] Many ICEs starting with 274404
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91445
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91445
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91444
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91440
--- Comment #5 from R Copley ---
> But is probably the reason for the failures... mingw might not implement
> the necessary relocation support for ASLR.
Yes, I think that's it. (I should have said so more explicitly.)
> You can try enable it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91446
Bug ID: 91446
Summary: Wrong cost for scalar_load/scalar_store of vector type
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91294
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Wed Aug 14 16:27:59 2019
New Revision: 274486
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274486=gcc=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/91294 - [10 Regression] wrong strlen result of a
conditional
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86581
Ted Lyngmo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ted at lyncon dot se
--- Comment #2 from
90 matches
Mail list logo
