[Bug c/92478] [8 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92478 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libgomp/92305] [10 regression] libgomp.fortran/use_device_addr-1.f90 fails starting with r277606

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92305 --- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus --- (In reply to Thomas Schwinge from comment #6) > On powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu I can reproduce it on a powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu w/o real offloading. It fails here for subroutine

[Bug fortran/92470] CFI_address wrongly assumes that lower bounds are at zero – invalid for pointers + allocatables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92470 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/92477] [[nodiscard]] method in a decltype expression causes "warning: ignoring return value of"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92477 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug sanitizer/92474] Sanitizer breaks tail-recursion optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92474 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- No, feel free to file it.

[Bug tree-optimization/92452] [10 Regression] ICE in vrp_prop::check_array_ref at tree-vrp.c:4153

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92452 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Nov 12 08:21:40 2019 New Revision: 278080 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278080=gcc=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/92452 * tree-vrp.c

[Bug target/92449] [10 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2311

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92449 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Nov 12 08:22:29 2019 New Revision: 278081 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278081=gcc=rev Log: PR target/92449 * tree-complex.c (expand_complex_multiplication):

[Bug testsuite/92464] [10 regression] r278033 breaks gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-vect-76b.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92464 Kewen Lin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/92452] [10 Regression] ICE in vrp_prop::check_array_ref at tree-vrp.c:4153

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92452 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/92470] New: CFI_address wrongly assumes that lower bounds are at zero – invalid for pointers + allocatables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92470 Bug ID: 92470 Summary: CFI_address wrongly assumes that lower bounds are at zero – invalid for pointers + allocatables Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/92470] CFI_address wrongly assumes that lower bounds are at zero – invalid for pointers + allocatables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92470 --- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus --- Created attachment 47215 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47215=edit Lightly tested patch

[Bug tree-optimization/92461] [10 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed (error: excess use operand for statement)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92461 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/92460] [10 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed (error: definition in block 13 does not dominate use in block 22)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92460 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug target/92462] [arm32] -ftree-pre makes a variable to be wrongly hoisted out

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92462 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/92464] [10 regression] r278033 breaks gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-vect-76b.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92464 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.0

[Bug target/92465] [10 regression] r278034 breaks gcc.dg/pr47763.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92465 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Component|other |target Target Milestone|---

[Bug fortran/83118] [7/8/9/10 Regression] Bad intrinsic assignment of class(*) array component of derived type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83118 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/92469] [9/10 Regression] ICE: output_operand: invalid use of register 'frame'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92469 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.3

[Bug ipa/92471] New: [ICE] segmentation fault in ipa-profile.c ipa_get_cs_argument_count (args=0x0)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92471 Bug ID: 92471 Summary: [ICE] segmentation fault in ipa-profile.c ipa_get_cs_argument_count (args=0x0) Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c/92487] case label error when label is made from character of C string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92487 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- >So this is some GNU extension, but why GCC doesn't support it? Because it was undocumented one which was removed a long time ago.

[Bug target/92488] New: GCC generates to calls to __dpd_trunctdsd2 with -mhard-dfp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92488 Bug ID: 92488 Summary: GCC generates to calls to __dpd_trunctdsd2 with -mhard-dfp Product: gcc Version: 9.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug ipa/92454] [10 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in identify_dead_nodes)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92454 --- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka --- > I've bootstrapped the patch and am going to commit it. Thanks, in meanwhile I bootstrapped it too :)

[Bug c/89408] No constant folding when dereferencing string literals

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89408 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||SztfG at yandex dot ru --- Comment #4

[Bug fortran/92369] ICE in wide_int_to_tree_1, at tree.c:1569

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92369 --- Comment #1 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- This looks pretty much like a duplicate of PR84007.

[Bug libgomp/92305] [10 regression] libgomp.fortran/use_device_addr-1.f90 fails starting with r277606

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92305 --- Comment #14 from Tobias Burnus --- If the actual argument is itself optional but without value attribute, gfc_conv_expr_present returns a 'logical_type_node' (default-integer size, typically 4 bytes type) instead of a boolean_type_node (1

[Bug target/92465] [10 regression] r278034 breaks gcc.dg/pr47763.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92465 --- Comment #1 from Segher Boessenkool --- -funroll-loops no longer implies -fweb and -frename-registers, for powerpc, since those options hurt performance and never seem to help. The testcase can be fixed by simply explicitly passing -fweb?

[Bug target/92465] [10 regression] r278034 breaks gcc.dg/pr47763.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92465 --- Comment #2 from Jiu Fu Guo --- Author: guojiufu Date: Wed Nov 13 05:04:22 2019 New Revision: 278112 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278112=gcc=rev Log: Add option -fweb for pr47763.c This case is testing 'web' on ignore naked

[Bug testsuite/92464] [10 regression] r278033 breaks gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-vect-76b.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92464 --- Comment #3 from Kewen Lin --- (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #2) > What is the testcase testing? Whether we can properly vectorize this > code, right? And for p7 we now do it correctly, but thought it was > too expensive

[Bug c/92487] case label error when label is made from character of C string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92487 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ada/92489] New: GNAT Bug for Invalid_Value Attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92489 Bug ID: 92489 Summary: GNAT Bug for Invalid_Value Attribute Product: gcc Version: 9.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: ada

[Bug ada/92489] GNAT Bug for Invalid_Value Attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92489 --- Comment #1 from kunalsareen at posteo dot org --- Created attachment 47229 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47229=edit Debug log using -gnatd.n switch

[Bug c++/92490] New: ’std::stringstream‘ will let the program exit directly and report exit code 127

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92490 Bug ID: 92490 Summary: ’std::stringstream‘ will let the program exit directly and report exit code 127 Product: gcc Version: 9.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug testsuite/92464] [10 regression] r278033 breaks gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-vect-76b.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92464 --- Comment #4 from Kewen Lin --- By the way, if I removed the check_vect and result verification code, the vectorized version perform very slightly better than non-vectorized version. And yes, I think it was a bit off before.

[Bug c/92487] case label error when label is made from character of C string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92487 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/92491] New: when compile for gfortran on hisilicon Kunpeng920 , it reports error and terminate the compilation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92491 Bug ID: 92491 Summary: when compile for gfortran on hisilicon Kunpeng920 , it reports error and terminate the compilation Product: gcc Version: 9.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/92491] when compile for gfortran on hisilicon Kunpeng920 , it reports error and terminate the compilation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92491 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/92491] when compile for gfortran on hisilicon Kunpeng920 , it reports error and terminate the compilation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92491 --- Comment #2 from zhaobo at huawei dot com --- I work on the same dir to execute below two commands in sequence. ./configure --enable-checking=release --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran --disable-multilib make; Regards, Bob -邮件原件-

[Bug fortran/92491] when compile for gfortran on hisilicon Kunpeng920 , it reports error and terminate the compilation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92491 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/92491] when compile for gfortran on hisilicon Kunpeng920 , it reports error and terminate the compilation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92491 --- Comment #4 from zhaobo at huawei dot com --- will try it . Currently I manually delete three generated dirs : aarch64*, host* , build* , and recompile the project . It succeeded now . Thanks. Regards, Bob -邮件原件- 发件人: pinskia at

[Bug testsuite/92398] [10 regression] error in update of gcc.target/powerpc/pr72804.c in r277872

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92398 --- Comment #6 from Xiong Hu XS Luo --- Power9 genrates different code than Power8LE is because of reg cost in sched1, r120 from P9 of instruction 8 is a memory instruction while r120 of P8 of instruction 13 is not, which will cause different

[Bug other/91396] Link error when I use -fvtable-verify=std and -static

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91396 --- Comment #6 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to ctice from comment #5) > Author: ctice > Date: Tue Aug 13 16:11:20 2019 > New Revision: 274386 > > URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274386=gcc=rev > Log: > Fix PR other/91396 static linke

[Bug middle-end/92478] [8 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92478 --- Comment #3 from John X --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1) > Started to ICE with r247622, got fixed with r262742. Would the ICE in gcc-8 be fixed?

[Bug fortran/92369] ICE in wide_int_to_tree_1, at tree.c:1569

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92369 Arseny Solokha changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/84007] [OOP] ICE with SAME_TYPE_AS and CLASS(*) entity

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84007 Arseny Solokha changed: What|Removed |Added CC||asolokha at gmx dot com --- Comment #3

[Bug middle-end/92478] [8 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92478 --- Comment #2 from John X --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1) > Started to ICE with r247622, got fixed with r262742. Thanks~

<    1   2