https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92189
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #2)
> (A) For assumed-shape/assumed-rank arrays, there is trans-decl.c's
> convert_CFI_desc
I wonder if one needs to take care of TREE_THIS_VOLATILE() with any of the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92505
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
cxx_eval_component_reference has:
2967 if (DECL_MUTABLE_P (part))
2968 {
2969 if (!ctx->quiet)
2970 error ("mutable %qD is not usable in a constant expression",
part);
2971
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80938
--- Comment #12 from Arseny Solokha ---
As powerpcspe is no longer relevant and GCC 7 branch is now closed, it's
finally safe to close this PR.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83361
--- Comment #9 from Arseny Solokha ---
Segher, I believe it's finally safe to close this PR.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92505
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92430
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10 Regression] |[9 Regression] Compile-time
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92506
--- Comment #1 from Fabien ---
I can confirm the version, it works with r277978 and breaks with r277979.
See the trace on postgresql buildfarm:
https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_history.pl?nm=moonjelly=HEAD
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92123
--- Comment #12 from Tobias Burnus ---
(all related to gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/ISO_Fortran_binding_15.f90)
I tried - with Paul's attached patch (attachment 47261)
DECL_CONTEXT (gfc_desc) = current_function_decl;
instead of TREE_STATIC -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79636
--- Comment #7 from Arseny Solokha ---
GCC 7 seems to be the last supported branch where this issue could be
reproduced, so this PR can be closed now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92421
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92421
--- Comment #8 from Arseny Solokha ---
Should this PR be closed now?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92442
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
So pubnames has entries like
18 boost::spirit::x3::context [with auto:23 = boost::spirit::x3::
with very long names. There are not many duplicates but some, like
f4000
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92508
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #5)
> I am not sure if this is the same C++ code as the other reduced test case:
>
Maybe it's a bit different. Note I stopped using creduce rename pass as the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92462
--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener ---
I can't find PRE doing anything wrong and on 32bit x86_64 the testcase executes
correctly with GCC 7.3 and GCC 9 (when I add the missing return to
Bar::cmpxchg).
So -ftree-pre, if it triggers a bug,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92508
--- Comment #5 from David Binderman ---
I am not sure if this is the same C++ code as the other reduced test case:
typedef enum { a, b } c;
typedef struct {
c d;
} e;
void f(char());
template class> using g = int;
class h {};
struct i {
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92462
--- Comment #14 from Andrew Pinski ---
Have you tested gcc 7.5.0 that was just released? How about gcc 8.x? Have you
tried that. There has been aliasing bugs in gcc before and this might already
been fixed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92462
Aleksei Voitylov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92508
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 47263
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47263=edit
Reduced test-case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85323
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92123
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The TREE_STATIC looks wrong to me, it will misbehave if the function is called
recursively, or if the function is called several times concurrently (say in
OpenMP).
If the reason for TREE_STATIC is that the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92462
Aleksei Voitylov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #47260|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82123
--- Comment #16 from Vincent Lefèvre ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #15)
> Fixed in GCC 8.
I can still reproduce the bug with:
gcc-8 (Debian 8.3.0-24) 8.3.0
However, I can no longer reproduce it with:
gcc-9 (Debian 9.2.1-19)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92123
--- Comment #10 from Paul Thomas ---
Created attachment 47261
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47261=edit
A better fix
Hi Jakub and Tobias,
It turns out that the TREE_STATIC is only required for the gfc descriptor and
not
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92508
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92462
Aleksei Voitylov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #47212|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92508
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80491
--- Comment #17 from Vincent Lefèvre ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #12)
> Fixed on the trunk.
I tested with
gcc (Debian 20191008-1) 10.0.0 20191008 (experimental) [trunk revision 276697]
and the bug still occurs. Maybe another
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92508
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81426
--- Comment #10 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #9)
> Unfortunately, there's no simple fix for it that I know of. You can try to
> use the new register allocator with the option -mlra on a selective basis,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80491
--- Comment #16 from Vincent Lefèvre ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #14)
> Fixed for GCC 8.
With gcc-8 (Debian 8.3.0-24) 8.3.0, it is not fixed (OK with -O1, not with
-O3). And there does not seem to be a reference to this bug in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92508
--- Comment #1 from David Binderman ---
The bug first seems to occur sometime between revision 278150 and 278200.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92507
--- Comment #2 from David Brown ---
I am aware that "n" here is not a constant integer expression - it should not
need to be for a compiler warning. What the compiler needs in order to
eliminate the false positive is a knowledge of the ranges
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92504
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Slightly more valid testcase:
struct A { void foo (); A (); A (const A &); A & operator++ (); int a; };
void
bar ()
{
A a;
#pragma omp for
for (auto b = a; b != a.foo; ++b)
;
}
I believe the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92508
Bug ID: 92508
Summary: ice in do_estimate_edge_time, at
ipa-inline-analysis.c:223
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92504
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|9.2.1 |10.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92507
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
So there are two things here. First -Wsign-compare does not understand flow
control at all so it only looks at the statement/expression at hand (i < n).
Second n is not a constant integer expression in C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77435
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|7.2 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86329
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|7.4 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79241
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|7.0 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83818
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|7.4 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91396
--- Comment #9 from niva at niisi dot msk.ru ---
I have built gcc-9.2.0 with --enable-vtable-verify for x86_64 under Fedora 22
with the correction
https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revision=274386
Linking with -fvtable-verify and -static is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64089
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|7.4 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91891
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91137
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56456
Bug 56456 depends on bug 90758, which changed state.
Bug 90758 Summary: [7 Regression] spurious -Warray-bounds with -O3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90758
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90758
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90055
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|7.5 |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90055
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163
Bug 26163 depends on bug 90018, which changed state.
Bug 90018 Summary: [7 Regression] r265453 miscompiled 527.cam4_r in SPEC CPU
2017
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90018
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90018
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88419
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88528
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88235
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88198
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88066
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87828
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87436
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56456
Bug 56456 depends on bug 87072, which changed state.
Bug 87072 Summary: [7 Regression] g++6.2.0 false warning: array subscript is
above array bounds, with misleading line number
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87072
What
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87072
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86617
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86274
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85627
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85356
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85264
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85242
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85240
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85227
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85136
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85214
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85135
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84680
Vegard Nossum changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vegard.nossum at oracle dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85133
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 85133, which changed state.
Bug 85133 Summary: [7 Regression] [concepts] ICE with invalid concept used in
variadic template
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85133
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85108
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89180
Bug 89180 depends on bug 85108, which changed state.
Bug 85108 Summary: [7 Regression] Incorrect warning for constexpr lambda with
-Wunused-but-set-variable
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85108
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85093
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85062
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85027
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85030
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84985
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 84979, which changed state.
Bug 84979 Summary: [7 Regression] ICE with auto as template parameter and
-fconcepts
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84979
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84979
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84942
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84972
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84827
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84792
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84820
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84789
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84768
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84720
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84729
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84724
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84683
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84682
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84676
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85099
Bug 85099 depends on bug 84659, which changed state.
Bug 84659 Summary: [7 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (stack overflow in
bb_note) w/ selective scheduling
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84659
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84659
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84647
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84611
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84630
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
101 - 200 of 631 matches
Mail list logo