[Bug target/93738] [9/10 regression] test case gcc.target/powerpc/20050603-3.c fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93738 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Target

[Bug target/93619] aarch64 target testsuite is so broken with -mcpu=*

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93619 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- The target (non-testsuite) part is located at: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2020-02/msg00837.html

[Bug fortran/92587] Compiler is unable to generate finalization wrapper

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92587 --- Comment #5 from DIL --- If this helps, the gcc/gfortran svn repository from 17 Jan 2019 already had this regression bug while gcc/gfortran 8.2.0 did not. Hopefully this may help shorten the length of bisection.

[Bug rtl-optimization/66552] Missed optimization when shift amount is result of signed modulus

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66552 --- Comment #13 from Li Jia He --- In this optimization we assume n is either positive or divisible by the nth power of 2. So the result of the % is non-negative. However, it is not reasonable for translating (a % 32)) to (a & 31). If a is

[Bug target/93619] aarch64 target testsuite is so broken with -mcpu=*

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93619 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/93696] AVX512VPOPCNTDQ writemask intrinsics produce incorrect results

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93696 Hongtao.liu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/93675] Starship operator on a hidden friend operator does not work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93675 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/92906] [10 regression] FAIL: libstdc++-abi/abi_check

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92906 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:994e0ad41529f5518fd013474a657968807d9ca5 commit r10-6630-g994e0ad41529f5518fd013474a657968807d9ca5 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug middle-end/61577] [4.9.0 Regression] can't compile on hp-ux v3 ia64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577 --- Comment #176 from Peter Bisroev --- (In reply to dave.anglin from comment #174) > On 2020-02-13 2:44 p.m., dave.anglin at bell dot net wrote: > > The first thing to note is aCC doesn't use weak.  Instead, it uses COMDAT > > sections. 

[Bug middle-end/61577] [4.9.0 Regression] can't compile on hp-ux v3 ia64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577 --- Comment #175 from Peter Bisroev --- (In reply to dave.anglin from comment #173) > On 2020-02-13 1:11 p.m., peter.bisroev at groundlabs dot com wrote: > > If I try to compare this to aCC dump in attachment 47840 [details], I do > > not see

[Bug middle-end/93505] [8 Regression] wrong code or ICE with __builtin_bswap64() and rotation at -Og

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93505 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug target/93418] [9 Regression] GCC incorrectly constant propagates _mm_sllv/srlv/srav

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93418 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/93402] [8 Regression] Wrong code when returning padded struct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93402 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9 Regression] Wrong code |[8 Regression] Wrong code

[Bug target/93637] [9 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in force_operand)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93637 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/93576] [8 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (in gimplify.c)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93576 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9/10 Regression] |[8 Regression] internal

[Bug middle-end/93576] [8/9/10 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (in gimplify.c)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93576 --- Comment #10 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7276dd4c7480dd952f0d4a9322ca04ca29f5126f commit r9-8227-g7276dd4c7480dd952f0d4a9322ca04ca29f5126f Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/93673] Fake error given by gcc when compiling for _kshift intrinsics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93673 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:488a947b2ddd57a6f44a6aecc32862f8cbf4ec77 commit r9-8225-g488a947b2ddd57a6f44a6aecc32862f8cbf4ec77 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/93670] ICE for _mm256_extractf32x4_ps (unrecognized insn)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93670 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:20ac13c895c5abe7a350de0b664abf190aa28a16 commit r9-8224-g20ac13c895c5abe7a350de0b664abf190aa28a16 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/93637] [9 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in force_operand)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93637 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b7cbce7a174292adc7c9d6db81bba6922a591d69 commit r9-8223-gb7cbce7a174292adc7c9d6db81bba6922a591d69 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/65782] Assembly failure (invalid register for .seh_savexmm) with -O3 -mavx512f on mingw-w64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65782 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a91e5d88970c8d865a49f2a4ed4e17ee2c58b73f commit r9-8222-ga91e5d88970c8d865a49f2a4ed4e17ee2c58b73f Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/93696] AVX512VPOPCNTDQ writemask intrinsics produce incorrect results

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93696 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:08cf145f991327d943d785066709f5f39d20bd85 commit r9-8226-g08cf145f991327d943d785066709f5f39d20bd85 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug libgomp/93515] OpenMP target teams distribute parallel for with defaultmap not mapping correctly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93515 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d3266b1311723841ec553277f1fb6bfddef8809d commit r9-8220-gd3266b1311723841ec553277f1fb6bfddef8809d Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c++/93557] __builtin_convertvector doesn't mark input as used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93557 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:520b364da0b20dcb492229757190cc3f30322052 commit r9-8219-g520b364da0b20dcb492229757190cc3f30322052 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug libgomp/93515] OpenMP target teams distribute parallel for with defaultmap not mapping correctly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93515 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:05fa0de35ec63db2c3aacd30cc34a7389b3c4e5d commit r9-8221-g05fa0de35ec63db2c3aacd30cc34a7389b3c4e5d Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug middle-end/93505] [8/9 Regression] wrong code or ICE with __builtin_bswap64() and rotation at -Og

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93505 --- Comment #19 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:329475795c6eeaa2b122672091c9119b9d6c5564 commit r9-8217-g329475795c6eeaa2b122672091c9119b9d6c5564 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug middle-end/93555] ICE in simd_clone_struct_copy, at omp-simd-clone.c:84

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93555 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d42f9eaa3e189d4228a4b3a63d02b83fed6385e7 commit r9-8218-gd42f9eaa3e189d4228a4b3a63d02b83fed6385e7 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c++/91118] ubsan does not work with openmp default (none) directive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91118 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4b124e3c9c35121969cc23d0aea4bcb2c406fd21 commit r9-8216-g4b124e3c9c35121969cc23d0aea4bcb2c406fd21 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug fortran/93463] ICE in oacc_code_to_statement, at fortran/openmp.c:6007

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93463 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:244f4b8c2823531a1e479a3773272af539dda258 commit r9-8215-g244f4b8c2823531a1e479a3773272af539dda258 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug rtl-optimization/93402] [8/9 Regression] Wrong code when returning padded struct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93402 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3b2fbe3e723b20ea9089e5f45c55b79feb37085b commit r9-8213-g3b2fbe3e723b20ea9089e5f45c55b79feb37085b Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/93418] [9 Regression] GCC incorrectly constant propagates _mm_sllv/srlv/srav

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93418 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:764e831291a2e510978ca7be0bffb55589a5a0b6 commit r9-8214-g764e831291a2e510978ca7be0bffb55589a5a0b6 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug middle-end/61577] [4.9.0 Regression] can't compile on hp-ux v3 ia64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577 --- Comment #174 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2020-02-13 2:44 p.m., dave.anglin at bell dot net wrote: > The first thing to note is aCC doesn't use weak.  Instead, it uses COMDAT > sections.  Probably, HP ld does support > weak but

[Bug rtl-optimization/93565] [9/10 regression] Combine duplicates instructions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93565 --- Comment #21 from Segher Boessenkool --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #20) > (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #18) > > Created attachment 47841 [details] > > Patch to treat sign_extend as is_just_move > > Do you think

[Bug rtl-optimization/93565] [9/10 regression] Combine duplicates instructions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93565 --- Comment #20 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #18) > Created attachment 47841 [details] > Patch to treat sign_extend as is_just_move Do you think zero_extend should maybe be treated as such too? What about

[Bug rtl-optimization/93565] [9/10 regression] Combine duplicates instructions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93565 --- Comment #19 from Segher Boessenkool --- With that above patch, I get (T0 is original, T2 is with patch, these are file sizes of a Linux build, mostly defconfig): T0T2 alpha 6049096 100.020% arc

[Bug rtl-optimization/93565] [9/10 regression] Combine duplicates instructions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93565 --- Comment #18 from Segher Boessenkool --- Created attachment 47841 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47841=edit Patch to treat sign_extend as is_just_move

[Bug c++/93713] [10 Regression] ICE in equivalently_constrained, at cp/constraint.cc:2949

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93713 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/93643] [10 Regression] Static function pointer inside inline function with "C" linkage is not mangled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93643 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:abc79c6498a99e9c39e6056f432796c6dde3a887 commit r10-6628-gabc79c6498a99e9c39e6056f432796c6dde3a887 Author: Jason Merrill Date:

[Bug c++/91476] [9/10 Regression] const reference variables sharing the same name in two anonymous namespaces cause a multiple definition error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91476 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:abc79c6498a99e9c39e6056f432796c6dde3a887 commit r10-6628-gabc79c6498a99e9c39e6056f432796c6dde3a887 Author: Jason Merrill Date:

[Bug c++/93713] [10 Regression] ICE in equivalently_constrained, at cp/constraint.cc:2949

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93713 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9a0c4f5b373e236cb4af5491f50862d41fd8775a commit r10-6629-g9a0c4f5b373e236cb4af5491f50862d41fd8775a Author: Jason Merrill Date:

[Bug c++/93643] [10 Regression] Static function pointer inside inline function with "C" linkage is not mangled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93643 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/93737] inline memmove for insertion into small arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93737 --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor --- I was thinking for small N, the middle-end could make it work by emitting copies of the sequences using MEM_REFs, along these lines: char _2[N - 2]; _2 = MEM [(char * {ref-all}) + 1]; MEM [(char *

[Bug target/90262] Inline small constant memmoves

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90262 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target||aarch64-linux-gnu

[Bug target/93737] inline memmove for insertion into small arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93737 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Sdee the thread starting at: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-09/msg01618.html Continued at: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-10/msg00277.html This infastructure patch was committed October 2,

[Bug sanitizer/93731] [10 regression] asan tests cause kernel panic on Darwin 11

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93731 --- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #3) > These systems are EOL so we can't expect any fixes to the systems themselves. > > The question is "is the latest imported as an version even supposed to > support

[Bug c++/90515] g++ ignores [[deprecated("text")]] in some template specialisations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90515 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug c++/93228] [[deprecated("message")]] on template struct/class drops message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93228 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c++/68061] Can't use [[deprecated]] with requires clause

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68061 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid

[Bug c++/92572] Vague linkage does not work reliably when a matching segment is in a dynamically linked libarary on Linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92572 --- Comment #7 from Walt Karas --- I see this problem running in a Docker container on a MacBook. When I try it on the Mac (clang, Darwin kernel), the output is 2.

[Bug middle-end/93576] [8/9/10 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (in gimplify.c)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93576 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bacdd5e978dad84e9c547b0d5c7fed14b8d75157 commit r10-6625-gbacdd5e978dad84e9c547b0d5c7fed14b8d75157 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug target/93738] [8/9 regression] test case gcc.target/powerpc/20050603-3.c fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93738 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target||powerpc64-linux-gnu

[Bug target/93738] New: [8/9 regression] test case gcc.target/powerpc/20050603-3.c fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93738 Bug ID: 93738 Summary: [8/9 regression] test case gcc.target/powerpc/20050603-3.c fails Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/61577] [4.9.0 Regression] can't compile on hp-ux v3 ia64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577 --- Comment #173 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2020-02-13 1:11 p.m., peter.bisroev at groundlabs dot com wrote: > If I try to compare this to aCC dump in attachment 47840, I do not see any > calls to weak. Equivalent section to the

[Bug fortran/93736] Add .f18 and .F18 file suffixes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93736 --- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl --- On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 05:59:18PM +, thenlich at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > --- Comment #4 from Thomas Henlich --- > Additionally, we could also imply -std=f2018 with the .f18/.F18 suffix. That > would

[Bug middle-end/61577] [4.9.0 Regression] can't compile on hp-ux v3 ia64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577 --- Comment #172 from Peter Bisroev --- Hi Dave, (In reply to dave.anglin from comment #168) > There seems to be something broken regarding stub insertion for calls to > weak functions. Are we > using the correct branch form for calls to weak?

[Bug middle-end/61577] [4.9.0 Regression] can't compile on hp-ux v3 ia64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577 --- Comment #171 from Peter Bisroev --- Comment on attachment 47839 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47839 GCC 4.9.4 gimple-expr.c dump (aCC) Obsoleted by attachment 47840 as in this attachment inlining with aCC was not

[Bug middle-end/61577] [4.9.0 Regression] can't compile on hp-ux v3 ia64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577 Peter Bisroev changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #47839|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug fortran/93736] Add .f18 and .F18 file suffixes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93736 Thomas Henlich changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Henlich

[Bug c/93572] [8/9/10 Regression] internal compiler error: q from h referenced in main

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93572 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/93573] [8/9/10 Regression] internal compiler error: in force_constant_size, at gimplify.c:733

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93573 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/93736] Add .f18 and .F18 file suffixes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93736 --- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl --- On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 04:40:08PM +, thenlich at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93736 > > --- Comment #2 from Thomas Henlich --- > I don't know why the Fortran

[Bug tree-optimization/93737] inline memmove for insertion into small arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93737 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization See Also|

[Bug tree-optimization/93737] New: inline memmove for insertion into small arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93737 Bug ID: 93737 Summary: inline memmove for insertion into small arrays Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug sanitizer/93731] [10 regression] asan tests cause kernel panic on Darwin 11

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93731 --- Comment #3 from Iain Sandoe --- These systems are EOL so we can't expect any fixes to the systems themselves. The question is "is the latest imported as an version even supposed to support 10.7"? I have a patch to unsupport the sanitiser

[Bug fortran/93678] ICE in 9.2/9.2.1 not happening in previous gfortran versions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93678 --- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl --- On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 03:46:17PM +, mail.luis at web dot de wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93678 > > --- Comment #3 from Luis Kornblueh --- > Thanks @kargl for simplifing my

[Bug middle-end/61577] [4.9.0 Regression] can't compile on hp-ux v3 ia64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577 Peter Bisroev changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #47829|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug fortran/93736] Add .f18 and .F18 file suffixes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93736 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Henlich --- I don't know why the Fortran compiler doesn't treat all files as free-form Fortran source files, unless they have a known extension indicating otherwise.

[Bug c++/93713] [10 Regression] ICE in equivalently_constrained, at cp/constraint.cc:2949

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93713 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/93734] [8/9/10 Regression] Invalid code generated with -O2 -march=haswell -ftree-vectorize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93734 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug fortran/93678] ICE in 9.2/9.2.1 not happening in previous gfortran versions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93678 --- Comment #3 from Luis Kornblueh --- Thanks @kargl for simplifing my still very long case. However, a bug has been introduced in this version. The nested transfers cannot be split into two as the result of the first transfer is not a

[Bug fortran/93678] ICE in 9.2/9.2.1 not happening in previous gfortran versions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93678 --- Comment #2 from Luis Kornblueh --- Created attachment 47838 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47838=edit New testcase

[Bug c++/93643] [10 Regression] Static function pointer inside inline function with "C" linkage is not mangled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93643 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug fortran/93736] Add .f18 and .F18 file suffixes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93736 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/93736] New: Add .f18 and .F18 file suffixes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93736 Bug ID: 93736 Summary: Add .f18 and .F18 file suffixes Product: gcc Version: 9.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug c++/93705] [C++2a] Non-type literal class template-parameter types with mutable data members should not be allowed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93705 Kevin Hartman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/93734] [8/9/10 Regression] Invalid code generated with -O2 -march=haswell -ftree-vectorize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93734 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug tree-optimization/93734] [8/9/10 Regression] Invalid code generated with -O2 -march=haswell -ftree-vectorize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93734 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needs-bisection Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/93734] [8/9/10 Regression] Invalid code generated with -O2 -march=haswell -ftree-vectorize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93734 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-*-* Priority|P3

[Bug gcov-profile/93735] New: [GCOV] incorrect coverage for calling variable arguments function with incremental expression in its parameter list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93735 Bug ID: 93735 Summary: [GCOV] incorrect coverage for calling variable arguments function with incremental expression in its parameter list Product: gcc Version:

[Bug fortran/93734] New: Invalid code generated with -O2 -march=haswell -ftree-vectorize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93734 Bug ID: 93734 Summary: Invalid code generated with -O2 -march=haswell -ftree-vectorize Product: gcc Version: 8.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/93656] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr67770.c execution test with -fcf-protection

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93656 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1d69147af203d4dcd2270429f90c93f1a37ddfff commit r10-6622-g1d69147af203d4dcd2270429f90c93f1a37ddfff Author: H.J. Lu Date: Thu Feb 13

[Bug fortran/93714] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in gfc_check_same_strlen, at fortran/check.c:1253

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93714 markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||markeggleston at gcc

[Bug fortran/93733] New: F2008: G0.d output editing for integer/logical/character data

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93733 Bug ID: 93733 Summary: F2008: G0.d output editing for integer/logical/character data Product: gcc Version: 9.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/61577] [4.9.0 Regression] can't compile on hp-ux v3 ia64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577 --- Comment #168 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2020-02-13 12:24 a.m., peter.bisroev at groundlabs dot com wrote: > Tonight I have been trying to find a test case where this problem can be > reproduced with gcc and then compiled with

[Bug middle-end/93576] [8/9/10 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (in gimplify.c)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93576 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug target/93722] rorq is not produced for rotate on some cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93722 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug lto/93609] gcc -flto -fno-comon places symbols into ".text" section

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93609 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||laurent.stacul at gmail dot com ---

[Bug lto/93732] [10 Regression] Incorrect symbol type when activating LTO a compile step

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93732 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug sanitizer/93731] [10 regression] asan tests cause kernel panic on Darwin 11

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93731 --- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- > So you could just disable asan and keep ubsan (set ASAN_SUPPORTED=no in > libsanitizer/configure.tgt for a particular darwin OS version, and if

[Bug inline-asm/93027] ICE: in match_reload, at lra-constraints.c:1060

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93027 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug lto/93732] New: [10 Regression] Incorrect symbol type when activating LTO a compile step

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93732 Bug ID: 93732 Summary: [10 Regression] Incorrect symbol type when activating LTO a compile step Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/93639] [c++2a] Segfault on non type template parameter and consteval (master)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93639 --- Comment #4 from raphael grimm --- Created attachment 47835 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47835=edit reduced to 11 lines and no includes http://coliru.stacked-crooked.com/a/be3bbfdf6a59b45e on g++ (GCC) 9.2.0 output:

[Bug sanitizer/93731] [10 regression] asan tests cause kernel panic on Darwin 11

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93731 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- So you could just disable asan and keep ubsan (set ASAN_SUPPORTED=no in libsanitizer/configure.tgt for a particular darwin OS version, and if it is 32-bit only, also test x$ac_cv_sizeof_void_p = x4 ? Of

[Bug rtl-optimization/93730] [Bug] internal compiler error: in make_decl_rtl, at varasm.c:1375

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93730 --- Comment #2 from Akhilesh Kumar --- Working on Arm architecture. I am trying to reproduce the same with sample test case

[Bug rtl-optimization/93730] [Bug] internal compiler error: in make_decl_rtl, at varasm.c:1375

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93730 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug sanitizer/93731] [10 regression] asan tests cause kernel panic on Darwin 11

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93731 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.0

[Bug fortran/93715] [9/10 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_auto_array_allocation, at fortran/trans-array.c:6320

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93715 markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug sanitizer/93731] New: [10 regression] asan tests cause kernel panic on Darwin 11

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93731 Bug ID: 93731 Summary: [10 regression] asan tests cause kernel panic on Darwin 11 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/93667] [10 regression] ICE in esra with nested [[no_unique_address]] field

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93667 --- Comment #5 from Martin Jambor --- It is easy to prevent the ICE with the following, which prevents total scalarization from happening. However, if someone marked a field with such an attribute, the encompassing structure perhaps should be

[Bug c++/93093] __builtin_source_location reports values for default arguments not aligned with the Standard

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93093 --- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill --- This is https://github.com/cplusplus/nbballot/issues/167 In CWG today we decided that since this is all compiler magic anyway, we can be a bit more magical to get around this problematic interaction with

[Bug rtl-optimization/93730] New: [Bug] internal compiler error: in make_decl_rtl, at varasm.c:1375

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93730 Bug ID: 93730 Summary: [Bug] internal compiler error: in make_decl_rtl, at varasm.c:1375 Product: gcc Version: 9.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

  1   2   >