https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93093
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Jason, do you think the current spec is clear enough on when the consteval
evaluation of default arguments ought to happen (and does our implementation
match that), or does it need clarification?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93481
Frederik Harwath changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93093
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93388
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asolokha at gmx dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93674
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #4)
> I can't reproduce this with GCC 9, only 8.
Sorry, I was using -fsanitize=undefined, which prevented the miscompilation for
gcc 9.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93722
--- Comment #1 from Uroš Bizjak ---
But, x86 doesn't have 128bit rotate.
For:
void f0 (unsigned int *a)
{
unsigned long t0 = ((unsigned long *)a)[0];
unsigned long t1 = t0 >> sizeof(unsigned int)*8;
unsigned long t2 = t0 <<
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93696
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ae2b8ede40a81a83f50d1e705972bc46fafd4ce5
commit r10-6617-gae2b8ede40a81a83f50d1e705972bc46fafd4ce5
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93728
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91921
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||loximann at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90374
--- Comment #33 from Thomas Henlich ---
Created attachment 47834
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47834=edit
Proposed fix for test
Proposed test for verifying the correct output after finishing this bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93729
Bug ID: 93729
Summary: [concepts] binding bit-field to lvalue reference in
requires expression should be SFINAE
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93582
--- Comment #25 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8aba425f4ebc5e2c054776d3cdddf13f7c1918f8
commit r10-6614-g8aba425f4ebc5e2c054776d3cdddf13f7c1918f8
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93728
Bug ID: 93728
Summary: First half of warning message suppressed because code
pointed to is in system header
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93727
Bug ID: 93727
Summary: Fortran 2018: EX edit descriptor
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: libfortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93388
--- Comment #11 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #9)
> I'll report back with anything else I find.
154 ice left. They are all in get_lvalue_1. They
are are duplicates of these three:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93726
Bug ID: 93726
Summary: [GCOV] unexecuted functions lead to incorrect code
coverage when it calls a function with a variable
argument
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93721
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Store merging and bswap should be merged - there's PRs for bswap not working
for "stores" (because those are not seeds it works from). And bswap would
need to be enhanced to detect more permutation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93717
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93717
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Guenther :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8ea884b85e338d09b14e6a54043c53ae0c1b1fe9
commit r10-6613-g8ea884b85e338d09b14e6a54043c53ae0c1b1fe9
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93717
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93716
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93714
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93713
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93715
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93709
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Target Milestone|---
101 - 125 of 125 matches
Mail list logo
