[Bug testsuite/94023] [9 regression] gcc.dg/vect/slp-perm-12.c fails starting with r9-5008

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94023 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Component|target |testsuite Target Milestone|---

[Bug fortran/94016] Debug info produced by gfortran contains the wrong path for included files

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94016 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-debug

[Bug tree-optimization/94001] [10 Regression] ICE: in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2435 at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94001 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug debug/94018] gcc generates wrong debug information at -Og

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94018 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/94026] combine missed opportunity to simplify comparisons with zero

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94026 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization --- Comment #1

[Bug middle-end/94004] [8/9/10 Regression] missing -Walloca on calls to alloca due to -Wno-system-headers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94004 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug analyzer/93993] ICE in make_region_for_unexpected_tree_code, at analyzer/region-model.cc:4786

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93993 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/93806] Wrong optimization: instability of floating-point results with -funsafe-math-optimizations leads to nonsense

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93806 --- Comment #39 from Vincent Lefèvre --- So I wonder whether -fno-signed-zeros should be removed. It seems too dangerous. The -ffinite-math-only option is fine because the programmer may be able to prove that Inf and NaN never occur in his code

[Bug middle-end/93465] [10 Regression] ICE in oacc_verify_routine_clauses, at omp-general.c:1802 since r10-471-gb48f44bf77a39fef

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93465 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code |openmp Status|NEW

[Bug middle-end/91623] [8 Regression] -msse4.1 -O3 segfault in /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/8.3.0/include/smmintrin.h:270:10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91623 --- Comment #19 from David Seifert --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #17) > Can't reproduce, compiles without any ICE since the above mentioned commits. > In #c15 you are clearing testing with GCC 9.2.0, but that is expected, the > bug

[Bug bootstrap/93962] [10 regression] bootstrap fails with gcc/value-prof.c:268:28 : error: format '%lld' expects argument of type 'long long int', but argument 3 hastype 'int'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93962 --- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Absolutely.

[Bug bootstrap/93962] [10 regression] bootstrap fails with gcc/value-prof.c:268:28 : error: format '%lld' expects argument of type 'long long int', but argument 3 hastype 'int'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93962 --- Comment #6 from Gerald Pfeifer --- (In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #3) > Gerald, I wanted to reproduce the error so that I could in turn verify the > proposed fix of using std:abs would work. I verified that the fix of using

[Bug debug/93888] Incorrect DW_AT_location generated for copy-constructed function argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93888 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:64ba6d17022eeb65f56f0b141c2640f9ab938f97 commit r10-7014-g64ba6d17022eeb65f56f0b141c2640f9ab938f97 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug fortran/93462] ICE in gfc_trans_omp_atomic, at fortran/trans-openmp.c:3771

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93462 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6352c50d06a8ca0157293ecb0ef1f8a6dc19148a commit r8-10110-g6352c50d06a8ca0157293ecb0ef1f8a6dc19148a Author: Tobias Burnus

[Bug fortran/93462] ICE in gfc_trans_omp_atomic, at fortran/trans-openmp.c:3771

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93462 --- Comment #10 from Thomas Schwinge --- (In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #9) > (In reply to Thomas Schwinge from comment #6) > > Also needed on releases/gcc-8, to avoid introducing a regression, since […] > > "backport: re PR

[Bug target/87560] ICE in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.c:3892

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87560 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by William Schmidt : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0b0908c1f27d12a3cbbd3c9fd55aec1fe87586a6 commit r10-7020-g0b0908c1f27d12a3cbbd3c9fd55aec1fe87586a6 Author: Bill Schmidt Date:

[Bug analyzer/93993] ICE in make_region_for_unexpected_tree_code, at analyzer/region-model.cc:4786

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93993 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e516294a1acb28d44cfd583cc6a80354044e commit r10-7024-ge516294a1acb28d44cfd583cc6a80354044e Author: David Malcolm Date:

[Bug libfortran/93871] COTAN is slow for complex types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93871 --- Comment #38 from Thomas Henlich --- (In reply to Thomas Henlich from comment #37) > It would make sense to keep optimization in mind: > > Several calls to conversions of the same value should be performed only once. > > As a special case:

[Bug c++/93465] [10 Regression] ICE in oacc_verify_routine_clauses, at omp-general.c:1802 since r10-471-gb48f44bf77a39fef

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93465 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Thomas, can I ping on this?

[Bug tree-optimization/24021] VRP does not work with floating points

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24021 --- Comment #3 from Vincent Lefèvre --- But note that the optimization should be modified or disabled in contexts where floating-point exceptions need to be honored, as the i+=0.1f will sometimes trigger the inexact exception.

[Bug c++/58559] Underlying type of enum is hybrid of int and unsigned

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58559 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug analyzer/94028] ICE: in make_region_for_unexpected_tree_code, at analyzer/region-model.cc:4786 with -fanalyzer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94028 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/93949] [8/9/10 Regression] Register const local var will not compile since r0-58166

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93949 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/91623] [8 Regression] -msse4.1 -O3 segfault in /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/8.3.0/include/smmintrin.h:270:10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91623 --- Comment #18 from David Seifert --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #17) > Can't reproduce, compiles without any ICE since the above mentioned commits. > In #c15 you are clearing testing with GCC 9.2.0, but that is expected, the > bug

[Bug libfortran/93871] COTAN is slow for complex types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93871 --- Comment #39 from Steve Kargl --- On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 12:07:18PM +, thenlich at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93871 > > On the other hand side, always folding sind(45...90) to cosd(45...0) and

[Bug rtl-optimization/93159] [10 Regression] ICE (segfault) during RTL pass on arm-linux-gnueabihf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93159 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Ping.

[Bug analyzer/93993] ICE in make_region_for_unexpected_tree_code, at analyzer/region-model.cc:4786

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93993 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3d66e153b40ed000af30a9e569a05f34d5d576aa commit r10-7023-g3d66e153b40ed000af30a9e569a05f34d5d576aa Author: David Malcolm Date:

[Bug analyzer/93950] ICE: in make_region_for_unexpected_tree_code, at analyzer/region-model.cc:4786 with -fanalyzer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93950 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3d66e153b40ed000af30a9e569a05f34d5d576aa commit r10-7023-g3d66e153b40ed000af30a9e569a05f34d5d576aa Author: David Malcolm Date:

[Bug analyzer/93647] ICE in get_lvalue_1, at analyzer/region-model.cc:4613

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93647 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3d66e153b40ed000af30a9e569a05f34d5d576aa commit r10-7023-g3d66e153b40ed000af30a9e569a05f34d5d576aa Author: David Malcolm Date:

[Bug analyzer/93544] ICE in get_lvalue_1, at analyzer/region-model.cc:4613

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93544 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3d66e153b40ed000af30a9e569a05f34d5d576aa commit r10-7023-g3d66e153b40ed000af30a9e569a05f34d5d576aa Author: David Malcolm Date:

[Bug target/91855] [8/9 Regression] OpenJDK Zero VM segfaults on SPARC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91855 John Paul Adrian Glaubitz changed: What|Removed |Added Version|9.2.1 |10.0 --- Comment #10 from

[Bug fortran/93462] ICE in gfc_trans_omp_atomic, at fortran/trans-openmp.c:3771

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93462 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/81690] libgomp.c/{target-32,thread-limit-2}.c fail for nvptx: missing usleep

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81690 --- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus --- (In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #6) > for a busy-wait implementation, which was supposed get rewritten (see next > message in thread) "using declare variant". The missing bit referenced there is:

[Bug target/87560] ICE in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.c:3892

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87560 --- Comment #9 from Bill Schmidt --- I plan to backport the fix to releases/gcc-9 after 9.3 releases.

[Bug fortran/94030] ICE equivalence of an integer and an element of an array of size n

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94030 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/93949] [8/9/10 Regression] Register const local var will not compile since r0-58166

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93949 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a9e9ff7b8a4d10ccf54dd4a641dd55c1b1645e17 commit r8-10111-ga9e9ff7b8a4d10ccf54dd4a641dd55c1b1645e17 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug debug/93888] Incorrect DW_AT_location generated for copy-constructed function argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93888 --- Comment #5 from Mike Gulick --- Thanks Jakub! I can confirm that this fixes the issue for me.

[Bug c++/93314] [8/9/10 Regression] Invalid use of non-static data member causes ICE in gimplify_expr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93314 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6

[Bug testsuite/81690] libgomp.c/{target-32,thread-limit-2}.c fail for nvptx: missing usleep

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81690 --- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus --- Regarding {target-32.c, thread-limit-2.c}, see https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2020-02/msg00422.html for a busy-wait implementation, which was supposed get rewritten (see next message in thread) "using

[Bug middle-end/93399] [8/9/10 Regression] Annotate assembler option failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93399 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug libstdc++/94032] Please provide std::string::__resize_default_init

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94032 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- We'll add it when it's in the draft standard. Adding it before then would either mean only making it available for C++20 mode, or adding it to the shared library exports as a stable ABI artefact. Neither

[Bug tree-optimization/80776] -Wformat-overflow false positive for %d on integer bounded by __builtin_unreachable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80776 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2017-05-16 00:00:00 |2020-3-4 See Also|

[Bug c++/92601] [9 Regression] error: type variant differs by TYPE_NEEDS_CONSTRUCTING

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92601 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/94021] -Wformat-truncation false positive due to excessive integer range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94021 --- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor --- Since the merge with the sprintf pass, the strlen pass has an instance of EVRP that it passes to sprintf to get range info from (it also uses it itself in places).

[Bug libfortran/93871] COTAN is slow for complex types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93871 --- Comment #42 from Steve Kargl --- On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 04:35:02PM +, thenlich at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93871 > > --- Comment #41 from Thomas Henlich --- > One would assume that fast FMA

[Bug tree-optimization/83733] -Wformat-overflow false positive for %d on bounded integer when inlining

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83733 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c++/90432] [9/10 Regression] Internal compiler error with no_unique_address empty type with constructor call followed by value initialized to non-zero

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90432 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug analyzer/94028] ICE: in make_region_for_unexpected_tree_code, at analyzer/region-model.cc:4786 with -fanalyzer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94028 --- Comment #1 from Zdenek Sojka --- I can no longer reproduce this with r10-7026 , seems to be fixed by r10-7023

[Bug c++/94034] New: Broken diagnostic: 'result_decl' not supported by dump_expr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94034 Bug ID: 94034 Summary: Broken diagnostic: 'result_decl' not supported by dump_expr Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/94035] New: Wrong optimization: conditional equivalence vs. values with several representations

./a.out py[8] = 1 py[8] = 0 -- gcc x86-64 version: gcc (GCC) 10.0.1 20200304 (experimental) -- The value 0x1p-16382l admits two representations: 00 00 80 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 pseudo-d

[Bug c++/91993] [8/9/10 Regression] Spurious -Wconversion warning with -fsanitize=undefined since r6-4886-gcda0a029f45d20f4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91993 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug libstdc++/94033] New: is_trivially_copy_constructible<> fails with compiler error on complicated object with private default constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94033 Bug ID: 94033 Summary: is_trivially_copy_constructible<> fails with compiler error on complicated object with private default constructor Product: gcc Version:

[Bug middle-end/94004] [8/9/10 Regression] missing -Walloca on calls to alloca due to -Wno-system-headers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94004 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libfortran/93871] COTAN is slow for complex types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93871 --- Comment #41 from Thomas Henlich --- One would assume that fast FMA (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FMA_instruction_set) is or will be available to the modern Fortran enthusiast, in the year 202x.

[Bug libstdc++/94003] is_constructible seems to have sideeffects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94003 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/36566] Cannot bind packed field

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36566 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug libstdc++/94032] New: Please provide std::string::__resize_default_init

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94032 Bug ID: 94032 Summary: Please provide std::string::__resize_default_init Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug libstdc++/94033] is_trivially_copy_constructible<> fails with compiler error on complicated object with private default constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94033 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- Probably another instance of PR 93983 and PR PR 93923.

[Bug c++/94025] Expected-to-fail compilation goes through by not detecting mutable-specifier on lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94025 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/91953] [8 Regression] G++ rejects lambda with constexpr variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91953 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9 Regression] G++|[8 Regression] G++ rejects

[Bug inline-asm/93981] No EH information generated for asm statements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93981 --- Comment #15 from jwjagersma at gmail dot com --- Created attachment 47970 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47970=edit alternative patch v3 Alternative to last patch. Inserts the debug stmt across the fallthrough edge. Let

[Bug testsuite/94036] New: [9 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr72804.c fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94036 Bug ID: 94036 Summary: [9 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr72804.c fails Product: gcc Version: 9.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/91993] [8/9/10 Regression] Spurious -Wconversion warning with -fsanitize=undefined since r6-4886-gcda0a029f45d20f4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91993 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 47971 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47971=edit gcc10-pr91993-wip.patch As implemented in this completely untested (so far) patch, which makes the -Wconversion

[Bug libfortran/93871] COTAN is slow for complex types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93871 --- Comment #40 from Thomas Henlich --- Now I get it, symmetry is beautiful: Both sin(x) and cos(x) for any x can always be calculated with one range reduction to 0...45, one call to sincos(), and a sign transfer for each result.

[Bug target/93800] [9/10 Regression] GCC adds unwanted nops to align loops on powerpc 8xx since r9-1623

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93800 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/93962] [10 regression] bootstrap fails with gcc/value-prof.c:268:28 : error: format '%lld' expects argument of type 'long long int', but argument 3 hastype 'int'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93962 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- So do you think you could attach preprocessed sources from both the working and failing builds so that we can look up at the differences?

[Bug middle-end/93806] Wrong optimization: instability of floating-point results with -funsafe-math-optimizations leads to nonsense

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93806 --- Comment #40 from Alexander Cherepanov --- (In reply to Vincent Lefèvre from comment #35) > > You seem to say that either Annex F is fully there or not at all but why? > > -fno-signed-zeros breaks Annex F but only parts of it. Isn't it

[Bug libstdc++/94033] is_trivially_copy_constructible<> fails with compiler error on complicated object with private default constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94033 --- Comment #2 from Avi Kivity --- It does not look similar to 93923. There, there is an incomplete type. In my reproducer the type is complete but the default constructor is private. Note that for simple cases is_trivially_constructible works

[Bug tree-optimization/81401] False positive sprintf warning at O2 (-Wformat-overflow)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81401 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/85741] [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Wformat-overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85741 Bug 85741 depends on bug 81401, which changed state. Bug 81401 Summary: False positive sprintf warning at O2 (-Wformat-overflow) https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81401 What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/81401] False positive sprintf warning at O2 (-Wformat-overflow)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81401 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3ca63e1c76b7693b5d3f5ba2567421defc764249 commit r10-7027-g3ca63e1c76b7693b5d3f5ba2567421defc764249 Author: Martin Sebor Date: Wed

[Bug target/93800] [9/10 Regression] GCC adds unwanted nops to align loops on powerpc 8xx since r9-1623

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93800 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug middle-end/94035] Wrong optimization: conditional equivalence vs. values with several representations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94035 --- Comment #1 from Alexander Cherepanov --- clang bug -- https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45101

[Bug analyzer/94028] ICE: in make_region_for_unexpected_tree_code, at analyzer/region-model.cc:4786 with -fanalyzer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94028 --- Comment #2 from David Malcolm --- Yes, the ICE was fixed by r10-7023-g3d66e153b40ed000af30a9e569a05f34d5d576aa. It's a similar issue to the reproducer for PR analyzer/93993. I'll add your reproducer as a further regression test; thanks.

[Bug c++/91678] [9 Regression] decltype returns wrong type under certain conditions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91678 --- Comment #10 from Marek Polacek --- With this patch GCC 9 ICEs on: $ ./cc1plus -quiet pr87768.C -std=gnu++2a -fconcepts pr87768.C: In instantiation of ‘constexpr const bool c::f’: pr87768.C:14:29: required from here pr87768.C:9:29:

[Bug target/86801] Powerpcspe port (may) need updating for CVE-2017-5753

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86801 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/86772] [meta-bug] tracking port status for CVE-2017-5753

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86772 Bug 86772 depends on bug 86801, which changed state. Bug 86801 Summary: Powerpcspe port (may) need updating for CVE-2017-5753 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86801 What|Removed |Added

[Bug analyzer/94028] ICE: in make_region_for_unexpected_tree_code, at analyzer/region-model.cc:4786 with -fanalyzer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94028 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4ac3eb5c5f157bea22b5ae34b0df254d729dac25 commit r10-7028-g4ac3eb5c5f157bea22b5ae34b0df254d729dac25 Author: David Malcolm Date:

[Bug c++/94039] New: conditional operator fails to use proper overload

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94039 Bug ID: 94039 Summary: conditional operator fails to use proper overload Product: gcc Version: 9.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug analyzer/93993] ICE in make_region_for_unexpected_tree_code, at analyzer/region-model.cc:4786

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93993 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4ac3eb5c5f157bea22b5ae34b0df254d729dac25 commit r10-7028-g4ac3eb5c5f157bea22b5ae34b0df254d729dac25 Author: David Malcolm Date:

[Bug c++/91607] [9 regression] internal compiler error: in equal, at cp/constexpr.c:1088

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91607 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug c++/90938] [9 Regression] Initializing array with {1} works, but not {0}

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90938 --- Comment #14 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Martin Sebor : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1665d97d37559ea7403d5b3e0efd5c5ae416e1ae commit r9-8338-g1665d97d37559ea7403d5b3e0efd5c5ae416e1ae Author: Martin Sebor

[Bug c++/90938] [9 Regression] Initializing array with {1} works, but not {0}

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90938 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/91678] [9 Regression] decltype returns wrong type under certain conditions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91678 --- Comment #12 from Marek Polacek --- It depends on r10-3735-gcb57504a550158913258e5be8ddb991376475efb :/ So, we'd have to play some games with unwrapping the NON_LVALUE_EXPR.

[Bug tree-optimization/82689] merging writes of different types to the same location

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82689 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2017-10-24 00:00:00 |2020-3-4 CC|

[Bug c++/91607] [9 regression] internal compiler error: in equal, at cp/constexpr.c:1088

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91607 --- Comment #13 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e19f06538c51fed54240a4e98277e62daa00d9b3 commit r9-8339-ge19f06538c51fed54240a4e98277e62daa00d9b3 Author: Jason Merrill

[Bug target/90811] [nvptx] ptxas error on OpenMP offloaded code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90811 --- Comment #20 from Kito Cheng --- Created attachment 47972 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47972=edit PR90811-ipa-increase-alignment.patch Hi Jeff: Updated patch attached, tested on riscv32/riscv64, this version take the

[Bug c++/90938] [9/10 Regression] Initializing array with {1} works, but not {0}

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90938 --- Comment #13 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cb2409c60aeff498064346f85165531a3bbead14 commit r10-7034-gcb2409c60aeff498064346f85165531a3bbead14 Author: Martin Sebor Date:

[Bug c/94040] New: [10 Regression] ICE in get_constant, at c-family/c-format.c:325 (error: 'format' attribute argument 2 value '3' refers to parameter type 'int *')

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94040 Bug ID: 94040 Summary: [10 Regression] ICE in get_constant, at c-family/c-format.c:325 (error: 'format' attribute argument 2 value '3' refers to parameter type 'int *')

[Bug c++/94041] New: temporary object destructor called before the end of the full-expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94041 Bug ID: 94041 Summary: temporary object destructor called before the end of the full-expression Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libfortran/93871] COTAN is slow for complex types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93871 --- Comment #43 from Thomas Henlich --- (In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #42) > gfortran currently does not implement IEEE_FMA along > with a few additional IEEE_ARITHMETIC features added > in F2018. > > Note, gcc/builtins.def has fma,

[Bug libstdc++/93978] A snippet using views::join fails to compile with -O1, but succeeds with -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93978 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||94038 --- Comment #1 from Patrick Palka

[Bug middle-end/94004] [8/9/10 Regression] missing -Walloca on calls to alloca due to -Wno-system-headers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94004 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor

[Bug c++/36566] Cannot bind packed field

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36566 --- Comment #13 from Rene Rahn --- (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #12) > (In reply to Rene Rahn from comment #10) > > I know this is quite old now. But can someone explain me why using `#pragma > > pack(push, 1)` does work then? I

[Bug target/37759] powerpc option -mabi=no-spe still generates SPE instructions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37759 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org Target

[Bug middle-end/94035] Wrong optimization: conditional equivalence vs. values with several representations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94035 --- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- I think pseudo-denormals should be considered trap representations.

[Bug c++/90691] [9 regression] -Wsign-compare false-positive with constant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90691 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/93962] [10 regression] bootstrap fails with gcc/value-prof.c:268:28 : error: format '%lld' expects argument of type 'long long int', but argument 3 hastype 'int'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93962 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:20a235a8b443a81ea0ec6a10f260b119f2193a69 commit r10-7032-g20a235a8b443a81ea0ec6a10f260b119f2193a69 Author: Jeff Law Date: Wed Mar 4

[Bug c++/90432] [9/10 Regression] Internal compiler error with no_unique_address empty type with constructor call followed by value initialized to non-zero

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90432 --- Comment #7 from Marek Polacek --- *** Bug 93898 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug gcov-profile/94029] [9/10 Regression] gcc crash in coverage.c:655 since r9-4216-g390e529e2b98983d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94029 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 CC|

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >