https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94118
--- Comment #2 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Frédéric Recoules from comment #0)
> The section 6.47.2.8 x86 Operand Modifiers of
> https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Extended-Asm.html is only about x86.
>
> As it was done for Operand
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91031
--- Comment #5 from Alexey Makhalov ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> In previous versions of gcc, the compound literal was put in the function
> level scope rather than in the current scope. Which is why it worked
> previously.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91031
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Alexey Makhalov from comment #5)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> > In previous versions of gcc, the compound literal was put in the function
> > level scope rather than in the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94978
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.5
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94865
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48559
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I'm inclined to close this as WONTFIX.
The new C++17 algorithms use modern C++ and are standardised. Rather than
maintain our non-standard extension, I'd prefer to deprecate our parallel mode
and tell
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94928
--- Comment #13 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Myron Walker from comment #12)
> What would be helpful then is if gcno, gcda and source files could all have
> separate root file system prefixes.
Can you please describe more the situation?
Is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68989
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#1992 is in C++17,
what's the status of the front end?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94706
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94358
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to Thomas Schwinge from comment #2)
> Tobias, as a first step, can you please provide an exemplary Fortran test
> case that shows some cases of what code the Fortran front end generates to
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57359
--- Comment #32 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:283cb9ea6293e813e48a1b769e1e0779918ea20a
commit r11-161-g283cb9ea6293e813e48a1b769e1e0779918ea20a
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94982
Bug ID: 94982
Summary: '-Wformat-diag' diagnostics building GCC
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
Severity: normal
Priority:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94980
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94864
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94358
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #3)
> And with optional there are additional issues – especially for
> assumed-shape arrays as one has to check 'y == NULL' (argument absent) and
> 'y->data == NULL'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94672
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |burnus at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57359
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94928
--- Comment #14 from Myron Walker ---
There are three types of files used to create a code coverage report. Notes,
Data, and Source. It is likely that each type of file might have its own
prefix GCOV_SRC_PREFIX, GCOV_NOTES_PREFIX and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94981
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab ---
Converting a negative float to an unsigned integer is undefined.
507093816-gb24fc8a692e-checking-yes-rtl-extra-nobootstrap-amd64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 11.0.0 20200507 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94980
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-05-07
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94981
Bug ID: 94981
Summary: Wrong casts on Power machines dealing with fctiwuz
instruction
Product: gcc
Version: 9.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94980
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94842
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9/10 Regression] |[8/9 Regression] internal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94873
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Summary|[8/9/10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94985
Bug ID: 94985
Summary: False-positive -Warray-bounds for char[1] on a
non-zero offset in a referenced buffer
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94942
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94907
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94950
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9/10 regression] ICE in |[8/9 regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94951
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9/10/11 Regression] |[8/9 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94968
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94928
--- Comment #16 from Myron Walker ---
Just seems easier if the tool offers a choice.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94703
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:eb72dc663e9070b281be83a80f6f838a3a878822
commit r11-165-geb72dc663e9070b281be83a80f6f838a3a878822
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94703
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94957
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94946
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fadd59262921825b135b8e018ac8510e97dee92a
commit r9-8577-gfadd59262921825b135b8e018ac8510e97dee92a
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93431
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2020-01-27 00:00:00 |2020-5-7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94981
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
Report the bug to boost then. BOOST is broken and should not depend on
undefined behavior for out of range conversions.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94118
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94118
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||craig.topper at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94977
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94842
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:61fb8963c22d91152a9c46a3512307bef3b3d7f7
commit r10-8109-g61fb8963c22d91152a9c46a3512307bef3b3d7f7
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94942
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1b53c1169a6d0b10d43de0a56aabf7386b67496b
commit r10-8111-g1b53c1169a6d0b10d43de0a56aabf7386b67496b
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94873
--- Comment #22 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8982e39b46b1e4a4b09022ddebd758b77ab73bac
commit r10-8112-g8982e39b46b1e4a4b09022ddebd758b77ab73bac
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94951
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d82414ebcf7716ea24688510594a2c464a105908
commit r10-8115-gd82414ebcf7716ea24688510594a2c464a105908
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94907
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3d4c7e05de438fb0672f376e628c18812eea8982
commit r10-8114-g3d4c7e05de438fb0672f376e628c18812eea8982
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94946
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dd38686d9c810cecbaa80bb82ed91caaa58ad635
commit r10-8117-gdd38686d9c810cecbaa80bb82ed91caaa58ad635
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94950
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5454a13add37fa6a8eedbf9d2f6bdc63a7825e2c
commit r10-8113-g5454a13add37fa6a8eedbf9d2f6bdc63a7825e2c
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94968
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:da91f9d2b6edea15eee052f93976b15e786da536
commit r10-8116-gda91f9d2b6edea15eee052f93976b15e786da536
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94697
--- Comment #6 from nsz at gcc dot gnu.org ---
this is fixed for gcc 10.1, just not backported yet so i kept the bug open
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91188
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Target Milestone|10.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94981
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94984
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94968
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9b95bb52b40c05e630278fe5cd61a79a3c4f620a
commit r11-163-g9b95bb52b40c05e630278fe5cd61a79a3c4f620a
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94943
--- Comment #5 from Andrea Mastellone ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4)
> GCC 10.1 has been released.
When it will be available on Fedora 32 I will test it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94981
--- Comment #2 from Tony Reix ---
Big table was too large.
Here is a shorter table.
double -2 --> char
float -2 --> char
C | C++
--|---|---|
| Default |
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94983
Bug ID: 94983
Summary: Empty list initialization of aggregate class with
deleted default ctor rejected in C++14 and C++17
Product: gcc
Version: 9.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94943
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.0|10.2
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94324
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.0|10.2
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63326
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.0|10.2
--- Comment #29 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94885
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.0|10.2
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93055
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.0|10.2
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90828
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.0|10.2
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93404
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.0|10.2
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91512
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.0|10.2
--- Comment #32 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89635
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.0|10.2
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91498
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.0|10.2
--- Comment #21 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94655
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.0|10.2
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91035
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.0|10.2
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93007
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.0|10.2
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84916
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.0|10.2
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89689
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.0|10.2
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90807
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.0|10.2
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90777
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.0|10.2
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91799
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.0|10.2
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87988
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.0|10.2
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91287
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.0|10.2
--- Comment #40 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90720
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.0|10.2
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92342
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.0|10.2
--- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92310
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.0|10.2
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91584
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.0|10.2
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94938
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.0|10.2
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33799
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.0|10.2
--- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94817
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.0|10.2
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91543
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.0|10.2
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92799
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.0|10.2
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88783
Trupti Pardeshi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||trupti_pardeshi@persistent.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94981
--- Comment #5 from Tony Reix ---
I'm not invoking myself directly this conversion. It is made by C++.
The original issue appeared when running tests of Boost v1.73 math library,
dealing with include code of C++ , line 324 of file:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88540
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||94864
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94928
--- Comment #15 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Myron Walker from comment #14)
> There are three types of files used to create a code coverage report.
> Notes, Data, and Source. It is likely that each type of file might have its
> own
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88140
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.0|10.2
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92860
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.0|10.2
--- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91707
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.0|10.2
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90824
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.0|10.2
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93195
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.0|10.2
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91473
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.0|10.2
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94697
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.0|10.2
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80520
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.0|10.2
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92535
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.0|10.2
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85241
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.0|10.2
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek
1 - 100 of 247 matches
Mail list logo